Pricing Control and Regulation on Online Service Platforms

References

• Abhishek V, Jerath K, Zhang ZJ (2016) Agency selling or reselling? Channel structures in electronic retailing. Management Sci. 62(8):2259–2280.Link, Google Scholar
• Afèche P, Liu Z, Maglaras C (2023) Ride-hailing networks with strategic drivers: The impact of platform control capabilities on performance. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 25(5):1890–1908.Link, Google Scholar
• Ahmadinejad A, Nazerzadeh H, Saberi A, Skochdopole N, Sweeney K (2019) Competition in ride-hailing markets. Preprint, submitted October 9, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3461119.Google Scholar
• Allon G, Bassamboo A, Çil EB (2012) Large-scale service marketplaces: The role of the moderating firm. Management Sci. 58(10):1854–1872.Link, Google Scholar
• Angeletos GM, Pavan A (2007) Efficient use of information and social value of information. Econometrica 75(4):1103–1142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aouad A, Saritac O, Yan C (2023) Centralized versus decentralized pricing controls for dynamic matching platforms. Preprint, submitted May 23, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4453799.Google Scholar
• Arnosti N, Johari R, Kanoria Y (2021) Managing congestion in matching markets. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 23(3):620–636.Link, Google Scholar
• Atasu A, Ciocan DF, Désir A (2024) Price delegation with learning agents. Management Sci. 70(8):5540–5556. Link, Google Scholar
• Aumann RJ (1964) Markets with a continuum of traders. Econometrica 32(1/2):39–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bai J, So KC, Tang CS, Chen XM, Wang H (2019) Coordinating supply and demand on an on-demand service platform with impatient customers. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 21(3):556–570.Link, Google Scholar
• Banerjee S, Riquelme C, Johari R (2015) Pricing in ride-share platforms: A queueing-theoretic approach. Preprint, submitted February 24, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2568258.Google Scholar
• Benjaafar S, Ding JY, Kong G, Taylor T (2022) Labor welfare in on-demand service platforms. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 24(1):110–124.Link, Google Scholar
• Besbes O, Castro F, Lobel I (2021) Surge pricing and its spatial supply response. Management Sci. 67(3):1350–1367.Link, Google Scholar
• Bhardwaj P (2001) Delegating pricing decisions. Marketing Sci. 20(2):143–169.Link, Google Scholar
• Bhuiyan J (2020) AB 5 is already changing how Uber works for California drivers and riders. Los Angeles Times (February 3), https://www.latimes.com/business/technology/story/2020-02-03/uber-ab5-driver-app/.Google Scholar
• Bimpikis K, Candogan O, Saban D (2019a) Spatial pricing in ride-sharing networks. Oper. Res. 67(3):744–769.Link, Google Scholar
• Bimpikis K, Crapis D, Tahbaz-Salehi A (2019b) Information sale and competition. Management Sci. 65(6):2646–2664.Link, Google Scholar
• Birge J, Candogan O, Chen H, Saban D (2021) Optimal commissions and subscriptions in networked markets. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 23(3):569–588.Link, Google Scholar
• Cachon GP, Lariviere MA (2005) Supply chain coordination with revenue-sharing contracts: Strengths and limitations. Management Sci. 51(1):30–44.Link, Google Scholar
• Cachon GP, Zhang F (2006) Procuring fast delivery: Sole sourcing with information asymmetry. Management Sci. 52(6):881–896.Link, Google Scholar
• Cachon GP, Daniels KM, Lobel R (2017) The role of surge pricing on a service platform with self-scheduling capacity. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 19(3):368–384.Link, Google Scholar
• Carmona R, Wang P (2021) Finite-state contract theory with a principal and a field of agents. Management Sci. 67(8):4725–4741.Link, Google Scholar
• Castillo JC, Knoepfle DAN, Weyl EG (2025) Matching and pricing in ride hailing: Wild goose chases and how to solve them. Management Sci. 71(5):4377–4395. Link, Google Scholar
• Castro F, Frazier P, Ma H, Nazerzadeh H, Yan C (2020) Matching queues, flexibility and incentives. Preprint, submitted July 17, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3627920.Google Scholar
• Chen L, Cui Y, Liu J, Liu X (2023) Bonus competition in the gig economy. Preprint, submitted January 30, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3392700.Google Scholar
• Chen MK, Rossi PE, Chevalier JA, Oehlsen E (2019) The value of flexible work: Evidence from Uber drivers. J. Political Econom. 127(6):2735–2794.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen MC, Zhang R (2022) Competition and coopetition for two-sided platforms. Production Oper. Management 31(5):1997–2014.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooper R, John A (1988) Coordinating coordination failures in Keynesian models. Quart. J. Econom. 103(3):441–463.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Corbett CJ, de Groote X (2000) A supplier’s optimal quantity discount policy under asymmetric information. Management Sci. 46(3):444–450.Link, Google Scholar
• Corbett CJ, Zhou D, Tang CS (2004) Designing supply contracts: Contract type and information asymmetry. Management Sci. 50(4):550–559.Link, Google Scholar
• Dana JD Jr, Spier KE (2001) Revenue sharing and vertical control in the video rental industry. J. Indust. Econom. 49(3):223–245.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deneckere R, Marvel HP, Peck J (1996) Demand uncertainty, inventories, and resale price maintenance. Quart. J. Econom. 111(3):885–913.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Desiraju R, Moorthy S (1997) Managing a distribution channel under asymmetric information with performance requirements. Management Sci. 43(12):1628–1644.Link, Google Scholar
• Dixit A (1983) Vertical integration in a monopolistically competitive industry. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 1(1):63–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman P, Frazelle AE, Swinney R (2023) Managing relationships between restaurants and food delivery platforms: Conflict, contracts, and coordination. Management Sci. 69(2):812–823.Link, Google Scholar
• Feng G, Kong G, Wang Z (2021) We are on the way: Analysis of on-demand ride-hailing systems. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 23(5):1237–1256.Link, Google Scholar
• Filippas A, Jagabathula S, Sundararajan A (2023) The limits of centralized pricing in online marketplaces and the value of user control. Management Sci. 69(12):7202–7216.Link, Google Scholar
• Foros O, Hagen K, Kind H (2009) Price-dependent profit sharing as a channel coordination device. Management Sci. 55(8):1280–1291.Link, Google Scholar
• Foros O, Kind H, Shaffer G (2017) Apple’s agency model and the role of most-favored-nation clauses. RAND J. Econom. 48(3):673–703.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foster L, Haltiwanger J, Syverson C (2008) Reallocation, firm turnover, and efficiency: Selection on productivity or profitability? Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(1):394–425.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gurvich I, Lariviere M, Moreno A (2019) Operations in the on-demand economy: Staffing services with self-scheduling capacity. Hu M, ed. Sharing Economy, Springer Series in Supply Chain Management, vol. 6 (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), 249–278.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ha AY (2001) Supplier-buyer contracting: Asymmetric cost information and cutoff level policy for buyer participation. Naval Res. Logist. 48(1):41–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hagiu A, Wright J (2015) Marketplace or reseller? Management Sci. 61(1):184–203.Link, Google Scholar
• Hagiu A, Wright J (2019) Controlling vs. enabling. Management Science. 65(2):577–595. Link, Google Scholar
• Halaburda H, Jan Piskorski M, Yıldırım P (2018) Competing by restricting choice: The case of matching platforms. Management Sci. 64(8):3574–3594.Link, Google Scholar
• Hu M, Zhou Y (2019) Price, wage and fixed commission in on-demand matching. Preprint, submitted March 21, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2949513.Google Scholar
• Hu M, Zhou Y (2022) Dynamic type matching. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 24(1):125–142.Link, Google Scholar
• Hu B, Hu M, Zhu H (2022) Surge pricing and two-sided temporal responses in ride hailing. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 24(1):91–109.Link, Google Scholar
• Jerath K, Zhang Z (2010) Store within a store. J. Marketing Res. 47(4):748–763.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson J (2017) The agency model and MFN clauses. Rev. Econom. Stud. 84(3):1151–1185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joseph K (2001) On the optimality of delegating pricing authority to the sales force. J. Marketing 65(1):62–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ke TT, Zhu Y (2021) Cheap talk on freelance platforms. Management Sci. 67(9):5901–5920.Link, Google Scholar
• Lal R (1986) Delegating pricing responsibility to the salesforce. Marketing Sci. 5(2):159–168.Link, Google Scholar
• Lasry JM, Lions PL (2007) Mean field games. Japanese J. Math. 2(1):229–260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ledvina A, Sircar R (2012) Oligopoly games under asymmetric costs and an application to energy production. Math. Financial Econom. 6(4):261–293.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lian Z, Martin S, van Ryzin G (2022) Labor cost free-riding in the gig economy. Preprint, submitted December 9, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3775888.Google Scholar
• Light B, Weintraub GY (2022) Mean field equilibrium: Uniqueness, existence, and comparative statics. Oper. Res. 70(1):585–605.Link, Google Scholar
• Lobel I, Martin S, Song H (2024) Frontiers in operations: Employees vs. contractors: An operational perspective. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 26(4):1306–1322.Link, Google Scholar
• Ma H, Fang F, Parkes DC (2020) Spatio-temporal pricing for ridesharing platforms. ACM SIGecom Exchanges 18(2):53–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ma P, Shang J, Wang H (2017) Enhancing corporate social responsibility: Contract design under information asymmetry. Omega 67(2):19–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mishra B, Prasad A (2004) Centralized pricing versus delegating pricing to the salesforce under information asymmetry. Marketing Sci. 23(1):21–27.Link, Google Scholar
• Mishra B, Prasad A (2005) Delegating pricing decisions in competitive markets with symmetric and asymmetric information. Marketing Sci. 24(3):490–497.Link, Google Scholar
• Monahan JP (1984) A quantity discount pricing model to increase vendor profits. Management Sci. 30(6):720–726.Link, Google Scholar
• Mukhopadhyay SK, Zhu X, Yue X (2008) Optimal contract design for mixed channels under information asymmetry. Production Oper. Management 17(6):641–650.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Myerson RB (1981) Optimal auction design. Math. Oper. Res. 6(1):58–73.Link, Google Scholar
• O’Brien S (2021) Uber’s UK drivers to get paid vacation, pensions following supreme court ruling. CNN Bus. (March 16), https://www.cnn.com/2021/03/16/tech/uber-uk-vacation-pensions-drivers/index.html.Google Scholar
• Olszewski W, Siegel R (2016) Large contests. Econometrica 84(2):835–854.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ongweso EJ Jr (2021) Drivers are protesting a Proposition 22 clone in Massachusetts. Vice (March 4), https://www.vice.com/en/article/y3g7mg/drivers-are-protesting-a-proposition-22-clone-in-massachusetts.Google Scholar
• Ostroy JM, Zame WR (1994) Nonatomic economies and the boundaries of perfect competition. Econometrica 62(3):593–633.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Özkan E, Ward AR (2020) Dynamic matching for real-time ride sharing. Stochastic Systems 10(1):29–70.Link, Google Scholar
• Padmanabhan V, Png IPL (1997) Manufacturer’s return policies and retail competition. Marketing Sci. 16(1):81–94.Link, Google Scholar
• Rey P, Tirole J (1986) The logic of vertical restraints. Amer. Econom. Rev. 76(5):921–939.Google Scholar
• Schmeidler D (1973) Equilibrium points of nonatomic games. J. Statist. Phys. 7(4):295–300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Singh N, Vives X (1984) Price and quantity competition in a differentiated duopoly. RAND J. Econom. 15(4):546–554.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Song Y, Ray S, Li S (2008) Structural properties of buyback contracts for price-setting newsvendors. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 10(1):1–18.Link, Google Scholar
• Spengler JJ (1950) Vertical integration and antitrust policy. J. Political Econom. 58(4):347–352.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor TA (2018) On-demand service platforms. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 20(4):704–720.Link, Google Scholar
• Weinberg CB (1975) An optimal commission plan for salesmen’s control over price. Management Sci. 21(8):937–943.Link, Google Scholar
• Weng ZK (1995) Channel coordination and quantity discounts. Management Sci. 41(9):1509–1522.Link, Google Scholar
• Xie W, Jiang Z, Zhao Y, Shao X (2014) Contract design for cooperative product service system with information asymmetry. Internat. J. Production Res. 52(6):1658–1680.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yan C, Zhu H, Korolko N, Woodard D (2020) Dynamic pricing and matching in ride-hailing platforms. Naval Res. Logist. 67(8):705–724.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yao DQ, Yue X, Liu J (2008) Vertical cost information sharing in a supply chain with value-adding retailers. Omega 36(5):838–851.Crossref, Google Scholar