Will the Truth Free Us from Misinformation?
References
- (2023) A survey of expert views on misinformation: Definitions, determinants, solutions, and future of the field. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Rev. (July 27), https://misinforeview.hks.harvard.edu/article/a-survey-of-expert-views-on-misinformation-definitions-determinants-solutions-and-future-of-the-field/.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Checking the fact-checkers in 2008: Predicting political ad scrutiny and assessing consistency. J. Political Marketing 15(4):433–464.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Proc. 2019 Conf. Empirical Methods Natural Language Processing, 9th Internat. Joint Conf. Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP) (Association for Computational Linguistics, Hong Kong, China), 4685–4697.Google Scholar
- (2003) How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? Quart. J. Econom. 119:249–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Groupthink: Collective delusions in organizations and markets. Rev. Econom. Stud. 80(2):429–462.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Incentives and pro-social behavior. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96:1652–1678.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Identity, morals, and taboos: Beliefs as assets. Quart. J. Econom. 126:805–855.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Mindful economics: The production, consumption, and value of beliefs. J. Econom. Perspective 30:141–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Belief in fake news is associated with delusionality, dogmatism, religious fundamentalism, and reduced analytic thinking. J. Appl. Res. Memory Cognition 8(1):108–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Debunking: A meta-analysis of the psychological efficacy of messages countering misinformation. Psych. Sci. 28(11):1531–1546.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Good news and bad news are still news: Experimental evidence on belief updating. Experiment. Econom. 22(2):369–395.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Exploiting moral wiggle room: Experiments demonstrating an illusory preference for fairness. Econom. Theory 33:67–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) The good news-bad news effect: Asymmetric processing of objective information about yourself. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 3(2):114–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) What do the papers sell? A model of advertising and media bias. Econom. J. 119(537):680–704.Google Scholar
- (2024) Debunking misinformation about consumer products: Effects on beliefs and purchase behavior. J. Marketing Res. 61:659–681.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1994) Fairness in simple bargaining experiments. Games Econom. Behav. 6(3):347–369.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Media bias and reputation. J. Political Econom. 114(2):280–316.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Competition and truth in the market for news. J. Econom. Perspective 22(2):133–154.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Media bias in the marketplace: Theory. Anderson SP, Waldfogel J, Stromberg D, eds. Handbook of Media Economics, vol. 1 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 623–645.Google Scholar
- (2020) Selective exposure to misinformation: Evidence from the consumption of fake news during the 2016 U.S. presidential campaign. Nature Human Behaviour 4:472–480.Google Scholar
- (2009) Exploiting moral wiggle room: Illusory preference for fairness? A comment. Judgment Decision Making 4(6):467–474.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) Tribalism and tribulations: The social costs of not sharing fake news. J. Experiment. Psych. General 152(3), 611–631.Google Scholar
- (2012) Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debiasing. Psych. Sci. Public Interest 13(3):106–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2024) Fact-checker warning labels are effective even for those who distrust fact-checkers. Nature Human Behav. 8(10):1957–1967.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) When do people exploit moral wiggle room? An experimental analysis of information avoidance in a market setup. Ecological Econom. 169:106479.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) The market for news. Amer. Econom. Rev. 95(1):1031–1053.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) When corrections fail: The persistence of political misperceptions. Political Behav. 32(2):303–330.Google Scholar
- (2015) The effect of fact-checking on elites: A field experiment on U.S. state legislators. Amer. J. Political Sci. 59(3):628–640.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Taking fact-checks literally but not seriously? The effects of journalistic fact-checking on factual beliefs and candidate favorability. Political Behav. 42(3):939–960.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning. Cognition 188:39–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) The psychology of fake news. Trends Cognition Sci. 25(5):388–402.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) Identity concerns drive belief: The impact of partisan identity on the belief and dissemination of true and false news. Group Processes Intergroup Relations 26(1):24–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) The global effectiveness of fact-checking: Evidence from simultaneous experiments in Argentina, Nigeria, South Africa, and the United Kingdom. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118(37):e2104235118.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) Effective correction of misinformation. Current Opinion Psych. 54:101712.Google Scholar
- (2020) Confirmatory bias in health decisions: Evidence from the MMR-autism controversy. J. Health Econom. 70:102284.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1999) First impressions matter: A model of confirmation bias. Quart. J. Econom. 114(1):37–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Forming beliefs: Why valence matters. Trends Cognition Sci. 20(1):25–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Donald Trump wrongly says Jeb Bush said he would ‘moon everybody’ and ‘nobody reports that’. PolitiFact (February 14), https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2016/feb/14/donald-trump/donald-trump-says-jeb-bush-said-he-would-moon-ever/.Google Scholar
- (2016) Objective and subjective compliance: A norm-based explanation of ‘moral wiggle room’. Games Econom. Behav. 96:170–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) Partisans’ receptivity to persuasive messaging is undiminished by countervailing party leader cues. Nature Human Behav. 7(4):568–582.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) The partisan brain: An identity-based model of political belief. Trends Cognition Sci. 22(3):213–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2024) Updating the identity-based model of belief: From false belief to the spread of misinformation. Current Opinion Psych. 56:101787.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Political psychology in the digital (mis)information age: A model of news belief and sharing. Soc. Issues Policy Rev. 15(1):84–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Washington Post (2017) President Trump’s claim that MS-13 gang members are being deported ‘by the thousands’. Washington Post (June 26), https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2017/06/26/president-trumps-claim-that-ms-13-gang-members-are-being-deported-by-the-thousands/.Google Scholar
- (2007) News consumption and media bias. Marketing Sci. 26:611–628.Link, Google Scholar
- (2013) User-generated content and bias in news media. Management Sci. 59(12):2655–2666.Link, Google Scholar
- (2015) Selective reporting of factual content by commercial media. J. Marketing Res. 52(1):56–76.Crossref, Google Scholar

