Acquisitions and Technology Value Revision

References

• Acemoglu D, Griffith R, Aghion P, Zilibotti F (2010) Vertical integration and technology: Theory and evidence. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 8(5):989–1033.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aghion P, Howitt P (1992) A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica 60(2):323–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G, Katila R (2001) Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: A longitudinal study. Strategic Management J. 22(3):197–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ali U, Hirshleifer D (2020) Shared analyst coverage: Unifying momentum spillover effects. J. Financial Econom. 136(3):649–675.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arts S, Cassiman B, Gomez JC (2018) Text matching to measure patent similarity. Strategic Management J. 39(1):62–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baghai R, Silva R, Ye L (2019) Teams and bankruptcy. Working paper, Swedish House of Finance Research Paper No. 17–19, European Corporate Governance Institute–Finance Working Paper No. 626/2019, LawFin Working Paper No. 46, Stockholm.Google Scholar
• Barney JB (1988) Returns to bidding firms in mergers and acquisitions: Reconsidering the relatedness hypothesis. Strategic Management J. 9(S1):71–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bena J, Li K (2014) Corporate innovations and mergers and acquisitions. J. Finance 69(5):1923–1960.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernile G, Lyandres E (2019) The effects of horizontal merger operating efficiencies on rivals, customers, and suppliers. Rev. Finance 23(1):117–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya S, Ritter JR (1983) Innovation and communication: Signalling with partial disclosure. Rev. Econom. Stud. 50(2):331–346.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Van Reenen J (2002) Patents, real options and firm performance. Econom. J. (London) 112(478):C97–C116.Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Schankerman M, Van Reenen J (2013) Identifying technology spillovers and product market rivalry. Econometrica 81(4):1347–1393.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cai J, Song MH, Walkling RA (2011) Anticipation, acquisitions, and bidder returns: Industry shocks and the transfer of information across rivals. Rev. Financial Stud. 24(7):2242–2285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cain MD, McKeon SB, Solomon SD (2017) Do takeover laws matter? Evidence from five decades of hostile takeovers. J. Financial Econom. 124(3):464–485.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cassiman B, Veugelers R (2006) In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: Internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition. Management Sci. 52(1):68–82.Link, Google Scholar
• Chan LKC, Lakonishok J, Sougiannis T (2001) The stock market valuation of research and development expenditures. J. Finance 56(6):2431–2456.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chu Y, Tian X, Wang W (2019) Corporate innovation along the supply chain. Management Sci. 65(6):2445–2466.Link, Google Scholar
• Cohen L, Frazzini A (2008) Economic links and predictable returns. J. Finance 63(4):1977–2011.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen L, Diether K, Malloy C (2013) Misvaluing innovation. Rev. Financial Stud. 26(3):635–666.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cremers KJM, Nair VB, John K (2009) Takeovers and the cross-section of returns. Rev. Financial Stud. 22(4):1409–1445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cunningham C, Ederer F, Ma S (2021) Killer acquisitions. J. Political Econom. 129(3):649–702.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dougal C, Parsons CA, Titman S (2015) Urban vibrancy and corporate growth. J. Finance 70(1):163–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duffie D, Giroux G, Manso G (2010a) Information percolation. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 2(1):100–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duffie D, Malamud S, Manso G (2010b) The relative contributions of private information sharing and public information releases to information aggregation. J. Econom. Theory 145(4):1574–1601.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eberhart AC, Maxwell WF, Siddique AR (2004) An examination of long-term abnormal stock returns and operating performance following R&D increases. J. Finance 59(2):623–650.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eckbo B (1983) Horizontal mergers, collusion, and stockholder wealth. J. Financial Econom. 11(1):241–273.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Engelberg J, Ozoguz A, Wang S (2018) Know thy neighbor: Industry clusters, information spillovers, and market efficiency. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 53(5):1937–1961.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fama EF (1998) Market efficiency, long-term returns, and behavioral finance. J. Financial Econom. 49(3):283–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fama EF, French KR (1993) Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. J. Financial Econom. 33(1):3–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fan JP, Goyal VK (2006) On the patterns and wealth effects of vertical mergers. J. Bus. 79(2):877–902.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fee C, Thomas S (2004) Sources of gains in horizontal mergers: Evidence from customer, supplier, and rival firms. J. Financial Econom. 74(3):423–460.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frésard L, Hoberg G, Phillips GM (2020) Innovation activities and integration through vertical acquisitions. Rev. Financial Stud. 33(7):2937–2976.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fulghieri P, Sevilir M (2011) Mergers, spinoffs, and employee incentives. Rev. Financial Stud. 24(7):2207–2241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grossman S (1976) On the efficiency of competitive stock markets where trades have diverse information. J. Finance 31(2):573–585.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grossman SJ, Stiglitz JE (1980) On the impossibility of informationally efficient markets. Amer. Econom. Rev. 70(3):393–408.Google Scholar
• Guler I, Nerkar A (2012) The impact of global and local cohesion on innovation in the pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Management J. 33(5):535–549.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall BH, Jaffe A, Trajtenberg M (2005) Market value and patent citations. RAND J. Econom. 36(1):16–38.Google Scholar
• Hall BH, Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M (2001) The NBER patent citation data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools. Working paper, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 8498, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Harford J (2005) What drives merger waves? J. Financial Econom. 77(3):529–560.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harvey CR, Liu Y, Zhu H (2016) … and the cross-section of expected returns. Rev. Financial Stud. 29(1): 5–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayek FA (1945) The use of knowledge in society. Amer. Econom. Rev. 35(4):519–530.Google Scholar
• Henderson R, Cockburn IM (1996) Scale, scope, and spillovers: The determinants of research productivity in drug discovery. RAND J. Econom. 27(1):32–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hertzel MG, Li Z, Officer MS, Rodgers KJ (2008) Inter-firm linkages and the wealth effects of financial distress along the supply chain. J. Financial Econom. 87(2):374–387.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirshleifer D, Hsu P, Li D (2013) Innovative efficiency and stock returns. J. Financial Econom. 107(3):632–654.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoberg G, Phillips G (2010) Product market synergies and competition in mergers and acquisitions: A text-based analysis. Rev. Financial Stud. 23(10):3773–3811.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoberg G, Phillips G (2016) Text-based network industries and endogenous product differentiation. J. Political Econom. 124(5):1423–1465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hong H, Stein JC (2007) Disagreement and the stock market. J. Econom. Perspective 1(2):109–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hou K (2007) Industry information diffusion and the lead-lag effect in stock returns. Rev. Financial Stud. 20(4):1113–1138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hou K, Xue C, Zhang L (2020) Replicating anomalies. Rev. Financial Stud. 33(5):2019–2133.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsiao C (1996) Logit and probit models. Mátyás L, Sevestre P, eds. The Econometrics of Panel Data. Advanced Studies in Theoretical and Applied Econometrics, vol. 33 (Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands), 410–428.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaffe AB (1986) Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: Evidence from firms’ patents, profits and market value. Amer. Econom. Rev. 76(5):984–1001.Google Scholar
• Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M, Henderson R (1993) Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quart. J. Econom. 108(3):577–598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kalbfleisch JD, Sprott DA (1970) Application of likelihood methods to models involving large numbers of parameters. J. Royal Statist. Soc. B 32(2):175–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katz ML, Shapiro C (1986) How to license intangible property. Quart. J. Econom. 101(3):567–589.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kelly B, Papanikolaou D, Seru A, Taddy M (2021) Measuring technological innovation over the long run. Amer. Econom. Rev. Insights 3(3):303–320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogan L, Papanikolaou D, Seru A, Stoffman N (2017) Technological innovation, resource allocation, and growth. Quart. J. Econom. 132(2):665–712.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Korniotis GM, Kumar A (2013) State-level business cycles and local return predictability. J. Finance 68(3):1037–1096.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kyle AS (1985) Continuous auctions and insider trading. Econometrica 53(6):1315–1335.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee CM, Sun ST, Wang R, Zhang R (2019) Technological links and predictable returns. J. Financial Econom. 132(3):76–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lev B, Sougiannis T (1996) The capitalization, amortization, and value-relevance of R&D. J. Accounting Econom. 21(1):107–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lyytinen K, Rose GM (2003) The disruptive nature of information technology innovations: The case of Internet computing in systems development organizations. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 27(4):557–596.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ma S (2020) The life cycle of corporate venture capital. Rev. Financial Stud. 33(1):358–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maksimovic V, Pichler P (2001) Technological innovation and initial public offerings. Rev. Financial Stud. 14(2):459–494.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Menzly L, Ozbas O (2010) Market segmentation and cross-predictability of returns. J. Finance 65(4):1555–1580.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Patell JM (1976) Corporate forecasts of earnings per share and stock price behavior: Empirical test. J. Accounting Res. 14(2):246–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips GM, Zhdanov A (2013) R&D and the incentives from merger and acquisition activity. Rev. Financial Stud. 26(1):34–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pirinsky C, Wang Q (2006) Does corporate headquarters location matter for stock returns? J. Finance 61(4):1991–2015.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rhodes-Kropf M, Robinson DT (2008) The market for mergers and the boundaries of the firm. J. Finance 63(3):1169–1211.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Romer PM (1986) Increasing returns and long-run growth. J. Political Econom. 94(5):1002–1037.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rumelt RP (1991) How much does industry matter? Strategic Management J. 12(3):167–185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmookler J (1966) Invention and Economic Growth (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scholes M, Williams J (1977) Estimating betas from nonsynchronous data. J. Financial Econom. 5(3):309–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schumpeter JA (1942) Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy (Harper and Brothers, New York).Google Scholar
• Sears J, Hoetker G (2014) Technological overlap, technological capabilities, and resource recombination in technological acquisitions. Strategic Management J. 35(1):48–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Servaes H, Tamayo A (2013) The impact of corporate social responsibility on firm value: The role of customer awareness. Management Sci. 59(5):1045–1061.Link, Google Scholar
• Sevilir M, Tian X (2012) Acquiring innovation. Working paper, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.Google Scholar
• Shahrur H (2005) Industry structure and horizontal takeovers: Analysis of wealth effects on rivals, suppliers, and corporate customers. J. Financial Econom. 76(1):61–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Song H, Schwarz N (2010) If it’s easy to read, it’s easy to do, pretty, good, and true: Fluency effects on judgment, choice, and processing style. Psychologist 23:108–111.Google Scholar
• Song MH, Walkling RA (2000) Abnormal returns to rivals of acquisition targets: A test of the ‘acquisition probability hypothesis’. J. Financial Econom. 55(2):143–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spence M (1984) Cost reduction, competition, and industry performance. Econometrica 52(1):101–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stillman R (1983) Examining antitrust policy toward horizontal mergers. J. Financial Econom. 11(1):225–240.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Testoni M (2022) The market value spillovers of technological acquisitions: Evidence from patent-text analysis. Strategic Management J. 43(5):964–985.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wernerfelt B (1984) A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. 5(2):171–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wooldridge JM (2010) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Zhao X (2009) Technological innovation and acquisitions. Management Sci. 55(7):1170–1183.Link, Google Scholar