Customers as Friendly Shareholders: Uncovering the Complex Mutual Fund-Broker Relationship

References

• Alexander C, Chen M, Seppi D, Spatt C (2010) Interim news and the role of proxy voting advice. Rev. Financial Stud. 23:4419–4454.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anand A, Irvine P, Puckett A, Venkataraman K (2012) Performance of institutional trading desks: An analysis of persistence in trading costs. Rev. Financial Stud. 25:557–598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashraf R, Jayaraman N, Ryan HE Jr (2012) Do pension-related business ties influence mutual fund proxy voting? Evidence from shareholder proposals on executive compensation. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 47:567–588.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barbon A, Di Maggio M, Franzoni F, Landier A (2019) Brokers and order flow leakage: Evidence from fire sales. J. Finance 74:2707–2749.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bebchuk L, Hirst S (2019) Index funds and the future of corporate governance: Theory, evidence, and policy. Columbia Law Rev. 119:2029–2146.Google Scholar
• Bebchuk L, Cohen A, Ferrell A (2009) What matters in corporate governance? Rev. Financial Stud. 22:783–827.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bebchuk L, Cohen A, Hirst S (2017) The agency problems of institutional investors. J. Econom. Perspective 31:89–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benveniste L, Spindt P (1989) How investment banks determine the offer price and allocation of new issues. J. Financial Econom. 24:343–362.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bergstresser D, Chalmers J, Tufano P (2009) Assessing the costs and benefits of brokers in the mutual fund industry. Rev. Financial Stud. 22:4129–4156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bethel J, Gillian S (2002) The impact of institutional and regulatory environment on shareholder voting. Financial Management 4:29–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya U, Lee JH, Pool VK (2013) Conflicting family values in mutual fund families. J. Finance 68:173–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bolton P, Li T, Ravina E, Rosenthal H (2020) Investor ideology. J. Financial Econom. 137:320–352.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brav A, Jiang W, Li T, Pinnington J (2019) Picking friends before picking (proxy) fights: How mutual fund voting shapes proxy contests. Working Paper, Columbia University, NY.Google Scholar
• Brav A, Jiang W, Li T, Pinnington J (2023) Shareholder monitoring through voting: New evidence from proxy contests. Rev. Financial Stud. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Busse J, Jiang L, Tang Y (2021) Double-adjusted mutual fund performance. Rev. Asset Pricing Stud. 11:169–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Butler AW, Gurun U (2012) Educational networks, mutual fund voting patterns, and CEO compensation. Rev. Financial Stud. 25:2533–2562.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Calluzzo P, Kedia S (2019) Mutual fund board connections and proxy voting. J. Financial Econom. 134:669–688.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chalmers J, Reuter J (2020) Is conflicted investment advice better than no advice? J. Financial Econom. 138:366–387.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chou J, Ng L, Wang Q (2011) Are better governed funds better monitors? J. Corporate Finance 17:1254–1271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christoffersen S, Evans R, Musto D (2013) What do consumers’ fund flows maximize? Evidence from their brokers’. Incentives J. Finance 68:201–235.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen L, Schmidt B (2009) Attracting flows by attracting big clients. J. Finance 64:2125–2151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cunat V, Gine M, Guadalupe M (2012) The vote is cast: The effect of corporate governance on shareholder value. J. Finance 67:1943–1977.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cvijanović D, Dasgupta A, Zachariadis KE (2016) Ties that bind: How business connections affect mutual fund activism. J. Finance 71:2933–2966.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daniel K, Grinblatt M, Titman S, Wermers R (1997) Measuring mutual fund performance with characteristic-based benchmarks. J. Finance 52:1035–1058.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis GF, Kim EH (2007) Business ties and proxy voting by mutual funds. J. Financial Econom. 85:552–570.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Del Guercio D, Reuter J (2014) Mutual fund performance and the incentive to generate alpha. J. Finance 69:1673–1704.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Del Guercio D, Reuter J, Tkac P (2010) Broker incentives and mutual fund market segmentation. NBER Working Paper No. 16312, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Di Maggio M, Franzoni F, Kermani A, Sommavilla C (2019) The relevance of broker networks for information diffusion in the stock market. J. Financial Econom. 134:419–446.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dimmock SG, Gerken WC, Ivković Z, Weisbenner SJ (2018) Capital gains lock-in and governance choices. J. Financial Econom. 127:113–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duan Y, Hotchkiss ES, Jiaom Y (2018) Business ties and information advantage: Evidence from mutual fund trading. Contemporary Accounting Res. 35(2):866–897.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edelen R, Evans R, Kadlec G (2012) Disclosure and agency conflict: Evidence from mutual fund commission bundling. J. Financial Econom. 103:308–326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ertimur Y, Ferri F, Oesch D (2013) Shareholder votes and proxy advisors: Evidence from say on pay. J. Accounting Res. 51:951–996.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Evans R (2010) Mutual fund incubation. J. Finance 65:1581–1611.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fama EF, French KR (1993) Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. J. Financial Econom. 33:3–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferreira MA, Matos P, Pires P (2018) Asset management within commercial banking groups: International evidence. J. Finance 73:2181–2227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Firth M, Lin C, Liu P, Xuan Y (2013) The client is king: Do mutual fund relationships bias analyst recommendations? J. Accounting Res. 51:165–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gantchev N (2013) The costs of shareholder activism: Evidence from a sequential decision model. J. Financial Econom. 107:610–631.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gaspar JM, Massa M, Matos P (2006) Favoritism in mutual fund families? Evidence on strategic cross‐fund subsidization. J. Finance 61:73–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldstein MA, Irvine P, Puckett A (2011) Purchasing IPOs with commissions. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 46:1193–1225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldstein MA, Irvine P, Kandel E, Wiener Z (2009) Brokerage commissions and institutional trading patterns. Rev. Financial Stud. 22:5175–5212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gokkaya S, Liu X, Pool VK, Xie F, Zhang J (2021) Is there investment value in soft dollar arrangements? Evidence from mutual funds. Working paper, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.Google Scholar
• Golez B, Rizzo A, Zambrana R (2021) Asset managers as buyers of last resort. Working paper, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN.Google Scholar
• Hao Q, Yan XS (2012) The performance of investment bank-affiliated mutual funds: Conflicts of interest or informational advantage? J. Financial Quant. Anal. 47:537–565.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hwang C, Titman S, Wang Y (2018) Is it who you know or what you know? Evidence from IPO allocations and mutual fund performance. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 53:2491–2523.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iliev P, Lowry M (2015) Are mutual funds active voters? Rev. Financial Stud. 28:446–485.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Irvine P, Lipson M, Puckett A (2007) Tipping. Rev. Financial Stud. 20:741–768.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Juergens JL, Lindsey L (2009) Getting out early: An analysis of market making activity at the recommending analyst’s firm. J. Finance 64:2327–2359.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kacperczyk M, Sialm C, Zheng L (2008) Unobserved actions of mutual funds. Rev. Financial Stud. 21:2379–2416.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kumar N, Mullally K, Ray S, Tang Y (2020) Prime (information) brokerage. J. Financial Econom. 137:371–391.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li FW, Mukherjee A, Sen R (2021) Insider brokers. J. Financial Econom. 141(3):1096–1118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malenko A, Malenko N, Spatt C (2021) Creating controversy in proxy voting advice. NBER Working Paper No. 29036, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Malenko N, Shen Y (2016) The role of proxy advisory firms: Evidence from a regression-discontinuity design. Rev. Financial Stud. 29:3394–3427.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Matvos G, Ostrovsky M (2010) Heterogeneity and peer effects in mutual fund proxy voting. J. Financial Econom. 98:90–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCahery JA, Sautner Z, Starks LT (2016) Behind the scenes: The corporate governance preferences of institutional investors. J. Finance 71:2905–2932.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morgan A, Poulsen A, Wolf J, Yang T (2011) Mutual funds as monitors: Evidence from mutual fund voting. J. Corporate Finance 17:914–928.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nimalendran M, Ritter JR, Zhang D (2007) Do today’s trades affect tomorrow’s IPO allocations? J. Financial Econom. 84:87–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pool VK, Stoffman N, Yonker S (2015) The people in your neighborhood: Social interactions and mutual fund portfolios. J. Finance 70:2679–2733.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Qian H, Zhong Z (2018) Do hedge funds possess private information in IPO stocks? Evidence from post-IPO holdings. Rev. Asset Pricing Stud. 8:117–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reuter J (2006) Are IPO allocations for sale? Evidence from mutual funds. J. Finance 61:2289–2324.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spatt C (2021) Proxy advisory firms, governance, market failure, and regulation. Rev. Corporate Finance Stud. 10:136–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stoughton NM, Wu Y, Zechner J (2011) Intermediated investment management. J. Finance 66:947–980.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wermers R (2000) Mutual fund performance: An empirical decomposition into stock-picking talent, style, transaction costs, and expenses. J. Finance 55:1655–1695.Crossref, Google Scholar