How Do Behavioral Approaches to Increase Savings Compare? Evidence from Multiple Interventions in the U.S. Army

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2024.04939

References

  • Abadie A, Athey S, Imbens GW, Wooldridge JM (2023) When should you adjust standard errors for clustering? Quart. J. Econom. 138(1):1–35.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Allen SG (2023) Demand for older workers: What do we know? What do we need to learn? J. Econom. Ageing 24:100414.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ankel-Peters J, Fiala N, Neubauer F (2023) Do economists replicate? J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 212:219–232.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benartzi S, Thaler RH (2013) Behavioral economics and the retirement savings crisis. Science (1979) 339(6124):1152–1153.Google Scholar
  • Benartzi S, Beshears J, Milkman KL, Sunstein CR, Thaler RH, Shankar M, Tucker-Ray W, et al. (2017) Should governments invest more in nudging? Psych. Sci. 28(8):1041–1055.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beshears J, Choi JJ, Laibson D, Madrian BC (2009) The importance of default options for retirement saving outcomes: Evidence from the United States. Brown JR, Liebman JB, Wise DA, eds. Social Security Policy in a Changing Environment (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 167–195.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beshears J, Choi JJ, Laibson D, Madrian BC (2013) Simplification and saving. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 95:130–145.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beshears J, Choi JJ, Laibson D, Madrian BC (2018) Behavioral household finance. Bernheim BD, DellaVigna S, Laibson D, eds. Handbook of Behavioral Economics: Foundations and Applications 1 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 177–276.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beshears J, Dai H, Milkman KL, Benartzi S (2021) Using fresh starts to nudge increased retirement savings. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processing 167:72–87.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bird KA, Castleman BL, Denning JT, Goodman J, Lamberton C, Rosinger KO (2021) Nudging at scale: Experimental evidence from FAFSA completion campaigns. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 183:105–128.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bureau of Labor Statistics (2024a) News release: Employer costs for employee compensation. Accessed June 12, 2024, https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/ecec.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Bureau of Labor Statistics (2024b) Occupational outlook handbook, human resources specialists. Accessed June 12, 2024, https://www.bls.gov/ooh/business-and-financial/human-resources-specialists.htm.Google Scholar
  • Bureau of Labor Statistics (2024c) Table B-3. Average hourly and weekly earnings of all employees on private nonfarm payrolls by industry sector. Accessed July 31, 2024, https://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t19.htm.Google Scholar
  • Carroll GD, Choi JJ, Laibson D, Madrian BC, Metrick A (2009) Optimal defaults and active decisions. Quart. J. Econom. 124(4):1639–1674.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Choi JJ, Haisley E, Kurkoski J, Massey C (2017) Small cues change savings choices. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 142(C):378–395.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Choi JJ, Laibson D, Madrian BC, Metrick A (2004) For better or for worse: Default effects and 401 (k) savings behavior. Perspectives on the Economics of Aging (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 81–126.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Choi JJ, Laibson D, Madrian BC, Metrick A (2006) Saving for retirement on the path of least resistance. McCaffrey EJ, Slemrod J, eds. Behavioral Public Finance: Toward a New Agenda (Russell Sage Foundation, New York), 304–351.Google Scholar
  • Congiu L, Moscati I (2022) A review of nudges: Definitions, justifications, effectiveness. J. Econom. Surveys 36(1):188–213. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dai H, Milkman KL, Riis J (2014) The fresh start effect: Temporal landmarks motivate aspirational behavior. Management Sci. 60(10):2563–2582.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • DellaVigna S, Linos E (2022) RCTs to scale: Comprehensive evidence from two nudge units. Econometrica 90(1):81–116.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Derenoncourt E, Kim CH, Kuhn M, Schularick M (2024) Wealth of two nations: The US racial wealth gap, 1860–2020. Quart. J. Econom. 139(2):693–750. Google Scholar
  • Duckworth AL, Milkman KL (2022) A guide to megastudies. PNAS Nexus 1(5):pgac214.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Finkelstein A, Notowidigdo MJ (2019) Take-up and targeting: Experimental evidence from SNAP. Quart. J. Econom. 134(3):1505–1556.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goda GS, Manchester CF, Sojourner AJ (2014) What will my account really be worth? Experimental evidence on how retirement income projections affect saving. J. Public Econom. 119:80–92.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goldin J, Homonoff T, Tucker-Ray W (2017) Retirement contribution rate nudges and plan participation: Evidence from a field experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(5):456–461.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goldin J, Homonoff T, Patterson R, Skimyhorn W (2020) How much to save? Decision costs and retirement plan participation. J. Public Econom. 191:104247.Google Scholar
