The Strategic Value of Data Sharing in Interdependent Markets

References

• Afuah A (2013) Are network effects really all about size? The role of structure and conduct. Strategic Management J. 34(3):257–273.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Antón M, Ederer F, Giné M, Schmalz M (2023) Common ownership, competition, and top management incentives. J. Political Econom. 131(5):1294–1355.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argenton C, Prüfer J (2012) Search engine competition with network externalities. J. Competition Law Econom. 8(1):73–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Awaya Y, Krishna V (2016) On communication and collusion. Amer. Econom. Rev. 106(2):285–315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldwin CY (2024) Design Rules, Volume 2: How Technology Shapes Organizations (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baysinger B, Hoskisson RE (1989) Diversification strategy and R&D intensity in multiproduct firms. Acad. Management J. 32(2):310–332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger PG, Ofek E (1995) Diversification’s effect on firm value. J. Financial Econom. 37(1):39–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cason TN, Mason CF (1999) Information sharing and tacit collusion in laboratory duopoly markets. Econom. Inquiry 37(2):258–281.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cennamo C, Sokol DD (2021) Can the EU regulate platforms without stifling innovation? Harvard Bus. Rev. (March 1), https://hbr.org/2021/03/can-the-eu-regulate-platforms-without-stifling-innovation.Google Scholar
• Chiou L, Tucker C (2017) Search engines and data retention: Implications for privacy and antitrust. NBER Working Paper No. 23815, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Choe C, Cong J, Wang C (2024) Softening competition through unilateral sharing of customer data. Management Sci. 70(1):526–543.Link, Google Scholar
• Clarke RN (1983) Collusion and the incentives for information sharing. Bell J. Econom. 14(2):383–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dubus A, Legros P (2022) The sale of data: Learning synergies before M&As. CEPR Discussion Paper No. 17404, CEPR Press, Paris.Google Scholar
• Ederer F, Pellegrino B (2022) A tale of two networks: Common ownership and product market rivalry. NBER Working Paper No. 30004, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• European Commission (2018) Study on data sharing between companies in Europe: Final report. Accessed November 16, 2023, https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/8b8776ff-4834-11e8-be1d-01aa75ed71a1/language-.Google Scholar
• European Commission (2020a) Business-to-business data sharing: An economic and legal analysis. Working paper, European Commission, Brussels.Google Scholar
• European Commission (2020b) A European strategy for data. Accessed November 17, 2023, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52020DC0066.Google Scholar
• European Commission (2022) Guidance on private sector data sharing. Accessed January 19, 2023, https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/private-sector-data-sharing.Google Scholar
• European Commission and Directorate-General for Competition, de Montjoye Y-A, Schweitzer H, Crémer J (2019) Competition Policy for the Digital Era (Publications Office, Luxembourg).Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D, Tirole J (1984) The fat-cat effect, the puppy-dog ploy, and the lean and hungry look. Amer. Econom. Rev. 74(2):361–366.Google Scholar
• Gal-Or E (1985) Information sharing in oligopoly. Econometrica 53(2):329–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilo D, Moshe Y, Spiegel Y (2006) Partial cross ownership and tacit collusion. RAND J. Econom. 37(1):81–99.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gomes J, Livdan D (2004) Optimal diversification: Reconciling theory and evidence. J. Finance 59(2):507–535.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graef I, Prüfer J (2021) Governance of data sharing: A law & economics proposal. Res. Policy 50(9):104330.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graham JR, Lemmon ML, Wolf JG (2002) Does corporate diversification destroy value? J. Finance 57(2):695–720.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gregory RW, Henfridsson O, Kaganer E, Kyriakou H (2021) The role of artificial intelligence and data network effects for creating user value. Acad. Management Rev. 46(3):534–551.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hagiu A (2020) When data creates competitive advantage. Harvard Bus. Rev. 98(1):94–101.Google Scholar
