Generalized Stochastic Arbitrage Opportunities

References

• Agarwal V, Naik NY (2004) Risk and portfolio decision involving hedge funds. Rev. Financial Stud. 17(1):63–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arvanitis S, Post Th (2022) Stochastic arbitrage opportunities: Set estimation and statistical testing. Preprint, submitted November 5, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4268835.Google Scholar
• Arvanitis S, Post Th, Topaloglou N (2021) Stochastic bounds for reference sets in portfolio analysis. Management Sci. 67(12):7737–7754.Link, Google Scholar
• Beare BK (2011) Measure preserving derivatives and the pricing kernel puzzle. J. Math. Econom. 47:689–697.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cochrane JH, Saa-Requejo J (2000) Beyond arbitrage: Good-deal asset price bounds in incomplete markets. J. Political Econom. 108:79–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Constantinides GM, Czerwonko M, Perrakis S (2020) Mispriced index option portfolios. Financial Management 49(2):297–330.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Constantinides GM, Jackwerth JC, Perrakis S (2009) Mispricing of S&P 500 Index options. Rev. Financial Stud. 22:1247–1277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cover T, Thomas J (2006) Elements of Information Theory, 2nd ed. (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• Davidson R, Duclos J-Y (2013) Testing for restricted stochastic dominance. Econometric Rev. 32(1):84–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Bondt W, Thaler R (1987) Further evidence on investor overreaction and stock market seasonality. J. Finance 42:557–581.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeMiguel V, Garlappi L, Nogales FJ, Uppal R (2009) A generalized approach to portfolio optimization: Improving performance by constraining portfolio norms. Management Sci. 55:798–812.Link, Google Scholar
• DeMiguel V, Martin-Utrera A, Nogales FJ, Uppal R (2020) A transaction-cost perspective on the multitude of firm characteristics. Rev. Financial Stud. 33(5):2180–2222.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dentcheva D, Ruszczynski A (2006) Portfolio optimization with stochastic dominance constraints. J. Bank. Finance 30:433–451.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dybvig PH (1988) Distributional analysis of portfolio choice. J. Bus. 61:369–393.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dybvig PA, Ross SA (2008) Arbitrage. Durlauf SF, Blume LE, eds. The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, vol. 1, 2nd ed. (Palgrave MacMillan, New York), 100–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fábián CI, Mitra G, Roman D (2011) Processing second-order stochastic dominance models using cutting-plane representations. Math. Programming 130:33–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fama EF, French KR (1996) Multifactor explanations of asset pricing anomalies. J. Finance 51(1):55–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fama EF, French KR (2015) A five-factor asset pricing model. J. Financial Econom. 116(1):1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frazzini A, Israel R, Moskowitz TJ (2015) Trading costs of asset pricing anomalies. Working paper, Chicago Booth Research Paper.Google Scholar
• Fung W, Hsieh DA (2004) Hedge fund benchmarks: A risk-based approach. Financial Anal. J. 60(5):65–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fung W, Hsieh DA, Naik NY, Ramadorai T (2008) Hedge funds: Performance, risk, and capital formation. J. Finance 63(4):1777–1803.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hodder E, Jackwerth JC, Kolokolova O (2015) Improved portfolio choice using second-order stochastic dominance. Rev. Finance 19:1623–1647.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacobs BI, Levy KN, Starer D (1998) On the optimality of long-short strategies. Financial Anal. J. 54(2):40–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacobs BI, Levy KN, Starer D (1999) Long-short portfolio management: An integrated approach. J. Portfolio Management 25(2):23–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacobs H, Müller S (2020) Anomalies across the globe: Once public, no longer existent? J. Financial Econom. 135(1):213–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jegadeesh N (1990) Evidence of predictable behavior of security returns. J. Finance 45:881–898.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jegadeesh N, Titman S (1993) Returns to buying winners and selling losers: Implications for stock market efficiency. J. Finance 48:65–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jouini E, Kallal H (1995) Martingales and arbitrage in securities markets with transaction costs. J. Econom. Theory 66(1):178–197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Korkie B, Turtle HJ (2002) A mean-variance analysis of self-financing portfolios. Management Sci. 48(3):427–443.Link, Google Scholar
• Kuosmanen T (2004) Efficient diversification according to stochastic dominance criteria. Management Sci. 50:1390–1406.Link, Google Scholar
• Linton O, Maasoumi E, Whang Y-J (2005) Consistent testing for stochastic dominance under general sampling schemes. Rev. Econom. Stud. 72:735–765.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McLean RD, Pontiff J (2016) Does academic research destroy stock return predictability? J. Finance 71(1):5–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Novy-Marx R, Velikov M (2016) A taxonomy of anomalies and their trading costs. Rev. Financial Stud. 29(1):104–147.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Patton AJ, Weller BM (2020) What you see is not what you get: The costs of trading market anomalies. J. Financial Econom. 137(2):515–549.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perrakis S, Oancea IM (2022) Stochastic dominance, stochastic volatility and the prices of volatility and jump risk. Working paper.Google Scholar
• Post Th (2003) Empirical tests for stochastic dominance efficiency. J. Finance 58(5):1905–1931.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Post Th (2017) Empirical tests for stochastic dominance optimality. Rev. Finance 21(2):793–810.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Post Th, Kopa M (2016) Portfolio choice based on third-degree stochastic dominance. Management Sci. 63(10):3381–3392.Link, Google Scholar
• Post Th, Poti V (2017) Portfolio analysis using stochastic dominance, relative entropy, and empirical likelihood. Management Sci. 63(1):153–165.Link, Google Scholar
• Post Th, Rodriguez Longarela I (2020) Risk arbitrage opportunities for stock index options. Oper. Res. 69(1):100–113.Link, Google Scholar
• Post Th, Versijp P (2007) Multivariate tests for stochastic dominance efficiency of a given portfolio. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 42(2):489–515.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Post Th, Karabat S, Arvanitis S (2018) Portfolio optimization based on stochastic dominance and empirical likelihood. J. Econometrics 206(1):167–186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rockafellar RT, Uryasev S (2000) Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. J. Risk 2:21–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roll R (1977) A critique of the asset pricing theory’s tests. Part I: On past and potential testability of the theory. J. Financial Econom. 4(2):129–176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Russell WR, Seo TK (1989) Representative sets for stochastic dominance rules. Fomby TB, Seo TK, eds. Studies in the Economics of Uncertainty: In Honor of Josef Hadar (Springer-Verlag, New York), 59–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shalit H, Yitzhaki S (1994) Marginal conditional stochastic dominance. Management Sci. 40(5):670–684.Link, Google Scholar
• Shalit H, Yitzhaki S (2003) An asset allocation puzzle. Amer. Econom. Rev. 93(3):1002–1008.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sharpe WF (1988) Determining a fund’s effective asset mix, investment. Management Rev. (December):59–69.Google Scholar
• Sion M (1958) On general minimax theorems. Pacific J. Math. 8(1):171–176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Neumann J, Morgenstern O (1947) Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar