Rational Choice Models: The Temporal Tree Representation

References

• Akchen YC, Mitrofanov D (2024) Consider or choose? The role and power of consideration sets. Preprint, submitted February 8, 2023, https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.04354.Google Scholar
• Alptekinoğlu A, Semple JH (2021) Heteroscedastic exponomial choice. Oper. Res. 69(3):841–858.Link, Google Scholar
• Anderson SP, De Palma A, Thisse JF (1992) Discrete Choice Theory of Product Differentiation (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aouad A, Farias V, Levi R (2021) Assortment optimization under consider-then-choose choice models. Management Sci. 67(6):3368–3386.Link, Google Scholar
• Apesteguia J, Ballester MA, Lu J (2017) Single-crossing random utility models. Econometrica 85(2):661–674.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bai Y, Feldman J, Topaloglu H, Wagner L (2024a) Assortment optimization under the multinomial logit model with utility–based rank cutoffs. Oper. Res. 72(4):1453–1474.Link, Google Scholar
• Bai Y, Feldman J, Segev D, Topaloglu H, Wagner L (2024b) Assortment optimization under the multi-purchase multinomial logit choice model. Oper. Res. 72(6):2631–2664. Link, Google Scholar
• Barberá S, Pattanaik PK (1986) Falmagne and the rationalizability of stochastic choices in terms of random orderings. Econometrica 54(3):707–715.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berbeglia G, Venkataraman A (2018) The generalized stochastic preference choice model. Preprint, submitted March 7, https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.04244.Google Scholar
• Bhat CR (1995) A heteroscedastic extreme value model of intercity travel mode choice. Transportation Res. B 29(6):471–483.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blanchet J, Gallego G, Goyal V (2016) A Markov chain approximation to choice modeling. Oper. Res. 64(4):886–905.Link, Google Scholar
• Block HD, Marschak J (1960) Random orderings and stochastic theories of responses. Marschak J, ed. Economic Information, Decision and Prediction (Springer, Heidelberg, Germany), 172–271.Google Scholar
• Bronnenberg BJ, Kruger MW, Mela CF (2008) Database paper—The IRI marketing data set. Marketing Sci. 27(4):745–748.Link, Google Scholar
• Brownstone D, Small KA (1989) Efficient estimation of nested logit models. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 7(1):67–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cao Y, Kleywegt AJ, Wang H (2022) Network revenue management under a spiked multinomial logit choice model. Oper. Res. 70(4):2237–2253.Link, Google Scholar
• Cao Y, Rusmevichientong P, Topaloglu H (2023) Revenue management under a mixture of independent demand and multinomial logit models. Oper. Res. 71(2):603–625.Link, Google Scholar
• Chang H, Narita Y, Saito K (2022) Approximating choice data by discrete choice models. Preprint, submitted May 4, https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.01882.Google Scholar
• Chen N, Chen YJ (2021) Duopoly competition with network effects in discrete choice models. Oper. Res. 69(2):545–559.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Mišić VV (2022) Decision forest: A nonparametric approach to modeling irrational choice. Management Sci. 68(10):7090–7111.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen N, Gallego G, Tang Z (2019) The use of binary choice forests to model and estimate discrete choices. Preprint, submitted August 3, https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.01109.Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Dwivedi R, Wainwright MJ, Yu B (2018) Fast MCMC sampling algorithms on polytopes. J. Machine Learn. Res. 19(1):2146–2231.Google Scholar
• Chen J, Liang Y, Shen H, Shen ZJM, Xue M (2022) Offline-channel planning in smart omnichannel retailing. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 24(5):2444–2462.Link, Google Scholar
• Désir A, Goyal V, Jiang B, Xie T, Zhang J (2024) Robust assortment optimization under the Markov chain choice model. Oper. Res. 72(4):1595–1614.Link, Google Scholar
• Dong J, Şimşek AS, Topaloglu H (2019) Pricing problems under the Markov chain choice model. Production Oper. Management 28(1):157–175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Echenique F, Saito K (2019) General Luce model. Econom. Theory 68(4):811–826.Crossref, Google Scholar
