CEO Activism and Firm Value
References
- (2022) Understanding labor market discrimination against transgender people: Evidence from a double list experiment and a survey. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- (2009) The limitations of industry concentration measures constructed with Compustat data: Implications for finance research. Rev. Financial Stud. 22(10):3839–3871.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Industry concentration and corporate disclosure policy. J. Accounting Econom. 58(2–3):240–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) Why is there so little money in US politics? J. Econom. Perspective 17(1):105–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) The big three corporate carbon emissions around the world. J. Financial Econom. 142(2):674–696.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Do CEOs affect employees’ political choices? Rev. Financial Stud. 33(4):1781–1817.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) Clawback provisions and firm risk. Rev. Corporate Finance Stud. 12(2):191–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) To advocate or not to advocate: Determinants and financial consequences of CEO activism. British J. Management 32(4):1062–1081.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Corporate sociopolitical activism and firm value. J. Marketing 84(5):1–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Option backdating and board interlocks. Rev. Financial Stud. 22(11):4821–4847.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Corporate governance propagation through overlapping directors. Rev. Financial Stud. 24(7):2358–2394.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) The demotivating effects of communicating a social-political stance: Field experimental evidence from an online labor market platform. Management Sci. 67(2):1004–1025.Link, Google Scholar
- (2007) It’s all about me: Narcissistic chief executive officers and their effects on company strategy and performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(3):351–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) The new CEO activists. Harvard Bus. Rev. 96(1):78–89.Google Scholar
- (2019) Assessing the impact of CEO activism. Organ. Environment 32(2):159–185.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Institutional shareholders and corporate social responsibility. J. Financial Econom. 135(2):483–504.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Monitoring: Which institutions matter? J. Financial Econom. 86(2):279–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) The consequences of managerial indiscretions: Sex, lies, and firm value. J. Financial Econom. 127(2):389–415.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Corporate political contributions and stock returns. J. Finance 65(2):687–724.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Knowing where and how criminal organizations operate using web content. Chen X, ed. Proc. 21st ACM Internat. Conf. on Inform. and Knowledge Management (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 1412–1421.Google Scholar
- (2016) The grammar of decoupling: A cognitive-linguistic perspective on firms’ sustainability claims and stakeholders’ interpretation. Acad. Management J. 59(2):705–729.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Faking it or muddling through? Understanding decoupling in response to stakeholder pressures. Acad. Management J. 55(6):1429–1448.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Shaped by their daughters: Executives, female socialization, and corporate social responsibility. J. Financial Econom. 126(3):543–562.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Financial expert CEOs: CEO’s work experience and firm’s financial policies. J. Financial Econom. 114(1):125–154.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Are red or blue companies more likely to go green? Politics and corporate social responsibility. J. Financial Econom. 111(1):158–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) CEO (in)activism and investor decisions. Working paper, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.Google Scholar
- (2019) Do institutional investors drive corporate social responsibility? International evidence. J. Financial Econom. 131(1):693–714.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Does the stock market fully value intangibles? Employee satisfaction and equity prices. J. Financial Econom. 101(3):621–640.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Managers with and without style: Evidence using exogenous variation. Rev. Financial Stud. 26(3):567–601.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Corporate finance policies and social networks. Management Sci. 63(8):2420–2438.Link, Google Scholar
- (2005) Limousine liberals and corporate conservatives: The financial constituencies of the democratic and republican parties. Soc. Sci. Quart. 86(4):761–778.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) CEO political preference and corporate tax sheltering. J. Corporate Finance 38:37–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Strategic CEO activism in polarized markets. Working paper, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.Google Scholar
- (2001) Institutional investors and equity prices. Quart. J. Econom. 116(1):229–259.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) The big three and board gender diversity: The effectiveness of shareholder voice. J. Financial Econom. 149(2):323–348.Google Scholar
