Betting on Diversity—Occupational Segregation and Gender Stereotypes

References

• Adams RB, Ferreira D (2009) Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. J. Financial Econom. 94:291–309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Albert R, Escot L, Fernàndez-Cornejo JA (2011) A field experiment to study sex and age discrimination in the Madrid labour market. Internat. J. Human Resources Management 22:351–375.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Apesteguia J, Azmat G, Iriberri N (2012) The impact of gender composition on team performance and decision making: Evidence from the field. Management Sci. 58:78–93.Link, Google Scholar
• Baccara M, Yariv L (2013) Homophily in peer groups. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconomics 5:69–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barron K, Ditlmann R, Gehrig S, Schweighofer-Kodritsch S (2020) Explicit and implicit belief-based gender discrimination: A hiring experiment. WZB Discussion Paper No. SP II 2020–306, Wissenschaftszentrum für Sozialforschung, Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
• Blau FD, Kahn LM (2017) The gender wage gap: Extent, trends, and explanations. J. Econom. Literature 55:789–865.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bohren JA, Imas A, Rosenberg M (2019) The dynamics of discrimination: Theory and evidence. Amer. Econom. Rev. 109:3395–3436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bohren JA, Haggag K, Imas A, Pope DG (2021) Inaccurate statistical discrimination: An identification problem. Preprint, submitted July 16, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3402134.Google Scholar
• Booth A, Leigh A (2010) Do employers discriminate by gender? A field experiment in female-dominated occupations. Econom. Lett. 107:236–238.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bordalo P, Coffman K, Gennaioli N, Shleifer A (2016) Stereotypes. Quart. J. Econom. 131:1753–1794.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bordalo P, Coffman K, Gennaioli N, Shleifer A (2019) Beliefs about gender. Amer. Econom. Rev. 109:739–773.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bureau of Labor Statistics (2020) Household data, annual averages 2019. Accessed March 8, 2023, https://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat11.htm.Google Scholar
• Calder-Wang S, Gompers PA (2021) And the children shall lead: Gender diversity and performance in venture capital. J. Financial Econom. 142:1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Calder-Wang S, Gompers PA, Huang K (2021) Diversity and performance in entrepreneurial teams. NBER Working Paper No. 28684, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Carlana M (2019) Implicit stereotypes: Evidence from teachers’ gender bias. Quart. J. Econom. 134:1163–1224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carlsson M (2011) Does hiring discrimination cause gender segregation in the Swedish labor market? Feminist Econom. 17:71–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carlsson M, Eriksson S (2019) In-group gender bias in hiring: Real-world evidence. Econom. Lett. 185:108686.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cash TF, Gillen B, Burns DS (1977) Sexism and beautyism in personnel consultant decision making. J. Appl. Psych. 62:301–310.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen DL, Schonger M, Wickens C (2016) oTree: An open-source platform for laboratory, online, and field experiments. J. Behav. Experiment. Finance 9:88–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coffman K, Exley CL, Niederle M (2021a) The role of beliefs in driving gender discrimination. Management Sci. 67:3551–3569.Link, Google Scholar
• Coffman K, Flikkema CB, Shurchkov O (2021b) Gender stereotypes in deliberation and team decisions. Games Econom. Behav. 129:329–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen PN (2013) The persistence of workplace gender segregation in the US. Sociol. Compass 7:889–899.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Das S, Kotikula A (2019) Gender-based employement segregation: Understanding causes and policy interventions. Jobs Working Paper No. 26, World Bank Group, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Dustan A, Koutout K, Leo G (2022) Second-order beliefs and gender. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 200:752–781.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischbacher U (2007) z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experiment. Econom. 10:171–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fréchette GR (2015) Laboratory experiments: Professionals versus students. Fréchette G, Schotter A, eds. The Methods of Modern Experimental Economics (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 360–390.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fréchette GR (2016) Experimental economics across subject populations. Kagel JH, Roth AE, eds. The Handbook of Experimental Economics, vol. 2 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 435–480.Google Scholar
• Gächter S, Starmer C, Tufano F (2023) Measuring “group cohesion” to reveal the power of social relationships in team production. Rev. Econom. Statist. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Glick P, Zion C, Nelson C (1988) What mediates sex discrimination in hiring decisions? J. Personality Soc. Psych. 55:178–186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Leonard KL, List JA (2009) Gender differences in competition: Evidence from a matrilineal and a patriarchal society. Econometrica 77:1637–1664.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greiner B (2015) Subject pool recruitment procedures: Organizing experiments with ORSEE. J. Econom. Sci. Assoc. 1:114–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Günther C, Ekinci NA, Schwieren C, Strobel M (2010) Women can’t jump? An experiment on competitive attitudes and stereotype threat. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 75:395–401.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haeckl S, Kartal M (2021) Does a stereotype benefit women in the labor market: An experiment on perseverance. UiS Working Paper Series 2021/5, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.Google Scholar
• Hoogendoorn S, Oosterbeek H, Van Praag M (2013) The impact of gender diversity on the performance of business teams: Evidence from a field experiment. Management Sci. 59:1514–1528.Link, Google Scholar
• Iriberri N, Rey-Biel P (2017) Stereotypes are only a threat when beliefs are reinforced: On the sensitivity of gender differences in performance under competition to information provision. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 135:99–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Isaksson S (2018) It takes two: Gender differences in group work. Unpublished Manuscript.Google Scholar
• Ivanova-Stenzel R, Kübler D (2011) Gender differences in team work and team competition. J. Econom. Psych. 32:797–808.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kübler D, Schmid J, Stüber R (2018) Gender discrimination in hiring across occupations: A nationally-representative vignette study. Labour Econom. 55:215–229.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM (2001) Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Rev. Sociol. 27:415–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Muchinsky PM, Harris SL (1977) The effect of applicant sex and scholastic standing on the evaluation of job applicant resumes in sex-typed occupations. J. Vocational Behav. 11:95–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Olivetti C, Petrongolo B (2016) The evolution of gender gaps in industrialized countries. Annual Rev. Econom. 8:405–434.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reuben E, Sapienza P, Zingales L (2014) How stereotypes impair women’s careers in science. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111:4403–4408.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Riach PA, Rich J (1987) Testing for sexual discrimination in the labour market. Australian Econom. Papers 26:165–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Riach PA, Rich J (2006) An experimental investigation of sexual discrimination in hiring in the English labor market. B. E. J. Econom. Anal. Policy 6:0000102202153806371416.Google Scholar
• Sarsons H (2017) Recognition for group work: Gender differences in academia. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107:141–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sarsons H, Gërxhani K, Reuben E, Schram A (2021) Gender differences in recognition for group work. J. Political Econom. 129:101–147.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sharp C, Post R (1980) Evaluation of male and female applicants for sex-congruent and sex-incongruent jobs. Sex Roles 6:391–401.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shurchkov O (2012) Under pressure: Gender-differences in output quality and quantity under competition and time constraints. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 10:1189–1213.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spencer SJ, Steele CM, Quinn DM (1999) Stereotype threat and women’s math performance. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 35:4–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Voyer D, Voyer S, Bryden MP (1995) Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psych. Bull. 117:250.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weidmann B, Deming DJ (2021) Team players: How social skills improve team performance. Econometrica 89:2637–2657.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wiking S, Brattfjell ML, Iversen EE, Malinowska K, Mikkelsen RL, Røed LP, Westgren JE (2016) Sex differences in furniture assembly performance: An experimental study. Appl. Cognitive Psych. 30:226–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wühr P, Lange BP, Schwarz S (2017) Tears or fears? Comparing gender stereotypes about movie preferences to actual preferences. Frontiers Psych. 8:428.Google Scholar