Classical Lottery in Action: Quantifying Risk and Evaluating Uncertainty

References

• Ahn DS (2008) Ambiguity without a state space. Rev. Econom. Stud. 75(1):3–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allais M (1953) L’extension des théories de l’équilibre économique général et du rendement social au cas du risque. Econometrica, J. Econometric Soc. 21(2):269–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alon S, Gayer G (2025) A procedure for revising data-based priors in a group. Management Sci. 71(2):1737–1755.Link, Google Scholar
• Ancker JS, Senathirajah Y, Kukafka R, Starren JB (2006) Design features of graphs in health risk communication: A systematic review. J. Amer. Medical Informatics Assoc. 13(6):608–618.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anscombe FJ, Aumann RJ (1963) A definition of subjective probability. Ann. Math. Statist. 34(1):199–205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arrow KJ (1973) Some ordinalist-utilitarian notes on Rawls’s theory of justice. J. Philos. 70(9):245–263.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aydogan I, Gao Y (2020) Experience and rationality under risk: Re-examining the impact of sampling experience. Exp. Econom. 23(4):1100–1128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baillon A, Bleichrodt H, Li C, Wakker PP (2025) Source theory: A tractable and positive ambiguity theory. Management Sci. 71(10):8767–8782.Link, Google Scholar
• Baillon A, Huang Z, Selim A, Wakker PP (2018) Measuring ambiguity attitudes for all (natural) events. Econometrica 86(5):1839–1858.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ben-Porath E, Gilboa I, Schmeidler D (1997) On the measurement of inequality under uncertainty. J. Econom. Theory 75(1):194–204.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borel E (1924) À propos d’un traité de probabilités. Revue Philosophique de la France et de L’Étranger. 98:321–336.Google Scholar
• De Finetti B (1972) Probability, Induction and Statistics: The Art of Guessing (John Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• Debreu G, Koopmans TC (1982) Additively decomposed quasiconvex functions. Math. Programming 24(1):1–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Denti T, Pomatto L (2022) Model and predictive uncertainty: A foundation for smooth ambiguity preferences. Econometrica 90(2):551–584.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diaconis P, Skyrms B (2018) Ten Great Ideas about Chance (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dimmock SG, Kouwenberg R, Wakker PP (2016) Ambiguity attitudes in a large representative sample. Management Sci. 62(5):1363–1380.Link, Google Scholar
• Durrett R (2019) Probability: Theory and Examples, vol. 49 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ergin H, Gul F (2009) A theory of subjective compound lotteries. J. Econom. Theory 144(3):899–929.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fagerlin A, Wang C, Ubel PA (2005) Reducing the influence of anecdotal reasoning on people’s health care decisions: Is a picture worth a thousand statistics? Medical Decision Making 25(4):398–405.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fagerlin A, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Ubel PA (2011) Helping patients decide: Ten steps to better risk communication. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 103(19):1436–1443.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flanigan B, Gölz P, Gupta A, Hennig B, Procaccia AD (2021) Fair algorithms for selecting citizens’ assemblies. Nature 596(7873):548–552.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleurbaey M (2010) Assessing risky social situations. J. Political Econom. 118(4):649–680.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleurbaey M (2018) Welfare economics, risk and uncertainty. Canadian J. Econom./Revue Canadienne D’économique 51(1):5–40.Google Scholar
• Flores-Szwagrzak K (2024) Learning by Convex Combination. Working paper, Copenhagen Business School [wp], Denmark.Google Scholar
• French KR, Poterba JM (1991) Investor diversification and international equity markets. Amer. Econom. Rev. 81(2):222.Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer G (2014) Risk Savvy: How to Make Good Decisions (Penguin, London, UK).Google Scholar
• Gilboa I, Schmeidler D (1989) Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior. J. Math. Econom. 18(2):141–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant S, Kajii A, Polak B, Safra Z (2010) Generalized utilitarianism and Harsanyi’s impartial observer theorem. Econometrica 78(6):1939–1971.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen LP, Maccheroni F, Marinacci M, Sargent T (2025) Distributional ambiguity and misspecification. Working paper, Bocconi University, Milan.Google Scholar
