The Limits of Centralized Pricing in Online Marketplaces and the Value of User Control

References

• Athey S, Luca M (2019) Economists (and economics) in tech companies. J. Econom. Perspective 33(1):209–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Duflo E, Mullainathan S (2004) How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? Quart. J. Econom. 119(1):249–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bimpikis K, Candogan O, Saban D (2019) Spatial pricing in ride-sharing networks. Oper. Res. 67(3):744–769.Link, Google Scholar
• Cachon GP, Daniels KM, Lobel R (2017) The role of surge pricing on a service platform with self-scheduling capacity. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 19(3):368–384.Link, Google Scholar
• Castillo JC (2019) Who benefits from surge pricing? Preprint, submitted September 24, 2018; last revised August 9, 2022, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3245533.Google Scholar
• Castillo JC, Knoepfle D, Weyl G (2017) Surge pricing solves the wild goose chase. Proc. 2017 ACM Conf. on Econom. and Comput. (ACM, New York), 241–242.Google Scholar
• Chen MK, Rossi PE, Chevalier JA, Oehlsen E (2019) The value of flexible work: Evidence from Uber drivers. J. Political Econom. 127(6):2735–2794.Google Scholar
• Cohen P, Hahn R, Hall J, Levitt S, Metcalfe R (2016) Using big data to estimate consumer surplus: The case of Uber. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Cramer J, Krueger AB (2016) Disruptive change in the taxi business: The case of Uber. Amer. Econom. Rev. 106(5):177–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diamond PA (1971) A model of price adjustment. J. Econom. Theory 3(2):156–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dinerstein M, Einav L, Levin J, Sundaresan N (2018) Consumer price search and platform design in internet commerce. Amer. Econom. Rev. 108(7):1820–1859.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Einav L, Farronato C, Levin J (2016) Peer-to-peer markets. Annu. Rev. Econom. 8:615–635.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Einav L, Farronato C, Levin J, Sundaresan N (2018) Auctions versus posted prices in online markets. J. Political Econom. 126(1):178–215.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Einav L, Kuchler T, Levin J, Sundaresan N (2015) Assessing sale strategies in online markets using matched listings. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 7(2):215–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farronato C (2017) Pricing mechanisms in online markets. Working paper, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Filippas A, Horton JJ (2018) The tragedy of your upstairs neighbors: When is the home-sharing externality internalized?” Working paper, Fordham University, Bronx, NY.Google Scholar
• Filippas A, Horton JJ (2021) The production and consumption of social media. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Filippas A, Horton JJ, Golden J (2022) Reputation inflation. Marketing Sci. 41(4):733–745.Google Scholar
• Filippas A, Horton JJ, Golden J, Zeckhauser RJ (2020) Owning, using and renting: Some simple economics of the “sharing economy.” Management Sci. 66(9):4152–4172.Link, Google Scholar
• Fraiberger SP, Sundararajan A (2015) Peer-to-peer rental markets in the sharing economy. Working paper, NYU Stern School of Business, New York.Google Scholar
• Gerber AS, Green DP (2012) Field Experiments: Design, Analysis, and Interpretation (WW Norton).Google Scholar
• Gurvich I, Lariviere M, Moreno A (2019) Operations in the on-demand economy: Staffing services with self-scheduling capacity. Sharing Economy (Springer, Berlin), 249–278.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall JV, Horton JJ, Knoepfle DT (2018) Pricing efficiently in designed markets: Evidence from ride-sharing. Working paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Hall RE (1983) Is unemployment a macroeconomic problem? Amer. Econom. Rev. 73(2):219–222.Google Scholar
• Hayek FA (1945) The use of knowledge in society. Amer. Econom. Rev. 35(4):519–530.Google Scholar
• Hirschman AO (1970) Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States, vol. 25 (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Horton JJ (2017) The effects of algorithmic labor market recommendations: Evidence from a field experiment. J. Labor Econom. 35(2):345–385.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johari R, Li H, Liskovich I, Weintraub G (2022) Experimental design in two-sided platforms: An analysis of bias. Management Sci. 68(10):7069–7089.Google Scholar
• Li J, Moreno A, Zhang D (2016) Pros vs Joes: Agent Pricing Behavior in the Sharing Economy (Ross School of Business).Google Scholar
• Liu M, Brynjolfsson E, Dowlatabadi J (2018) Do digital platforms reduce moral hazard? The case of Uber and taxis. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Ma H, Fang F, Parkes DC (2021) Spatio-temporal pricing for ridesharing platforms. Oper. Res. 70(2):1025–1041.Google Scholar
• Sundararajan A (2016) The Sharing Economy: The End of Employment and the Rise of Crowd-Based Capitalism (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Taylor TA (2018) On-demand service platforms. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 20(4):704–720.Link, Google Scholar
• Varian HR (2010) Computer mediated transactions. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(2):1–10.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yan C, Zhu H, Korolko N, Woodard D (2020) Dynamic pricing and matching in ride-hailing platforms. Naval Res. Logist. 67(8):705–724.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zoepf SM, Chen S, Adu P, Pozo G (2018) The Economics of Ride-Hailing: Driver Revenue, Expenses and Taxes (CEEPR WP Series, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar