Measuring Deterrence Motives in Dynamic Oligopoly Games

References

• Aguirregabiria V (2010) Some useful properties and formulas for random utility models with logit, nested logit, and ordered nested logit stochastic components. Unpublished manuscript, University of Toronto, Toronto.Google Scholar
• Aguirregabiria V, Ho C-Y (2012) A dynamic oligopoly game of the US airline industry: Estimation and policy experiments. J. Econometrics 168:56–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aguirregabiria V, Mira P (2007) Sequential estimation of dynamic discrete games. Econometrica 75:1–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aguirregabiria V, Suzuki J (2014) Identification and counterfactuals in dynamic models of market entry and exit. Quant. Marketing Econom. 12(3):267–304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anton M, Azar J, Gine M, Lin LX (2022) Beyond the target: M&A decisions and rival ownership. J. Financial Econom. 144(1):44–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azar J, Schmalz MC, Tecu I (2018) Anticompetitive effects of common ownership. J. Finance 73(4):1513–1565.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Backus M, Conlon C, Sinkinson M (2021) Common ownership in America: 1980–2017. Amer. Econom. J.:Microeconom. 13(3):273–308.Google Scholar
• Bajari P, Benkard CL, Levin J (2007) Estimating dynamic models of imperfect competition. Econometrica 75(5):1331–1370.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Besanko D, Doraszelski U, Kryukov Y (2014) The economics of predation: What drives pricing when there is learning-by-doing? Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(3):868–897.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Besanko D, Doraszelski U, Kryukov Y (2019) Sacrifice tests for predation in a dynamic pricing model: Ordover and Willig (1981) and Cabral and Riordan (1997) meet Ericson and Pakes (1995). Internat. J. Industry Organ. 70:102522.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blevins J, Khwaja A, Yang N (2018) Firm expansion, size spillovers and market dominance in retail chain dynamics. Management Sci. 64:4070–4093.Link, Google Scholar
• Bonanno G (1987) Location, choice, product proliferation and entry deterrence. Rev. Econom. Stud. 54:37–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borkovsky R, Doraszelski U, Kryukov Y (2010) A user’s guide to solving dynamic stochastic games using the homotopy method. Oper. Res. 58(4-part-2):1116–1132.Google Scholar
• Chang H-H, Daniel Sokol D (2022) How incumbents respond to competition from innovative disruptors in the sharing economy—The impact of Airbnb on hotel performance. Strategic Management J. 43(3):425–446.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ching AT, Lim H (2020) A structural model of correlated learning and late-mover advantages: The case of statins. Management Sci. 66(3):1095–1123.Link, Google Scholar
• Choi C-J, Scarpa C (1992) Credible spatial preemption through reputation extension. Internat. J. Industry Organ. 10:439–447.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conlin M, Kadiyali V (2006) Entry-deterring capacity in the Texas lodging industry. J. Econom. Management Strategy 15(1):167–185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cookson JA (2018) Anticipated entry and entry deterrence: Evidence from the American casino industry. Management Sci. 64(5):2325–2344.Link, Google Scholar
• Cosman J (2014) Industry dynamics and the value of variety in nightlife: Evidence from Chicago. Working paper, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.Google Scholar
• Cunningham C, Ederer F, Ma S (2021) Killer acquisitions. J. Political Econom. 129(3):649–702.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dafny LS (2005) Games hospitals play: Entry deterrence in hospital procedure markets. J. Econom. Management Strategy 14(3):513–542.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DellaVigna S, Gentzkow M (2019) Uniform pricing in us retail chains. Quart. J. Econom. 134(4):2011–2084.Google Scholar
• Dixit A (1980) The role of investment in entry-deterrence. Econom. J. (London) 90(357):95–106.Google Scholar
