Introduction to the Special Issue on the Human-Algorithm Connection

References

• Almog D, Gauriot R, Page L, Martin D (2025) AI oversight and human mistakes: Evidence from centre court. Preprint, submitted February 12, https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.16754.Google Scholar
• Bai B, Dai H, Zhang DJ, Zhang F, Hu H (2022) The impacts of algorithmic work assignment on fairness perceptions and productivity: Evidence from field experiments. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 24(6):3060–3078.Link, Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan M, Ferreira KJ, Tong J (2025) Human-algorithm collaboration with private information: Naïve advice-weighting behavior and mitigation. Management Sci. 72(1):265–284.Link, Google Scholar
• Bao L, Huang D, Lin C (2024) Can artificial intelligence improve gender equality? Evidence from a natural experiment. Management Sci. 72(1):474–494.Google Scholar
• Bastani H, Bastani O, Park Sinchaisri W (2025) Improving human sequential decision-making with reinforcement learning. Management Sci. 72(1):733–755.Google Scholar
• Bayer RC, Renou L (2024) Interacting with man or machine: When do humans reason better? Management Sci. 72(1):594–608.Google Scholar
• Beer R, Qi A, Rios I (2025) Behavioral externalities of process automation. Management Sci. 72(1):575–593.Google Scholar
• Ben-David D, Mintz I, Sade O (2025) Using AI and behavioral finance to cope with limited attention and reduce overdraft fees. Management Sci. 72(1):204–222.Google Scholar
• Bianchi M, Brière M (2024) Human-robot interactions in investment decisions. Management Sci. 72(1):14–31.Google Scholar
• Bockstedt JC, Buckman JR (2025) Humans’ use of AI-assistance: The effect of loss aversion on willingness to delegate decisions. Management Sci. 72(1):323–342.Google Scholar
• Boyacı T, Canyakmaz C, De Véricourt F (2024) Human and machine: The impact of machine input on decision making under cognitive limitations. Management Sci. 70(2):1258–1275.Link, Google Scholar
• Burton JW, Stein MK, Jensen TB (2020) A systematic review of algorithm aversion in augmented decision making. J. Behav. Decision Making 33(2):220–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Calvano E, Calzolari G, Denicolo V, Pastorello S (2020) Artificial intelligence, algorithmic pricing, and collusion. Amer. Econom. Rev. 110(10):3267–3297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caro F, de Tejada Cuenca AS (2023) Believing in analytics: Managers’ adherence to price recommendations from a DSS. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 25(2):524–542.Link, Google Scholar
• Castro F, Gao J, Martin S (2023) Human-AI interactions and societal pitfalls. Preprint, submitted September 19, https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.10448.Google Scholar
• Chapkovski P, Khapko M, Zoican M (2024) Trading gamification and investor behavior. Management Sci. 72(1):32–56.Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Kirshner SN, Ovchinnikov A, Andiappan M, Jenkin T (2025) A manager and an AI walk into a bar: Does ChatGPT make biased decisions like we do? Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 27(2):354–368.Link, Google Scholar
• Chohlas-Wood A, Coots M, Zhu H, Brunskill E, Goel S (2024) Learning to be fair: A consequentialist approach to equitable decision-making. Management Sci. 72(1):456–473.Google Scholar
• Colliard JE, Zhao J (2025) Artificial intelligence and the rents of finance workers. Preprint, submitted July 8, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5339402.Google Scholar
• Dargnies MP, Hakimov R, Kübler D (2024) Aversion to hiring algorithms: Transparency, gender profiling, and self-confidence. Management Sci. 72(1):285–301.Link, Google Scholar
• Davis AM, Mankad S, Corbett CJ, Katok E (2024) OM forum—The best of both worlds: Machine learning and behavioral science in operations management. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 26(5):1605–1621.Link, Google Scholar
• De-Arteaga M, Feuerriegel S, Saar-Tsechansky M (2022) Algorithmic fairness in business analytics: Directions for research and practice. Production Oper. Management 31(10):3749–3770.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Bock KW, Coussement K, De Caigny A, Słowiński R, Baesens B, Boute RN, Choi TM, et al. (2024) Explainable ai for operational research: A defining framework, methods, applications, and a research agenda. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 317(2):249–272.Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Véricourt F, Gurkan H (2023) Is your machine better than you? You may never know. Management Sci. 72(1):558–574.Link, Google Scholar
• de Véricourt F, Perakis G (2020) Frontiers in service science: The management of data analytics services: New challenges and future directions. Service Sci. 12(4):121–129.Link, Google Scholar
