Innovation: The Bright Side of Common Ownership?

References

• Aghion P, Howitt P (1992) A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica 60(2):323–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aghion P, Van Reenen J, Zingales L (2013) Innovation and institutional ownership. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(1):277–304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aghion P, Bloom N, Blundell R, Griffith R, Howitt P (2005) Competition and innovation: An inverted-U relationship. Quart. J. Econom. 120(2):701–728.Google Scholar
• Akcigit U, Ates ST (2021) Ten facts on declining business dynamism and lessons from endogenous growth theory. Amer. Econom. J. Macroeconom. 13(1):257–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amel-Zadeh A, Kasperk F, Schmalz MC (2022) Measuring common ownership: The role of blockholders and insiders. Preprint, submitted September 19, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4219430.Google Scholar
• Antón M, Ederer F, Giné M, Pellegrino B (2023a) Mergers and acquisitions under common ownership. AEA Papers Proc. 113:294–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Antón M, Ederer F, Giné M, Schmalz MC (2023b) Common ownership, competition, and top management incentives. J. Political Econom. 131(5):1294–1355.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Belenzon S, Lia S (2021) Knowledge spillovers and corporate investment in scientific research. Amer. Econom. Rev. 111(3):871–898.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azar J (2012) A new look at oligopoly: Implicit collusion through portfolio diversification. PhD thesis, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
• Azar J, Vives X (2021) General equilibrium oligopoly and ownership structure. Econometrica 89(3):999–1048.Google Scholar
• Azar J, Schmalz M, Tecu I (2018) Anticompetitive effects of common ownership. J. Finance 73(4):1513–1565.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Backus M, Conlon C, Sinkinson M (2021) Common ownership in America: 1980–2017. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 13(3):273–308.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ben-David I, Franzoni F, Moussawi R, Sedunov J (2021) The granular nature of large institutional investors. Management Sci. 67(11):6629–6659.Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Schankerman M, Van Reenen J (2013) Identifying technology spillovers and product market rivalry. Econometrica 81(4):1347–1393.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blundell R, Griffith R, Van Reenen J (1999) Market share, market value and innovation in a panel of British manufacturing firms. Rev. Econom. Stud. 66(3):529–554.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boller L, Scott Morton F (2020) Testing the theory of common stock ownership. NBER Working Paper No. 27515, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Bolton P, Harris C (1999) Strategic experimentation. Econometrica 67(2):349–374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borochin P, Yang J, Zhang R (2020) Common ownership types and their effects on innovation and competition. Preprint, submitted July 31, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3204767.Google Scholar
• Botelho TL (2018) Here’s an opportunity: Knowledge sharing among competitors as a response to buy-in uncertainty. Organ. Sci. 29(6):1033–1055.Link, Google Scholar
• Brander JA, Spencer BJ (1983) Strategic commitment with R&D: The symmetric case. Bell J. Econom. 14(1):225–235.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Branstetter LG, Sakakibara M (2002) When do research consortia work well and why? Evidence from Japanese panel data. Amer. Econom. Rev. 92(1):143–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brav A, Jiang W, Ma S, Tian X (2018) How does hedge fund activism reshape corporate innovation? J. Financial Econom. 130(2):237–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bryan KA, Lemus J (2017) The direction of innovation. J. Econom. Theory 172:247–272.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Callander S, Matouschek N (2021) The novelty of innovation: Competition, disruption, and antitrust policy. Management Sci. 68(1):37–51.Google Scholar
• Chiao C-H, Qiu B, Wang B (2021) Corporate innovation in a world of common ownership. Managerial Finance 47(2):145–166.Google Scholar
• D’Aspremont C, Jacquemin A (1988) Cooperative and noncooperative R&D in duopoly with spillovers. Amer. Econom. Rev. 78(5):1133–1137.Google Scholar
• Davis GF (2008) A new finance capitalism? Mutual funds and ownership re-concentration in the United States. Eur. Management Rev. 5(1):11–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Loecker J, Eeckhout J, Unger G (2020) The rise of market power and the macroeconomic implications. Quart. J. Econom. 135(2):561–644.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Drèze JH (1974) Investment under private ownership: Optimality, equilibrium and stability. Allocation Under Uncertainty: Equilibrium and Optimality (Springer, Berlin), 129–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ederer F, Pellegrino B (2021) The welfare cost of common ownership. Working paper, Yale, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
