How Do Behavioral Approaches to Increase Savings Compare? Evidence from Multiple Interventions in the U.S. Army
References
- (2023) When should you adjust standard errors for clustering? Quart. J. Econom. 138(1):1–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) Demand for older workers: What do we know? What do we need to learn? J. Econom. Ageing 24:100414.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) Do economists replicate? J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 212:219–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Behavioral economics and the retirement savings crisis. Science (1979) 339(6124):1152–1153.Google Scholar
- (2017) Should governments invest more in nudging? Psych. Sci. 28(8):1041–1055.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) The importance of default options for retirement saving outcomes: Evidence from the United States. Brown JR, Liebman JB, Wise DA, eds. Social Security Policy in a Changing Environment (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 167–195.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Simplification and saving. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 95:130–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Behavioral household finance. Bernheim BD, DellaVigna S, Laibson D, eds. Handbook of Behavioral Economics: Foundations and Applications 1 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 177–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Using fresh starts to nudge increased retirement savings. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processing 167:72–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Nudging at scale: Experimental evidence from FAFSA completion campaigns. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 183:105–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Bureau of Labor Statistics (2024a) News release: Employer costs for employee compensation. Accessed June 12, 2024, https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/ecec.pdf.Google Scholar
- Bureau of Labor Statistics (2024b) Occupational outlook handbook, human resources specialists. Accessed June 12, 2024, https://www.bls.gov/ooh/business-and-financial/human-resources-specialists.htm.Google Scholar
- Bureau of Labor Statistics (2024c) Table B-3. Average hourly and weekly earnings of all employees on private nonfarm payrolls by industry sector. Accessed July 31, 2024, https://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t19.htm.Google Scholar
- (2009) Optimal defaults and active decisions. Quart. J. Econom. 124(4):1639–1674.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Small cues change savings choices. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 142(C):378–395.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) For better or for worse: Default effects and 401 (k) savings behavior. Perspectives on the Economics of Aging (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 81–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Saving for retirement on the path of least resistance. McCaffrey EJ, Slemrod J, eds. Behavioral Public Finance: Toward a New Agenda (Russell Sage Foundation, New York), 304–351.Google Scholar
- (2022) A review of nudges: Definitions, justifications, effectiveness. J. Econom. Surveys 36(1):188–213. Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) The fresh start effect: Temporal landmarks motivate aspirational behavior. Management Sci. 60(10):2563–2582.Link, Google Scholar
- (2022) RCTs to scale: Comprehensive evidence from two nudge units. Econometrica 90(1):81–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2024) Wealth of two nations: The US racial wealth gap, 1860–2020. Quart. J. Econom. 139(2):693–750. Google Scholar
- (2022) A guide to megastudies. PNAS Nexus 1(5):pgac214.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Take-up and targeting: Experimental evidence from SNAP. Quart. J. Econom. 134(3):1505–1556.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) What will my account really be worth? Experimental evidence on how retirement income projections affect saving. J. Public Econom. 119:80–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Retirement contribution rate nudges and plan participation: Evidence from a field experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(5):456–461.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) How much to save? Decision costs and retirement plan participation. J. Public Econom. 191:104247.Google Scholar
- (2007) Viewpoint: Replication in economics. Canadian J. Econom. 40(3):715–733.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Replication in financial economics. Critical Finance Rev. 8(1–2):1–9.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Mega-IRAs, Mega-401(k)s, and other mega-retirement accounts: Statement for the record, Coase-Sandor Working Paper Series in Law and Economics No. 936, University of Chicago Law School, Chicago.Google Scholar
- (2010) Disparities for women and minorities in retirement saving. https://www.brookings.edu/testimonies/disparities-for-women-and-minorities-in-retirement-saving/.Google Scholar
- (2018) Peer effects in financial decision-making. J. Public Econom. 163:37–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Testing behavioral interventions designed to improve on-time SNAP recertification. J. Behav. Public Admin. 3(2):1–8.Google Scholar
- (2014) Applying insights from behavioral economics to policy design. Annu. Rev. Econom. 6(1):663–688.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) The power of suggestion: Inertia in 401(k) participation and savings behavior. Quart. J. Econom. 116(4):1149–1187.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Behaviorally informed policies for household financial decision-making. Behavioral Sci. Policy 3(1):26–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
- . (2021) Megastudies improve the impact of applied behavioural science. Nature 600(7889):478–483.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Replication studies in economics—How many and which papers are chosen for replication, and why? Res. Policy 48(1):62–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Office of Evaluation Sciences (2015a) On-base service member TSP enrollment. https://oes.gsa.gov/assets/abstracts/1506-On-Base-Servicemember-TSP-Enrollment.pdf.Google Scholar
- Office of Evaluation Sciences (2015b) Service member TSP enrollment. https://oes.gsa.gov/assets/abstracts/1507-Servicemember-TSP-Enrollment.pdf.Google Scholar
- Office of Evaluation Sciences (2017) Prompting decisions on retirement saving. https://oes.gsa.gov/assets/abstracts/1703-prompting-tsp.pdf.Google Scholar
- Office of Financial Readiness (2017) Uniformed services blended retirement system. https://militarypay.defense.gov/Portals/3/Documents/BlendedRetirementDocuments/A%20Guide%20to%20the%20Uniformed%20Services%20BRS%20December%202017.pdf?ver=2017-12-18-140805-343.Google Scholar
- (2016) Assessing financial education: Evidence from boot camp. Amer. Econom. J. Econom. Policy 8(2):322–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) America’s racial wealth gap in retirement savings. Forbes, https://www.forbes.com/advisor/retirement/retirement-racial-wealth-gap/.Google Scholar
- (2013) Simpler: The Future of Government (Simon and Schuster).Google Scholar
- (2022) No reason to expect large and consistent effects of nudge interventions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119(31):e2200732119.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) A Reasons-Based Framework for Understanding Default Effects (University of California, Irvine).Google Scholar
- (2004) Save More TomorrowTM: Using behavioral economics to increase employee saving. J. Political Econom. 112(S1):S164–S187.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Thrift Savings Plan (2024) Summary of the thrift savings plan. https://www.tsp.gov/publications/tspbk08.pdf.Google Scholar
- (2022) When should governments invest more in nudging? Revisiting Benartzi et al. (2017). Rev. Law Econom. 18(3):347–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
- U.S. Census Bureau (2019) The number of firms and establishments, employment, and annual payroll by state, industry, and enterprise employment size. Accessed January 23, 2023, https://www.census.gov/data/tables/2019/econ/susb/2019-susb-annual.html.Google Scholar
- (2001) The motivations for business retirement policies. Ogura S, Tachibanaki T, Wise DA, eds. Aging Issues in the United States and Japan (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 307–334.Google Scholar
- (2019) Disparities in Minority Retirement Savings Behavior: Survey and Experimental Evidence from a Nationally-Representative Sample of US Households (RAND, Santa Monica, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar

