Output-Oriented Agricultural Subsidy Design

References

• Abadie LM, Galarraga I, Milford AB, Gustavsen GW (2016) Using food taxes and subsidies to achieve emission reduction targets in Norway. J. Cleaner Production 134:280–297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adida E, Dey D, Mamani H (2013) Operational issues and network effects in vaccine markets. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 231(2):414–427.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agbo M, Rousselière D, Salanié J (2015) Agricultural marketing cooperatives with direct selling: A cooperative–non-cooperative game. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 109:56–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alizamir S, de Véricourt F, Sun P (2016) Efficient feed-in-tariff policies for renewable energy technologies. Oper. Res. 64(1):52–66.Link, Google Scholar
• Alizamir S, Iravani F, Mamani H (2019) An analysis of price vs. revenue protection: Government subsidies in the agriculture industry. Management Sci. 65(1):32–49.Link, Google Scholar
• An J, Cho S, Tang CS (2015) Aggregating smallholder farmers in emerging economies. Production Oper. Management 24(9):1414–1429.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arifoğlu K, Deo S, Iravanis SMR (2012) Consumption externality and yield uncertainty in the influenza vaccine supply chain: Interventions in demand and supply sides. Management Sci. 58(6):1072–1091.Link, Google Scholar
• Arndt C, Pauw K, Thurlow J (2016) The economy-wide impacts and risks of Malawi’s farm input subsidy program. Amer. J. Agricultural Econom. 98(3):962–980.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bekkerman A, Belasco EJ, Smith VH (2019) Does farm size matter? Distribution of crop insurance subsidies and government program payments across US farms. Appl. Econom. Perspect. Policy 41(3):498–518.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berenguer G, Feng Q, Shanthikumar JG, Xu L (2017) The effects of subsidies on increasing consumption through for-profit and not-for-profit newsvendors. Production Oper. Management 26(6):1191–1206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Wen X, Wang B, Nie P (2017) Agricultural pollution and regulation: How to subsidize agriculture? J. Cleaner Production 164:258–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen YJ, Shanthikumar JG, Shen ZJ (2013a) Incentive for peer-to-peer information sharing in Avaaj Otalo. Preprint, submitted August 4, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2265855.Google Scholar
• Chen YJ, Shanthikumar JG, Shen ZJ (2013b) Training, production, and channel separation in ITC’s e-choupal network. Production Oper. Management 22(2):348–364.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen YJ, Tang CS (2015) The economic value of market information for farmers in developing economies. Production Oper. Management 24(9):1441–1452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen MC, Lobel R, Perakis G (2016) The impact of demand uncertainty on consumer subsidies for green technology adoption. Management Sci. 62(5):1235–1258.Link, Google Scholar
• Cui J, Lapan H, Moschini G, Cooper J (2011) Welfare impacts of alternative biofuel and energy policies. Amer. J. Agricultural Econom. 93(5):1235–1256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cui TH, Raju JS, Zhang ZJ (2007) Fairness and channel coordination. Management Sci. 53(8):1303–1314.Link, Google Scholar
• Devalkar SK, Seshadri S, Ghosh C, Mathias A (2018) Data science applications in Indian agriculture. Production Oper. Management 27(9):1701–1708.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feng Q, Shanthikumar JG (2018a) Arrangement increasing resource allocation. Methodology Comput. Appl. Probab. 20(3):935–955.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feng Q, Shanthikumar JG (2018b) How research in production and operations management may evolve in the era of big data. Production Oper. Management 27(9):1670–1684.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feng Q, Jia J, Shanthikumar JG (2019) Dynamic multisourcing with dependent supplies. Management Sci. 65(6):2770–2786.Link, Google Scholar
• Frick F, Sauer J (2018) Deregulation and productivity: Empirical evidence on dairy production. Amer. J. Agricultural Econom. 100(1):354–378.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fullerton D, Mohr RD (2002) Suggested subsidies are sub-optimal unless combined with an output tax. NBER Working Paper No. 8723, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Gale HF (2013) Growth and evolution in China’s agricultural support policies. USDA-ERS Economic Research Report No. 153, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Gale HF, Hansen J, Jewison M (2015) China’s growing demand for agricultural imports. USDA-ERS Economic Information Bulletin No. 136, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Guda H, Dawande M, Janakiraman G, Rajapakshe T (2021) An economic analysis of agricultural support prices in developing economies. Production Oper. Management 30(9):3036–3053.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta S, Dawande M, Janakiraman G, Sarkar A (2017) Distressed selling by farmers: Model, analysis, and use in policy-making. Production Oper. Management 26(10):1803–1818.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ho TH, Su X, Wu Y (2014) Distributional and peer-induced fairness in supply chain contract design. Production Oper. Management 23(2):161–175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holloway G (2002) When do export subsidies have a redistributional role? Amer. J. Agricultural Econom. 84(1):234–244.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hueth B, Marcoul P (2006) Information sharing and oligopoly in agricultural markets: The role of the cooperative bargaining association. Amer. J. Agricultural Econom. 88(4):866–881.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huh WT, Lall U (2013) Optimal crop choice, irrigation allocation, and the impact of contract farming. Production Oper. Management 22(5):1126–1143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katok E, Olsen T, Pavlov V (2014) Wholesale pricing under mild and privately known concerns for fairness. Production Oper. Management 23(2):285–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kazaz B, Webster S (2011) The impact of yield-dependent trading costs on pricing and production planning under supply uncertainty. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 13(3):404–417.Link, Google Scholar
