Reversing Reserves
References
- (2018) An introduction to the Understanding America Study internet panel. Soc. Security Bull. 78(2):13–28.Google Scholar
- (2018) Cognitive ability and games of school choice. Games Econom. Behav. 109:156–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Errors in probabilistic reasoning and judgment biases. Handbook of Behavioral Economics: Applications and Foundations, vol. 2 (Elsevier, New York), 69–186.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Constrained school choice: An experimental study. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(4):1860–1874.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) School choice: An experimental study. J. Econom. Theory 127:202–231.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Market design, human behavior, and management. Management Sci. 67(9):5317–5348.Link, Google Scholar
- (2017) Matching and chatting: An experimental study of the impact of network communication on school-matching mechanisms. Games Econom. Behav. 103(C):94–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Explicit vs. statistical targeting in affirmative action: Theory and evidence from Chicago’s Exam Schools. J. Econom. Theory 187:104996.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Reserve design: Unintended consequences and the demise of Boston’s walk zones. J. Political Econom. 126(6):2457–2479.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Clearinghouses for two-sided matching: An experimental study. Quant. Econom. 7(2):449–482.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) What you see is all there is. Quart. J. Econom. 135(3):1363–1398.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Taking the interface between mind and environment seriously. Information Sampling and Adaptive Cognition (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 3–29.Google Scholar
- (2018) The effectiveness of top-down advice in strategy-proof mechanisms: A field experiment. Eur. Econom. Rev. 101(C):505–511.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Experiments on centralized school choice and college admissions: A survey. Experiment. Econom. 24(2):434–488.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Learning through noticing: Theory and evidence from a field experiment. Quart. J. Econom. 129(3):1311–1353.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) The limits of incentives in economic matching procedures. Management Sci. 67(2):951–963.Link, Google Scholar
- (2007) The naïve intuitive statistician: A naïve sampling model of intuitive confidence intervals. Psych. Rev. 114(3):678.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1973) On the psychology of prediction. Psych. Rev. 80:237–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Matching with slot-specific priorities: Theory. Theoretical Econom. 11(2):683–710.Crossref, Google Scholar
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2020) Framework for Equitable Allocation of COVID-19 Vaccine (The National Academies Press, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
- (2020) Immigration lottery design: Engineered and coincidental consequences of H-1B reforms. NBER Working Paper No. 26767, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- (2018) Suboptimal behavior in strategy-proof mechanisms: Evidence from the residency match. Games Econom. Behav. 108:317–330.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) An experimental investigation of preference misrepresentation in the residency match. Proc. National Acad. Sci. USA 115(45):11471–11476.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Correlation neglect in student-to-school matching. NBER Working Paper No. 26734, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- (1990) Bounded rationality. J. Institute Theoretical Econom. 146(4):649–658.Google Scholar
- (2018) Obvious mistakes in a strategically simple college admissions environment: Causes and consequences. Preprint, submitted June 28, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2993538.Google Scholar
- (1990) Bounded rationality. Utility and Probability (Palgrave Macmillan UK), 15–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1961) Estimating averages. Ergonomics 4(4):317–328.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1963) A further study of estimating averages. Ergonomics 6(3):255–265.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Rational inattention. The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics (Palgrave Macmillan UK), 1–5.Google Scholar

