Motivating Experts to Contribute to Digital Public Goods: A Personalized Field Experiment on Wikipedia

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4852

References

  • Adamic LA, Zhang J, Bakshy E, Ackerman MS (2008) Knowledge sharing and Yahoo answers: Everyone knows something. Proc. 17th Internat. Conf. on World Wide Web (ACM, New York), 665–674.Google Scholar
  • Ai C, Norton EC (2003) Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Econom. Lett. 80(1):123–129.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Akerlof GA, Kranton RE (2000) Economics and identity. Quart. J. Econom. 115(3):715–753.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Algan Y, Benkler Y, Morell MF, Hergueux J (2013) Cooperation in a peer production economy experimental evidence from Wikipedia. Proc. Workshop on Inform. Systems and Econom. (ACM, New York), 1–31.Google Scholar
  • Andreoni J, Bernheim DB (2009) Social image and the 50–50 norm: A theoretical and experimental analysis of audience effects. Econometrica 77(5):1607–1636.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ariely D, Bracha A, Meier S (2009) Doing good or doing well? Image motivation and monetary incentives in behaving prosocially. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(1):544–555.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bénabou R, Tirole J (2006) Incentives and prosocial behavior. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(5):1652–1678.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bergstrom T, Blume L, Varian H (1986) On the private provision of public goods. J. Public Econom. 29(1):25–49.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bobrow DG, Whalen J (2002) Community knowledge sharing in practice: The Eureka story. J. Soc. Organ. Learn. 4(2):47–59.Google Scholar
  • Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Machine Learn. 45(1):5–32.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen Y (2008) Incentive-compatible mechanisms for pure public goods: A survey of experimental research. Plott C, Smith V, eds. The Handbook of Experimental Economics Results, vol.1 (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 625–643.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen R, Chen Y (2011) The potential of social identity for equilibrium selection. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(6):2562–2589.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen Y, Liang Y (2022) Group size and efficient contribution level in voluntary contribution mechanism. Working paper, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
  • Chen Y, Ho TH, Kim YM (2010) Knowledge market design: A field experiment at Google Answers. J. Public Econom. Theory 12(4):641–664.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chetty R, Saez E, Sandor L (2014) What policies increase prosocial behavior? An experiment with referees at the Journal of Public Economics. J. Econom. Perspective 28(3):169–188.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chuan A, Samek AS (2014) “Feel the warmth” glow: A field experiment on manipulating the act of giving. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 108:198–211.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clark HH (1973) The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 12(4):335–359.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cosley D, Frankowski D, Terveen L, Riedl J (2007) SuggestBot: Using intelligent task routing to help people find work in Wikipedia. Proc. 12th Internat. Conf. on Intelligent User Interfaces (ACM, New York), 32–41.Google Scholar
  • DellaVigna S, Pope D (2017) What motivates effort? Evidence and expert forecasts. Rev. Econom. Stud. 85(2):1029–1069.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Doyle K (2016) Xerox’s Eureka: A 20-year-old knowledge management platform that still performs. Field Service Digital. https://fsd.servicemax.com/2016/01/22/xeroxs-eureka-20-year-old-knowledge-management-platform-still-performs/.Google Scholar
  • Eckel CC, Grossman PJ (2005) Managing diversity by creating team identity. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 58(3):371–392.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edelman B (2012) Earnings and ratings at Google Answers. Econom. Inquiry 50(2):309–320.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fudenberg D, Liang A (2019) Predicting and understanding initial play. Amer. Econom. Rev. 109(12).Google Scholar
  • Gallus J (2016) Fostering public good contributions with symbolic awards: A large-scale natural field experiment at Wikipedia. Management Sci. 63(12):3999–4015.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Goeree JK, Holt CA, Laury SK (2002) Private costs and public benefits: Unraveling the effects of altruism and noisy behavior. J. Public Econom. 83(2):255–276.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Groves T, Ledyard JO (1987) Incentive compatibility since 1972. Groves T, Radner R, Reiter S, eds. Information, Incentives and Economic Mechanisms: Essays in Honor of Leonid Hurwicz (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis), 48–111.Google Scholar