• Kazaz B, Webster S, Yadav P (2016) Interventions for an artemisinin-based malaria medicine supply chain. Production Oper. Management 25(9):1576–1600.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levi R, Singhvi S, Zheng Y (2020) Economically motivated adulteration in farming supply chains. Management Sci. 66(1):209–226.Link, Google Scholar
• Lobel R, Perakis G (2011) Consumer choice model for forecasting demand and designing incentives for solar technology. Preprint, submitted January 27, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1748424.Google Scholar
• Lowe TJ, Preckel PV (2004) Decision technologies for agribusiness problems: A brief review of selected literature and a call for research. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 6(3):201–208.Link, Google Scholar
• Lunduka R, Ricker-Gilbert J, Fisher M (2013) What are the farm-level impacts of Malawi’s farm input subsidy program? A critical review. Agricultural Econom. 44(6):563–579.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ma Y, Wang T, Zheng H (2022) On the fairness and efficiency in nonprofit operations: Dynamic resource allocations. Production Oper. Management, ePub ahead of print January 4, https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13940.Google Scholar
• Mamani H, Adida E, Dey D (2012) Vaccine market coordination using subsidy. IIE Trans. Healthcare Systems Engrg. 2(1):78–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peng H, Pang T (2019) Optimal strategies for a three-level contract-farming supply chain with subsidy. Internat. J. Production Econom. 216:274–286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raz G, Ovchinnikov A (2015) Coordinating pricing and supply of public interest goods using government rebates and subsidies. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management 62(1):65–79.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmitz A, Schmitz TG, Rossi F (2006) Agricultural subsidies in developed countries: Impact on global welfare. Rev. Agricultural Econom. 28(3):416–425.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shi G, Chavas JP, Stiegert K (2010) An analysis of the pricing of traits in the US corn seed market. Amer. J. Agricultural Econom. 92(5):1324–1338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sodhi MS, Tang CS (2014) Supply chain research opportunities with the poor as suppliers or distributors in developing countries. Production Oper. Management 23(9):1483–1494.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tang CS, Wang Y, Zhao M (2015) The implications of utilizing market information and adopting agricultural advice for farmers in developing economies. Production Oper. Management 24(8):1197–1215.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tang CS, Wang Y, Zhao M (2019) The impact of input- vs. output-based farm subsidies on farmer welfare and income inequality in developing economies. Preprint, submitted June 7, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3182548.Google Scholar
• Taylor TA, Xiao W (2014) Subsidizing the distribution channel: Donor funding to improve the availability of malaria drugs. Management Sci. 60(10):2461–2477.Link, Google Scholar
• Taylor TA, Xiao W (2019) Donor product-subsidies to increase consumption: Implications of consumer awareness and profit-maximizing intermediaries. Production Oper. Management 28(7):1757–1772.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tong YL (1997) Some majorization orderings of heterogeneity in a class of epidemics. J. Appl. Probab. 34(1):84–93.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang W, Wei L (2021) Impacts of agricultural price support policy on price variability and welfare: Evidence from China’s soybean market. Agricultural Econom. 52(1):3–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wise TA (2005) Identifying the real winners from US agricultural policies. Technical report.Google Scholar
• Yao DD (1987) Majorization and arrangement orderings in open queueing networks. Ann. Oper. Res. 9(1):531–543.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ye F, Cai Z, Chen YJ, Li Y, Hou G (2021) Subsidize farmers or bioenergy producer? The design of a government subsidy program for a bioenergy supply chain. Naval Res. Logist. 68(8):1082–1097.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yu J (2013) Decoupled payment, domestic subsidy and trade barrier under imperfect competition. Eur. Rev. Agricultural Econom. 40(3):487–505.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yu JJ, Tang CS, Sodhi MS, Knuckles J (2020) Optimal subsidies for development supply chains. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 22(6):1131–1147.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Swaminathan JM (2020) Improved crop yields through optimized planting schedules. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 22(6):1165–1180.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhu S, Xu X, Ren X, Sun T, Oxley L, Rae A, Ma H (2016) Modeling technological bias and factor input behavior in China’s wheat production sector. Econom. Modelling 53:245–253.Crossref, Google Scholar