Essentiality Checks for Standard Essential Patents

References

• Albano GL, Lizzeri A (2001) Strategic certification and provision of quality. Internat. Econom. Rev. 42(1):267–283.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allison JR, Lemley MA, Schwartz DL (2014) Understanding the realities of modern patent litigation. Texas Law Rev. 92(7):1769–1802.Google Scholar
• Aoki R, Arai Y (2018) Strategic declaration of standard essential patents. RIETI Discussion Paper 18-E-035, Tokyo.Google Scholar
• Baron J, Ménière Y, Pohlmann T (2014) Standards, consortia, and innovation. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 36:22–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bebchuk LA (1984) Litigation and settlement under imperfect information. RAND J. Econom. 15(3):404–415.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beggs AW (1992) The licensing of patents under asymmetric information. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 10(2):171–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bekkers R, Catalini C, Martinelli A, Righi C, Simcoe T (2023) Disclosure rules and declared essential patents. Res. Policy. 52(1):104618.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bekkers R, Henkel J, Tur EM, van der Vorst T, Driesse M, Kang B, Martinelli A, et al. (2020) Pilot study for essentiality assessment of Standard Essential Patents. Report for the Joint Research Center of the European Commission, https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC119894.Google Scholar
• Bonatti A, Rantakari H (2016) The politics of compromise. Amer. Econom. Rev. 106(2):229–259.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boone J, Schuett F, Tarantino E (2024) Price commitments in standard setting under asymmetric information. J. Indust. Econom. 72(1):3–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bourreau M, Ferraz RCDM, Ménière Y (2023) Licensing standard-essential patents with costly enforcement. J. Econom. Management Strategy 32(4):827–855.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brachtendorf L, Gaessler F, Harhoff D (2023) Truly standard-essential patents? A semantics-based analysis. J. Econom. Management Strategy 32(1):132–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buehler B, Schuett F (2014) Certification and minimum quality standards when some consumers are uninformed. Eur. Econom. Rev. 70:493–511.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Contreras JL (2017) Essentiality and standards-essential patents. Contreras JL, ed. The Cambridge Handbook of Technical Standardization Law: Competition, Antitrust, and Patents (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA), 209–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooter RD, Rubinfeld DL (1989) Economic analysis of legal disputes and their resolution. J. Econom. Literature 27(3):1067–1097.Google Scholar
• Dewatripont M, Legros P (2013) ‘Essential’ patents, FRAND royalties and technological standards. J. Indust. Econom. 61(4):913–937.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dranove D, Jin GZ (2010) Quality disclosure and certification: Theory and practice. J. Econom. Literature 48(4):935–963.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fan C, Jun BH, Wolfstetter EG (2018) Optimal licensing under incomplete information: The case of the inside patent holder. Econom. Theory 66(4):979–1005.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farrell J, Shapiro C (2008) How strong are weak patents? Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(4):1347–1369.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farrell J, Simcoe T (2012) Choosing the rules for consensus standardization. RAND J. Econom. 43(2):235–252.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farrell J, Hayes J, Shapiro C, Sullivan T (2007) Standard setting, patents, and hold-up. Antitrust Law J. 74(3):603–670.Google Scholar
• Gallini NT, Wright BD (1990) Technology transfer under asymmetric information. RAND J. Econom. 21(1):147–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ganglmair B, Tarantino E (2014) Conversation with secrets. RAND J. Econom. 45(2):273–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ganglmair B, Froeb LM, Werden GJ (2012) Patent hold-up and antitrust: How a well-intentioned rule could retard innovation. J. Indust. Econom. 60(2):249–273.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodman DJ, Myers RA (2005) 3G cellular standards and patents. 2005 Internat. Conf. Wireless Networks, Comm. Mobile Comput., vol. 1 (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 415–420.Google Scholar
• Harbaugh R, Rasmusen E (2018) Coarse grades: Informing the public by withholding information. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconomics 10(1):210–235.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harsanyi JC (1973) Games with randomly disturbed payoffs: A new rationale for mixed-strategy equilibrium points. Internat. J. Game Theory 2(1):1–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kang B, Bekkers R (2015) Just-in-time patents and the development of standards. Res. Policy 44(10):1948–1961.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larouche P, Schuett F (2019) Repeated interaction in standard setting. J. Econom. Management Strategy 28(3):488–509.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Layne-Farrar A, Llobet G (2014) Moving beyond simple examples: Assessing the incremental value rule within standards. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 36:57–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Layne-Farrar A, Llobet G, Padilla J (2014) Payments and participation: The incentives to join cooperative standard setting efforts. J. Econom. Management Strategy 23(1):24–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leiponen AE (2008) Competing through cooperation: The organization of standard setting in wireless telecommunications. Management Sci. 54(11):1904–1919.Link, Google Scholar
• Lemley MA, Simcoe T (2019) How essential are standard-essential patents? Cornell Law Rev. 104(3):607–642.Google Scholar
• Lerner J, Tirole J (2015) Standard-essential patents. J. Political Econom. 123(3):547–586.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J, Tabakovic H, Tirole J (2016) Patent disclosures and standard-setting. NBER Working Paper No. 22768, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Lizzeri A (1999) Information revelation and certification intermediaries. RAND J. Econom. 30(2):214–231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Llanes G (2019) Ex-ante agreements and FRAND commitments in a repeated game of standard-setting organizations. Rev. Indust. Organ. 54(1):159–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Llanes G (2024) Innovation incentives in technical standards. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 93:103046.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Llanes G, Poblete J (2014) Ex ante agreements in standard setting and patent-pool formation. J. Econom. Management Strategy 23(1):50–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Llobet G, Padilla J (2023) A theory of socially inefficient patent holdout. J. Econom. Management Strategy 32(2):424–449.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meurer MJ (1989) The settlement of patent litigation. RAND J. Econom. 20(1):77–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mezzanotti F (2021) Roadblock to innovation: The role of patent litigation in corporate R&D. Management Sci. 67(12):7362–7390.Link, Google Scholar
• Régibeau P, De Coninck R, Zenger H (2016) Study on transparency, predictability and efficiency of SSO-based standardization and SEP licensing. Report for the European Commission, https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/20506/attachments/1/translations/en/renditions/native.Google Scholar
• Righi C, Simcoe T (2023) Patenting inventions or inventing patents? Continuation practice at the USPTO. RAND J. Econom. 54(3):416–442.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rysman M, Simcoe T (2008) Patents and the performance of voluntary standard-setting organizations. Management Sci. 54(11):1920–1934.Link, Google Scholar
• Schankerman M, Schuett F (2022) Patent screening, innovation, and welfare. Rev. Econom. Stud. 89(4):2101–2148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• SEPs Expert Group (2021) Contribution to the debate on SEPs. Report prepared for the European Commission, https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/44733.Google Scholar
• Shapiro C (2001) Navigating the patent thicket: Cross licenses, patent pools, and standard setting. Jaffe AB, Lerner J, Stern S, eds. Innovation Policy and the Economy, vol. 1 (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 119–150.Google Scholar
• Spulber DF (2019) Standard setting organisations and standard essential patents: Voting and markets. Econom. J. 129(619):1477–1509.Google Scholar
• Stitzing R, Sääskilahti P, Royer J, Van Audenrode M (2017) Over-declaration of standard essential patents and determinants of essentiality. Preprint, submitted April 12, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2951617.Google Scholar
• Swanson DG, Baumol WJ (2005) Reasonable and nondiscriminatory (RAND) royalties, standards selection, and control of market power. Antitrust Law J. 73(1):1–58.Google Scholar
• Vatter B (2022) Quality disclosure and regulation: Scoring design in Medicare advantage. Preprint, submitted January 11, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.425036.Google Scholar
• Viscusi WK (1978) A note on “lemons” markets with quality certification. Bell J. Econom. 9(1):277–279.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wipusanawan C (2020) Standard-essential patents and incentives for innovation. TILEC Discussion Paper 2020-025, Tilburg, Netherlands.Google Scholar
• Zapechelnyuk A (2020) Optimal quality certification. Amer. Econom. Rev. Insights 2(2):161–176.Crossref, Google Scholar