Intersectionality: Affirmative Action with Multidimensional Identities

References

• Akerlof R (2017) Value formation: The role of esteem. Games Econom. Behav. 102:1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Akerlof GA, Kranton RE (2000) Economics and identity. Quart. J. Econom. 115(3):715–753.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aliprantis CD, Border KC (2006) Infinite Dimensional Analysis: A Hitchhiker’s Guide (Springer Science & Business Media, Boston).Google Scholar
• Altonji JG, Blank RM (1999) Race and gender in the labor market. Handbook Labor Econom. 3:3143–3259.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arrow KJ (1973) The theory of discrimination. Ashenfelter O, Rees A, eds. Discrimination in Labor Markets (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 3–33.Google Scholar
• Athey S, Avery C, Zemsky P (2000) Mentoring and diversity. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(4):765–786.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aygun O, Bó I (2021) College admission with multidimensional privileges: The Brazilian affirmative action case. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 13(3):1–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bagde S, Epple D, Taylor L (2016) Does affirmative action work? Caste, gender, college quality, and academic success in India. Amer. Econom. Rev. 106(6):1495–1521.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker G (1957) The Economics of Discrimination (Chicago University Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Becker GS, Tomes N (1979) An equilibrium theory of the distribution of income and intergenerational mobility. J. Political Econom. 87(6):1153–1189.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benabou RJ (1993) Workings of a city: Location, education, and production. Quart. J. Econom. 108(3):619–652.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Kamenica E, Pan J (2015) Gender identity and relative income within households. Quart. J. Econom. 130(2):571–614.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bordalo P, Coffman K, Gennaioli N, Shleifer A (2016) Stereotypes. Quart. J. Econom. 131(4):1753–1794.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borjas GJ (1992) Ethnic capital and intergenerational mobility. Quart. J. Econom. 107(1):123–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bowen WG, Bok D (1998) The Shape of the River (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brekhus WH, Brunsma DL, Platts T, Priya D (2010) On the contributions of cognitive sociology to the sociological study of race. Sociol. Compass 4:61–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carvalho JP, Pradelski BSR (2022) Identity and underrepresentation: Interactions between race and gender. J. Public Econom. 216:104764.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cassan G (2015) Identity-based policies and identity manipulation: Evidence from colonial Punjab. Amer. Econom. J. Econom. Policy 7(4):103–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Çelebi O (2023) Diversity preferences, affirmative action and choice rules. Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
• Celis K, Erzeel S, Muegge L, Damstra A (2014) Quotas and intersectionality: Ethnicity and gender in candidate selection. Internat. Political Sci. Rev. 35:41–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chambers CP, Echenique F (2021) A characterisation of ‘Phelpsian’ statistical discrimination. Econom. J. (London) 131(637):2018–2032.Google Scholar
• Chan J, Eyster E (2003) Does banning affirmative action lower college student quality? Amer. Econom. Rev. 93(3):858–872.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chaudhuri S, Sethi R (2008) Statistical discrimination with peer effects: Can integration eliminate negative stereotypes? Rev. Econom. Stud. 75(2):579–596.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Li SX (2009) Group identity and social preferences. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(1):431–457.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chetty R, Hendren N, Kline P, Saez E (2014) Where is the land of opportunity? The geography of intergenerational mobility in the United States. Quart. J. Econom. 129(4):1553–1623.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chouldechova A, Roth A (2020) A snapshot of the frontiers of fairness in machine learning. Comm. ACM 63(5):82–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chung KS (2000) Role models and arguments for affirmative action. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(3):640–648.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coate S, Loury GC (1993) Will affirmative-action policies eliminate negative stereotypes? Amer. Econom. Rev. 83(5):1220–1240.Google Scholar
• Coffman KB, Exley CL, Niederle M (2021) The role of beliefs in driving gender discrimination. Management Sci. 67(6):3551–3569.Link, Google Scholar
• Collins PH, Bilge S (2020) Intersectionality (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Cooper B (2016) Intersectionality. Disch L, Hawkesworth M, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Feminist Theory (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 385–406.Google Scholar
• Crenshaw K (1989) Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University Chicago Legal Forum 139:139–168.Google Scholar
• Croson R, Gneezy U (2009) Gender differences in preferences. J. Econom. Literature 47(2):448–474.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eguia JX (2017) Discrimination and assimilation at school. J. Public Econom. 156:48–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fang H, Moro A (2011) Theories of statistical discrimination and affirmative action: A survey. Jess Benhabib MOJ, Bisin A, eds. Handbook of Social Economics (Elsevier, New York), 133–200.Google Scholar
• Fernández R (2013) Cultural change as learning: The evolution of female labor force participation over a century. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(1):472–500.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fershtman D, Pavan A (2021) “Soft” affirmative action and minority recruitment. Amer. Econom. Rev. Insights 3(1):1–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flanigan B, Gölz P, Gupta A, Brett H, Procaccia AD (2021) Fair algorithms for selecting citizens’ assemblies. Nature 596:548–552.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fonda A, Gidoni P (2016) Generalizing the Poincaré–Miranda theorem: The avoiding cones condition. Ann. Matematica Pura Appl. 195(4):1347–1371.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fryer RG, Loury GC (2005) Affirmative action and its mythology. J. Econom. Perspective 19(3):147–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fryer RG, Loury GC (2013) Valuing diversity. J. Political Econom. 121(4):747–774.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldin C, Rouse C (2000) Orchestrating impartiality: The impact of “blind” auditions on female musicians. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(4):715–741.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holzer H, Neumark D (2000) Assessing affirmative action. J. Econom. Literature 38(3):483–568.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hong F, Riyanto YE, Zhang R (2022) Multidimensional social identity and redistributive preferences: An experimental study. Theory Decision 93:151–184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kleinberg J, Raghavan M (2018) Selection problems in the presence of implicit bias. Karlin AR, ed. 9th Innovations Theoretical Comput. Sci. Conf. (ITCS 2018), Leibniz Internat. Proc. Informatics, vol. 94 (Schloss Dagstuhl, Dagstuhl, Germany), 33:1–33:17.Google Scholar
• Kleinberg J, Mullainathan S, Raghavan M (2017) Inherent trade-offs in the fair determination of risk scores. Papadimitriou CH, ed. 7th Innovations Theoretical Comput. Sci. Conf. (ITCS 2017), Leibniz Internat. Proc. Informatics, vol. 67 (Schloss Dagstuhl, Dagstuhl, Germany), 43:1–43:23.Google Scholar
• Kleinberg J, Ludwig J, Mullainathan S, Sunstein CR (2018) Discrimination in the age of algorithms. J. Legal Anal. 10:113–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonard JS (1984) The impact of affirmative action on employment. J. Labor Econom. 2(4):439–463.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loury GC (1977) A dynamic theory of racial income differences. Wallace P, LaMond A, eds. Women, Minorities, and Employment Discrimination (D.C Heathand Co, Lexington, MA), 86–153.Google Scholar
• Loury GC (1981) Intergenerational transfers and the distribution of earnings. Econometrica 49(4):843–867.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loury GC (2009) The Anatomy of Racial Inequality (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Mehrotra A, Pradelski BSR, Vishnoi NK (2022) Selection in the presence of implicit bias: The advantage of intersectional constraints. Proc. ACM Conf. Fairness Accountability Transparency (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 599–609.Google Scholar
• Meyer M, Strulovici B (2012) Increasing interdependence of multivariate distributions. J. Econom. Theory 147(4):1460–1489.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Muegge LM, Erzeel S (2016) Double jeopary or multiple advantage? Intersectionality and political representation. Parliamentary Affairs 69:499–511.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pathak PA, Sönmez T, Ünver MU, Yenmez MB (2024) Fair allocation of vaccines, ventilators and antiviral treatments: Leaving no ethical value behind in healthcare rationing. Management Sci. 70(6):3999–4036.Google Scholar
• Phelps ES (1972) The statistical theory of racism and sexism. Amer. Econom. Rev. 62(4):659–661.Google Scholar
• Raji ID, Gebru T, Mitchell M, Buolamwini J, Lee J, Denton E (2020) Saving face: Investigating the ethical concerns of facial recognition auditing. Proc. AAAI/ACM Conf. AI Ethics Soc. (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 145–151.Google Scholar
• Rambachan A, Roth J (2020) Bias in, bias out? Evaluating the folk wisdom. Roth A, ed. 1st Sympos. Foundations Responsible Comput. (FORC 2020). Leibniz Internat. Proc. Informatics (LIPIcs), vol. 156 (Schloss Dagstuhl, Dagstuhl, Germany), 6:1–6:15.Google Scholar
• Roth AE (1984) Stability and polarization of interests in job matching. Econometrica 52(1):47–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saari DG (2015) Social science puzzles: A systems analysis challenge. Evolutionary Institutional Econom. Rev. 12(1):123–139.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saari DG (2018) Mathematics Motivated by the Social and Behavioral Sciences (SIAM, Philadelphia).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schroer M (2019) Sociology of attention: Fundamental reflections on a theoretical program. Brekus WH, Ignatow G, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Sociology (Oxford Handbooks, Oxford, UK), 193–218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sen A (2006) Identity and Violence: The Illusion of Destiny (W.W. Norton, New York).Google Scholar
• Sgroi D, Yeo J, Zhuo S (2021) Ingroup bias with multiple identities: The case of religion and attitudes toward government size. Working Paper, IZA DP No. 14714, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.Google Scholar
• Shayo M (2009) A model of social identity with an application to political economy: Nation, class, and redistribution. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 103(2):147–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Skjeie H (2015) Gender equality and nondiscrimination: How to tackle multiple discrimination effectively. Bettio F, Sansonetti S, eds. Visions for Gender Equality (European Union, Luxembourg), 79–82.Google Scholar
• Small ML, Pager D (2020) Sociological perspectives on racial discrimination. J. Econom. Perspective 34(2):49–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sönmez T, Yenmez MB (2022) Affirmative action in India via vertical, horizontal, and overlapping reservations. Econometrica 90(3):1143–1176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Supreme Court of the United States (2023) Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and fellows of Harvard College (20–1199).Google Scholar
• Young HP (2015) The evolution of social norms. Annu. Rev. Econom. 7(1):359–387.Crossref, Google Scholar