Information, Asset Price Volatility, and Liquidity

References

• Andrei D, Hasler M (2015) Investor attention and stock market volatility. Rev. Financial Stud. 28(1):33–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Angeletos G-M, Werning I (2006) Crises and prices: Information aggregation, multiplicity, and volatility. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(5):1720–1736.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Asonuma T, Niepelt D, Ranciere R (2023) Sovereign bond prices, haircuts and maturity. J. Internat. Econom. 140:103689.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Asparouhova EN, Bossaerts P, Yang W (2017) Costly information acquisition in decentralized markets: An experiment. Preprint, submitted December 1, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3079240.Google Scholar
• Barber BM, Odean T (2008) All that glitters: The effect of attention and news on the buying behavior of individual and institutional investors. Rev. Financial Stud. 21(2):785–818.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barelli P, Govindan S, Wilson R (2021) Large auctions. Stanford University Graduate School of Business Research Paper, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
• Bassetto M, Galli C (2019) Is inflation default? The role of information in debt crises. Amer. Econom. Rev. 109(10):3556–3584.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker GM, DeGroot MH, Marschak J (1964) Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. Behav. Sci. 9(3):226–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ben-Rephael A, Da Z, Israelsen RD (2017) It depends on where you search: Institutional investor attention and underreaction to news. Rev. Financial Stud. 30(9):3009–3047.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Biais B, Glosten L, Spatt C (2005) Market microstructure: A survey of microfoundations, empirical results, and policy implications. J. Financial Markets 8(2):217–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carlson M, Hale GB (2006) Rating agencies and sovereign debt rollover. Topics Macroeconom. 6(2).Google Scholar
• Cason TN, Plott CR (2014) Misconceptions and game form recognition: Challenges to theories of revealed preference and framing. J. Political Econom. 122(5):1055–1075.Google Scholar
• Chen DL, Schonger M, Wickens C (2016) oTree—An open-source platform for laboratory, online, and field experiments. J. Behav. Experiment. Finance 9:88–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cole HL, Neuhann D, Ordonez G (2022) Information spillovers and sovereign debt: Theory meets the eurozone crisis. NBER Working Paper No. 30216, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Cziraki P, Mondria J, Wu T (2021) Asymmetric attention and stock returns. Management Sci. 67(1):48–71.Google Scholar
• Da Z, Engelberg J, Gao P (2011) In search of attention. J. Finance 66(5):1461–1499.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deck C, Servátka M, Tucker S (2020) Designing call auction institutions to eliminate price bubbles: Is English Dutch the best? Amer. Econom. Rev. Insights 2(2):225–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dimpfl T, Jank S (2016) Can internet search queries help to predict stock market volatility? Eur. Financial Management 22(2):171–192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foley-Fisher N, Gorton GB, Verani S (2020) Adverse selection dynamics in privately-produced safe debt markets. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Friedman D (1993) How trading institutions affect financial market performance: Some laboratory evidence. Econom. Inquiry 31(3):410–435.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friedman D, Rust J (1993) Chapter 5. Friedman D, Rust J, ed. The Double Auction Market: Institutions, Theories, and Evidence (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
• Greiner B (2004) An online recruitment system for economic experiments. GWDG Bericht 63:79–93.Google Scholar
• Gu GW, Stangebye ZR (2023) Costly information and sovereign risk. Internat. Econom. Rev. (Philadelphia) 64(4):1397–1429.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guler B, Lugovskyy V, Puzzello D, Tucker SJ (2021) Trading institutions in experimental asset markets: Theory and evidence. Preprint, submitted November 23, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3968193.Google Scholar
• Halevy Y, Walker-Jones D, Zrill L (2023) Difficult Decisions (Department of Economics, University of Toronto, Toronto). Google Scholar
• Halim E, Riyanto YE, Roy N (2019) Costly information acquisition, social networks, and asset prices: Experimental evidence. J. Finance 74(4):1975–2010.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huber J, Angerer M, Kirchler M (2011) Experimental asset markets with endogenous choice of costly asymmetric information. Experiment. Econom. 14(2):223–240.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jankowitsch R, Nagler F, Subrahmanyam MG (2014) The determinants of recovery rates in the US corporate bond market. J. Financial Econom. 114(1):155–177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuo W, Li Y-C (2011) Trading mechanisms and market quality: Call markets versus continuous auction markets. Internat. Rev. Finance 11(4):417–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kyle AS (1989) Informed speculation with imperfect competition. Rev. Econom. Stud. 56(3):317–355.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lichtenstein S, Slovic P (1971) Reversals of preference between bids and choices in gambling decisions. J. Experiment. Psych. 89(1):46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lugovskyy V, Puzzello D, Tucker S, Williams A (2014) Asset-holdings caps and bubbles in experimental asset markets. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 107:781–797.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milgrom P, Stokey N (1982) Information, trade and common knowledge. J. Econom. Theory 26(1):17–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morris S, Shin HS (1998) Unique equilibrium in a model of self-fulfilling currency attacks. Amer. Econom. Rev. 88(3):587–597.Google Scholar
• Ngangoué MK, Weizsäcker G (2021) Learning from unrealized versus realized prices. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 13(2):174–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pagano M, Volpin P (2012) Securitization, transparency, and liquidity. Rev. Financial Stud. 25(8):2417–2453.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Plott CR, Smith VL (1978) An experimental examination of two exchange institutions. Rev. Econom. Stud. 45(1):133–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Buforn A, Camacho-Cuena E, Morone A, Alfarano S (2021) Overweighting of public information in financial markets: A lesson from the lab. J. Banking Finance 133:106298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schnitzlein CR (1996) Call and continuous trading mechanisms under asymmetric information: An experimental investigation. J. Finance 51(2):613–636.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith VL (1962) An experimental study of competitive market behavior. J. Political Econom. 70(2):111–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith VL, Suchanek GL, Williams AW (1988) Bubbles, crashes, and endogenous expectations in experimental spot asset markets. Econometrica 56(5):1119–1151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sunder S (1992) Market for information: Experimental evidence. Econometrica 60(3):667–695.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Theissen E (2000) Market structure, informational efficiency and liquidity: An experimental comparison of auction and dealer markets. J. Financial Markets 3(4):333–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Boening MV, Williams AW, LaMaster S (1993) Price bubbles and crashes in experimental call markets. Econom. Lett. 41(2):179–185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vlastakis N, Markellos RN (2012) Information demand and stock market volatility. J. Banking Finance 36:1808–1821.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilson R (1985) Game-theoretic analyses of trading processes. Technical Report 85-96, Institute for Mathematical Studies in the Social Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
• Wilson RB (1987) On equilibria of bid-ask markets. Arrow KJ, Fisher SC, eds. Arrow and the Ascent of Modern Economic Theory (Palgrave Macmillan, London), 375–414.Crossref, Google Scholar