Social Media Alleviates Venture Capital Funding Inequality for Women and Less Connected Entrepreneurs

References

• Aggarwal R, Gopal R, Gupta A, Singh H (2012) Putting money where the mouths are: The relation between venture financing and electronic word-of-mouth. Inform. Systems Res. 23(3 part 2):976–992.Link, Google Scholar
• Agrawal AK, Catalini C, Goldfarb A (2011) The geography of crowdfunding. NBER Working Paper No. 16820, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Ahl H (2006) Why research on women entrepreneurs needs new directions. Entrepreneurship Theory Pract. 30(5):595–621.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aldrich HE, Fiol CM (1994) Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Acad. Management Rev. 19(4):645–670.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amit R, Glosten L, Muller E (1990) Entrepreneurial ability, venture investments, and risk sharing. Management Sci. 36(10):1233–1246.Link, Google Scholar
• Angst CM, Agarwal R, Sambamurthy V, Kelley K (2010) Social contagion and information technology diffusion: The adoption of electronic medical records in US hospitals. Management Sci. 56(8):1219–1241.Link, Google Scholar
• Aral S, Van Alstyne M (2011) The diversity-bandwidth trade-off. Amer. J. Sociol. 117(1):90–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aral S, Walker D (2011) Creating social contagion through viral product design: A randomized trial of peer influence in networks. Management Sci. 57(9):1623–1639.Link, Google Scholar
• Aral S, Dellarocas C, Godes D (2013) Introduction to the special issue—social media and business transformation: A framework for research. Inform. Systems Res. 24(1):3–13.Link, Google Scholar
• Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev. Econom. Stud. 58(2):277–297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balachandra L, Briggs T, Eddleston K, Brush C (2019) Don’t pitch like a girl!: How gender stereotypes influence investor decisions. Entrepreneurship Theory Pract. 43(1):116–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baltagi BH, Rich DP (2005) Skill-biased technical change in US manufacturing: A general index approach. J. Econometrics 126(2):549–570.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bardhan I, Krishnan V, Lin S (2013) Research note—business value of information technology: Testing the interaction effect of IT and R&D on Tobin’s Q. Inform. Systems Res. 24(4):1147–1161.Link, Google Scholar
• Baron JN, Burton MD, Hannan MT (1996) The road taken: Origins and evolution of employment systems in emerging companies. Indust. Corporate Change 5(2):239–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Behaghel L, Greenan N (2010) Training and age-biased technical change. Ann. Econom. Statist. 99/100:317–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Behaghel L, Caroli E, Roger M (2014) Age‐biased technical and organizational change, training and employment prospects of older workers. Economica 81(322):368–389.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj A, El Sawy OA, Pavlou PA, Venkatraman N (2013) Digital business strategy: Toward a next generation of insights. MIS Quart. 37(2):471–482.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhaskaran V, Mirchandani R, Shah M (2013) Creating a measurable social media marketing strategy: Increasing the value and ROI of intangibles and tangibles for hokey pokey. Marketing Sci. 32(2):194–212.Link, Google Scholar
• Bird B, Brush C (2002) A gendered perspective on organizational creation. Entrepreneurship Theory Pract. 26(3):41–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blackwell M, Iacus S, King G, Porro G (2009) CEM: Coarsened exact matching in Stata. Stata J. 9(4):524–546.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blundell R, Bond S (1998) Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. J. Econometrics 87(1):115–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bond SD, He SX, Wen W (2019) Speaking for “free”: Word of mouth in free-and paid-product settings. J. Marketing Res. 56(2):276–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bresnahan TF, Brynjolfsson E, Hitt LM (2002) Information technology, workplace organization, and the demand for skilled labor: Firm-level evidence. Quart. J. Econom. 117(1):339–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Breznitz D, Forman C, Wen W (2018) The role of venture capital in the formation of a new technological ecosystem: Evidence from the cloud. MIS Quart. 42(4):1143–1169.Google Scholar
• Brooks AW, Huang L, Kearney SW, Murray FE (2014) Investors prefer entrepreneurial ventures pitched by attractive men. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111(12):4427–4431.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bruni A, Gherardi S, Poggio B (2004) Doing gender, doing entrepreneurship: An ethnographic account of intertwined practices. Gender Work Organ. 11(4):406–429.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brush C, Carter NM, Gatewood EJ, Greene PG, Hart M (2001) The Diana Project: Women business owners and equity capital: The myths dispelled. Babson College Center for Entrepreneurship Research Paper No. 2009-11, Babson College, Wellesley, MA.Google Scholar
• Brush C, Greene P, Balachandra L, Davis A, Blank AM (2014) Women entrepreneurs 2014: Bridging the gender gap in venture capital. Working paper, Arthur M. Blank Center for Entrepreneurship, Babson College, Wellesley, MA.Google Scholar
• Burt RS (1992) Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS, Kilduff M, Tasselli S (2013) Social network analysis: Foundations and frontiers on advantage. Annual Rev. Psych. 64:527–547.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bygrave WD (1988) The structure of the investment networks of venture capital firms. J. Bus. Venturing 3(2):137–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campa JM, Kedia S (2002) Explaining the diversification discount. J. Finance 57(4):1731–1762.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cui R, Ding H, Zhu F (2022) Gender inequality in research productivity during the COVID-19 pandemic. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 24(2):707–726.Link, Google Scholar
