From Feeds to Inboxes: A Comparative Study of Polarization in Facebook and Email News Sharing
References
- (2020) The welfare effects of social media. Amer. Econom. Rev. 110(3):629–676.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) How can publishers collaborate and compete with news aggregators? J. Marketing Res. 60(6):1114–1134.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Media platforms’ content provision strategies and sources of profits. Marketing Sci. 40(3):527–547.Link, Google Scholar
- (2018) Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115(37):9216–9221.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science 348(6239):1130–1132.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Partisans without constraint: Political polarization and trends in American public opinion. Amer. J. Sociol. 114(2):408–446.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Tweeting from left to right: Is online political communication more than an echo chamber? Psych. Sci. 26(10):1531–1542.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Identity signaling, social influence, and social contagion. Prinstein MJ, Dodge KA, eds. Understanding Peer Influence in Children and Adolescents (The Guilford Press, New York), 181–199.Google Scholar
- (2012) What makes online content viral? J. Marketing Res. 49(2):192–205.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) Latent Dirichlet allocation. J. Machine Learn. Res. 3(January):993–1022.Google Scholar
- (2017) Greater internet use is not associated with faster growth in political polarization among us demographic groups. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114(40):10612–10617.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) The Development and Psychometric Properties of LIWC-22 (University of Texas at Austin, Austin).Google Scholar
- (2023) Harvard Business School Marketing Unit Working Paper No. 23-062, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
- (2016) Fair and balanced? Quantifying media bias through crowdsourced content analysis. Public Opinion Quart. 80(S1):250–271.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) The echo chamber effect on social media. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118(9):e2023301118.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Dev Portal (2022) Article search. Accessed May 9, 2024, https://developer.nytimes.com/docs/articlesearch-product/1/overview.Google Scholar
- (1996) Have American’s social attitudes become more polarized? Amer. J. Sociol. 102(3):690–755.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) How many people live in political bubbles on social media? Evidence from linked survey and Twitter data. SAGE Open 9(1):2158244019832705.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) What drives media slant? Evidence from US daily newspapers. Econometrica 78(1):35–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Ideological segregation online and offline. Quart. J. Econom. 126(4):1799–1839.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Measuring group differences in high-dimensional choices: Method and application to congressional speech. Econometrica 87(4):1307–1340.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Online learning for latent Dirichlet allocation. Adv. Neural Inform. Processing Systems 23:856–864.Google Scholar
- (2021) Strategic polarization in group interactions. J. Marketing Res. 58(4):782–800.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) U.S. media polarization and the 2020 election: A nation divided. Pew Research Center (January 24), https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/2020/01/24/u-s-media-polarization-and-the-2020-election-a-nation-divided/.Google Scholar
- (2021) Social media, news consumption, and polarization: Evidence from a field experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 111(3):831–870.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) A semantic approach for estimating consumer content preferences from online search queries. Marketing Sci. 37(6):930–952.Link, Google Scholar
- (2011) The Filter Bubble: How the New Personalized Web Is Changing What We Read and How We Think (Penguin, London).Google Scholar
- (2020) Social Media and Democracy: The State of the Field, Prospects for Reform (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) The effect of calorie posting regulation on consumer opinion: A flexible latent Dirichlet allocation model with informative priors. Marketing Sci. 36(5):726–746.Link, Google Scholar
- (2019) Handbook of Research on Identity Theory in Marketing (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Identity-based consumer behavior. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 29(4):310–321.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Reuters Staff (2021) Facebook does not believe it is a primary cause of polarization - Exec to CNN. Reuters (October 13), https://www.reuters.com/article/facebook-whistleblower-clegg-idCAKBN2GT0EO.Google Scholar
- (2023) Frontiers: Polarized America: From political partisanship to preference partisanship. Marketing Sci. 42(1):48–60.Link, Google Scholar
- (2022) Social learning with polarized preferences on content platforms. Preprint, submitted October 11, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3916284.Google Scholar
- (2018) Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
- (2014) Mining marketing meaning from online chatter: Strategic brand analysis of big data using latent Dirichlet allocation. J. Marketing Res. 51(4):463–479.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Extracting features of entertainment products: A guided latent Dirichlet allocation approach informed by the psychology of media consumption. J. Marketing Res. 56(1):18–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Strategic identity signaling in heterogeneous networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119(10):e2117898119.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Capturing changes in social media content: A multiple latent changepoint topic model. Marketing Sci. 39(4):827–846.Link, Google Scholar