  • Hammermesh D (2007) Viewpoint: Replication in economics. Canadian J. Econom. 40(3):715–733.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harvey CR (2019) Replication in financial economics. Critical Finance Rev. 8(1–2):1–9.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hemel DJ, Rosenthal S (2022) Mega-IRAs, Mega-401(k)s, and other mega-retirement accounts: Statement for the record, Coase-Sandor Working Paper Series in Law and Economics No. 936, University of Chicago Law School, Chicago.Google Scholar
  • John DC (2010) Disparities for women and minorities in retirement saving. https://www.brookings.edu/testimonies/disparities-for-women-and-minorities-in-retirement-saving/.Google Scholar
  • Lieber EM, Skimmyhorn W (2018) Peer effects in financial decision-making. J. Public Econom. 163:37–59.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lopoo LM, Heflin C, Boskovski J (2020) Testing behavioral interventions designed to improve on-time SNAP recertification. J. Behav. Public Admin. 3(2):1–8.Google Scholar
  • Madrian BC (2014) Applying insights from behavioral economics to policy design. Annu. Rev. Econom. 6(1):663–688.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Madrian BC, Shea DF (2001) The power of suggestion: Inertia in 401(k) participation and savings behavior. Quart. J. Econom. 116(4):1149–1187.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Madrian BC, Hershfield HE, Sussman AB, Bhargava S, Burke J, Huettel SA, Jamison J, et al. (2017) Behaviorally informed policies for household financial decision-making. Behavioral Sci. Policy 3(1):26–40.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Milkman KL, Gromet D, Ho H, Kay JS, Lee TW, Pandiloski P, Park Y, et al.. (2021) Megastudies improve the impact of applied behavioural science. Nature 600(7889):478–483.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mueller-Langer F, Fecher B, Harhoff D, Wagner GG (2019) Replication studies in economics—How many and which papers are chosen for replication, and why? Res. Policy 48(1):62–83.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Office of Evaluation Sciences (2015a) On-base service member TSP enrollment. https://oes.gsa.gov/assets/abstracts/1506-On-Base-Servicemember-TSP-Enrollment.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Office of Evaluation Sciences (2015b) Service member TSP enrollment. https://oes.gsa.gov/assets/abstracts/1507-Servicemember-TSP-Enrollment.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Office of Evaluation Sciences (2017) Prompting decisions on retirement saving. https://oes.gsa.gov/assets/abstracts/1703-prompting-tsp.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Office of Financial Readiness (2017) Uniformed services blended retirement system. https://militarypay.defense.gov/Portals/3/Documents/BlendedRetirementDocuments/A%20Guide%20to%20the%20Uniformed%20Services%20BRS%20December%202017.pdf?ver=2017-12-18-140805-343.Google Scholar
  • Skimmyhorn W (2016) Assessing financial education: Evidence from boot camp. Amer. Econom. J. Econom. Policy 8(2):322–343.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith KA (2020) America’s racial wealth gap in retirement savings. Forbes, https://www.forbes.com/advisor/retirement/retirement-racial-wealth-gap/.Google Scholar
  • Sunstein CR (2013) Simpler: The Future of Government (Simon and Schuster).Google Scholar
  • Szaszi B, Higney A, Charlton A, Gelman A, Ziano I, Aczel B, Tipton E, et al. (2022) No reason to expect large and consistent effects of nudge interventions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119(31):e2200732119.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tannenbaum D (2011) A Reasons-Based Framework for Understanding Default Effects (University of California, Irvine).Google Scholar
  • Thaler RH, Benartzi S (2004) Save More TomorrowTM: Using behavioral economics to increase employee saving. J. Political Econom. 112(S1):S164–S187.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thrift Savings Plan (2024) Summary of the thrift savings plan. https://www.tsp.gov/publications/tspbk08.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Tor A, Klick J (2022) When should governments invest more in nudging? Revisiting Benartzi et al. (2017). Rev. Law Econom. 18(3):347–376.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • U.S. Census Bureau (2019) The number of firms and establishments, employment, and annual payroll by state, industry, and enterprise employment size. Accessed January 23, 2023, https://www.census.gov/data/tables/2019/econ/susb/2019-susb-annual.html.Google Scholar
  • Woodbury R (2001) The motivations for business retirement policies. Ogura S, Tachibanaki T, Wise DA, eds. Aging Issues in the United States and Japan (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 307–334.Google Scholar
  • Yoong JK, Hung AA, Barcellos SH, Carvalho L, Clift JW (2019) Disparities in Minority Retirement Savings Behavior: Survey and Experimental Evidence from a Nationally-Representative Sample of US Households (RAND, Santa Monica, CA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.