Author Country of Origin and Attention on Open Science Platforms: Evidence from COVID-19 Preprints

References

• Abadie A, Athey S, Imbens GW, Wooldridge, J (2017) When should you adjust standard errors for clustering? NBER Working Paper No. w24003, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Agrawal A, Lacetera N, Lyons E (2016) Does standardized information in online markets disproportionately benefit job applicants from less developed countries? J. Internat. Econom. 103:1–12.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aigner DJ, Cain GG (1977) Statistical theories of discrimination in labor markets. Industrial Labor Related Rev. 30(2):175–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartoš V, Bauer M, Chytilová J, Matějka F (2016) Attention discrimination: Theory and field experiments with monitoring information acquisition. Amer. Econom. Rev. 106(6):1437–1475.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker GS (1957) The Economics of Discrimination (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Bikard M (2018) Made in academia: The effect of institutional origin on inventors’ attention to science. Organ. Sci. 29(5):818–836.Link, Google Scholar
• Boudreau KJ, Guinan EC, Lakhani KR, Riedl C (2016) Looking across and looking beyond the knowledge frontier: Intellectual distance, novelty, and resource allocation in science. Management Sci. 62(10):2765–2783.Link, Google Scholar
• Brandon A, Holz JE, Simon A, Uchida H (2022) Minimum wages and racial differences in hiring: Theory and evidence from a field experiment. Working paper, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore.Google Scholar
• Card D, DellaVigna S, Funk P, Iriberri N (2020) Are referees and editors in economics gender neutral? Quart. J. Econom. 135(1):269–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doleac J, Stein L (2013) The visible hand: Race and online market outcomes. Econom. J. (London) 123(572):F469–F492.Google Scholar
• Dowling M, Hammami H, Zreik O (2018) Easy to read, easy to cite? Econom. Lett. 173:100–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edelman BG, Luca M (2014) Digital discrimination: The case of Airbnb.com. Working paper, Harvard Business School, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Fages DM (2020) Write better, publish better. Scientometrics 122(3):1671–1681.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freedman LP, Cockburn IM, Simcoe TS (2015) The economics of reproducibility in preclinical research. PLoS Biol. 13(6):e1002165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenstein S, Zhu F (2018) Do experts or crowd-based models produce more bias? Evidence from Encyclopædia Britannica and Wikipedia. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 42(3):945–959.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenstein S, Gu G, Zhu F (2021) Ideology and composition among an online crowd: Evidence from Wikipedians. Management Sci. 67(5):3067–3086.Link, Google Scholar
• Harris M, Marti J, Watt H, Bhatti Y, Macinko J, Darzi AW (2017) Explicit bias toward high-income-country research: A randomized, blinded, crossover experiment of English clinicians. Health Affairs 36(11):1997–2004.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hengel E (2022) Publishing while female: Are women held to higher standards? Evidence from peer review. Econom. J. 132(648):2951–2991.Google Scholar
• Huber J, Inoua S, Kerschbamer R, König-Kersting C, Palan S, Smith VL (2022) Nobel and novice: Author prominence affects peer review. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 119(41):e2205779119.Google Scholar
• Hvistendahl M (2013) China’s publication bazaar. Science 342(6162):1035–1039.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johansson MA, Reich NG, Meyers LA, Lipsitch M (2018) Preprints: An underutilized mechanism to accelerate outbreak science. PLoS Med. 15(4):e1002549.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones B (2009) The burden of knowledge and the ‘death of the Renaissance man’: Is innovation getting harder? Rev. Econom. Stud. 76(1):283–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kupferschmidt K (2020) A completely new culture of doing research. Coronavirus outbreak changes how scientists communicate. Science 10:1–5.Google Scholar
• Lee CJ, Sugimoto CR, Zhang G, Cronin B (2013) Bias in peer review. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. Tech. 64(1):2–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee YJ, Hosanagar K, Tan Y (2015) Do I follow my friends or the crowd? Information cascades in online movie ratings. Management Sci. 61(9):2241–2258.Link, Google Scholar