• El Housni O, Topaloglu H (2023) Joint assortment optimization and customization under a mixture of multinomial logit models: On the value of personalized assortments. Oper. Res. 71(4):1197–1215.Link, Google Scholar
• Falmagne J (1978) A representation theorem for finite random scale systems. J. Math. Psych. 18(1):52–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farias VF, Jagabathula S, Shah D (2013) A nonparametric approach to modeling choice with limited data. Management Sci. 59(2):305–322.Link, Google Scholar
• Feldman JB, Topaloglu H (2017) Revenue management under the Markov chain choice model. Oper. Res. 65(5):1322–1342.Link, Google Scholar
• Feng Q, Shanthikumar JG, Xue M (2022) Consumer choice models and estimation: A review and extension. Production Oper. Management 31(2):847–867.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Filiz-Ozbay E, Masatlioglu Y (2023) Progressive random choice. J. Political Econom. 131(3):716–750.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiorini S (2004) A short proof of a theorem of Falmagne. J. Math. Psych. 48(1):80–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fishburn P (1998) Stochastic utility. Barbera S, Hammond P, Seidl C, eds. Handbook of Utility Theory (Kluwer, Dordrecht, Netherlands), 273–318.Google Scholar
• Gao P, Ma Y, Chen N, Gallego G, Li A, Rusmevichientong P, Topaloglu H (2021) Assortment optimization and pricing under the multinomial logit model with impatient customers: Sequential recommendation and selection. Oper. Res. 69(5):1509–1532.Link, Google Scholar
• Greene WH, Hensher DA (2003) A latent class model for discrete choice analysis: Contrasts with mixed logit. Transportation Res. B 37(8):681–698.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guan L, Nip K, Wang R, Zhang L (2023) The focal multinomial logit model: Threshold effects on consumer choice, assortment, pricing and estimation. Preprint, submitted June 30, https://ssrn.com/abstract=4495817.Google Scholar
• Gul F, Pesendorfer W (2006) Random expected utility. Econometrica 74(1):121–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hauser JR (2014) Consideration-set heuristics. J. Bus. Res. 67(8):1688–1699.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hinnosaar M (2023) The persistence of healthy behaviors in food purchasing. Marketing Sci. 42(3):521–537.Link, Google Scholar
• Honhon D, Gaur V, Seshadri S (2010) Assortment planning and inventory decisions under stockout-based substitution. Oper. Res. 58(5):1364–1379.Link, Google Scholar
• Honhon D, Jonnalagedda S, Pan XA (2012) Optimal algorithms for assortment selection under ranking-based consumer choice models. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 14(2):279–289.Link, Google Scholar
• Huang T, Allon G, Bassamboo A (2013) Bounded rationality in service systems. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 15(2):263–279.Link, Google Scholar
• Jagabathula S, Rusmevichientong P (2019) The limit of rationality in choice modeling: Formulation, computation, and implications. Management Sci. 65(5):2196–2215.Abstract, Google Scholar
• Jagabathula S, Vulcano G (2018) A partial-order-based model to estimate individual preferences using panel data. Management Sci. 64(4):1609–1628.Link, Google Scholar
• Jagabathula S, Mitrofanov D, Vulcano G (2022) Personalized retail promotions through a directed acyclic graph–based representation of customer preferences. Oper. Res. 70(2):641–665.Link, Google Scholar
• Jagabathula S, Subramanian L, Venkataraman A (2020) A conditional gradient approach for nonparametric estimation of mixing distributions. Management Sci. 66(8):3635–3656.Link, Google Scholar
• Kleywegt AJ, Shao H (2022) Revenue management under the Markov chain choice model with joint price and assortment decisions. Preprint, submitted April 10, https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.04774.Google Scholar
• Kono H, Saito K, Sandroni A (2023) Axiomatization of random utility model with unobservable alternatives. Preprint, submitted February 8, https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.03913.Google Scholar
• Li H, Webster S (2023) Technical note—Optimizing risk-balancing return under discrete choice models. Oper. Res. 71(6):2232–2244.Link, Google Scholar
• Li G, Rusmevichientong P, Topaloglu H (2015) The d-level nested logit model: Assortment and price optimization problems. Oper. Res. 63(2):325–342.Link, Google Scholar
• Liu M, Cao J, Shen ZJM (2022) Learning from click transition data: Effectiveness of greedy pricing policy under dynamic product availability. Preprint, submitted July 22, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4158054.Google Scholar
• Liu N, Ma Y, Topaloglu H (2020) Assortment optimization under the multinomial logit model with sequential offerings. INFORMS J. Comput. 32(3):835–853.Link, Google Scholar
• Luce RD (1959) Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis (John Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• McFadden D (1973) Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. Zarembka P, ed. Frontier Econometrics (Academic Press, New York), 105–142. Google Scholar
• Monderer D (1992) The stochastic choice problem: A game-theoretic approach. J. Math. Psych. 36(4):547–554.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paul A, Feldman J, Davis JM (2018) Assortment optimization and pricing under a nonparametric tree choice model. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 20(3):550–565.Link, Google Scholar
• Payne JW (1976) Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: An information search and protocol analysis. Organ. Behav. Human Performance 16(2):366–387.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ren H, Huang T (2018) Modeling customer bounded rationality in operations management: A review and research opportunities. Comput. Oper. Res. 91:48–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schoenmueller V, Netzer O, Stahl F (2023) Frontiers: Polarized America: From political polarization to preference polarization. Marketing Sci. 42(1):48–60.Link, Google Scholar
• Shaked M, Shanthikumar JG (1987) The multivariate hazard construction. Stochastic Processes Appl. 24(2):241–258.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaked M, Shanthikumar JG (1990) Dynamic construction and simulation of random vectors. Block HW, Sampson AR, Savits TH, eds. Lecture Notes-Monograph Series, vol. 16 (Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Waite Hill, OH), 415–433.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Şimşek AS, Topaloglu H (2018) Technical note—An expectation-maximization algorithm to estimate the parameters of the Markov chain choice model. Oper. Res. 66(3):748–760.Link, Google Scholar
• Susan F, Golrezaei N, Emamjomeh-Zadeh E, Kempe D (2022) Active learning for non-parametric choice models. Preprint, submitted August 5, https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.03346.Google Scholar
• Turansick C (2022) Identification in the random utility model. J. Econom. Theory 203:105489.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Ryzin G, Vulcano G (2015) A market discovery algorithm to estimate a general class of nonparametric choice models. Management Sci. 61(2):281–300.Link, Google Scholar
• van Ryzin G, Vulcano G (2017) An expectation-maximization method to estimate a rank-based choice model of demand. Oper. Res. 65(2):396–407.Link, Google Scholar
• Wang R (2021) Discrete choice models and applications in operations management. INFORMS TutORials Oper. Res. 2021:199–226.Google Scholar
• Wang R (2022) Hybrid model for sequential and simultaneous choice with search cost. Preprint, submitted August 12, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4184854.Google Scholar
• Wang R, Ke C, Cui S (2022a) Product price, quality, and service decisions under consumer choice models. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 24(1):430–447.Link, Google Scholar
• Wang R, Zhao Z, Ke C (2022b) Modeling consumer choice and optimizing assortment under the threshold multinomial logit model. Preprint, submitted August 12, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4184044.Google Scholar
• Webster S (2023) Multiple discrete choice and quantity with order statistic marginal utilities. J. Choice Model. 46:100395.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams HC (1977) On the formation of travel demand models and economic evaluation measures of user benefit. Environ. Planning A 9(3):285–344.Crossref, Google Scholar