Measuring Probabilistic Risk Attitudes

References

• Abdellaoui M, Bleichrodt H, L’Haridon O (2008) A tractable method to measure utility and loss aversion under prospect theory. J. Risk Uncertainty 36:245–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abdellaoui M, L’Haridon O, Zank H (2010) Separating curvature and elevation: A parametric probability weighting function. J. Risk Uncertainty 41:39–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abdellaoui M, Baillon A, Placido L, Wakker P (2011) The rich domain of uncertainty: Source functions and their experimental implementation. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101:695–723.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anantanasuwong K, Kouwenberg R, Mitchell OS, Peijnenburg K (2024) Ambiguity attitudes about investments: Evidence from the field. Experiment. Econom. 27:548–581.Google Scholar
• Arrow KJ (1965) Aspects of the Theory of Risk Beari (Yrjo Jahnssonin Saatio, Helsinki).Google Scholar
• Baillon A, Bleichrodt H, Li C, Wakker P (2021) Belief hedges: Applying ambiguity measurements to all events and all ambiguity models. J. Econom. Theory 198:105353.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baillon A, Bleichrodt H, Li C, Wakker PP (2025) Source theory: A tractable and positive ambiguity theory. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print February 12, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.03307.Link, Google Scholar
• Baillon A, Huang Z, Selim A, Wakker PP (2018) Measuring ambiguity attitudes for all (natural) events. Econometrica 86(5):1839–1858.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Birnbaum MH (2008) New paradoxes of risky decision making. Psych. Rev. 115:463–501.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bleichrodt H, L’Haridon O (2016) The risk attitudes of professional athletes: Optimism and success are related. Decision 5(2):95–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bruhin A, Fehr-Duda H, Epper T (2010) Risk and rationality: Uncovering heterogeneity in probability distortion. Econometrica 78(4):1375–1412.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diecidue E, Schmidt U, Zank H (2009) Parametric weighting functions. J. Econom. Theory 144:1102–1118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dimmock SG, Kouwenberg R, Wakker P (2016) Ambiguity attitudes in a large representative sample. Management Sci. 62(5):1363–1380.Link, Google Scholar
• Fehr-Duda H, Epper T (2012) Probability and risk: Foundations and economic implications of probability-dependent risk preferences. Annu. Rev. Econom. 4:567–593.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldstein W, Einhorn H (1987) Expression theory and the preference reversal phenomena. Psych. Rev. 94(2):236–254.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gonzalez R, Wu G (1999) On the shape of the probability weighting function. Cognitive Psych. 38(1):129–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):363–391.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kilka M, Weber M (2001) What determines the shape of the probability weighting function under uncertainty? Management Sci. 47(12):1581–1732.Google Scholar
• Kunreutherk H, Novemsky N, Kahneman D (2001) Making low probabilities useful. J. Risk Uncertainty 23(2):103–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lopes LL (1987) Between hope and fear: The psychology of risk. Adv. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 20:255–295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miyamoto JM (1988) Generic utility theory: Measurement foundations and applications in multiattribute utility theory. J. Math. Psych. 32(4):357–404.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nascimento A, Ng CT (2022) An axiomatization of the Goldstein–Einhorn weighting functions. J. Math. Psych. 109:102669.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pan J, Webb CS, Zank H (2019) Delayed probabilistic risk attitude: A parametric approach. Theory Decision 87:201–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pratt JW (1964) Risk aversion in the small and in the large. Econometrica 32:122–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prelec D (1998) The probability weighting function. Econometrica 66(3):497–527.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Preston M, Baratta P (1948) An experimental study of the auction-value of an uncertain outcome. Amer. J. Psych. 61:183–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Quiggin J (1981) Risk perception and the analysis of risk attitudes. Australian J. Agricultural Econom. 25:160–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Fox C (1995) Weighting risk and uncertainty. Psych. Rev. 102(2):269–283.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1992) Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty 5(4):297–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Wakker P (1995) Risk attitudes and decision weights. Econometrica 63:1255–1280.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Viscusi WK (1989) Prospective reference theory: Toward an explanantion of the paradoxes. J. Risk Uncertainty 2:235–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Neumann J, Morgenstern O (1944) Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Wakker P (2010) Prospect Theory for Risk and Ambiguity (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber EU (1994) From subjective probabilities to decision weights: The effect of asymmetric loss functions on the evaluation of uncertain outcomes and events. Psych. Bull. 115(2):228–242.Crossref, Google Scholar