A Meta-Analysis of Quasi-Hyperbolic Discounting

References

• Abdellaoui M, Bleichrodt H, L’Haridon O, Paraschiv C (2013) Is there one unifying concept of utility? An experimental comparison of utility under risk and utility over time. Management Sci. 59(9):2153–2169.Link, Google Scholar
• Ainslie G, Haendel V (1983) The motives of the will. Gottheil E, Druley KA, Skoloda TE, Waxman HM, eds. Etiologic Aspects of Alcohol and Drug Abuse (Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL), 119–140.Google Scholar
• Andersen S, Harrison GW, Lau MI, Rutström EE (2008) Eliciting risk and time preferences. Econometrica 76(3):583–618.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andersen S, Harrison GW, Lau MI, Rutström EE (2014) Discounting behavior: A reconsideration. Eur. Econom. Rev. 71:15–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andreoni J, Sprenger C (2012) Estimating time preferences from convex budgets. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(7):3333–3356.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andreoni J, Kuhn MA, Sprenger C (2015) Measuring time preferences: A comparison of experimental methods. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 116:451–464.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Augenblick N, Niederle M, Sprenger C (2015) Working over time: Dynamic inconsistency in real effort tasks. Quart. J. Econom. 130(3):1067–1115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baucells M, Cillo A (2020) Predicting the discount rate of multiple future payoffs. Preprint, submitted April 14, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3575208.Google Scholar
• Bleichrodt H, Potter van Loon RJ, Prelec D (2022) Beta-Delta or Delta-Tau? A reformulation of quasi-hyperbolic discounting. Management Sci. 68(8):6326–6335.Link, Google Scholar
• Bleichrodt H, Rohde KI, Wakker PP (2009) Non-hyperbolic time inconsistency. Games Econom. Behav. 66(1):27–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bom PR, Rachinger H (2019) A kinked meta-regression model for publication bias correction. Res. Synthesis Methods 10(4):497–514.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brañas-Garza P, Jorrat D, Espín AM, Sánchez A (2023) Paid and hypothetical time preferences are the same: Lab, field and online evidence. Experiment. Econom. 26(2):412–434.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown AL, Vieider FM, Imai T, Camerer CF (2024) Meta-analysis of empirical estimates of loss aversion. J. Econom. Lit. 62(2):485–516.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheung SL (2016) Recent developments in the experimental elicitation of time preference. J. Behav. Experiment. Finance 11:1–8.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheung SL (2020) Eliciting utility curvature in time preference. Experiment. Econom. 23(2):493–525.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheung SL, Tymula A, Wang X (2022) Present bias for monetary and dietary rewards. Experiment. Econom. 25(4):1202–1233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheung SL, MacGibbon K, Milin-Byrne A, Tymula A (2024) Quasi-exponential discounting. Preprint, submitted July 30, https://ssrn.com/abstract=4910013.Google Scholar
• Cohen J, Ericson KM, Laibson D, White JM (2020) Measuring time preferences. J. Econom. Lit. 58(2):299–347.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coller M, Williams MB (1999) Eliciting individual discount rates. Experiment. Econom. 2(2):107–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DellaVigna S, Malmendier U (2006) Paying not to go to the gym. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(3):694–719.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DerSimonian R, Laird N (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials 7(3):177–188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ebert JE, Prelec D (2007) The fragility of time: Time-insensitivity and valuation of the near and far future. Management Sci. 53(9):1423–1438.Link, Google Scholar
• Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Brit. Med. J. 315(7109):629–634.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eicher TS, Papageorgiou C, Raftery AE (2011) Default priors and predictive performance in Bayesian model averaging, with application to growth determinants. J. Appl. Econometrics 26(1):30–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Estle SJ, Green L, Myerson J, Holt DD (2007) Discounting of monetary and directly consumable rewards. Psych. Sci. 18(1):58–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frederick S, Loewenstein G, O’Donoghue T (2002) Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. J. Econom. Lit. 40(2):351–401.Crossref, Google Scholar
• George EI (2010) Dilution priors: Compensating for model space redundancy. Berger JO, Cai TT, Johnstone IM, eds. Borrowing Strength: Theory Powering Applications—A Festschrift for Lawrence D. Brown (Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Willoughby Hills, OH), 158–165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldstein H, Yang M, Omar R, Turner R, Thompson S (2000) Meta-analysis using multilevel models with an application to the study of class size effects. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. C Appl. Statist. 49(3):399–412.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Halevy Y (2015) Time consistency: Stationarity and time invariance. Econometrica 83(1):335–352.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hedges LV (1983) A random effects model for effect sizes. Psych. Bull. 93(2):388–395.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hedges L, Olkin I (1985) Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Higgins J, Thompson S (2002) Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Statist. Med. 21(11):1539–1558.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Imai T, Rutter TA, Camerer CF (2021) Meta-analysis of present-bias estimation using convex time budgets. Econom. J. 131(636):1788–1814.Google Scholar
• Ioannidis JP, Stanley T, Doucouliagos H (2017) The power of bias in economics research. Econom. J. 127(605):F236–F265.Google Scholar
• Irsova Z, Bom PR, Havranek T, Rachinger H (2023) Spurious precision in meta-analysis. Discussion Paper 17927, Centre for Economic Policy Research, London.Google Scholar
• Irsova Z, Doucouliagos H, Havranek T, Stanley TD (2024) Meta-analysis of social science research: A practitioner’s guide. J. Econom. Surveys 38(5):1547–1566.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jackson D, White IR, Riley RD (2020) Multivariate meta-analysis. Schmid CH, Stijnen TA, White IR, eds. Handbook of Meta-Analysis (Chapman and Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL), 163–186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaur S, Kremer M, Mullainathan S (2015) Self-control at work. J. Political Econom. 123(6):1227–1277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laibson D (1997) Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. Quart. J. Econom. 112(2):443–478.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laibson D, Repetto A, Tobacman J (1998) Self-control and saving for retirement. Brookings Pap. Econom. Activity 1998(1):91–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Light RJ, Pillemer DB (1984) Summing Up: The Science of Reviewing Research (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lipman SA, Attema AE (2024) A systematic review of unique methods for measuring discount rates. J. Risk Uncertainty 69(2):145–189.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loewenstein GF, Prelec D (1992) Anomalies in intertemporal choice: Evidence and an interpretation. Quart. J. Econom. 107(2):573–597.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Matousek J, Havranek T, Irsova Z (2022) Individual discount rates: A meta-analysis of experimental evidence. Experiment. Econom. 25(1):318–358.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mazur J (1987) An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement. Commons M, Mazur J, Nevin J, Rachlin H, eds. The Effect of Delay and of Intervening Events on Reinforcement Value (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ), 55–73.Google Scholar
• Myerson J, Green L (1995) Discounting of delayed rewards: Models of individual choice. J. Experiment. Anal. Behav. 64(3):263–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rachlin H (2006) Notes on discounting. J. Experiment. Anal. Behav. 85(3):425–435.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raftery AE, Madigan D, Hoeting JA (1997) Bayesian model averaging for linear regression models. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 92(437):179–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raudenbush S (2009) Analyzing effect sizes: Random-effects models. Cooper H, Hedges L, Valentine J, eds. The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis. 2nd ed. (Russell Sage Foundation, New York), 295–316.Google Scholar
• Read D (2001) Is time discounting hyperbolic or subadditive? J. Risk Uncertainty 23(1):5–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reuben E, Sapienza P, Zingales L (2010) Time discounting for primary and monetary rewards. Econom. Lett. 106(2):125–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Samuelson PA (1937) A note on measurement of utility. Rev. Econom. Stud. (2):155–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scholten M, Read D (2006) Discounting by intervals: A generalized model of intertemporal choice. Management Sci. 52(9):1424–1436.Link, Google Scholar
• Scholten M, Read D (2010) The psychology of intertemporal tradeoffs. Psych. Rev. 117(3):925–944.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stanley T, Doucouliagos H (2014) Meta-regression approximations to reduce publication selection bias. Res. Synthesis Methods 5(1):60–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steel MF (2020) Model averaging and its use in economics. J. Econom. Lit. 58(3):644–719.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strotz R (1955) Myopia and inconsistency in dynamic utility maximization. Rev. Econom. Stud. 23(3):165–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thaler R (1981) Some empirical evidence on dynamic inconsistency. Econom. Lett. 8(3):201–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson SG, Turner RM, Warn DE (2001) Multilevel models for meta-analysis, and their application to absolute risk differences. Statist. Methods Med. Res. 10(6):375–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ubfal D (2016) How general are time preferences? Eliciting good-specific discount rates. J. Dev. Econom. 118:150–170.Crossref, Google Scholar