  • Hinnosaar M (2019) Gender inequality in new media: Evidence from Wikipedia. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 163:262–276.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hinnosaar M, Hinnosaar T, Kummer M, Slivko O (2021) Wikipedia matters. J. Econom. Management Strategy. 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/jems.12421.Google Scholar
  • Hinnosaar M, Hinnosaar T, Kummer ME, Slivko O (2022) Externalities in knowledge production: Evidence from a randomized field experiment. Experiment. Econom. 25(2):706–733.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Isaac RM, Walker JM (1988) Group size effects in public goods provision: The voluntary contributions mechanism. Quart. J. Econom. 103(1):179–199.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Isaac RM, Walker JM, Williams AW (1994) Group size and the voluntary provision of public goods: Experimental evidence utilizing large groups. J. Public Econom. 54(1):1–36.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jorgensen B (1987) Exponential dispersion models. J. Royal Statist. Soc. B 49(2):127–162.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kessler JB, Milkman KL (2018) Identity in charitable giving. Management Sci. 64(2):845–859.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kleinberg J, Ludwig J, Mullainathan S, Obermeyer Z (2015) Prediction policy problems. Amer. Econom. Rev. 105(5):491–495.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kriplean T, Beschastnikh I, McDonald DW (2008) Articulations of Wikiwork: Uncovering valued work in Wikipedia through barnstars. Proc. ACM Conf. on Comput. Supported Cooperative Work (ACM, New York), 47–56.Google Scholar
  • Krippendorff K (2003) Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology, 2nd ed. (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Ledyard J (1995) Public goods: A survey of experimental research. Kagel JH, Roth AE, eds. The Handbook of Experimental Economics, vol. 1 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 111–181.Google Scholar
  • Manning CD, Schütze H (1999) Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Miller R (2004) Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales responds. Slashdot (July 28), https://slashdot.org/story/04/07/28/1351230/wikipedia-founder-jimmy-wales-responds.Google Scholar
  • Mullainathan S, Spiess J (2017) Machine learning: An applied econometric approach. J. Econom. Perspective 31(2):87–106.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rege M, Telle K (2004) The impact of social approval and framing on cooperation in public good situations. J. Public Econom. 88(7):1625–1644.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Samuelson PA (1954) The pure theory of public expenditure. Rev. Econom. Statist. 36(4):387–389.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shafee T, Masukume G, Kipersztok L, Das D, Häggström M, Heilman J (2017) Evolution of Wikipedia’s medical content: Past, present and future. J. Epidemiology Community Health 71(11):1122–1129.Google Scholar
  • Shrout PE, Fleiss JL (1979) Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psych. Bull. 86(2):420–428.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Šidák Z (1967) Rectangular confidence regions for the means of multivariate normal distributions. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 62(318):626–633.Google Scholar
  • Singhal A (2001) Modern information retrieval: A brief overview. IEEE Data Engrg. Bull. 24(4):35–43.Google Scholar
  • Strayhorn S Jr, McDermott JF, Tanguay P (1993) An intervention to improve the reliability of manuscript reviews for the Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. Amer. J. Psychiatry 150(6):947–952.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stukas AA, Worth KA, Clary EG, Snyder M (2009) The matching of motivations to affordances in the volunteer environment: An index for assessing the impact of multiple matches on volunteer outcomes. Nonprofit Volunteer Sector Quart. 38(1):5–28.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thompson N, Hanley D (2018) Science is shaped by Wikipedia: Evidence from a randomized control trial. MIT Sloan Research Paper No. 5238-17. Preprint, submitted February 13, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3039505.Google Scholar
  • Vesterlund L (2015) Using experimental methods to understand why and how we give to charity. Kagel JH, Roth AE, eds. The Handbook of Experimental Economics, vol. 2 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 91–152.Google Scholar
  • Wang Y-C, Kraut R, Levine JM (2012) To stay or leave?: The relationship of emotional and informational support to commitment in online health support groups. Proc. ACM Conf. on Comput. Supported Cooperative Work (ACM, New York), 833–842.Google Scholar
  • Zhang XM, Zhu F (2011) Group size and incentives to contribute: A natural experiment at Chinese Wikipedia. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(4):1601–1615.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.