Price Delegation with Learning Agents

References

• Barron D, Georgiadis G, Swinkels J (2020) Optimal contracts with a risk-taking agent. Theoret. Econom. 15(2):715–761.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Basu AK, Lal R, Srinivasan V, Staelin R (1985) Salesforce compensation plans: An agency theoretic perspective. Marketing Sci. 4(4):267–291.Link, Google Scholar
• Bond P, Gomes A (2009) Multitask principal–agent problems: Optimal contracts, fragility, and effort misallocation. J. Econom. Theory 144(1):175–211.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cachon GP, Lariviere MA (2005) Supply chain coordination with revenue-sharing contracts: Strengths and limitations. Management Sci. 51(1):30–44.Link, Google Scholar
• Carroll G (2015) Robustness and linear contracts. Amer. Econom. Rev. 105(2):536–563.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen F (2000) Sales-force incentives and inventory management. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 2(2):186–202.Link, Google Scholar
• Chu LY, Lai G (2013) Salesforce contracting under demand censorship. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 15(2):320–334.Link, Google Scholar
• Dai T, Jerath K (2013) Salesforce compensation with inventory considerations. Management Sci. 59(11):2490–2501.Link, Google Scholar
• Dai T, Jerath K (2016) Impact of inventory on quota-bonus contracts with rent sharing. Oper. Res. 64(1):94–98.Link, Google Scholar
• Dai T, Ke R, Ryan CT (2021) Incentive design for operations-marketing multitasking. Management Sci. 67(4):2211–2230.Link, Google Scholar
• Frenzen H, Hansen A-K, Krafft M, Mantrala MK, Schmidt S (2010) Delegation of pricing authority to the sales force: An agency-theoretic perspective of its determinants and impact on performance. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 27(1):58–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gallego G, Topaloglu H (2019) Revenue Management and Pricing Analytics, vol. 209 (Springer, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gallego G, Van Ryzin G (1994) Optimal dynamic pricing of inventories with stochastic demand over finite horizons. Management Sci. 40(8):999–1020.Link, Google Scholar
• Gallego G, Van Ryzin G (1997) A multiproduct dynamic pricing problem and its applications to network yield management. Oper. Res. 45(1):24–41.Link, Google Scholar
• Grossman SJ, Hart OD 1992. An analysis of the principal-agent problem. Dionne G, Harrington SE, eds. Foundations of Insurance Economics: Readings in Economics and Finance (Springer, New York), 302–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmstrom B, Milgrom P (1987) Aggregation and linearity in the provision of intertemporal incentives. Econometrica 55:303–328.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmstrom B, Milgrom P (1991) Multitask principal-agent analyses: Incentive contracts, asset ownership, and job design. J. Law Econom. Organ. 7:24–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Homburg C, Jensen O, Hahn A (2012) How to organize pricing? Vertical delegation and horizontal dispersion of pricing authority. J. Marketing 76(5):49–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Innes RD (1990) Limited liability and incentive contracting with ex-ante action choices. J. Econom. Theory 52(1):45–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joseph K (2001) On the optimality of delegating pricing authority to the sales force. J. Marketing 65(1):62–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim SK (1997) Limited liability and bonus contracts. J. Econom. Management Strategy 6(4):899–913.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laffont J-J, Martimort D (2009) The Theory of Incentives: The Principal-Agent Model (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lal R (1986) Delegating pricing responsibility to the salesforce. Marketing Sci. 5(2):159–168.Link, Google Scholar
• Lal R, Srinivasan V (1993) Compensation plans for single-and multi-product salesforces: An application of the holmstrom-milgrom model. Management Sci. 39(7):777–793.Link, Google Scholar
• Lal R, Staelin R (1986) Salesforce compensation plans in environments with asymmetric information. Marketing Sci. 5(3):179–198.Link, Google Scholar
• Lariviere MA (2006) A note on probability distributions with increasing generalized failure rates. Oper. Res. 54(3):602–604.Link, Google Scholar
• Maglaras C, Meissner J (2006) Dynamic pricing strategies for multiproduct revenue management problems. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 8(2):136–148.Link, Google Scholar
• Mas-Colell A, Whinston MD, Green JR (1995) Microeconomic Theory, vol. 1 (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Mirrlees JA (1999) The theory of moral hazard and unobservable behaviour: Part I. Rev. Econom. Stud. 66(1):3–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mishra BK, Prasad A (2004) Centralized pricing vs. delegating pricing to the salesforce under information asymmetry. Marketing Sci. 23(1):21–27.Link, Google Scholar
• Oyer P (2000) A theory of sales quotas with limited liability and rent sharing. J. Labor Econom. 18(3):405–426.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips R, Serdar Şimşek A, Van Ryzin G (2015) The effectiveness of field price discretion: Empirical evidence from auto lending. Management Sci. 61(8):1741–1759.Link, Google Scholar
• Radner R (1981) Monitoring cooperative agreements in a repeated principal-agent relationship. Econometrica 49:1127–1148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rao RC (1990) Compensating heterogeneous salesforces: Some explicit solutions. Marketing Sci. 9(4):319–341.Link, Google Scholar
• Rogerson WP (1985) Repeated moral hazard. Econometrica 53:69–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rubinstein A (1979) Equilibrium in supergames with the overtaking criterion. J. Econom. Theory 21(1):1–9.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stephenson PR, Cron WL, Frazier GL (1979) Delegating pricing authority to the sales force: The effects on sales and profit performance. J. Marketing 43(2):21–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Talluri KT, Van Ryzin G, Van Ryzin G (2004) The Theory and Practice of Revenue Management, vol. 1 (Springer, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weinberg CB (1975) An optimal commission plan for salesmen’s control over price. Management Sci. 21(8):937–943.Link, Google Scholar
• Xiao B, Xiao W (2020) Optimal salesforce compensation with supply–demand mismatch costs. Production Oper. Management 29(1):62–71.Crossref, Google Scholar