Does Offshoring Production Reduce Innovation? Firm-Level Evidence from Taiwan
References
- (2020) Foreign competition and domestic innovation: Evidence from US patents. AER Insights 2(3):357–374.Google Scholar
- (2016) Trade induced technical change? The impact of Chinese imports on innovation, IT and productivity. Rev. Econom. Stud. 83(1):87–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Bloom N, Romer PM, Terry SJ, Van Reenen J (2013) A trapped-factors model of innovation. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(3):208–213.Google Scholar
- (2018) Invention, productivity, and the evolution of East Asia’s innovation systems. Cohen-Setton J, Hebling T, Posen A, Rhee C, eds. Sustaining Economic Growth in East Asia (Peterson Institute for International Economics, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
- (2008) China’s embrace of globalization. China’s Economic Transition: Origins, Mechanisms, and Consequences (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 633–682.Google Scholar
- (2011) Intellectual property rights, foreign direct investment and industrial development. Econom. J. 121(555):1161–1191.Google Scholar
- Campbell DL, Mau K (2021) On trade induced technical change: The impact of Chinese imports on innovation, IT, and productivity. Rev. Econom. Stud. 88(5):2555–2559.Google Scholar
- (2004) Shanghaied? The economic and political implications of the flow of information technology and investment across the Taiwan Strait (RAND National Defense Research Institute, Santa Monica, CA).Google Scholar
- Chen J, Roth J (2024) Logs with zeros? Some problems and solutions. Quart. J. Econom. 139(2):891–936.Google Scholar
- (1987) Why manufacturing matters: The myth of the post-industrial economy. California Management Rev. 29(3):9–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) Triadic patent families methodology. OECD Science, Technology, and Industry Working Papers (02), OECD Publications, Paris, France.Google Scholar
- (2020) Co-location of production and innovation: Evidence from the United States. Working paper, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- (2014) Global manufacturing and the future of technology. Science 345(6196):519–520.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Design for location? The impact of manufacturing offshore on technology competitiveness in the optoelectronics industry. Management Sci. 56(12):2323–2349.Link, Google Scholar
- (2022) The rise of process claims: Evidence from a century of U.S. patents. ZEW Centre for European Economic Research Discussion Paper No. 22-011, Mannheim, Germany.Google Scholar
- (2001) Innovation and wage effects of international outsourcing. Eur. Econom. Rev. 45(1):67–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1991a) Quality ladders and product cycles. Quart. J. Econom. 106(2):557–586.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1991b) Quality ladders in the theory of growth. Rev. Econom. Stud. 58(1):43–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) The NBER patent citations data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools. NBER Working Paper No. 8498, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- (2002) Citations, family size, opposition, and the value of patent rights. Res. Policy 32(8):1343–1363.Google Scholar
- 1984) Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents-R&D relationship. Econometrica 52(4):909–938.Google Scholar
- (1999) Citation frequency and the value of patented inventions. Rev. Econom. Statist. 81(3):511–515.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1993) Innovation, imitation, and intellectual property rights. Econometrica 61(6):1247–1280.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Jaffe AB (1986) Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: Evidence from firms’ patents, profits, and market value. Amer. Econom. Rev. 76(5):984–1001.Google Scholar
- (2002) Patents, Citations, and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
- Jung S, Imm KY (2002). The patent activities of Korea and Taiwan: A comparative case study of patent statistics. World Patent Inform. 24(4): 303–311.Google Scholar
- (2009) Unbundling R&D and manufacturing: Postindustrial myth or economic reality? Rev. Policy Res. 26(1–2):35–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) Red chips: Implications of the semiconductor industry’s relocation to China. Asian Affairs Amer. Rev. 29(4):237–253.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1996) Entry, exit, growth, and innovation over the product life cycle. Amer. Econom. Rev. 86(3):562–583.Google Scholar
- (1986) An overview of innovation. Eur. J. Innovation Management 38:275–305.Google Scholar
- (1998) International intellectual property rights protection and the rate of product innovation. J. Development Econom. 55(1):133–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
- 2022) Valid t-ratio inference for IV. Amer. Econom. Rev. 112(10):3260–3290. Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Getting patents and economic data to speak to each other: An “algorithmic links with probabilities” approach for joint analyses of patenting and economic activity. Res. Policy 43(3):530–542.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Export prices across firms and destinations. Quart. J. Econom. 127(1):379–436.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2000) From Silicon Valley to Singapore: Location and Competitive Advantage in the Hard Disk Drive Industry (Stanford University Press, Redwood City, CA).Google Scholar
- Mullahy J, Norton EC (2022) Why transform Y? A critical assessment of dependent- variable transformations in regression models for skewed and sometimes-zero outcomes. NBER Working Paper No. 30735, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- (2009) Restoring American competitiveness. Harvard Bus. Rev. 87(7–8):114–125.Google Scholar
- (2011) The Implications of China-Taiwan Economic Liberalization (Peterson Institute for International Economics, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
- Saxenian AL (1999) Silicon Valley’s New Immigrant Entrepreneurs (Public Policy Institute of California, San Francisco, CA), 1–105. Google Scholar
- (1986) Estimates of the value of patent rights in European countries during the post-1950 period. Econom. J. 96(384):1052–1076.Google Scholar
- (2003) Linking technology areas to industrial sectors: Final report to the European Commission, DG Research.Google Scholar
- (1939) Business Cycles (Porcupine Press, Philadelphia).Google Scholar
- (2013) Measuring patent quality: Indicators of technological and economic value. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers (03):70.Google Scholar
- (2007) Chinese Economic Coercion Against Taiwan: A Tricky Weapon to Use (RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1996) Firm organization, industrial structure, and technological innovation. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 31(2):193–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Tung C (2003) China's Economic Leverage and Taiwan's Security Concerns with Respect to Cross-Strait Economic Relations, 1124–1124.Google Scholar
- (2005) Taiwan’s cross-strait economic policy and prospects of cross-strait economic relations. Views Policies Taiwan Forum 2(2):99–117.Google Scholar
- (1966) International investment and international trade in the product cycle. Quart. J. Econom. 80(2):190–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1994) MERIT Concordance Table: IPC - ISIC (Rev. 2). MERIT Research Memorandum (31).Google Scholar
- (1990) Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002) The Chen Shui-Bian administration’s mainland policy: Toward a modus vivendi or continued stalemate? Amer. Asian Rev. 20(3):91–124.Google Scholar
- (2010) Guarding the nation against the market: The rise and fall of Taiwan’s “No Haste, Be Patient” policy, 1996-2001.Google Scholar
- (2003) Taiwan’s dilemma across the strait: Lifting the ban on semiconductor investment in China. Asian Survey 43(4):681–696.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Gains from others’ losses: Technology trajectories and the global division of firms. Res. Policy 45(3):724–745.Crossref, Google Scholar

