Pick-an-Object Mechanisms

References

• Abdulkadiroğlu A, Sönmez T (2003) School choice: A mechanism design approach. Amer. Econom. Rev. 93(3):729–747.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Akbarpour M, Li S (2020) Credible auctions: A trilemma. Econometrica 88(2):425–467.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Artemov G, Che Y-K, He Y (2017) Strategic ‘mistakes’: Implications for market design research. Working paper, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
• Ashlagi I, Gonczarowski YA (2018) Stable matching mechanisms are not obviously strategy-proof. J. Econom. Theory 177:405–425.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ausubel LM (2004) An efficient ascending-bid auction for multiple objects. Amer. Econom. Rev. 108(2):1452–1475.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Auseubel LM (2006) An efficient dynamic auction for heterogeneous commodities. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(3):602–629.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aygün O, Bó I (2021) College admission with multidimensional privileges: The Brazilian affirmative action case. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 13(3):1–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balinski M, Sönmez T (1999) A tale of two mechanisms: Student placement. J. Econom. Theory 84(1):73–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bergemann D, Morris S (2005) Robust mechanism design. Econometrica 73(6):1771–1813.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bó I, Hakimov R (2020) Iterative vs. standard deferred acceptance: Experimental evidence. Econom. J. (London) 130(626):356–392.Google Scholar
• Bó I, Hakimov R (2022) The iterative deferred acceptance mechanism. Games Econom. Behav. 135:411–433.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Börgers T, Li J (2019) Strategically simple mechanisms. Econometrica 87(6):2003–2035.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Breitmoser Y, Schweighofer-Kodritsch S (2022) Obviousness around the clock. Experiment. Econom. 25(2):483–513.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Calsamiglia C, Haeringer G, Klijn F (2010) Constrained school choice: An experimental study. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(4):1860–1874.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen L, Pereyra JS (2019) Self-selection in school choice. Games Econom. Behav. 117:59–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Sönmez T (2002) Improving efficiency of on-campus housing: An experimental study. Amer. Econom. Rev. 92(5):1669–1686.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Sönmez T (2006) School choice: An experimental study. J. Econom. Theory 127(1):202–231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dur U, Hammond RG, Morrill T (2018) Identifying the harm of manipulable School-Choice mechanisms. Amer. Econom. J. Econom. Policy 10(1):187–213.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Echenique F, Wilson AJ, Yariv L (2016) Clearinghouses for two-sided matching: An experimental study. Quant. Econom. 7(2):449–482.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischbacher U (2007) z-tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experiment. Econom. 10(2):171–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gale D, Shapley LS (1962) College admissions and the stability of marriage. Amer. Math. Monthly 69(1):9–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gong B, Liang Y (2016) A dynamic college admission mechanism in inner Mongolia: Theory and experiment. Working paper, East China Normal University, Shanghai.Google Scholar
• Greiner B (2015) Subject pool recruitment procedures: organizing experiments with ORSEE. J. Econom. Sci. Assoc. 1(1):114–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grenet J, He Y, Kübler D (2022) Preference discovery in university admissions: The case for dynamic multioffer mechanisms. J. Political Econom. 130(6):1427–1476.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guillen P, Hakimov R (2017) Not quite the best response: Truth-telling, strategy-proof matching, and the manipulation of others. Experiment. Econom. 20(3):670–686.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guillen P, Hakimov R (2018) The effectiveness of top-down advice in strategy-proof mechanisms: A field experiment. Eur. Econom. Rev. 101:505–511.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haeringer G, Hałaburda H (2016) Monotone strategyproofness. Games Econom. Behav. 98:68–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haeringer G, Iehle V (2021) Gradual college admission. J. Econom. Theory 198:105378.Google Scholar
• Hakimov R, Kesten O (2018) The equitable top trading cycles mechanism for school choice. Internat. Econom. Rev. 59(4):2219–2258.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hakimov R, Kübler D (2021) Experiments on centralized school choice and college admissions: A survey. Experiment. Econom. 24(2):434–488.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hakimov R, Raghavan M (2021) Improving transparency in school admissions: Theory and experiment. Working paper, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.Google Scholar
• Hakimov R, Kübler D, Pan S (2023) Costly information acquisition in centralized matching markets. Quant. Econom. Forthcoming.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hakimov R, Schmacker R, Terrier C (2022) Confidence and college applications: Evidence from a randomized intervention. Working Paper, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.Google Scholar
• Hakimov R, Heller C, Kübler D, Kurino M (2021) How to avoid black markets for appointments with online booking systems. Amer. Econom. Rev. 111(7):2127–2151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hassidim A, Romm A, Shorrer RI (2021) The limits of incentives in economic matching procedures. Management Sci. 67(2):951–963.Link, Google Scholar
• Jones W, Teytelboym A (2017) Matching systems for refugees. J. Migration Human Security 5(3):667–681.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kagel JH, Harstad RM, Levin D (1987) Information impact and allocation rules in auctions with affiliated private values: A laboratory study. Econometrica 55(6):1275–1304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kawase Y, Bando K (2021) Subgame perfect equilibria under the deferred acceptance algorithm. Internat. J. Game Theory 50(2):503–546.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klijn F, Pais J, Vorsatz M (2019) Static vs. dynamic deferred acceptance in school choice: Theory and experiment. Games Econom. Behav. 113:147–163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li S (2017) Obviously strategy-proof mechanisms. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(11):3257–3287.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu Q, Pycia M (2016) Ordinal efficiency, fairness, and incentives in large markets. Working paper, Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
• Luflade M (2018) The value of information in centralized school choice systems. Working paper, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
• Mackenzie A, Zhou Y (2022) Menu mechanisms. J. Econom. Theory 204:105511.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mandal P, Roy S (2022) Obviously strategy-proof implementation of assignment rules: A new characterization. Internat. Econom. Rev. 63(1):261–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milgrom PR, Weber RJ (1982) A theory of auctions and competitive bidding. Econometrica 50(5):1089–1122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pais J, Pintér Á (2008) School choice and information: An experimental study on matching mechanisms. Games Econom. Behav. 64(1):303–328.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pycia M, Troyan P (2023) A theory of simplicity in games and mechanism design. Econometrica 91(4):1495–1526.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pycia M, Ünver MU (2017) Incentive compatible allocation and exchange of discrete resources. Theoretical Econom. 12(1):287–329.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pycia M, Yenmez MB (2021) Matching with externalities. Working paper, University of Zurich, Zurich.Google Scholar
• Rees-Jones A (2018) Suboptimal behavior in strategy-proof mechanisms: Evidence from the residency match. Games Econom. Behav. 108:317–330.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth AE, Peranson E (1999) The redesign of the matching market for American physicians: Some engineering aspects of economic design. Amer. Econom. Rev. 89(4):748–780.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth AE, Sönmez T, Ünver MU (2004) Kidney exchange. Quart. J. Econom. 119(2):457–488.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schummer J, Velez RA (2021) Sequential preference revelation in incomplete information settings. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 13(1):116–147.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shapley L, Scarf H (1974) On cores and indivisibility. J. Math. Econom. 1(1):23–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shorrer RI, Sóvágó S (2018) Obvious mistakes in a strategically simple college admissions environment: Causes and consequences. Working paper, Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA.Google Scholar
• Troyan P (2019) Obviously strategy-proof implementation of top trading cycles. Internat. Econom. Rev. 60(3):1249–1261.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Veski A, Biró P, Pöder K, Lauri T (2017) Efficiency and fair access in kindergarten allocation policy design. J. Mechanism Institution Design 2(1):57–104.Crossref, Google Scholar