Data-Driven Mergers
References
- (2005) Market provision of broadcasting: A welfare analysis. Rev. Econom. Stud. 72(4):947–972.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) Competitive price discrimination. RAND J. Econom. 4:1–27.Google Scholar
- Autorité de la Concurrence, Bundeskartellamt (2016) Competition law and data. Accessed April 2, 2024, https://www.autoritedelaconcurrence.fr/sites/default/files/Big%20Data%20Papier.pdf.Google Scholar
- (2019) Markets for information: An introduction. Annual Rev. Econom. 11(1):85–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Selling strategic information in digital competitive markets. RAND J. Econom. 52(2):283–313.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) Competition between strategic data intermediaries with implications for merger policy. CER-ETH Working Paper No. 23/383, Center of Economic Research, Zurich.Google Scholar
- Competition and Markets Authority (2019) Online platforms and digital advertising: Market study interim report. Accessed April 2, 2024, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5dfa0580ed915d0933009761/Interim_report.pdf.Google Scholar
- (2022) Data-driven mergers and personalization. RAND J. Econom. 53(1):3–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Competition policy for the digital era. Accessed April 2, 2024, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2763/407537.Google Scholar
- (2017) Vertical integration in the TV market: Exclusive provision and program quality. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 53:114–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) Data and competition: A simple framework. Working paper, Toulouse School of Economics, Toulouse, France.Google Scholar
- (2015) Price discrimination under customer recognition and mergers. J. Econom. Management Strategy 24(3):523–549.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1984) The fat-cat effect, the puppy-dog ploy, and the lean and hungry look. Amer. Econom. Rev. 74(2):361–366.Google Scholar
- (2019) Unlocking digital competition. Report of the digital competition expert panel. Accessed April 2, 2024, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5c88150ee5274a230219c35f/unlocking_digital_competition_furman_review_web.pdf.Google Scholar
- (2016) Big Data and Competition Policy (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
- (2023) Data-enabled learning, network effects, and competitive advantage. RAND J. Econom. 54(4):638–667.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Data linkage between markets: Does the emergence of an informed insurer cause consumer harm? CEPR Discussion Paper No. 17947, CEPR Press, Paris, London.Google Scholar
- (1986) How to license intangible property. Quart. J. Econom. 101(3):567–589.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Customer information sharing: Strategic incentives and new implications. J. Econom. Management Strategy 19(2):403–433.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Screening incentives and privacy protection in financial markets: A theoretical and empirical analysis. RAND J. Econom. 46(1):1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) The impact of access to consumer data on the competitive effects of horizontal mergers and exclusive dealing. J. Econom. Management Strategy 28(3):373–391.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) Privacy regulation and quality-enhancing innovation. J. Indust. Econom., ePub ahead of print November 16, https://doi.org/10.1111/joie.12374.Google Scholar
- (2018) The value of personal information in online markets with endogenous privacy. Management Sci. 65(3):1342–1362.Link, Google Scholar
- (2022) The microeconomics of data – A survey. J. Indust. Bus. Econom. 49:635–665.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Google/Fitbit will monetise health data and harm consumers. VoxEU (September 30), https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/googlefitbit-will-monetise-health-data-and-harm-consumers.Google Scholar
- (2015) An economic analysis of internet privacy regulation. Working paper, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.Google Scholar

