Demographic “Stickiness”: The Demographic Identity of Departing Group Members Influences Who Is Chosen to Replace Them

References

• Acker J (2006) Inequality regimes: Gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender Soc. 20(4):441–464.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Angrist JD, Pischke JS (2008) Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bailey AH, LaFrance M, Dovidio JF (2019) Is man the measure of all things? A social cognitive account of androcentrism. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 23(4):307–331.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bastian B, Haslam N (2006) Psychological essentialism and stereotype endorsement. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 42(2):228–235.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berdahl JL, Min JA (2012) Prescriptive stereotypes and workplace consequences for East Asians in North America. Cultural Diversity Ethnic Minority Psych. 18(2):141–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bezrukova K, Spell CS, Perry JL, Jehn KA (2016) A meta-analytical integration of over 40 years of research on diversity training evaluation. Psych. Bull. 142(11):1227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blake A (2020) Analysis: Who Trump might pick for the Supreme Court. Washington Post (September 19), https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/09/19/who-trump-might-pick-ruth-bader-ginsburg-replacement/.Google Scholar
• Chang EH, Kirgios EL, Smith RK (2021) Large-scale field experiment shows null effects of team demographic diversity on outsiders’ willingness to support the team. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 94:104099.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chang EH, Milkman KL, Chugh D, Akinola M (2019a) Diversity thresholds: How social norms, visibility, and scrutiny relate to group composition. Acad. Management J. 62(1):144–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chang EH, Milkman KL, Gromet DM, Rebele RW, Massey C, Duckworth AL, Grant AM (2019b) The mixed effects of online diversity training. Proc. National Acad. Sci. USA 116(16):7778–7783.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cuddy AJ, Fiske ST, Glick P (2008) Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The stereotype content model and the BIAS map. Adv. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 40:61–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Czopp AM, Kay AC, Cheryan S (2015) Positive stereotypes are pervasive and powerful. Perspective Psych. Sci. 10(4):451–463.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Danbold F, Unzueta MM (2020) Drawing the diversity line: Numerical thresholds of diversity vary by group status. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 118(2):283–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dorison CA, Heller BH (2022) Observers penalize decision makers whose risk preferences are unaffected by loss–gain framing. J. Experiment. Psych. General. 151(9):2043–2059.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiske ST, Neuberg SL (1990) A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 23:1–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Geerling DM, Chen JM (2020) Women’s perceived contributions to diversity: The impact of target race and contextual gender salience. Group Processing Intergroup Relations 24(7):1077–1094.Google Scholar
• Harrison DA, Klein KJ (2007) What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 32(4):1199–1228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heilman M (1994) Affirmative action: Some unintended consequences for working women. Research in Organizational Behavior (JAI Press, Stamford, CT), 125–169.Google Scholar
• Imai K, Keele L, Yamamoto T (2010) Identification, inference and sensitivity analysis for causal mediation effects. Statist. Sci. 25(1):51–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econom. J. Econom. Soc. 47(2):263–291.Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Knetsch JL, Thaler RH (1991) Anomalies: The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. J. Econom. Perspective 5(1):193–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kawakami K, Dunn E, Karmali F, Dovidio JF (2009) Mispredicting affective and behavioral responses to racism. Science 323(5911):276–278.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kellar SJ, Hall EV (2022) Measuring racial discrimination remotely: A contemporary review of unobtrusive measures. Perspective Psych. Sci. 17(5):1404–1430.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim SM, Itkowitz C (2020) Trump announces Judge Amy Coney Barrett is his pick for the Supreme Court. Washington Post (September 26), https://www.washingtonpost.com/elections/2020/09/26/supreme-court-trump-biden-live-updates/.Google Scholar
