The Impact of Input and Output Farm Subsidies on Farmer Welfare, Income Disparity, and Consumer Surplus
References
- (1978) Price support vs. fertilizer subsidy for increasing rice production in Bangladesh. Bangladesh Development Stud. 6(2):119–138.Google Scholar
- (2011) Glut has Gujarat potato farmers in a rut, govt mulls transport subsidy. Accessed November 1, 2019, http://archive.indianexpress.com/news/glut-has-gujarat-potato-farmers-in-a-rut-govt-mulls-transport-subsidy/868799/.Google Scholar
- (2016) Agricultural supply chains under government interventions. Working paper, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
- (2019) An analysis of price vs. revenue protection: Government subsidies in the agriculture industry. Management Sci. 65(1):32–49.Link, Google Scholar
- (2015) Aggregating smallholder farmers in emerging economies. Production Oper. Management 24(9):1414–1429.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) A two-sided incentive program for coordinating the influenza vaccine supply chain. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 24(1):235–255.Link, Google Scholar
- (1976) Price support vs. input subsidy for food self-sufficiency in developing countries. Amer. J. Agricultural Econom. 58(4):617–628.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Average Production Cost and Profit Margin of Pulse, Oilseed, Spice and Commercial Crops 2071/2071 (Ministry of Agriculture Development Department of Agriculture, Lalitpur, Nepal).Google Scholar
- (2019) Tackling inequality in India: Is the 2019 election campaign up to the challenge? World Inequality Database. Accessed August 10, 2021, https://wid.world/document/india2019/.Google Scholar
- (1993) The reform of public expenditures for agriculture. World Bank Discussion Paper 216, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- (2021) Budgeting in Thailand. OECD J. Budgeting 20(3).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Agricultural Supply Chain Management Research: Operations and Analytics in Planting, Selling, and Government Interventions. (Springer Series in Supply Chain Management, New York).Google Scholar
- Chakravorty S, Chandrasekhar S, Naraparaju K (2019) Land distribution, income generation and inequality in India’s agricultural sector. Rev. Income Wealth 65: S182–S203.Google Scholar
- (1992) On the design of agricultural policy mechanisms. Amer. J. Agricultural Econom. 74(3):646–654.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) The economic value of market information for farmers in developing economies. Production Oper. Management 24(9):1441–1452.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Cropland allocation effects of agricultural input subsidies in Malawi. World Development 40(1):124–133.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Crop minimum support price vs. cost subsidy: Farmer and consumer welfare. Production Oper. Management 31(4):1753–1769.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Chinyamakobvu T (2012) Point-of-output subsidy will boost farming. Accessed May 3, 2022, https://www.cfuzim.com/2012/05/07/point-of-output-subsidy-will-boost-farming/.Google Scholar
- (1977) Rational expectations in American agriculture 1867–1914. Rev. Econom. Statist. 59(1):9–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Income inequality in Malawi: Does the farm input subsidy play a role? Working paper, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.Google Scholar
- (2016) Food vs. fiber: An analysis of agricultural support policy in Turkey. Food Policy 61:1–8.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Toward resilient agriculture value chains: Challenges and opportunities. Production Oper. Management 30(3):666–675.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Rethinking agricultural input subsidy programmes in developing countries. Elbehri A, Sarris A, eds. Nondistorting Farm Support to Enhance Global Food Production (Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome), 311–374.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) The Malawi agricultural input subsidy programme: 2005-06 to 2008-09. Internat. J. Agricultural Sustainability 9(1):232–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1984) A rational expectations model of agricultural supply. J. Political Econom. 92(1):1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Yield and yield gaps in central U.S. corn production systems. Agronomy J. 106(6):2248–2254.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Investment, subsidies, and pro-poor growth in rural India. Agricultural Econom. 39(2):163–170.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Supply chain analysis of contract farming. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 21(2):361–378.Link, Google Scholar
- (1997) Effects of the subsidy removal of fertilizer on rural poverty in north Sulawesi, Indonesia. Internat. J. Soc. Econom. 24(1–3):207–222.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1982) Rational expectations in agricultural economics research and policy analysis. Amer. J. Agricultural Econom. 64(2):260–265.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1956) The contribution of farm price support programs to general economic stability. Policies to Combat Depression (NBER), 295–356.Google Scholar
