Emergency Preparation and Uncertainty Persistence
References
- (2017) Information percolation, momentum and reversal. J. Financial Econom. 123(3):617–645.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Investor attention and stock market volatility. Rev. Financial Stud. 28(1):33–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Dynamic information acquisition and strategic trading. Working paper, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
- (2010) Disagreement and learning: Dynamic patterns of trade. J. Finance 65(4):1269–1302.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) The impact of uncertainty shocks. Econometrica 77(3):623–685.Google Scholar
- (2009) Thinking ahead: The decision problem. Rev. Econom. Stud. 76(4):1205–1238.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Salience theory of choice under risk. Quart. J. Econom. 127(3):1243–1285.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013a) Salience and asset prices. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(3):623–628.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013b) Salience and consumer choice. J. Political Econom. 121(5):803–843.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) The sound of many funds rebalancing. Rev. Asset Pricing Stud. 11(3):502–551.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Parameter learning in general equilibrium: The asset pricing implications. Amer. Econom. Rev. 106(3):664–698.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Asymmetric information and inventory concerns in over-the-counter markets. Preprint, submitted July 10, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2464399.Google Scholar
- (2010) Non-Bayesian learning. B.E. J. Theoretical Econom. 10(1):1–20.Google Scholar
- (1986) Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model. Perception Psychophysics 40(4):225–240.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1985) Bid, ask and transaction prices in a specialist market with heterogeneously informed traders. J. Financial Econom. 14(1):71–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Herodotus (1920) Histories. Godley AD, ed. Complete Works (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
- (2020) The tail that wags the economy: Beliefs and persistent stagnation. J. Political Econom. 128(8):2839–2879.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Optimal sticky prices under rational inattention. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(3):769–803.Google Scholar
- (2018) Lack of preparation for rare events. J. Monetary Econom. 100:35–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Dynamic rational inattention: Analytical results. J. Econom. Theory 176:650–692.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Averting catastrophes: The strange economics of Scylla and Charybdis. Amer. Econom. Rev. 105(10):2947–2985.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Rationally inattentive seller: Sales and discrete pricing. Rev. Econom. Stud. 83(3)1125–1155.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Rational inattention to discrete choices: A new foundation for the multinomial logit model. Amer. Econom. Rev. 105(1):272–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Man-bites-dog business cycles. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(8):2320–2367.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Inattention and belief polarization. J. Econom. Theory 180:203–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Understanding uncertainty shocks and the role of black swans. NBER Working Paper No. 20445, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1980) Attention and the detection of signals. J. Experiment. Psych. General 109(2):160–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1977) Optimal allocation of cognitive resources to spatial locations. J. Experiment. Psych. Human Perception Performance 3(2):201–211.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) Implications of rational inattention. J. Monetary Econom. 50(3):665–690.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Rational inattention dynamics: Inertia and delay in decision-making. Econometrica 85(2):521–553.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Valchev R, Ilut C (2017) Economic agents as imperfect problem solvers. 2017 Meeting Papers. No. 1285. Society for Economic Dynamics.Google Scholar
- (2009) Information immobility and the home bias puzzle. J. Finance 64(3):1187–1215.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Inattentive valuation and reference-dependent choice. Unpublished manuscript, Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar

