Antitrust Platform Regulation and Entrepreneurship: Evidence from China

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2024.04397

References

  • Ahuja G, Katila R (2001) Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: A longitudinal study. Strategic Management J. 22(3):197–220.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aridor G, Che YK, Salz T (2020) The economic consequences of data privacy regulation: Empirical evidence from GDPR. NBER Working Paper No. 26900, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Bae D, Mayya R, Nian T (2023) Privacy regulation and its unintended consequence on consumption behaviors: Evidence from CCPA. ICIS 2023 Proc. 2023 (AIS eLibrary).Google Scholar
  • Bakos Y, Halaburda H (2020) Platform competition with multihoming on both sides: Subsidize or not? Management Sci. 66(12):5599–5607.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bergemann D, Bonatti A (2024) Data, competition, and digital platforms. Amer. Econom. Rev. 114(8):2553–2595.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bertrand M, Duflo E, Mullainathan S (2004) How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? Quart J. Econom. 119(1):249–275.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bhargava HK (2021) Bundling for flexibility and variety: An economic model for multiproducer value aggregation. Management Sci. 67(4):2365–2380.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bhargava HK, Evans DS, Mani D (2016) The move to smart mobile platforms: Implications for antitrust analysis of online markets in developed and developing countries. UC Davis Bus. Law J. 16(2):157–188.Google Scholar
  • Bhargava HK, Wang K, Zhang X (2022) Fending off critics of platform power with differential revenue sharing: Doing well by doing good? Management Sci. 68(11):8249–8260.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Biggar D, Heimler A (2021) Digital platforms and the transactions cost approach to competition law. Indust. Corporate Change 30(5):1230–1258.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Binder J (1998) The event study methodology since 1969. Rev. Quant. Finance Accounting 11(2):111–137.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Braggion F, Manconi A, Zhu H (2023) Household credit and regulatory arbitrage: Evidence from online marketplace lending. Management Sci. 69(10):6271–6292.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Breznitz D, Forman C, Wen W (2018) The role of venture capital in the formation of a new technological ecosystem. MIS Quart. 42(4):1143–1169.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brogaard J, Detzel A (2015) The asset-pricing implications of government economic policy uncertainty. Management Sci. 61(1):3–18.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Buchak G, Matvos G, Piskorski T, Seru A (2018) Fintech, regulatory arbitrage, and the rise of shadow banks. J. Financial Econom. 130(3):453–483.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Buckman JR, Adjerid I, Tucker C (2023) Privacy regulation and barriers to public health. Management Sci. 69(1):342–350.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Burtch G, Carnahan S, Greenwood BN (2018) Can you gig it? An empirical examination of the gig economy and entrepreneurial activity. Management Sci. 64(12):5497–5520.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cabral L (2021) Merger policy in digital industries. Inform. Econom. Policy 54:100866.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Caillaud B, Jullien B (2003) Chicken & egg: Competition among intermediation service providers. RAND J. Econom. 34(2):309–328.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ceccagnoli M, Forman C, Huang P, Wu D (2012) Cocreation of value in a platform ecosystem! The case of enterprise software. MIS Quart. 36(1):263–290.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cennamo C (2021) Competing in digital markets: A platform-based perspective. Acad. Management Perspect. 35(2):265–291.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cennamo C, Ozalp H, Kretschmer T (2018) Platform architecture and quality trade-offs of multihoming complements. Inform. Systems Res. 29(2):461–478.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chakraborty I, Ewens M (2018) Managing performance signals through delay: Evidence from venture capital. Management Sci. 64(6):2875–2900.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen L (2022) Influence Empire: Inside the Story of Tencent and China’s Tech Ambition (Hodder & Stoughton, London).Google Scholar
  • Chen W, Wei Z, Xie K (2023) Regulating professional players in peer-to-peer markets: Evidence from Airbnb. Management Sci. 69(5):2893–2918.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen L, Zhou Z, Chan LT (2024) Algorithm envelopment in platform markets. Acad. Management Rev., ePub ahead of print December 5, https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2023.0156.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chung HD, Zhou YM, Ethiraj S (2024) Platform governance in the presence of within-complementor interdependencies: Evidence from the rideshare industry. Management Sci. 70(2):799–814.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cochrane JH (2005) The risk and return of venture capital. J. Financial Econom. 75(1):3–52.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen M, Sundararajan A (2015) Self-regulation and innovation in the peer-to-peer sharing economy. Univ. Chicago Law Rev. Online 82(1):116–133.Google Scholar
  • Cong LW, Howell ST (2021) Policy uncertainty and innovation: Evidence from initial public offering interventions in China. Management Sci. 67(11):7238–7261.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cullen Z, Farronato C (2021) Outsourcing tasks online: Matching supply and demand on peer-to-peer internet platforms. Management Sci. 67(7):3985–4003.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cusumano MA, Gawer A, Yoffie DB (2019) The Business of Platforms: Strategy in the Age of Digital Competition, Innovation, and Power (Harper Business, New York).Google Scholar
  • Cusumano MA, Gawer A, Yoffie DB (2021) Can self-regulation save digital platforms? Indust. Corporate Change 30(5):1259–1285.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • De Bettignies JE, Duchêne A (2015) Product market competition and the financing of new ventures. Management Sci. 61(8):1849–1867.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • DeFond M, Erkens DH, Zhang J (2017) Do client characteristics really drive the Big N audit quality effect? New evidence from propensity score matching. Management Sci. 63(11):3628–3649.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Deutsch J (2021) EU lawmakers pass strict new rules affecting big U.S. tech. Bloomberg (November 23), https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-11-23/eu-lawmakers-pass-strict-new-rules-affecting-big-u-s-tech.Google Scholar
  • Dushnitsky G, Lenox MJ (2005a) When do firms undertake R&D by investing in new ventures? Strategic Management J. 26(10):947–965.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dushnitsky G, Lenox MJ (2005b) When do incumbents learn from entrepreneurial ventures? Corporate venture capital and investing firm innovation rates. Res. Policy 34(5):615–639.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dushnitsky G, Yu L (2022) Why do incumbents fund startups? A study of the antecedents of corporate venture capital in China. Res. Policy 51(3):104463.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenmann T, Parker G, Van Alstyne M (2011) Platform envelopment. Strategic Management J. 32(12):1270–1285.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Evans DS, Schmalensee R (2016) Matchmakers: The New Economics of Multisided Platforms (Harvard Business Review Press, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Frame WS, Mihov A, Sanz L (2020) Foreign investment, regulatory arbitrage, and the risk of U.S. banking organizations. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 55(3):955–988.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greenwood B, Gopal AG (2017) Ending the mending wall: Herding, media coverage, and colocation in IT entrepreneurship. MIS Quart. 41(3):989–1007.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gulen H, Ion M (2016) Policy uncertainty and corporate investment. Rev. Financial Stud. 29(3):523–564.Google Scholar
  • Hagiu A, Wright J (2020) When data creates competitive advantage. Harvard Bus. Rev. 98(1):94–101.Google Scholar
  • Han W, Wang X, Ahsen M, Wattal S (2022) The societal impact of sharing economy platform self-regulations—An empirical investigation. Inform. Systems Res. 33(4):1303–1323.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Huang Z (2021) China’s VCs join startups in rush to build a homegrown clubhouse. Bloomberg (March 18), https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-03-18/with-clubhouse-banned-china-investors-are-hunting-for-copycats.Google Scholar
  • Huang P, Lyu G, Xu Y (2022) Quality regulation on two-sided platforms: Exclusion, subsidization, and first-party applications. Management Sci. 68(6):4415–4434.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Huang P, Ceccagnoli M, Forman C, Wu DJ (2013) Appropriability mechanisms and the platform partnership decision: Evidence from enterprise software. Management Sci. 59(1):102–121.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Huang P, Ceccagnoli M, Forman C, Wu DJ (2022) IT knowledge spillovers, absorptive capacity, and productivity: Evidence from enterprise software. Inform. Systems Res. 33(3):908–934.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Huang Y, Yin N, Zhang VY, Zhao S (2025) Impact of antitrust regulations on firm market value—Evidence from Chinese and U.S. internet platforms. Rev. Indust. Organ., ePub ahead of print October 13, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-025-10035-z.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ichihashi S, Kim BC (2023) Addictive platforms. Management Sci. 69(2):1127–1145.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jacobides MG, Cennamo C, Gawer A (2018) Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management J. 39(8):2255–2276.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Janssen R, Kesler R, Kummer ME, Waldfogel J (2022) GDPR and the lost generation of innovative apps. NBER Working Paper No. 30028, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Jia J, Jin GZ, Wagman L (2021) The short-run effects of the general data protection regulation on technology venture investment. Marketing Sci. 40(4):661–684.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jin GZ, Leccese M, Wagman L (2023) How do top acquirers compare in technology mergers? New evidence from an SP taxonomy. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 89:102891.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Johnson GA, Shriver SK, Goldberg SG (2023) Privacy and market concentration: Intended and unintended consequences of the GDPR. Management Sci. 69(10):5695–5721.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jullien B, Sand-Zantman W (2021) The economics of platforms: A theory guide for competition policy. Inform. Econom. Policy 54:100880.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kamepalli SK, Rajan R, Zingales L (2020) Kill zone. NBER Working Paper No. 27146, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Katila R, Piezunka H, Reineke P, Eisenhardt KM (2022) Big fish versus big pond? Entrepreneurs, established firms, and antecedents of tie formation. Acad. Management J. 65(2):427–452.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Katz ML, Shapiro C (1994) Systems competition and network effects. J. Econom. Perspect. 8(2):93–115.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim K, Gopal A, Hoberg G (2016) Does product market competition drive CVC investment? Evidence from the U.S. IT industry. Inform. Systems Res. 27(2):259–281.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kircher T, Foerderer J (2021) Does EU-consumer privacy harm financing of US-app-startups? Within-US evidence of cross-EU-effects. Proc. 42nd Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems ICIS (Austin, TX), 12–15.Google Scholar
  • Korteweg A, Sorensen M (2010) Risk and return characteristics of venture capital-backed entrepreneurial companies. Rev. Financial Stud. 23(10):3738–3772.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Koski H, Kässi O, Braesemann F (2020) Killers on the road of emerging start-ups—Implications for market entry and venture capital financing. ETLA Working Papers No. 81. Elinkeinoelämän Tutkimuslaitos (ETLA), Helsinki, Finland.Google Scholar
  • Lerner J (1994) The syndication of venture capital investments. Financial Management 23(3):16–27.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levie J, Autio E (2011) Regulatory burden, rule of law, and entry of strategic entrepreneurs: An international panel study. J. Management Stud. 48(6):1392–1419.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li Z, Agarwal A (2017) Platform integration and demand spillovers in complementary markets: Evidence from Facebook’s integration of Instagram. Management Sci. 63(10):3438–3458.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Li Z, Wang G (2025) Regulating powerful platforms: Evidence from commission fee caps. Inform. Systems Res. 36(1):126–140.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Li H, Zhu F (2021) Information transparency, multihoming, and platform competition: A natural experiment in the daily deals market. Management Sci. 67(7):4384–4407.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lin Z, Ding P, Han F (2023) Estimation based on nearest neighbor matching: From density ratio to average treatment effect. Econometrica 91(6):2187–2217.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liu J, Bharadwaj A (2020) Drug abuse and the internet: Evidence from craigslist. Management Sci. 66(5):2040–2049.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Liu Y, Li X, Zheng Z (2024) Consequences of China’s 2018 online lending regulation and the promise of PolicyTech. Inform. Systems Res. 35(3):1235–1256.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lu K, Wei Z, Chan TY (2022) Information asymmetry among investors and strategic bidding in peer-to-peer lending. Inform. Systems Res. 33(3):824–845.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McGill M, Gold A (2021) The Biden administration’s tightrope act on tech. AXIOS (December 9), https://www.axios.com/2021/12/09/biden-raimondo-vestager-big-tech-europe.Google Scholar
  • Miric M, Pagani M, El Sawy M (2021) When and who do platform companies acquire? Understanding the role of acquisitions in the growth of platform companies. MIS Quart. 45(4):2159–2174.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nguyen G, Vu L (2021) Does venture capital syndication affect mergers and acquisitions? J. Corporate Finance 67:101851.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nikkei Asia (2021) India must abandon protectionism to unleash growth. Nikkei Asia (October 27), https://asia.nikkei.com/opinion/the-nikkei-view/india-must-abandon-protectionism-to-unleash-growth.Google Scholar
  • Pan Y, Song WL (2024) Tech giants and new entry threats. Acad. Management Proc. 2024(1):12491.Google Scholar
  • Pan Y, Huang P, Gopal A (2019) Storm clouds on the horizon? New entry threats and R&D investments in the U.S. IT industry. Inform. Systems Res. 30(2):540–562.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Park HD, Steensma HK (2012) When does corporate venture capital add value for new ventures? Strategic Management J. 33(1):1–22.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Parker G, Petropoulos G, Van Alstyne M (2021) Platform mergers and antitrust. Indust. Corporate Change 30(5):1307–1336.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Parker G, Van Alstyne M, Choudary S (2016) Platform Revolution: How Networked Markets Are Transforming the Economy and How to Make Them Work for You (W. W. Norton & Company, New York).Google Scholar
  • Parker G, Van Alstyne M, Jiang X (2017) Platform ecosystems: How developers invert the firm. MIS Quart. 41(1):255–266.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peukert C, Bechtold S, Batikas M, Kretschmer T (2022) Regulatory spillovers and data governance: Evidence from the GDPR. Marketing Sci. 41(4):746–768.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pollman E (2019) Tech, regulatory arbitrage, and limits. Eur. Bus. Organ. Law Rev. 20(3):567–590.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Prado T, Bauer J (2022) Big Tech platform acquisitions of start-ups and venture capital funding for innovation. Inform. Econom. Policy 59:100973.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pu J, Nian T, Qiu L, Cheng HK (2022) Platform policies and sellers’ competition in agency selling in the presence of online quality misrepresentation. J. Management Inform. Systems 39(1):159–186.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Qin A (2017) In China, umbrellas and basketballs join the sharing economy. New York Times (May 28), https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/28/business/china-communal-sharing.html.Google Scholar
  • Rietveld J, Seamans R, Meggiorin K (2021) Market orchestrators: The effects of certification on platforms and their complementors. Strategy Sci. 6(3):244–264.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rochet JC, Tirole J (2003) Platform competition in two-sided markets. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 1(4):990–1029.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roth J (2022) Pretest with caution: Event-study estimates after testing for parallel trends. Amer. Econom. Rev. Insights 4(3):305–322.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Seamans R, Zhu F (2014) Responses to entry in multi-sided markets: The impact of Craigslist on local newspapers. Management Sci. 60(2):476–493.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sine WD, Shane S, Gregorio DD (2003) The halo effect and technology licensing: The influence of institutional prestige on the licensing of university inventions. Management Sci. 49(4):478–496.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Skog DA, Sandberg J, Wimelius H (2021) How Spotify balanced trade-offs in pursuing digital platform growth. MIS Quart. Executive 20(4):259–274.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sokol DD, Van Alstyne M (2021) The rising risk of platform regulation. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 62(2):6A–10A.Google Scholar
  • Thatchenkery S, Katila R (2023) Innovation and profitability following antitrust intervention against a dominant platform: The wild, wild west? Strategic Management J. 44(4):943–976.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Angeren J, Karunakaran A (2023) Anchored inferential learning: Platform-specific uncertainty, venture capital investments by the platform owner, and the impact on complementors. Organ. Sci. 34(3):1027–1050.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wang J, Ran M, Li Y (2023a) Striving to improve investment efficiency among Chinese firms: Does the role of venture capital matter? Chinese Management Stud. 17(4):851–882.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang N, Yang Y, Fang Y, Li H, Lu A (2023b) Growing user base in the early stage of sharing economy platforms: An integration of competitive repertoire and institutional legitimacy theories. Production Oper. Management 32(11):3484–3503.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weiss LM, Capozzi MM, Prusak L (2004) Learning from the internet giants. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 45(4):79–84.Google Scholar
  • Yap C-W (2017) Alibaba-affiliate Ant Financial isn’t itching to go public. Wall Street J. (October 27), https://www.wsj.com/articles/alibaba-affiliate-ant-financial-isnt-itching-to-go-public-1509094130.Google Scholar
  • Yu J, Tang C, Shen Z-Y, Chen X (2020) A balancing act of regulating on-demand ride services. Management Sci. 66(7):2975–2992.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zeng M (2018) Alibaba and the future of business: Lessons from China’s innovative digital giant. Harvard Bus. Rev. (September–October):88–96.Google Scholar
  • Zhang XM, Zhu F (2011) Group size and incentives to contribute: A natural experiment at Chinese Wikipedia. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(4):1601–1615.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhao X, Song P, Shi L, Xue L, Feng F (2023) Customer complaint avoidance: A randomized field experiment of platform governance based on value co-creation and appropriation. MIS Quart. 47(3):955–982.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhu F, Cao BY (2024) Smart Rivals: How Innovative Companies Play Games That Tech Giants Can’t Win (Harvard Business Review Press, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Zhu F, Iansiti M (2012) Entry into platform‐based markets. Strategic Management J. 33(1):88–106.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhu F, Liu Q (2018) Competing with complementors: An empirical look at Amazon.com. Strategic Management J. 39(10):2618–2642.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhu F, Li X, Valavi E, Iansiti M (2021) Network interconnectivity and entry into platform markets. Inform. Systems Res. 32(3):1009–1024.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.