• Dell’Acqua F, Kogut B, Perkowski P (2025) Super Mario meets AI: Experimental effects of automation and skills on team performance and coordination. Rev. Econom. Statist. 107(4):951–966.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dietvorst BJ, Simmons JP, Massey C (2018) Overcoming algorithm aversion: People will use imperfect algorithms if they can (even slightly) modify them. Management Sci. 64(3):1155–1170.Link, Google Scholar
• Dixon J, Hong B, Wu L (2021) The robot revolution: Managerial and employment consequences for firms. Management Sci. 67(9):5586–5605.Link, Google Scholar
• Flicker B (2025) Managerial insight and “optimal” algorithms. Management Sci. 72(1):128–147.Google Scholar
• Fu X, Chen N, Gao P, Li Y (2025a) Privacy-preserving personalized recommender systems. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management, ePub ahead of print August 18, https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2023.0271.Link, Google Scholar
• Fu Z, Qi Z, Yang Z, Wang Z, Wang L (2025b) Offline reinforcement learning for human-guided human-machine interaction with private information. Management Sci. 72(1):646–666.Google Scholar
• Fügener A, Walzner DD, Gupta A (2025) Roles of artificial intelligence in collaboration with humans: Automation, augmentation, and the future of work. Management Sci. 72(1):538–557.Link, Google Scholar
• Fuster A, Goldsmith-Pinkham P, Ramadorai T, Walther A (2022) Predictably unequal? The effects of machine learning on credit markets. J. Finance 77(1):5–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ganju KK, Atasoy H, McCullough J, Greenwood B (2020) The role of decision support systems in attenuating racial biases in healthcare delivery. Management Sci. 66(11):5171–5181.Link, Google Scholar
• Garcia D, Tolvanen J, Wagner AK (2025) Strategic responses to algorithmic recommendations: Evidence from hotel pricing. Management Sci. 72(1):609–626.Google Scholar
• Ge H, Bastani H, Bastani O (2023) Rethinking fairness for human-AI collaboration. Preprint, submitted October 5, https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.03647.Google Scholar
• Gnewuch U, Morana S, Hinz O, Kellner R, Maedche A (2024) More than a bot? The impact of disclosing human involvement on customer interactions with hybrid service agents. Inform. Systems Res. 35(3):936–955.Link, Google Scholar
• Grand-Clément J, Pauphilet J (2024) The best decisions are not the best advice: Making adherence-aware recommendations. Management Sci. 72(1):667–692.Link, Google Scholar
• Greiner B, Grünwald P, Lindner T, Lintner G, Wiernsperger M (2025) Incentives, framing, and reliance on algorithmic advice: An experimental study. Management Sci. 72(1):302–322.Google Scholar
• Hillenbrand A, Hippel S (2025) Strategic inattention in product search. Management Sci. 72(1):693–722.Google Scholar
• Hillebrand L, Raisch S, Schad J (2025) Managing with artificial intelligence: An integrative framework. Acad. Management Ann. 19(1):343–375.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hu X, Huang Y, Li B, Lu T (2025) Human-algorithmic bias: Source, evolution, and impact. Management Sci. 72(1):495–514.Google Scholar
• Hurlin C, Pérignon C, Saurin S (2024) The fairness of credit scoring models. Management Sci. 72(1):406–425.Google Scholar
• Ibanez MR, Clark JR, Huckman RS, Staats BR (2018) Discretionary task ordering: Queue management in radiological services. Management Sci. 64(9):4389–4407.Link, Google Scholar
• Kawaguchi K (2021) When will workers follow an algorithm? A field experiment with a retail business. Management Sci. 67(3):1670–1695.Link, Google Scholar
• Kesavan S, Kushwaha T (2020) Field experiment on the profit implications of merchants’ discretionary power to override data-driven decision-making tools. Management Sci. 66(11):5182–5190.Link, Google Scholar
• Kesavan S, Kushwaha KR, Steele D (2025) Profit implications of judgmental adjustments to forecast inputs: Evidence from a large-scale field experiment. Management Sci. 72(1):119–127.Google Scholar
• Kim Y, Knight B, Mitrofanov D, Xu Y (2024) Algorithm-enabled decision support and worker learning: A large-scale field experiment. Preprint, submitted October 12, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4976809.Google Scholar
• Kleinberg J, Lakkaraju H, Leskovec J, Ludwig J, Mullainathan S (2018) Human decisions and machine predictions. Quart. J. Econom. 133(1):237–293.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Komiyama J, Noda S (2024) On statistical discrimination as a failure of social learning: A multiarmed bandit approach. Management Sci. 72(1):442–455.Link, Google Scholar
• Koren M (2024) The gatekeeper effect: The implications of pre-screening, self-selection, and bias for hiring processes. Management Sci. 72(1):426–441.Google Scholar
• Kormylo C, Adjerid I, Ball S, Dogan C (2025) Till tech do us part: Betrayal aversion and its role in algorithm use. Management Sci. 72(1):343–367.Google Scholar
• Krakowski S, Haftor D, Luger J, Pashkevich N, Raisch S (2025) Human-centered artificial intelligence: A field experiment. Management Sci. 72(1):57–72.Google Scholar
• Lambrecht A, Tucker C (2019) Algorithmic bias? An empirical study of apparent gender-based discrimination in the display of stem career ads. Management Sci. 65(7):2966–2981.Link, Google Scholar
• Lambrecht A, Tucker C (2024) Apparent algorithmic discrimination and real-time algorithmic learning in digital search advertising. Quant. Marketing Econom. 22(4):357–387.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lian Z, Delarue A, Martin S (2025) Algorithmic precision and human decision: A study of interactive optimization for school schedules. Management Sci. 72(1):148–166.Google Scholar
• Liu M, Tang X, Xia S, Zhang S, Zhu Y, Meng Q (2023) Algorithm aversion: Evidence from ridesharing drivers. Management Sci. 72(1):193–203.Link, Google Scholar
• Lu T, Tomlin B (2025) Augmenting the operations manager with a prediction machine. Preprint, submitted June 6, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5282711.Google Scholar
• Lu T, Zhang Y (2025) 1 + 1 > 2? Information, humans, and machines. Inform. Systems Res. 36(1):394–418.Link, Google Scholar
• Luo X, Tong S, Fang Z, Qu Z (2019) Frontiers: Machines vs. humans: The impact of artificial intelligence chatbot disclosure on customer purchases. Marketing Sci. 38(6):937–947.Abstract, Google Scholar
• Melzner J, Bonezzi A, Meyvis T (2024) Speaking in private: Privacy expectations depend on communication modality. Management Sci. 72(1):723–732.Google Scholar
• Miklós-Thal J, Tucker C (2019) Collusion by algorithm: Does better demand prediction facilitate coordination between sellers? Management Sci. 65(4):1552–1561.Link, Google Scholar
• Schanke S, Burtch G, Ray G (2024) Digital lyrebirds: Experimental evidence that voice-based deepfakes influence trust. Management Sci. 72(1):386–405.Google Scholar
• Senoner J, Netland T, Feuerriegel S (2022) Using explainable artificial intelligence to improve process quality: Evidence from semiconductor manufacturing. Management Sci. 68(8):5704–5723.Link, Google Scholar
• Snyder C, Keppler S, Leider S (2025) Algorithm reliance, fast and slow. Management Sci. 72(1):368–385.Google Scholar
• Sun J, Zhang DJ, Hu H, Van Mieghem JA (2022) Predicting human discretion to adjust algorithmic prescription: A large-scale field experiment in warehouse operations. Management Sci. 68(2):846–865.Link, Google Scholar
• Tambe PB (2025) Reskilling the workforce for AI: Domain expertise and algorithmic literacy. Management Sci. 72(1):515–537.Google Scholar
• Te’eni D, Yahav I, Zagalsky A, Schwartz D, Silverman G, Cohen D, Mann Y, Lewinsky D (2025) Reciprocal human-machine learning: A theory and an instantiation for the case of message classification. Management Sci. 72(1):167–192.Google Scholar
• Tucker C (2018) Privacy, algorithms, and artificial intelligence. Agrawal A, Gans J, Goldfarb A, eds. The Economics of Artificial Intelligence: An Agenda (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 423–437.Google Scholar
• Van Donselaar KH, Gaur V, Van Woensel T, Broekmeulen RA, Fransoo JC (2010) Ordering behavior in retail stores and implications for automated replenishment. Management Sci. 56(5):766–784.Link, Google Scholar
• Wang G, Wu L (2025) Artificial intelligence, lean startup method, and product innovations. Management Sci. 72(1):756–782.Google Scholar
• Wang H, Zhang Y, Lu T (2025) The power of disagreement: A field experiment to investigate human-algorithm collaboration in loan evaluations. Management Sci. 72(1):96–118.Google Scholar
• Wiles E, Munyikwa Z, Horton J (2025) Algorithmic writing assistance on jobseekers’ resumes increases hires. Management Sci. 71(12):10144–10164.Link, Google Scholar
• Xu Y, Dai H, Yan W (2024) Identity disclosure and anthropomorphism in voice chatbot design: A field experiment. Management Sci. 72(1):223–241.Google Scholar
• Yang C, Bauer K, Li X, Hinz O (2025) My advisor, her AI and me: Evidence from a field experiment on human-AI collaboration and investment decisions. Management Sci. 72(1):242–264.Google Scholar
• Yin J, Ngiam KY, Tan SSL, Teo HH (2025) Designing AI-based work processes: How the timing of AI advice affects diagnostic decision making. Management Sci. 71(11):9361–9383.Link, Google Scholar
• Yu Y, Xue W, Jia L, Tan Y (2025) When emotion AI meets strategic users. Management Sci. 72(1):627–645.Google Scholar
• Zhang S, Narayandas D (2025) Engaging customers with AI in online chats: Evidence from a randomized field experiment. Management Sci. 72(1):73–95.Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Dou Y, Wu D (2025) Incentivizing the content creator when tasks can be delegated to artificial intelligence. Preprint, submitted February 11, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5118060.Google Scholar