Auditor Tenure and Misreporting: Evidence from a Dynamic Oligopoly Game
References
- (2007) Sequential estimation of dynamic discrete games. Econometrica 75(1):1–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Recent developments in empirical IO: Dynamic demand and dynamic games. Adv. Econom. Econometrics 3:53–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) The impact of the PCAOB individual engagement inspection process-preliminary evidence. Accounting Rev. 93(4):53–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Practical methods for estimation of dynamic discrete choice models. Annu. Rev. Econom. 3(1):363–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Conditional choice probability estimation of dynamic discrete choice models with unobserved heterogeneity. Econometrica 79(6):1823–1867.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Audit Analytics (2020) Auditor tenure by revenue. https://blog.auditanalytics.com/auditor-tenure-by-revenue/.Google Scholar
- (2009) Discussion of “Mandatory audit partner rotation, audit quality, and market perception: Evidence from Taiwan”. Contemporary Accounting Res. 26(2):393–402.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Are audit fees discounted in initial year audit engagements? J. Accounting Econom. 69(2–3):101282.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Learning by doing and audit quality. Contemporary Accounting Res. 23(1):1–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Audit firm tenure, non-audit services, and internal assessments of audit quality. J. Accounting Res. 53(3):461–509.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) How often do managers withhold information? Accounting Rev. 95(4):73–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Effects of multiple clients on the reliability of audit reports. J. Accounting Res. 44(1):29–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Earnings management and earnings quality: Theory and evidence. Accounting Rev. 94(4):77–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) The effects of mandatory audit firm rotation on client importance and audit industry concentration. Accounting Rev. 93(1):1–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) An analysis of forced auditor change: The case of former Arthur Andersen clients. Accounting Rev. 82(3):621–650.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Audit market concentration and auditor tolerance for earnings management. Contemporary Accounting Res. 29(4):1171–1203.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Rent-extraction in audit: Evidence from hurricanes. Working paper, Columbia University, New York, NY.Google Scholar
- (2019) Investment dynamics and earnings-return properties: A structural approach. J. Accounting Res. 57(3):639–674.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Auditor–client compatibility and audit firm selection. J. Accounting Res. 54(3):725–775.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Mandatory audit firm rotation and audit quality. Eur. Accounting Rev. 25(1):35–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Audit partner tenure and audit quality. Accounting Rev. 81(3):653–676.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) The role of accounting in a dynamic model of CEO pay and turnover. Working paper, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
- (2010) Reporting bias with an audit committee. Accounting Rev. 85(2):447–481.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Audit partner tenure, audit firm tenure, and discretionary accruals: Does long auditor tenure impair earnings quality? Contemporary Accounting Res. 25(2):415–445.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Accrual accounting and resource allocation: A general equilibrium analysis. J. Accounting Res. 59(4):1179–1219.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Maintaining a reputation for consistently beating earnings expectations and the slippery slope to earnings manipulation. Contemporary Accounting Res. 36(4):1966–1998.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) The auditor’s slippery slope: An analysis of reputational incentives. Management Sci. 56(6):924–937.Link, Google Scholar
- (1981a) Auditor independence, ‘low balling’, and disclosure regulation. J. Accounting Econom. 3(2):113–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1981b) Auditor size and audit quality. J. Accounting Econom. 3(3):183–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) A review of archival auditing research. J. Accounting Econom. 58(2–3):275–326.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Audit retendering and mandatory auditor rotation. Preprint, submitted September 24, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3444676.Google Scholar
- (2020) Using a hidden Markov model to measure earnings quality. J. Accounting Econom. 69(2–3):101281.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) The evolution of audit market structure and the emergence of the Big 4: Evidence from Australia. Preprint, submitted July 12, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2431727.Google Scholar
- (2013) Empirical evidence on repeat restatements. Accounting Horizons 28(1):93–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2000) Reporting bias. Accounting Rev. 75(2):229–245.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Implications of power: When the CEO can pressure the CFO to bias reports. J. Accounting Econom. 58(1):117–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Lobbying and uniform disclosure regulation. J. Accounting Res. 54(3):863–893.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) How is the audit market affected by characteristics of the nonaudit services market? J. Accounting Res. 59(3):959–1020.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Was Sarbanes-Oxley costly? Evidence from optimal contracting on CEO compensation. J. Accounting Res. 60(4):1189–1234.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) The economic consequences of audit market competition: Evidence from cost of bank financing. Preprint, submitted August 5, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3274044.Google Scholar
- (2015) Competition in the audit market: Policy implications. J. Accounting Res. 53(4):725–775.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Audit firms face downward-sloping demand curves and the audit market is far from perfectly competitive. Rev. Accounting Stud. 22(4):1582–1594.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) Auditor tenure and perceptions of audit quality. Accounting Rev. 80(2):585–612.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) On the economics of audit partner tenure and rotation: Evidence from PCAOB data. Accounting Rev. 96(2):303–331.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Public audit oversight and reporting credibility: Evidence from the PCAOB inspection regime. Rev. Financial Stud. 33(10):4532–4579.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1994) Protection for sale. Amer. Econom. Rev. 84(4):833.Google Scholar
- (2009) Earnings quality: Some evidence on the role of auditor tenure and auditors’ industry expertise. J. Accounting Econom. 47(3):265–287.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Joint audit, audit market structure, and consumer surplus. Rev. Accounting Stud. 22(4):1595–1627.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) The value of auditor industry specialization: Evidence from a structural model. Accounting Rev. 97(7):193–222.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Mandatory audit rotation: An international investigation. Working paper, University of Houston, Houston, TX.Google Scholar
- (2008) The importance of distinguishing errors from irregularities in restatement research: The case of restatements and CEO/CFO turnover. Accounting Rev. 83(6):1487–1519.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1993) Conditional choice probabilities and the estimation of dynamic models. Rev. Econom. Stud. 60(3):497–529.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) CFO fiduciary responsibilities and annual bonus incentives. J. Accounting Res. 47(4):1061–1093.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002) Audit-firm tenure and the quality of financial reports. Contemporary Accounting Res. 19(4):637–660.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) The association between audit-firm tenure and audit fees paid to successor auditors: Evidence from Arthur Andersen. Auditing 26(2):95–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Do the SEC’s enforcement preferences affect corporate misconduct? J. Accounting Econom. 51(3):259–278.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1997) Litigation risk and auditor resignations. Accounting Rev. 72(4):539–560.Google Scholar
- (2014) The effect of mandatory audit firm rotation on audit quality and audit fees: Empirical evidence from the Korean audit market. Auditing 33(4):167–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) US audit partner rotations. Accounting Rev. 92(3):209–237.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Auditor liability and client acceptance decisions. Accounting Rev. 85(1):261–285.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1998) Low balling, legal liability and auditor independence. Accounting Rev. 73(4):533–555.Google Scholar
- (2014) Auditor tenure and rotation. The Routledge Companion to Auditing (Routledge), 111–128.Google Scholar
- (2010) Big five audits and accounting fraud. Contemporary Accounting Res. 27(1):209–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Selection models in accounting research. Accounting Rev. 87(2):589–616.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Does mandatory rotation of audit partners improve audit quality? Accounting Rev. 89(5):1775–1803.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) Two-sided matching in the audit market. Preprint, submitted September 12, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3117828.Google Scholar
- (2015) Evaluating market-based corporate governance reform: Evidence from a structural analysis of mandatory auditor rotation. Preprint, submitted November 6, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2686354.Google Scholar
- (2013) Relation between audit effort and financial report misstatements: Evidence from quarterly and annual restatements. Accounting Rev. 88(4):1385–1412.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Mandatory audit firm rotation: Fresh look vs. poor knowledge. J. Accounting Public Policy 28(2):71–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1990) Audit pricing and independence. Accounting Rev. 65(2):315–336.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002) Identifying dynamic discrete decision processes. Econometrica 70(2):801–816.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) Does auditor quality and tenure matter to investors? Evidence from the bond market. J. Accounting Res. 42(4):755–793.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Non-GAAP reporting and investment. Chicago Booth Research Paper (19-27).Google Scholar
- (2002) Evidence from auditors about managers’ and auditors’ earnings management decisions. Accounting Rev. 77(s-1):175–202.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) Determinants of market reactions to restatement announcements. J. Accounting Econom. 37(1):59–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Auditor specialization and information spillovers. Accounting Rev. 97(7):401–428.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Meta-analysis and the accounting literature: The case of audit committee independence and financial reporting quality. Eur. Accounting Rev. 17(2):305–330.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Does mandatory audit firm rotation enhance auditor independence? Evidence from Spain. Auditing 28(1):113–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1994) Structural estimation of Markov decision processes. Engle RF, McFadden DL, eds. Handbook of Econometrics, vol. IV, 3081–3143.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Auditor tenure and the timeliness of misstatement discovery. Accounting Rev. 93(2):315–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Auditor size and audit quality revisited: The importance of audit technology. Accounting Auditing Control 22(3):111–144.Google Scholar
- (2015) Admitting mistakes: Home country effect on the reliability of restatement reporting. Accounting Rev. 90(3):1201–1240.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Audit firm tenure and financial restatements: An analysis of industry specialization and fee effects. J. Accounting Public Policy 26(2):131–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) The causes and consequences of auditor switching: A review of the literature. J. Accounting Literature 28:47–121.Google Scholar
- (2019) EU Statutory Audit Reform: Impact on Costs, Concentration and Competition (European Parliamentary Research Service).Google Scholar
- (2017) Audit firm perspective on audit firm rotation and enhancing independence: Evidence from PCAOB comment letters. Current Issues Auditing 11(1):A22–A44.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Ye M (2023) The theory of auditing economics: Evidence and suggestions for future research. Found. Trends Account. 18(3):138–267.Google Scholar
- (2018) How common are intentional GAAP violations? Estimates from a dynamic model. J. Accounting Res. 56(1):5–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Disclosure dynamics and investor learning. Management Sci. 67(6):3429–3466.Link, Google Scholar