• Harsanyi JC (1953) Cardinal utility in welfare economics and in the theory of risk-taking. J. Political Econom. 61(5):434–435.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harsanyi JC (1955) Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics, and interpersonal comparisons of utility. J. Political Econom. 63:309–321.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harsanyi JC (1975) Can the maximin principle serve as a basis for morality? A critique of John Rawls’s theory. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 69:594–606.Crossref, Google Scholar
• He Y (2021) Revisiting Ellsberg’s and Machina’s paradoxes: A two-stage evaluation model under ambiguity. Management Sci. 67(11):6897–6914.Link, Google Scholar
• Heal G, Millner A (2018) Uncertainty and ambiguity in environmental economics: Conceptual issues. Dasgupta P, Pattanayak SK, Smith VK, eds. Handbook of Environmental Economics, vol. 4 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 439–468.Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1975) Value theory: An analysis of choices under risk. Paper presented at the ISRACON conference on Public Economics, Jerusalem.Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karni E (2009) A mechanism for eliciting probabilities. Econometrica 77(2):603–606.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keeney RL, Raiffa H (1993) Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keynes JM (1937) The general theory of employment. Quart J. Econom. 51(2):209–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klibanoff P, Marinacci M, Mukerji S (2005) A smooth model of decision making under ambiguity. Econometrica 73(6):1849–1892.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knight FH (1921) Risk, Uncertainty and Profit, vol. 31 (Houghton Mifflin, Boston).Google Scholar
• Köbberling V, Wakker PP (2003) Preference foundations for nonexpected utility: A generalized and simplified technique. Math. Oper. Res. 28(3):395–423.Link, Google Scholar
• Kothiyal A, Spinu V, Wakker PP (2014) Average utility maximization: A preference foundation. Oper. Res. 62(1):207–218.Link, Google Scholar
• Kreps DM, Porteus EL (1978) Temporal resolution of uncertainty and dynamic choice theory. Econometrica 46(1):185–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li C, Rohde K, Wakker PP (2023) The deceptive beauty of monotonicity and the million dollar question: Row-first or column-first aggregation. Working paper, Erasmus University Rotterdam.Google Scholar
• Lipkus IM, Hollands JG (1999) The visual communication of risk. JNCI Monographs 1999(25):149–163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marinacci M (2015) Model uncertainty. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 13(6):1022–1100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marquis de Laplace PS (1902) A Philosophical Essay on Probabilities (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• Nau RF (2006) Uncertainty aversion with second-order utilities and probabilities. Management Sci. 52(1):136–145.Link, Google Scholar
• Neilson WS (1993) Ambiguity aversion: An axiomatic approach using second order probabilities.Google Scholar
• Quiggin J (1982) A theory of anticipated utility. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 3(4):323–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rawls J (1971) A Theory of Justice (The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Savage LJ (1954) The Foundations of Statistics (John Wiley and Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Schmeidler D (1989) Subjective probability and expected utility without additivity. Econometrica 57(3):571–587.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Segal U (1987) The Ellsberg paradox and risk aversion: An anticipated utility approach. Internat. Econom. Rev. 28:175–202.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Segal U (1990) Two-stage lotteries without the reduction axiom. Econometrica 58(2):349–377.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seo K (2009) Ambiguity and second-order belief. Econometrica 77(5):1575–1605.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith JE, Dyer JS (2021) On (measurable) multiattribute value functions: An expository argument. Decision Anal. (Oxford) 18(4):247–256.Link, Google Scholar
• Smith JE, Nau RF (1995) Valuing risky projects: Option pricing theory and decision analysis. Management Sci. 41(5):795–816.Link, Google Scholar
• Spiegelhalter D (2024) Why probability probably doesn’t exist (but it is useful to act like it does. Nature 636(8043):560–563.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spiegelhalter D, Pearson M, Short I (2011) Visualizing uncertainty about the future. Science (1979) 333(6048):1393–1400.Google Scholar
• Vickrey W (1945) Measuring marginal utility by reactions to risk. Econometrica 13(4):319–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Neumann J, Morgenstern O (1944) Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Wakker PP (1989) Additive Representations of Preferences: A New Foundation of Decision Analysis (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang F (2019) Comparative ambiguity attitudes. Working paper, HEC Paris, France.Google Scholar
• Wang F (2022) Rank-dependent utility under multiple priors. Management Sci. 68(11):8166–8183.Link, Google Scholar