Is the Price Right? The Role of Economic Trade-Offs in Explaining Reactions to Price Surges

References

• Alsan M, Braghieri L, Eichmeyer S, Kim MJ, Stantcheva S, Yang DY (2023) Civil liberties in times of crisis. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 15(4):389–421.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amasino D, Pace D, van der Weele JJ (2024) Fair shares and selective attention. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 16(4):259–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ambuehl S (2017) An offer you can’t refuse? Incentives change how we inform ourselves and what we believe. Working Paper No. 6296, CESifo, München, Germany.Google Scholar
• Anderson ET, Simester DI (2010) Price stickiness and customer antagonism. Quart. J. Econom. 125(2):729–765.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andre P, Schirmer P, Wohlfart J (2024) Mental models of the stock market (No. 23-07). University of Copenhagen, Department of Economics. The Center for Economic Behavior and Inequality (CEBI), Copenhagen.Google Scholar
• Andre P, Haaland I, Roth C, Wiederholt M, Wohlfart J (2025) Narratives about the Macroeconomy. Rev. Econom. Stud. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Beckert J, Aspers P, eds. (2011) The Worth of Goods: Valuation and Pricing in the Economy (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bellemare MF (2015) Rising food prices, food price volatility, and social unrest. Amer. J. Agricultural Econom. 97(1):1–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bénabou R, Tirole J (2006) Incentives and prosocial behavior. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(5):1652–1678.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bénabou R, Falk A, Tirole J (2020) Narratives, imperatives, and moral persuasion. Working paper, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
• Bentley A (2001) Reading food riots: Scarcity, abundance and national identity. Scholliers P, ed. Food, Drink and Identity: Cooking, Eating and Drinking in Europe Since the Middle Ages (Berg Publishers, Oxford, UK), 179–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bowles S (2016) The Moral Economy: Why Good Incentives Are No Substitute for Good Citizens (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
• Brandts J, Busom I, Lopez-Mayan C, Panadés J (2024) Images say more than just words: Visual versus text communication to dispel a rent-control misconception. Exp. Econ. 27(2):417–468. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buccafusco C, Hemel DJ, Talley EL (2021) Price gouging in a pandemic. Research Paper No. 921, University of Chicago Coase-Sandor Institute for Law & Economics, Chicago.Google Scholar
• Bursztyn L, Egorov G, Fiorin S (2020) From extreme to mainstream: The erosion of social norms. Amer. Econom. Rev. 110(11):3522–3548.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cabral L, Xu L (2021) Seller reputation and price gouging: Evidence from the COVID‐19 pandemic. Econom. Inquiry 59(3):867–879.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dal Bó E, Dal Bó P, Eyster E (2018) The demand for bad policy when voters underappreciate equilibrium effects. Rev. Econom. Stud. 85(2):964–998.Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Quidt J, Haushofer J, Roth C (2018) Measuring and bounding experimenter demand. Amer. Econom. Rev. 108(11):3266–3302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dolls M, Schüle P, Windsteiger L (2023) Affecting public support for economic policies: Evidence from a survey experiment about rent control in Germany. Working paper, CESIfo, Munich.Google Scholar
• Dworczak P, Kominers SD, Akbarpour M (2021) Redistribution through markets. Econometrica 89(4):1665–1698.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elias JJ, Lacetera N, Macis M (2015a) Sacred values? The effect of information on attitudes toward payments for human organs. Amer. Econom. Rev. 105(5):361–365.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elias JJ, Lacetera N, Macis M (2015b) Markets and morals: An experimental survey study. PLoS One 10(6):e0127069.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elias JJ, Lacetera N, Macis M (2019) Paying for kidneys? A randomized survey and choice experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 109(8):2855–2888.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eyster E, Madarász K, Michaillat P (2021) Pricing under fairness concerns. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 19(3):1853–1898.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferrario B, Stantcheva S (2022) Eliciting people’s first-order concerns: Text analysis of open-ended survey questions. Amer. Econom. Assoc. Papers Proc. 112:163–169.Google Scholar
• Guzmán RA, Barbato MT, Sznycer D, Cosmides L (2022) A moral trade-off system produces intuitive judgments that are rational and coherent and strike a balance between conflicting moral values. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 119(42):e2214005119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haaland IK, Roth C, Stantcheva S, Wohlfart J (2024) Measuring what is top of mind. NBER Working Paper No. 32421, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Haidt J (2012) The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion (Vintage Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Hainmueller J, Hopkins DJ, Yamamoto T (2014) Causal inference in conjoint analysis: Understanding multidimensional choices via stated preference experiments. Political Anal. 22(1):1–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holz J, Jiménez Durán R, Laguna-Müggenburg E (2024) Estimating the distaste for price gouging with incentivized consumer reports. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 16(1):33–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D (2011) Thinking, Fast and Slow (Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York).Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Knetsch JL, Thaler R (1986) Fairness as a constraint on profit seeking: Entitlements in the market. Amer. Econom. Rev. 76(4):728–741.Google Scholar