• Hagiu A, Wright J (2023) Data-enabled learning, network effects, and competitive advantage. RAND J. Econom. 54(4):638–667.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hill CW, Hoskisson RE (1987) Strategy and structure in the multiproduct firm. Acad. Management Rev. 12(2):331–341.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang H, Parker G, Tan YR, Xu H (2020) Altruism or shrewd business? Implications of technology openness on innovations and competition. MIS Quart. 44(3):1049–1072.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hunold M, Shekhar S (2022) Supply chain innovations and partial ownership. Rev. Industrial Organ. 60(1):109–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones CI, Tonetti C (2020) Nonrivalry and the economics of data. Amer. Econom. Rev. 110(9):2819–2858.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kandori M, Matsushima H (1998) Private observation, communication and collusion. Econometrica 66(3):627–652.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein TJ, Kurmangaliyeva M, Prüfer J, Prüfer P, Park NN (2025) How important are user-generated data for search result quality? J. Law Econom. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Krämer J, Schnurr D (2022) Big data and digital markets contestability: Theory of harm and data access remedies. J. Competition Law Econom. 18(2):255–322.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krämer J, Shekhar S (2025) Regulating digital platform ecosystems through data sharing and data siloing: Consequences for innovation and welfare. MIS Quart. 49(1):123–154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krämer J, Schnurr D, Wohlfarth M (2019) Winners, losers, and facebook: The role of social logins in the online advertising ecosystem. Management Sci. 65(4):1678–1699.Link, Google Scholar
• Lang LH, Stulz RM (1994) Tobin’s q, corporate diversification, and firm performance. J. Political Econom. 102(6):1248–1280.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Legenvre H, Hameri A-P (2024) The emergence of data sharing along complex supply chains. Internat. J. Oper. Production Management 44(1):292–297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lei X, Chen Y, Sen A (2023) Trade-offs in leveraging external data capabilities: Evidence from a field experiment in an online search market. Management Sci. Accepted.Google Scholar
• Lins K, Servaes H (1999) International evidence on the value of corporate diversification. J. Finance 54(6):2215–2239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mandalari AM, Dubois DJ, Kolcun R, Paracha MT, Haddadi H, Choffnes D (2021) Blocking without breaking: Identification and mitigation of non-essential IoT traffic. Preprint, submitted May 11, https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.05162.Google Scholar
• Mišura K, Žagar M (2016) Data marketplace for internet of things. Proc. Internat. Conf. Smart Systems Tech. (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 255–260.Google Scholar
• O’Brien DP, Salop SC (1999) Competitive effects of partial ownership: Financial interest and corporate control. Antitrust Law J. 67:559.Google Scholar
• Parker G, Petropoulos G, Van Alstyne M (2021) Platform mergers and antitrust. Industrial Corporate Change 30(5):1307–1336.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prüfer J, Schottmüller C (2021) Competing with big data. J. Industrial Econom. 69(4):967–1008.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raith M (1996) A general model of information sharing in oligopoly. J. Econom. Theory 71(1):260–288.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ren J, Dubois DJ, Choffnes D, Mandalari AM, Kolcun R, Haddadi H (2019) Information exposure from consumer IoT devices: A multidimensional, network-informed measurement approach. Proc. Internet Measurement Conf. (ACM, New York), 267–279.Google Scholar
• Rhodes A, Zhou J, Zhou J (2025) Digital ecosystems and data regulation. Working paper, Toulouse School of Economics, Toulouse, UK.Google Scholar
• Schaefer M, Sapi G (2023) Complementarities in learning from data: Insights from general search. Inform. Econom. Policy 65:101063.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaked A, Sutton J (1990) Multiproduct firms and market structure. RAND J. Econom. 21(1):45–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tucker C (2019) Digital data, platforms and the usual [antitrust] suspects: Network effects, switching costs, essential facility. Rev. Industrial Organ. 54(4):683–694.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vives X (1984) Duopoly information equilibrium: Cournot and Bertrand. J. Econom. Theory 34(1):71–94.Crossref, Google Scholar