Are Third-Party Fundamental Valuations Relevant in Public Company Takeovers?
References
- (2009) Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion, 1st ed. (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Valuation disputes in corporate bankruptcy. Univ. Pennsylvania Law Rev. 166:1819.Google Scholar
- (2017) In defense of fairness opinions. Duff and Phelps white paper, New York.Google Scholar
- (2014) Golden parachutes and the wealth of shareholders. J. Corporate Finance 25:140–154.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1989) Fairness opinions: How fair are they and what can be done about it? Duke Law J. 1989(1):27–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Market-based corrective actions. Rev. Financial Stud. 23(2):781–820.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) How are firms sold? J. Finance 62(2):847–875.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Do sell-side analysts exhibit differential target price forecasting ability? Rev. Accounting Stud. 18(4):930–955.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Information production by investment banks: Evidence from fairness opinions. J. Law Econom. 56(1):245–280.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Spring-loading future performance when no one is looking? Earnings and cash flow management around acquisitions. Rev. Accounting Stud. 21(4):1081–1115.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Investment Valuation, 3rd ed. (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
- (2016) Fairness opinions: Fix them flush them. https://aswathdamodaran.blogspot.com/2016/09/fairness-opinions-fix-them-or-get-rid.html.Google Scholar
- (2006) Fairness opinions. Wayne State University Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series No. 07-07, Detroit, MI.Google Scholar
- (1990) Equity valuation and corporate control. Accounting Rev. 65(1):93–112.Google Scholar
- (1999) An empirical assessment of the residual income valuation model. J. Accounting Econom. 26(1–3):1–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1992) Responsibility of investment bankers to shareholders. Washington Univ. Law Rev. 70(2).Google Scholar
- (1985) The business judgment rule and the Trans Union Case. Bus. Lawyer 40(4):1437–1455.Google Scholar
- (1998) Accounting valuation, market expectation, and cross-sectional stock returns. J. Accounting Econom. 25(3):283–319.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Are fairness opinions fair? The case of mergers and acquisitions. J. Financial Econom. 91(2):179–207.Google Scholar
- (2020) Valuation, 7th ed. (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
- (1997) Measuring long-horizon security price performance. J. Financial Econom. 43(3):301–339.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1985) Golden parachutes, executive decision-making, and shareholder wealth. J. Accounting Econom. 7(1–3):179–203.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002) Equity valuation using multiples. J. Accounting Res. 40(1):135–172.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) The information provision in the corporate acquisition process: Why target firms obtain multiple fairness opinions. Accounting Rev. 95(1):287–310.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) The “market exception” in appraisal statutes. Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance. Accessed March 30, 2020, https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2020/03/30/the-market-exception-in-appraisal-statues/.Google Scholar
- (1997) A survey of corporate governance. J. Finance LII(2):737–783.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Smith v. Van Gorkom (1985) 488A.2d 858 [Del. 1985], https://law.justia.com/cases/delaware/supreme-court/1985/488-a-2d-858-4.html.Google Scholar
- (2000) Merton Miller and modern finance. Financial Management 29(4):119–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) Essays on disclosure. J. Accounting Econom. 32(1–3):97–180.Crossref, Google Scholar