• Lennon C, Fernandez J, Gohmann S, Teltser K (2019) Minimum wages, morality, and efficiency: A choice experiment. AEA Papers Proc. 109:176–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levenson M (2020) Price gouging complaints surge amid coronavirus pandemic. New York Times (March 27), https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/27/us/coronavirus-price-gouging-hand-sanitizer-masks-wipes.html.Google Scholar
• Li X, Camerer CF (2022) Predictable effects of visual salience in experimental decisions and games. Quart. J. Econom. 137(3):1849–1900. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li KJ, Jain S (2016) Behavior-based pricing: An analysis of the impact of peer-induced fairness. Management Sci. 62(9):2705–2721.Link, Google Scholar
• Lieberman D, Shenouda S (2022) The superior explanatory power of models that admit trade-offs in moral judgment and decision-making. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 119(51):e2216447119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lipset SM (2013) Continental Divide: The Values and Institutions of the United States and Canada (Routledge, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lupkin S (2020) Putting a price on COVID-19 treatment remdesivir. NPR (May 8), https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2020/05/08/851632704/putting-a-price-on-covid-19-treatment-remdesivir.Google Scholar
• Moriarty J (2021) Why online personalized pricing is unfair. Ethics Inform. Tech. 23(3):495–503.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mummolo J, Peterson E (2019) Demand effects in survey experiments: An empirical assessment. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 113(2):517–529.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nicas J (2020) He has 17,700 bottles of hand sanitizer and nowhere to sell them. New York Times (March 14), https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/14/technology/coronavirus-purell-wipes-amazon-sellers.html.Google Scholar
• Ody-Brasier A, Fernandez-Mateo I (2017) When being in the minority pays off: Relationships among sellers and price setting in the champagne industry. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 82(1):147–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pärnamets P, Johansson P, Hall L, Balkenius C, Spivey MJ, Richardson DC (2015) Biasing moral decisions by exploiting the dynamics of eye gaze. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112(13):4170–4175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Piotrowski D (2014) What a shameful disgrace: Ridesharing app Uber forced to back down after outraged commuters found minimum fare had risen to $100 in middle of Sydney hostage crisis. Daily Mail (December 14), https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2874062/Uber-forced-dramatically-lifting-prices-middle-Sydney-hostage-crisis-encourage-drivers-come-online.html.Google Scholar
• PricewaterhouseCoopers (2020) Ethical aspects of dynamic pricing. Accessed June 12, 2025, https://www.pwc.de/de/im-fokus/customercentrictransformation/ethical-aspects-of-dynamic-pricing-en.pdf.Google Scholar
• Ranganathan A (2018) The artisan and his audience: Identification with work and price setting in a handicraft cluster in Southern India. Admin. Sci. Quart. 63(3):637–667.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rotemberg JJ (2011) Fair pricing. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 9(5):952–981.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth AE (2007) Repugnance as a constraint on markets. J. Econom. Perspect. 21(3):37–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth AE, Wang SW (2020) Popular repugnance contrasts with legal bans on controversial markets. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 117(33):19792–19798.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sandel MJ (2012) What Money Can’t Buy: The Moral Limits of Markets (Macmillan, New York).Google Scholar
• Satz D (2010) Why Some Things Should Not Be for Sale: The Moral Limits of Markets (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schonlau M, Guenther N, Sucholutsky I (2017) Text mining with n-gram variables. Stata J. 17(4):866–881. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwarz C (2018) Ldagibbs: A command for topic modeling in Stata using latent Dirichlet allocation. Stata J. 18(1):101–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seele P, Dierksmeier C, Hofstetter R, Schultz MD (2021) Mapping the ethicality of algorithmic pricing: A review of dynamic and personalized pricing. J. Bus. Ethics 170(4):697–719.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Selyukh A (2020) ‘Stop price gouging,’ 33 attorneys general tell Amazon, Walmart, others. NPR (March 25), https://www.npr.org/sections/coronavirus-live-updates/2020/03/25/821513190/stop-price-gouging-33-attorneys-general-tell-amazon-walmart-others.Google Scholar
• Shiller RJ (1997) Why do people dislike inflation? Romer CD, Romer DH, eds. Reducing Inflation: Motivation and Strategy (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 13–70.Google Scholar
• Smith A (1981) An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (Liberty Classics, Indianapolis).Google Scholar
• Sorenson O, Waguespack DM (2006) Social structure and exchange: Self-confirming dynamics in Hollywood. Admin. Sci. Quart. 51(4):560–589.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stantcheva S (2021) Understanding tax policy: How do people reason? Quart. J. Econom. 136(4):2309–2369.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stantcheva S (2023) How to run surveys: A guide to creating your own identifying variation and revealing the invisible. Annual Rev. Econom. 15:205–234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stigler GJ (1987) The Theory of Price, 4th ed. (Macmillan, New York).Google Scholar
• Sullivan CD (2020) Eliciting preferences over life and death: Experimental evidence from organ transplantation. Working paper, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.Google Scholar
• Sunstein CR (2018) The Cost-Benefit Revolution (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Turillazzi A (2020) The ethics of algorithmic pricing. Neos Magazine (December 30).Google Scholar
• Weitzman ML (1977) Is the price system or rationing more effective in getting a commodity to those who need it most? Bell J. Econom. 8(2):517–524.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zelizer VA (1989) The social meaning of money: “Special monies”. Amer. J. Sociol. 95(2):342–377.Crossref, Google Scholar