• Edgeworth FY (1881) Mathematical Psychics: An Essay on the Application of Mathematics to the Moral Sciences, vol. 10 (Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
• Eldar O, Grennan J, Waldock K (2020) Common Ownership and Startup Growth (Duke Law School, Durham, NC).Google Scholar
• European Competition Commission (2017) Commission decision M.7932-Dow/DuPont. Accessed July 27, 2024, https://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/decisions/m7932_13668_3.pdf.Google Scholar
• Federal Trade Commission (2018) Competition and consumer protection in the 21st century. Accessed July 27, 2024, https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/public_events/1422929/ftc_hearings_session_8_transcript_12-6-18_0.pdf.Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D, Tirole J (1984) The fat-cat effect, the puppy-dog ploy, and the lean and hungry look. Amer. Econom. Rev. 74(2):361–366.Google Scholar
• Geng H, Hau H, Lai S (2016) Technological progress and ownership structure. CEPR Discussion Paper No. 11064, CEPR Press, Paris & London.Google Scholar
• Gibbon AJ, Schain JP (2021) Rising markups, common ownership, and technological capacities. DICE Discussion Paper 340, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE), Germany.Google Scholar
• Gilbert R (2006) Looking for Mr. Schumpeter: Where are we in the competition-innovation debate? Innovation Policy and the Economy, vol. 6 (National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA), 159–215.Google Scholar
• Gompers PA, Metrick A (2001) Institutional investors and equity prices. Quart. J. Econom. 116(1):229–259.Crossref, Google Scholar
• González-Uribe J (2020) Exchanges of innovation resources inside venture capital portfolios. J. Financial Econom. 135(1):144–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grossman SJ, Hart O (1979) A theory of competitive equilibrium in stock market economies. Econometrica 47(2):293–329.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grossman GM, Helpman E (1991) Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez G, Philippon T (2017) Declining competition and investment in the US. NBER Working Paper No. 23583, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Häckner J (2000) A note on price and quantity competition in differentiated oligopolies. J. Econom. Theory 93(2):233–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall BH, Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M (2001) The NBER patent citation data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools. NBER Working Paper No. 8498, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Hall BH, Jaffe A, Trajtenberg M (2005) Market value and patent citations. RAND J. Econom. 36(1):16–38.Google Scholar
• Harford J, Jenter D, Li K (2011) Institutional cross-holdings and their effect on acquisition decisions. J. Financial Econom. 99(1):27–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hart OD (1979) On shareholder unanimity in large stock market economies. Econometrica 47(5):1057–1083.Crossref, Google Scholar
• He J, Huang J (2017) Product market competition in a world of cross-ownership: Evidence from institutional blockholdings. Rev. Financial Stud. 30(8):2674–2718.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoberg G, Phillips G (2016) Text-based network industries and endogenous product differentiation. J. Political Econom. 124(5):1423–1465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoskisson RE, Hitt MA, Johnson RA, Grossman W (2002) Conflicting voices: The effects of institutional ownership heterogeneity and internal governance on corporate innovation strategies. Acad. Management J. 45(4):697–716.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaffe AB (1988) Demand and supply influences in R & D intensity and productivity growth. Rev. Econom. Statist. 70(3):431–437.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson S, La Porta R, Lopez-de Silanes F, Shleifer A (2000) Tunneling. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(2):22–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones C (2005) Growth and ideas. Aghion P, Durlauf SN, eds. Handbook of Economic Growth, vol. 1, Part B (Elsevier B.V., Amsterdam), 1063–1111.Google Scholar
• Jones C, Williams J (2000) Too much of a good thing? The economics of investment in R&D. J. Econ. Growth 5(1):65–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kamien MI, Muller E, Zang I (1992) Research joint ventures and R&D cartels. Amer. Econom. Rev. 82(5):1293–1306.Google Scholar
• Katz ML (1986) An analysis of cooperative research and development. RAND J. Econom. 17(4):527–543.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knott AM, Posen HE, Wu B (2009) Spillover asymmetry and why it matters. Management Sci. 55(3):373–388.Link, Google Scholar
• Kogan L, Papanikolaou D, Seru A, Stoffman N (2017) Technological innovation, resource allocation, and growth. Quart. J. Econom. 132(2):665–712.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koh P-S, Reeb DM (2015) Missing R&D. J. Accounting Econom. 60(1):73–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kostovetsky L, Manconi A (2020) Common institutional ownership and diffusion of innovation. Preprint, submitted April 15, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2896372.Google Scholar