• Cumming D (2006) Adverse selection and capital structure: Evidence from venture capital. Entrepreneurship Theory Pract. 30(2):155–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davila A, Foster G, Gupta M (2003) Venture capital financing and the growth of startup firms. J. Bus. Venturing 18(6):689–708.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dessein W (2005) Information and control in ventures and alliances. J. Finance 60(5):2513–2549.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eddleston KA, Ladge JJ, Mitteness C, Balachandra L (2016) Do you see what I see? Signaling effects of gender and firm characteristics on financing entrepreneurial ventures. Entrepreneurship Theory Pract. 40(3):489–514.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eesley C, Wu L (2020) For startups, adaptability and mentor network diversity can be pivotal: Evidence from a randomized experiment on a MOOC platform. MIS Quart. 44(2):661–697.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eesley C, Li JB, Yang D (2016) Does institutional change in universities influence high-tech entrepreneurship? Evidence from China’s Project 985. Organ. Sci. 27(2):446–461.Link, Google Scholar
• Feng L, Hu Y, Li B, Stanley HE, Havlin S, Braunstein LA (2015) Competing for attention in social media under information overload conditions. PLoS One 10(7):e0126090.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Forman C (2005) The corporate digital divide: Determinants of Internet adoption. Management Sci. 51(4):641–654.Link, Google Scholar
• Forman C, Ghose A, Wiesenfeld B (2008) Examining the relationship between reviews and sales: The role of reviewer identity disclosure in electronic markets. Inform. Systems Res. 19(3):291–313.Link, Google Scholar
• Forman C, Goldfarb A, Greenstein S (2002) Digital dispersion: An industrial and geographic census of commercial internet use. NBER Working Paper No. 9287, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Forman C, Goldfarb A, Greenstein S (2005) Geographic location and the diffusion of Internet technology. Electronic Commerce Res. Appl. 4(1):1–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Forret ML, Dougherty TW (2004) Networking behaviors and career outcomes: Differences for men and women? J. Organ. Behav. 25(3):419–437.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibson DE, Lawrence BS (2010) Women’s and men’s career referents: How gender composition and comparison level shape career expectations. Organ. Sci. 21(6):1159–1175.Link, Google Scholar
• Gompers PA (1995) Optimal investment, monitoring, and the staging of venture capital. J. Finance 50(5):1461–1489.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter M (1993) The nature of economic relationships. Swedberg R, ed. Explorations in Economic Sociology (Russell Sage Foundation, New York), 3–41.Google Scholar
• Greenwood BN, Gopal A (2015) Research note—Tigerblood: Newspapers, blogs, and the founding of information technology firms. Inform. Systems Res. 26(4):812–828.Link, Google Scholar
• Greve A, Salaff JW (2003) Social networks and entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory Pract. 28(1):1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guo Rj, Lev B, Zhou N (2004) Competitive costs of disclosure by biotech IPOs. J. Accounting Res. 42(2):319–355.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haltiwanger J, Jarmin RS, Miranda J (2013) Who creates jobs? Small vs. large vs. young. Rev. Econom. Statist. 95(2):347–361.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrison RT, Mason CM (2007) Does gender matter? Women business angels and the supply of entrepreneurial finance. Entrepreneurship Theory Pract. 31(3):445–472.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hausman JA (1996) Valuation of new goods under perfect and imperfect competition. The Economics of New Goods (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 207–248.Google Scholar
• Hellmann T, Puri M (2000) The interaction between product market and financing strategy: The role of venture capital. Rev. Financial Stud. 13(4):959–984.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hitt L, Jin F, Wu L (2015) Data skills and value of social media: Evidence from large-sample firm value analysis. ICIS 2015 Proc., 17.Google Scholar
• Hoang H, Antoncic B (2003) Network-based research in entrepreneurship: A critical review. J. Bus. Venturing 18(2):165–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hochberg YV, Ljungqvist A, Lu Y (2007) Whom you know matters: Venture capital networks and investment performance. J. Finance 62(1):251–301.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsu DH, Roberts EB, Eesley CE (2007) Entrepreneurs from technology-based universities: Evidence from MIT. Res. Policy 36(5):768–788.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ingram P, Roberts PW (2000) Friendships among competitors in the Sydney hotel industry. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(2):387–423.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jin F, Wu A, Hitt L (2017) Social is the new financial: How startup social media activity influences funding outcomes. Working paper, Kelley School of Business, Indiana University, Bloomington.Google Scholar
• Jones Q, Ravid G, Rafaeli S (2004) Information overload and the message dynamics of online interaction spaces: A theoretical model and empirical exploration. Inform. Systems Res. 15(2):194–210.Link, Google Scholar