- (2013) Managerial attitudes and corporate actions. J. Financial Econom. 109(1):103–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) Measuring and improving stakeholder welfare is easier said than done. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 58(4):1473–1507.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Entropy balancing for causal effects: A multivariate reweighting method to produce balanced samples in observational studies. Political Anal. 20(1):25–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Ebalance: A Stata package for entropy balancing. J. Statist. Software 54(7):1–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) CEO sociopolitical activism: A stakeholder alignment model. Acad. Management Rev. 46(1):33–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Do investors value sustainability? A natural experiment examining ranking and fund flows. J. Finance 74(6):2789–2837.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) Corporate political activity: A review and research agenda. J. Management 30(6):837–857.Google Scholar
- (2009) The price of sin: The effects of social norms on markets. J. Financial Econom. 93(1):15–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Red and blue investing: Values and finance. J. Financial Econom. 103(1):1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) The effects of CEO activism: Partisan consumer behavior and its duration. Strategic Management J. 44(3):672–703.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Political values, culture, and corporate litigation. Management Sci. 61(12):2905–2925.Link, Google Scholar
- (2017) Have instrumental variables brought us closer to the truth. Rev. Corporate Finance Stud. 6(2):127–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Partisan spatial sorting in the United States: A theoretical and empirical overview. J. Public Econom. 211(C):104668.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) On a stakeholder model of corporate governance. Financial Management 50(2):321–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Industry product market competition and managerial incentives. J. Accounting Econom. 43(2–3):275–297.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Taking a stand: Consumer responses when companies get (or don’t get) political. Working paper, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
- (2020) The importance of climate risks for institutional investors. Rev. Financial Stud. 33(3):1067–1111.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) The double-edged sword of CEO activism. Rock Center for Corporate Governance at Stanford University Closer Look Series: Topics, Issues Controversies Corporate Governance No. CGRP-74, 19–5.Google Scholar
- (2022) The effect of workplace gender diversity disclosures on job search decisions. Working paper, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.Google Scholar
- (2013) Corporate political activity: A literature review and research agenda. Internat. J. Management Rev. 15(1):86–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) The most liberal and conservative tech companies, ranked by employees’ political donations. Accessed July 1, 2020, https://www.cnbc.com/2020/07/02/most-liberal-tech-companies-ranked-by-employee-donations.html.Google Scholar
- (2011) When is a liability not a liability? Textual analysis, dictionaries, and 10‐Ks. J. Finance 66(1):35–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Behind the scenes: The corporate governance preferences of institutional investors. J. Finance 71(6):2905–2932.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) CEO activism as communication to multiple audiences. Working paper, Norwich Business School UEA, Norwich, UK.Google Scholar
- (2019) BlackRock chief Larry Fink tells CEOs to fix society’s problems in an increasingly divided world. Business Insider (January 17), Accessed March 27, 2023, https://www.businessinsider.com/larry-finks-annual-letter-2019-1-2019.Google Scholar
- (2018) Blue and red companies: How CEO activism is reshaping workforce politics. National Public Radio (October 15), Accessed March 27, 2023, https://www.npr.org/2018/10/15/656849460/blue-and-red-companies-how-ceo-activism-is-reshaping-workforce-politics.Google Scholar
- (2012) Individual political contributions and firm performance. J. Financial Econom. 105(2):367–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Firm statements, consumer political beliefs, and the limits of stakeholder capitalism. Working paper, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, MO.Google Scholar
- (2022) Do equity markets care about income inequality? Evidence from pay ratio disclosure. J. Finance 77(2):1371–1411.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Intangible capital and the investment-q relation. J. Financial Econom. 123(2):251–272.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Corporate America has embraced Pride but made some crucial missteps. Fortune (June 30), Accessed March 27, 2023, https://fortune.com/2021/06/30/corporate-america-pride-mistakes-lgbtq-political-donations-companies-anti-trans-laws-allyship/.Google Scholar
- (2022) IPO price formation and board gender diversity. Working paper, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.Google Scholar
- (2016) Does the market value CEO styles? Amer. Econom. Rev. 106(5):262–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) CEOs should lead on addressing social issues, poll finds. New York Times (May 1), Accessed March 27, 2023, https://www.nytimes.com/(2018)/05/01/business/dealbook/ceos-social-change.html.Google Scholar
- (2017) Pilot CEOs and corporate innovation. J. Financial Econom. 123(1):209–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) A top CEO was ousted after making his company more environmentally conscious. Now he’s speaking out. Time (November 21), Accessed March 27, 2023, https://time.com/6121684/emmanuel-faber-danone-interview/.Google Scholar
- Weber Shandwick & KRC Research (2018) CEO activism in 2018: The purposeful CEO. Accessed March 27, 2023, https://www.webershandwick.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/CEO-Activism-2018_Purposeful-CEO.pdf.Google Scholar
- (2017) Investor reaction to covert corporate political activity. Strategic Management J. 38(12):2424–2443.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1980) A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica 48(4):817–838.Crossref, Google Scholar