• Donnenfeld S, Weber S (1995) Limit qualities and entry deterrence. RAND J. Econom. 26(1):113–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doraszelski U, Satterthwaite M (2010) Computable Markov-perfect industry dynamics. RAND J. Econom. 41(2):215–243.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eaton C, Lipsey R (1979) The theory of market preemption: The persistence of excess capacity and monopoly in growing spatial markets. Economica 46(182):149–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellison G, Ellison S (2011) Strategic entry deterrence and the behavior of pharmaceutical incumbents prior to patent expiration. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 3:1–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ericson R, Pakes A (1995) Markov-perfect industry dynamics: A framework for empirical work. Rev. Econom. Stud. 62(1):53–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D, Tirole J (1984) The fat-cat effect, the puppy-dog ploy, and the lean and hungry look. Amer. Econom. Rev. 74(2):361–366.Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D, Tirole J (1985) Preemption and rent equalization in the adoption of new technology. Rev. Econom. Stud. 52:383–402.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D, Tirole J (1991) Game Theory (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Gil R, Houde J-F, Sun S, Takahashi Y (2021) Preemptive Entry and Technology Diffusion: The Market for Drive-in Theaters (National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilbert R, Harris R (1984) Competition with lumpy investment. RAND J. Econom. 15:197–212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilbert R, Newberry D (1982) Preemptive patenting and the persistent of monopoly. Amer. Econom. Rev. 72:514–526.Google Scholar
• Gilbert R, Vives X (1986) Entry deterrence and the free rider problem. Rev. Econom. Stud. 53(1):71–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goolsbee A, Syverson C (2008) How do incumbents respond to the threat of entry? Evidence from the major airlines. Quart. J. Econom. 123(4):1611–1633.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haan MA (2003) Vaporware as a means of entry deterrence. J. Industry Econom. 51(3):345–358.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hadfield G (1991) Credible spatial preemption through franchising. RAND J. Econom. 22(4):531–543.Google Scholar
• Hotz J, Miller R (1993) Conditional choice probabilities and the estimation of dynamic models. Rev. Econom. Stud. 60:497–529.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hünermund P, Schmidt-Dengler P, Takahashi Y (2014) Entry and shakeout in dynamic oligopoly. Working paper, KU Leuven.Google Scholar
• IBISWorld (2021) Coffee & snack shops in Canada: Market size 2005–2027. IBISWorld IExpert Research Reports in Canada (IBISWorld, Manhattan, NY). Accessed July 6, 2023, https://www.ibisworld.com/canada/market-size/coffee-snack-shops/.Google Scholar
• Igami M, Yang N (2016) Unobserved heterogeneity in dynamic games: Cannibalization and preemptive entry of Hamburger chains in Canada. Quant. Econom. 7(2):483–521.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jeziorski P (2014) Estimation of cost efficiencies from mergers: Application to US radio. RAND J. Econom. 45(4):816–846.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Judd K (1985) Credible spatial preemption. RAND J. Econom. 16:153–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kadiyali V (1996) Entry, its deterrence, and its accommodation: A study of the US photographic film industry. RAND J. Econom. 27(3):452–478.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee RS, Pakes A (2009) Multiple equilibria and selection by learning in an applied setting. Econom. Lett. 104(1):13–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Gupta S, John Zhang Z (2006) Note on self-restraint as an online entry-deterrence strategy. Management Sci. 52(11):1799–1809.Link, Google Scholar
• Long KA (2020) Starbucks demands landlords lower its rent for the next year, citing ‘staggering economic crisis’ of coronavirus. The Seattle Times (May 13), https://www.seattletimes.com/business/real-estate/starbucks-demands-landlords-lower-its-rent-for-the-next-year-citing-staggering-economic-crisis-of-coronavirus/.Google Scholar
• Love J (1995) McDonald’s: Behind the Arches (Bantam Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Marr B (2018) Starbucks: Using big data, analytics and artificial intelligence to boost performance. Forbes (May 28), https://www.forbes. com/sites/bernardmarr/2018/05/28/starbucks-using-big-data-analytics-and-artificial-intelligence-to-boost-performance.Google Scholar
• Nath S (2020) The retail apocalypse: Staying ahead during COVID-19. Business Review at Berkeley (November 10), https://businessreview.berkeley.edu/the-retail-apocalypse-staying-ahead-during-covid-19/.Google Scholar