- (2017) Sudanese farmers lament high cost of sesame harvest. Accessed October 27, 2019, https://www.dabangasudan.org/en/all-news/article/sudanese-farmers-lament-high-cost-of-sesame-harvest.Google Scholar
- (2016) The Gini concentration index: A review of the inference literature. J. Econom. Surveys 31(4):1130–1148.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Global Agricultural Information Network (2017) Thailand: Grain and feed update. GAIN Report TH7113. USDA Foreign Agricultural Service, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- (1982) Testing the rational expectations hypothesis in an agricultural market. Rev. Econom. Statist. 64(4):658–667.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) An economic analysis of agricultural support prices in developing economies. Production Oper. Management 30(9):3036–3053.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) On the formation of producers’ information-sharing coalitions. Production Oper. Management 27(5):917–927.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Agricultural partnership for dairy farming. Production Oper. Management 28(12):3042–3059.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Socially beneficial rationality: The value of strategic farmers, social entrepreneurs and for-profit firms in crop planting decisions. Management Sci. 65(8):3654–3672.Link, Google Scholar
- (1974) Optimal agricultural pest management with increasing pest resistance. Amer. J. Agricultural Econom. 56(3):543–552.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Input prices have pulled down farm income. Accessed August 23, 2019, http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/economy/agri-business/input-prices-have-pulled-down-farm-income/article9828657.ece.Google Scholar
- (2013) Input subsidy programs in Sub-Saharan Africa: A synthesis of recent evidence. Agricultural Econom. 44(6):547–562.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1982) Modelling equity and efficiency in agricultural production systems. International Association of Agricultural Economists Conference (IAAE, Toronto), 120–138.Google Scholar
- (2004) Production planning under yield and demand uncertainty with yield-dependent cost and price. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 6(3):209–224.Link, Google Scholar
- (2009) Transfer efficiency and distributional impacts of U.S. farm support: Evidence from a macro-micro simulation. Agricultural Appl. Econom. Assoc. 91(5):1289–1295.Google Scholar
- (2015) Decentralised beneficiary targeting in large-scale development programmes: Insights from the Malawi farm input subsidy programme. J. African Econom. 24(1):26–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) Agriculture in developing countries: Which way forward? Trade-Related Agenda, Development and Equity South Centre, occasional paper (4). Accessed May 3, 2023, https://www.iatp.org/sites/default/files/Agriculture_in_Developing_Countries_Which_Way_.htm.Google Scholar
- (2021) China’s Xi Jinping talks of “common prosperity” as the rich get richer, with little indication of how it will reduce inequality. South China Morning Post. Accessed August 10, 2021, https://www.scmp.com/economy/china-economy/article/3117755/chinas-xi-jinping-talks-common-prosperity-rich-get-richer.Google Scholar
- (2019) Information provision policies for improving farmer welfare in developing countries: Heterogeneous farmers and market selection. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 21(2):254–270.Link, Google Scholar
- (2008) Strategic capacity rationing to induce early purchases. Management Sci. 54(6):1115–1131.Link, Google Scholar
- (1905) Methods of measuring the concentration of wealth. Publications Amer. Statist. Assoc. 9(70):209–219.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Insufficient support to agricultural development. Accessed February 20, 2022, http://www.hungerexplained.org/Hungerexplained/Insufficient_support.html.Google Scholar
- (2010) Maize prices in South Africa: Can the producer increase his revenue by marketing grain through cattle? 2010 AAAE Third Conference/AEASA 48th Conference (AAAE), 1–25.Google Scholar
- (2015) Do input subsidies reduce poverty among smallholder farm households? Evidence from Zambia. International Association of Agricultural Economists Conference (IAAE, Toronto), 1–36.Google Scholar
- (2018) Agricultural inputs subsidy in Nigeria: An overview of the growth enhancement support scheme (GESS). Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis 66(3):781–789.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2009) Agricultural policies in emerging economies 2009: Monitoring and evaluation. OECD.Google Scholar
- (2022) Surging fertilizer costs make it harder for farmers to earn a living, provide for their families, and feed the world. Accessed August 1, 2022, https://www.businessinsider.nl/surging-fertilizer-costs-make-it-harder-for-farmers-to-earn-a-living-provide-for-their-families-and-feed-the-world/.Google Scholar
- (1982) Relative cost-effectiveness of input and output subsidies. Australian J. Agricultural Econom. 26(1):1–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Subsidy reform: Seeding change through direct benefit transfer. Accessed February 18, 2019, http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/subsidy-reform-seeding-change-through-direct-benefit-transfer/.Google Scholar
- (2020) Operational and financial decisions within proportional investment cooperatives. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 22(3):545–561.Link, Google Scholar
- (1989) Agricultural supply response: A survey. Agricultural Econom. 3(1):1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) A tale of two food chains: The duality of practices on well-being. Production Oper. Management 30(3):783–801.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Are fairness perceptions shaped by income inequality? Evidence from Latin America. J. Econom. Inequality 20(4):893–913.Google Scholar
- (2018) Farm distress: Why the potato isn’t hot in Bengal this season. Accessed January 8, 2018, http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/economy/agri-business/farm-distress-why-the-potato-isnt-hot-in-bengal-this-season/article10020466.ece.Google Scholar
- (2013) 34% marginal farmers in Punjab living below poverty line. Accessed November 22, 2022, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/34-marginal-farmers-in-Punjab-living-below-poverty-line/articleshow/26176039.cms.Google Scholar
- (2022) Promoting electric vehicles: Reducing charging inconvenience and price via station and consumer subsidies. Production Oper. Management 31(12):4333–4350.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1985) Price-support vs. fertiliser subsidy: An evaluation. Econom. Political Weekly 20(13):A17–A22.Google Scholar
- (2013) Hybrid seed, income, and inequality among smallholder maize farmers in Zambia. Working paper, Indaba Agricultural Policy Research Institute, Lusaka, Zambia.Google Scholar
- (2014) Supply chain research opportunities with the poor as suppliers or distributors in developing countries. Production Oper. Management 23(9):1483–1494.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Evolution of the economics of agricultural policy. Amer. J. Agricultural Econom. 92(2):403–423.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Selling to strategic consumers when product value is uncertain: The value of matching supply and demand. Management Sci. 57(10):1737–1751.Link, Google Scholar
- (2015) The implications of utilizing market information and adopting agricultural advice for farmers in developing economies. Production Oper. Management 24(8):1197–1215.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Input- vs. output-based farm subsidies in developing economies: Farmer welfare and income inequality. Boyabatlı O, Kazaz B, Tang CS, eds. Agricultural Supply Chain Management Research, Springer Book Series in Supply Chain Management, 265–286.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Sourcing from suppliers with financial constraints and performance risk. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 20(1):70–84.Link, Google Scholar
- United Nations (2018) The sustainable development goals report. Accessed January 5, 2023, https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2018/overview/.Google Scholar
- Wiggins S, Brooks J (2010) The use of input subsidies in developing countries. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. Accessed November 29, 2022, https://www.almendron.com/tribuna/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/46340359.pdf.Google Scholar
- (2020) Knowledge sharing and learning among smallholders in developing economies: Implications, incentives, and reward mechanisms. Oper. Res. 68(2):435–452.Abstract, Google Scholar
- (2009) Do input subsidy programs “crowd in” or “crowd out” commercial market development? Modeling fertilizer demand in a two-channel marketing system. Agricultural Econom. 40(1):79–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Financing an agricultural supply chain with a capital-constrained smallholder farmer in developing economies. Production Oper. Management 30(7):2102–2121.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Optimal subsidies for development supply chains. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 22(6):1131–1147.Link, Google Scholar
- (2019) Designing contracts and sourcing channels to create shared value. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 21(2):271–289.Link, Google Scholar
- (2020) Improved crop productivity through optimized planting schedules. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 22(6):1165–1180.Link, Google Scholar
- (2018) China is running a winning race against its poverty. Accessed January 3, 2018, http://usa.chinadaily.com.cn/a/201801/03/WS5a4cf9e9a31008cf16da4ee5.html.Google Scholar
- (2021) Information provision and farmer welfare in developing economies. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 23(1):230–245.Link, Google Scholar