• Li D (2017) Expertise vs. bias in evaluation: Evidence from the NIH. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 9(2):60–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li D, Agha L (2015) Big names or big ideas: Do peer-review panels select the best science proposals? Sci. 348(6233):434–438.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Link AM (1998) US and non-US submissions: An analysis of reviewer bias. JAMA 280(3):246–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCabe MJ, Snyder CM (2014) Identifying the effect of open access on citations using a panel of science journals. Econom. Inq. 52(4):1284–1300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCabe MJ, Snyder CM (2018) Open access as a crude solution to a hold‐up problem in the two‐sided market for academic journals. J. Industry Econom. 66(2):301–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCannon BC (2019) Readability and research impact. Econom. Lett. 76(7):76–79.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mollick E, Nanda R (2016) Wisdom or madness? Comparing crowds with expert evaluation in funding the arts. Management Sci. 62(6):1533–1553.Link, Google Scholar
• Peng H, Lakhani K, Teplitskiy M (2021) Acceptance in top journals shows large disparities across name-inferred ethnicities. Working paper, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.Google Scholar
• Peng H, Teplitskiy M, Jurgens D (2020) Author mentions in science news reveal wide-spread ethnic bias. Preprint, submitted September 3, https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.01896.Google Scholar
• Peters DP, Ceci SJ (1982) Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of accepted, published articles. Behav. Brain Sci. 5(2):187–195.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phelps ES (1972) The statistical theory of racism and sexism. Amer. Econom. Rev. 62(4):659–661.Google Scholar
• Polanyi M (1958) Personal Knowledge (Routledge, London).Google Scholar
• Powell K (2016) Does it take too long to publish research? Nature 530(7589):148–151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Qiu S, Steinwender C, Azoulay P (2022) Who stands on the shoulders of Chinese (scientific) giants? Evidence from chemistry. NBER Working Paper No. 30772, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Rajagopalan MS, Khanna VK, Leiter Y, Stott M, Showalter TN, Dicker AP, Lawrence YR (2011) Patient-oriented cancer information on the Internet: A comparison of Wikipedia and a professionally maintained database. J. Oncology Practice 7(5):319–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ravinetto R, Caillet C, Zaman MH, Singh JA, Guerin PJ, Ahmad A, Durán CE, et al. (2021) Preprints in times of COVID19: The time is ripe for agreeing on terminology and good practices. BMC Medical Ethics 22(1):1–5.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ross JS, Gross CP, Desai MM, Hong Y, Grant AO, Daniels SR, Hachinski VC, Gibbons RJ, Gardner TJ, Krumholz HM (2006) Effect of blinded peer review on abstract acceptance. JAMA 295(14):1675–1680.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simcoe T, Waguespack DM (2011) Status, quality and attention: What’s in a (missing) mame? Management Sci. 57(2):274–290.Link, Google Scholar
• Sugimoto CR, Work S, Larivière V, Haustein S (2017) Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature. J. Assoc. Inform. Sci. Tech. 68(9):2037–2062.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tomkins A, Zhang M, Heavlin WD (2017) Reviewer bias in single- vs. double-blind peer review. Proc. National Acad. Sci. USA 114(48):12708–12713.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vale RD (2015) Accelerating scientific publication in biology. Proc. National Acad. Sci. USA 112(44):13439–13446.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xie Q, Freeman RS (2019) Bigger than you thought: China’s contribution to scientific publications and its impact on the global economy. China World Econom. 27(1):1–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ye J, Skiena S (2019) The secret lives of names? Name embeddings from social media. Proc. 25th ACM SIGKDD Internat. Conf. on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining (ACM, New York), 3000–3008.Google Scholar
• Ye J, Han S, Hu Y, Coskun B, Liu M, Qin H, Skiena S (2017) Nationality classification using name embeddings. Proc. ACM Conf. on Inform. and Knowledge Management (ACM, New York), 1897–1906.Google Scholar
• Zhang JY (2021) World view. Nature 591:9.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zucker LG, Darby MR (1996) Star scientists and institutional transformation: Patterns of invention and innovation in the formation of the biotechnology industry. Proc. National Acad. Sci. USA 93(23):12709–12716.Crossref, Google Scholar