• Joseph D, Ang S, Slaughter SA (2015) Turnover or turnaway? Competing risks analysis of male and female IT professionals’ job mobility and relative pay gap. Inform. Systems Res. 26(1):145–164.Link, Google Scholar
• Kanze D, Huang L, Conley MA, Higgins ET (2018) We ask men to win and women not to lose: Closing the gender gap in startup funding. Acad. Management J. 61(2):586–614.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim HG, Lee S, Kyeong S (2013) Discovering hot topics using Twitter streaming data social topic detection and geographic clustering. 2013 IEEE/ACM Internat. Conf. Adv. Social Networks Anal. Mining (ASONAM 2013) (IEEE), 1215–1220.Google Scholar
• Kleis L, Chwelos P, Ramirez RV, Cockburn I (2012) Information technology and intangible output: The impact of IT investment on innovation productivity. Inform. Systems Res. 23(1):42–59.Link, Google Scholar
• Koellinger P, Minniti M, Schade C (2013) Gender differences in entrepreneurial propensity. Oxford Bull. Econom. Statist. 75(2):213–234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kulshrestha J, Kooti F, Nikravesh A, Gummadi KP (2012) Geographic dissection of the Twitter network. Sixth Internat. AAAI Conf. Weblogs Soc. Media.Google Scholar
• Lee HS (2017) Peer networks in venture capital. J. Empirical Finance 41:19–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee JK, Choi J, Kim C, Kim Y (2014) Social media, network heterogeneity, and opinion polarization. J. Comm. 64(4):702–722.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J, Malmendier U (2013) With a little help from my (random) friends: Success and failure in post-business school entrepreneurship. Rev. Financial Stud. 26(10):2411–2452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li S, Schulze W, Li Z (2009) Plunging into the sea, again? A study of serial entrepreneurship in China. Asia Pacific J. Management 26(4):667–680.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li X, Wu L (2018) Herding and social media word-of-mouth. MIS Quart. 42(4):1331–1351.Google Scholar
• Lin M, Prabhala NR, Viswanathan S (2013) Judging borrowers by the company they keep: Friendship networks and information asymmetry in online peer-to-peer lending. Management Sci. 59(1):17–35.Link, Google Scholar
• Lu T, Zhang Y, Li B (2019) The value of alternative data in credit risk prediction: Evidence from a large field experiment. ICIS 2019 Proc., 10.Google Scholar
• Martin GJ, Yurukoglu A (2017) Bias in cable news: Persuasion and polarization. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(9):2565–2599.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meier RL (1963) Information input overload: Features of growth in communications-oriented institutions. Libri 13(1):1–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nanda R, Sørensen JB (2010) Workplace peers and entrepreneurship. Management Sci. 56(7):1116–1126.Link, Google Scholar
• Nicolaou N, Birley S (2003) Social networks in organizational emergence: The university spinout phenomenon. Management Sci. 49(12):1702–1725.Link, Google Scholar
• Orser BJ, Riding AL, Manley K (2006) Women entrepreneurs and financial capital. Entrepreneurship Theory Pract. 30(5):643–665.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oster E (2019) Unobservable selection and coefficient stability: Theory and evidence. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 37(2):187–204.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parker SC (2013) Do serial entrepreneurs run successively better-performing businesses? J. Bus. Venturing 28(5):652–666.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petrova M, Sen A, Yildirim P (2021) Social media and political contributions: The impact of new technology on political competition. Management Sci. 67(5):2997–3021.Link, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway CL (2001) Gender, status, and leadership. J. Soc. Issues 57(4):637–655.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rishika R, Ramaprasad J (2019) The effects of asymmetric social ties, structural embeddedness, and tie strength on online content contribution behavior. Management Sci. 65(7):3398–3422.Link, Google Scholar
• Saxenian A (1991) The origins and dynamics of production networks in Silicon Valley. Res. Policy 20(5):423–437.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shane S, Cable D (2002) Network ties, reputation, and the financing of new ventures. Management Sci. 48(3):364–381.Link, Google Scholar
• Singh J, Hansen MT, Podolny JM (2010) The world is not small for everyone: Inequity in searching for knowledge in organizations. Management Sci. 56(9):1415–1438.Link, Google Scholar
• Snir EM, Hitt LM (2003) Costly bidding in online markets for IT services. Management Sci. 49(11):1504–1520.Link, Google Scholar
• Sorenson O, Stuart TE (2001) Syndication networks and the spatial distribution of venture capital investments. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(6):1546–1588.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Alstyne M, Brynjolfsson E (2005) Global village or cyber-Balkans? Modeling and measuring the integration of electronic communities. Management Sci. 51(6):851–868.Link, Google Scholar
• Wright M, Robbie K, Ennew C (1997) Venture capitalists and serial entrepreneurs. J. Bus. Venturing 12(3):227–249.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wu L (2013) Social network effects on productivity and job security: Evidence from the adoption of a social networking tool. Inform. Systems Res. 24(1):30–51.Link, Google Scholar
• Wu L, Kane GC (2021) Network-biased technical change: How modern digital collaboration tools overcome some biases but exacerbate others. Organ. Sci. 32(2):273–292.Link, Google Scholar
• Wu L, Lou B, Hitt L (2019) Data analytics supports decentralized innovation. Management Sci. 65(10):4863–4877.Link, Google Scholar