• Lai CK, Skinner AL, Cooley E, Murrar S, Brauer M, Devos T, Calanchini J, et al. (2016) Reducing implicit racial preferences: II. Intervention effectiveness across time. J. Experiment. Psych. General 145(8):1001.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leslie LM, Mayer DM, Kravitz DA (2014) The stigma of affirmative action: A stereotyping-based theory and meta-analytic test of the consequences for performance. Acad. Management J. 57(4):964–989.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Masatlioglu Y, Ok EA (2014) A canonical model of choice with initial endowments. Rev. Econom. Stud. 81(2):851–883.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGraw AP, Todorov A, Kunreuther H (2011) A policy maker’s dilemma: Preventing terrorism or preventing blame. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processing 115(1):25–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merritt RD, Harrison TW (2006) Gender and ethnicity attributions to a gender-and ethnicity-unspecified individual: Is there a people = white male bias? Sex Roles 54(11):787–797.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller C (2017) The persistent effect of temporary affirmative action. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 9(3):152–190.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petsko CD, Rosette AS (2022) Are leaders still presumed white by default? Racial bias in leader categorization revisited. J. Appl. Psych. 108(2):330–340.Google Scholar
• Phillips KW (2014) How diversity works. Sci. Amer. 311(4):42–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips KW, Loyd DL (2006) When surface and deep-level diversity collide: The effects on dissenting group members. Organ. Behav. Human. Decision Processing 99(2):143–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips LT, Slepian ML, Hughes BL (2018) Perceiving groups: The people perception of diversity and hierarchy. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 114(5):766.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Purdie-Vaughns V, Eibach RP (2008) Intersectional invisibility: The distinctive advantages and disadvantages of multiple subordinate-group identities. Sex Roles 59(5–6):377–391.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ray V (2019) A theory of racialized organizations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 84(1):26–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosette AS, Leonardelli GJ, Phillips KW (2008) The White standard: Racial bias in leader categorization. J. Appl. Psych. 93(4):758–777.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosette AS, de Leon RP, Koval CZ, Harrison DA (2018) Intersectionality: Connecting experiences of gender with race at work. Res. Organ. Behav. 38:1–22.Google Scholar
• Rothbart M, Taylor M (1992) Category labels and social reality: Do we view social categories as natural kinds? Semin GR, Fiedler K, eds. Language, Interaction and Social Cognition (Sage Publications, Inc., New York), 11–36.Google Scholar
• Rudman LA, Glick P (2001) Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. J. Soc. Issues 57(4):743–762.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Samuelson W, Zeckhauser R (1988) Status quo bias in decision making. J. Risk Uncertainty 1(1):7–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sanchez-Hucles JV, Davis DD (2010) Women and women of color in leadership: Complexity, identity, and intersectionality. Amer. Psych. 65(3):171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stainback K, Tomaskovic-Devey D, Skaggs S (2010) Organizational approaches to inequality: Inertia, relative power, and environments. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 36:225–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stangor C, Lynch L, Duan C, Glas B (1992) Categorization of individuals on the basis of multiple social features. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 62(2):207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tinsley CH, Wade JB, Main BG, O’Reilly CA (2017) Gender diversity on US corporate boards: Are we running in place? Industry Labor Related Rev. 70(1):160–189.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Torbati Y, Eilperin J, Rein L, Dawsey J (2020) A two-page White House ‘race’ memo became a flash point in Tuesday’s debate. Washington Post (September 30), https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2020/09/30/trump-race-training/.Google Scholar
• Tsui AS, O’Reilly CA III (1989) Beyond simple demographic effects: The importance of relational demography in superior-subordinate dyads. Acad. Management J. 32(2):402–423.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1991) Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. Quart. J. Econom. 106(4):1039–1061.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Unzueta MM, Binning KR (2010) Which racial groups are associated with diversity? Cultural Diversity Ethnic Minority Psych. 16(3):443.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Unzueta MM, Binning KR (2012) Diversity is in the eye of the beholder how concern for the in-group affects perceptions of racial diversity. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 38(1):26–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wagner J, Hawkins D, Knowles H (2020) Trump says he will nominate woman to the Supreme Court next week. Washington Post (September 20), https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/09/19/ruth-bader-ginsburg-death/.Google Scholar
• Williams KY, O’Reilly CA (1998) Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Res. Organ. Behav. 20:77–140.Google Scholar
• Zhang L (2019) Shaking things up: Unintended consequences of firm acquisitions on inequality and diversity. Preprint, submitted January 11, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3460840.Google Scholar