Comparative Statics of Disclosure Statements

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4742

References

  • Ahn D, Ergin H (2010) Framing contingencies. Econometrica 78(2):655–695.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Araujo A, Sandroni A (1999) On the convergence to homogeneous expectations when markets are complete. Econometrica 67(3):663–672.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beauchêne D, Li J, Li M (2019) Ambiguous persuasion. J. Econom. Theory 179:312–365.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bergemann D, Morris S (2019) Information design: A unified perspective. J. Econom. Literature 57(1):44–95.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bernheim BD, Rangel A (2009) Beyond revealed preference: Choice-theoretic foundations for behavioral welfare economics. Quart. J. Econom. 124(1):51–104.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blackwell D, Dubins L (1962) Merging of opinions with increasing information. Ann. Math. Statist. 33(3):882–886.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blume L, Easley D (2006) If you’re so smart, why aren’t you rich? Belief selection in complete and incomplete markets. Econometrica 74(4):929–966.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burkovskaya A (2022) A model of state aggregation. Econom. Theory 73:121–149.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burkovskaya A, Teperski A, Atalay K (2022) Framing and insurance choices. J. Risk Insurance 89(2):311–337.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Duraj J, He K (2023) Dynamic information design with diminishing sensitivity over news. Working paper, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  • Goldman SM, Uzawa H (1964) A note on separability in demand analysis. Econometrica 32(3):387–398.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gollier C, Kimball MS (2018) Toward a systematic approach to the economic effects of risk: Characterizing utility functions. J. Risk Insurance 85(2):397–430.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grant S, Polak B, Strzalecki T (2009) Second-order expected utility. Working paper, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Gul F, Pesendorfer W, Strzalecki T (2017) Coarse competitive equilibrium and extreme prices. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(1):109–137.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hershey J, Kunreuther H, Schoemaker P (1982) Sources of bias in assessment procedures for utility functions. Management Sci. 28(8):936–954.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kamenica E, Gentzkow M (2011) Bayesian persuasion. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(6):2590–2615.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kimball MS (1990) Precautionary saving in the small and in the large. Econometrica 58(1):53–73.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klibanoff P, Marinacci M, Mukerji S (2005) A smooth model of decision making under ambiguity. Econometrica 73(6):1849–1892.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kreps DM, Porteus EL (1978) Temporal resolution of uncertainty and dynamic choice theory. Econometrica 46:185–200.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li J (2020) Preferences for partial information and ambiguity. Theoret. Econom. 15(3):1059–1094.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lipnowski E, Mathevet L (2018) Disclosure to a psychological audience. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconomics 10(4):67–93.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maccheroni F, Marinacci M, Ruffino D (2013) Alpha as ambiguity: Robust mean-variance portfolio analysis. Econometrica 81(3):1075–1113.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Piccione M, Spiegler R (2012) Price competition under limited comparability. Quart. J. Econom. 127(1):97–135.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Salant Y, Rubinstein A (2008) (A, F): Choice with frames. Rev. Econom. Stud. 75(4):1287–1296.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Salant Y, Siegel R (2018) Contracts with framing. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconomics 10(3):315–346.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spiegler R (2014) Competitive framing. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconomics 6(3):35–58.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Strotz RH (1957) The empirical implications of a utility tree. Econometrica 25(2):269–280.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thaler R (1980) Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 1(1):39–60.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thaler RH, Sunstein CR (2009) Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
  • Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185(4157):1124–1131.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tversky A, Kahneman D (1981) The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211(4481):453–458.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.