• Kuhn J, Younge K, Marco A (2020) Patent citations reexamined. RAND J. Econom. 51(1):109–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leahy D, Neary PJ (1997) Public policy towards R&D in oligopolistic industries. Amer. Econom. Rev. 87(4):642–662.Google Scholar
• Letina I (2016) The road not taken: Competition and the R&D portfolio. RAND J. Econom. 47(2):433–460.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li X, Liu T, Taylor LA (2022) Common ownership and innovation efficiency. Preprint, submitted December 14, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3479439.Google Scholar
• Lindsey L (2008) Blurring firm boundaries: The role of venture capital in strategic alliances. J. Finance 63(3):1137–1168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• López AL, Vives X (2019) Overlapping ownership, R&D spillovers, and antitrust policy. J. Political Econom. 127(5):2394–2437.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lucking B, Bloom N, Van Reenen J (2019) Have R&D spillovers declined in the 21st century? Fiscal Stud. 40(4):561–590.Google Scholar
• Mooney A, Mancini DP (2020) Drugmakers urged to collaborate on coronavirus vaccine. Financial Times (April 23), https://www.ft.com/content/b452ceb9-765a-4c25-9876-fb73d736f92a.Google Scholar
• Moskalev A (2020) Objective function of a non-price-taking firm with heterogeneous shareholders. Preprint, submitted October 31, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3471564.Google Scholar
• OECD (2017) Common ownership by institutional investors and its impact on competition. Accessed July 27, 2024, https://one.oecd.org/document/DAF/COMP(2017)10/en/pdf.Google Scholar
• Olson B, Cook L (2017) Wall Street tells frackers to stop counting barrels, start making profits. Wall Street Journal (December 13), https://www.wsj.com/articles/wall-streets-fracking-frenzy-runs-dry-as-profits-fail-to-materialize-1512577420.Google Scholar
• Pellegrino B (2019) Product differentiation and oligopoly: A network approach. CESifo Working Paper No. 10244, Munich Society for the Promotion of Economic Research - CESifo GmbH, Munich, Germany.Google Scholar
• Philippon T, Gutierrez G (2017) Investment-less growth: An empirical investigation. NBER Working Paper No. 22897, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• PTI (2020) CCI to conduct market study on private equity investments. Bloomberg Quint (December 4), https://www.bloombergquint.com/business/competition-comm-to-conduct-market-study-on-private-equity-investments-chairperson.Google Scholar
• Rotemberg J (1984) Financial transaction costs and industrial performance. Working paper, MIT Sloan, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Saidi F, Streitz D (2021) Bank concentration and product market competition. Rev. Financial Stud. 34(10):4999–5035.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmalz M (2018) Common ownership concentration and corporate conduct. Annu. Rev. Financial Econom. 10:413–448.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmalz MC (2021) Recent studies on common ownership, firm behavior, and market outcomes. Antitrust Bull. 66(1):12–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwartz-Ziv M, Volkova E (2024) Is blockholder diversity detrimental? Management Sci., ePub ahead of print May 8, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.00528.Google Scholar
• Shekita N (2022) Interventions by common owners. J. Competition Law Econom. 18(1):99–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Singh N, Vives X (1984) Price and quantity competition in a differentiated duopoly. RAND J. Econom. 15(4):546–554.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spence M (1984) Cost reduction, competition, and industry performance. Econometrica 52(1):101–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stein JC (2008) Conversations among competitors. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(5):2150–2162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stenbacka R, Van Moer G (2020) Overlapping ownership and product innovation. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 89:102980.Google Scholar
• Suzumura K (1992) Cooperative and noncooperative R&D in an oligopoly with spillovers. Amer. Econom. Rev. 82(5):1307–1320.Google Scholar
• The Economist (2018) A bold scheme to dominate ride-hailing. The Economist (May 10), https://www.economist.com/briefing/2018/05/10/a-bold-scheme-to-dominate-ride-hailing.Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission (2023) Merger guidelines. Accessed July 27, 2024, https://www.ftc.gov/reports/merger-guidelines-2023.Google Scholar
• Vestager M (2018) Competition in changing times. Accessed July 24, 2024, https://ec.europa.eu/commission/commissioners/2014-2019/vestager/announcements/competition-changing-times-0_en.Google Scholar
• White House CEA (2016) Benefits of competition and indicators of market power. Council of Economic Advisers Issue Brief. Accessed July 27, 2024, https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/page/files/20160414_cea_competition_issue_brief.pdf.Google Scholar