• Nishida M, Yang N (2020) Threat of entry and organizational-form choice: The case of franchising in retailing. J. Marketing Res. 57(5):810–830.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pakes A, McGuire P (1994) Computing Markov-perfect Nash equilibria: Numerical implications of a dynamic differentiated product model. RAND J. Econom. 25(4):555–589.Google Scholar
• Rao VR, Yu Y, Umashankar N (2016) Anticipated vs. actual synergy in merger partner selection and post-merger innovation. Marketing Sci. 35(6):934–952.Link, Google Scholar
• Rozenfeld HD, Rybski D, Andrade JS, Batty M, Stanley HE, Makse HA (2008) Laws of population growth. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105(48):18702–18707.Google Scholar
• Ryan S (2012) The costs of environmental regulation in a concentrated industry. Econometrica 80(3):1019–1061.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmalensee R (1978) Entry deterrence in the ready-to-eat breakfast cereal industry. Bell J. Econom. 9:305–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schumpeter JA (1982) The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle (1912/1934) (Transaction Publishers).Google Scholar
• Seamans RC (2012) Fighting city hall: Entry deterrence and technology upgrades in cable TV markets. Management Sci. 58(3):461–475.Link, Google Scholar
• Shankar V (1997) Pioneers’ marketing mix reactions to entry in different competitive game structures: Theoretical analysis and empirical illustration. Marketing Sci. 16(3):271–293.Link, Google Scholar
• Shankar V (1999) New product introduction and incumbent response strategies: Their interrelationship and the role of multimarket contact. J. Marketing Res. 36(3):327–344.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shankar V (2006) Proactive and reactive product line strategies: Asymmetries between market leaders and followers. Management Sci. 52(2):276–292.Link, Google Scholar
• Shen Q, Villas-Boas JM (2010) Strategic entry before demand takes off. Management Sci. 56(8):1259–1271.Link, Google Scholar
• Shen Q, Xiao P (2014) McDonald’s and KFC in China: Competitors or companions? Marketing Sci. 33(2):287–307.Link, Google Scholar
• Sriram S, Kadiyali V (2009) Empirical investigation of channel reactions to brand introductions. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 26(4):345–355.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sweeting A, Roberts JW, Gedge C (2020) A model of dynamic limit pricing with an application to the airline industry. J. Political Econom. 128(3):1148–1193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor K (2017) Starbucks’ biggest competition isn’t Dunkin’ Donuts—It’s your neighborhood hipster coffee shop. Business Insider, https://www.businessinsider.com/starbucks-competition-independent-coffee-shops-2017-3.Google Scholar
• Tedesco T (2013) Rivals’ attack on Tim Hortons in morning market forces menu shakeup. Financial Post, https://financialpost.com/news/fp-street/rivals-attack-of-tim-hortons-in-morning-market-forces-shakeup.Google Scholar
• The Economist (2014) Corporate sardines: Free exchange. The Economist (May 3), https://www.economist.com/finance-and-economics/2014/05/03/corporate-sardines.Google Scholar
• Thomas D (2018) The Tim Hortons brand is badly broken. Here’s how to fix it. Maclean’s, https://macleans.ca/economy/business/the-tim-hortons-brand-is-badly-broken-heres-how-to-fix-it/.Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Justice (2008) Competition and monopoly: Single-firm conduct under section 2 of the Sherman Act. Accessed July 6, 2023, https://www.justice.gov/archives/atr/competition-and-monopoly-single-firm-conduct-under-section-2-sherman-act-chapter-1.Google Scholar
• Viscusi K, Vernon J, Harrington J (2005) Economics of Regulation and Antitrust, 4th ed. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Vitorino MA (2012) Empirical entry games with complementarities: An application to the shopping center industry. J. Marketing Res. 49(2):175–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilson R (1992) Strategic models of entry deterrence. Aumann RJ, Hart S, eds. Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 305–329.Google Scholar
• Yang N (2018) An empirically tractable dynamic oligopoly model: Application to store entry and exit in dutch grocery retail. Marketing Sci. 37(6):1029–1049.Link, Google Scholar
• Yang N (2020) Learning in retail entry. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 37(2):336–355.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zheng F (2016) Spatial competition and preemptive entry in the discount retail industry. Working paper, Columbia Business School, New York.Google Scholar