Behavioral Externalities of Process Automation

References

• Andreoni J, Miller J (2002) Giving according to GARP: An experimental test of the consistency of preferences for altruism. Econometrica 70(2):737–753.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andreoni J, Vesterlund L (2001) Which is the fair sex? Gender differences in altruism. Quart. J. Econom. 116(1):293–312.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bai B, Dai H, Zhang DJ, Zhang F, Hu H (2022) The impacts of algorithmic work assignment on fairness perceptions and productivity: Evidence from field experiments. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 24(6):3060–3078.Link, Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan M, Ferreira K, Tong J (2025) Improving human-algorithm collaboration: Causes and mitigation of over- and under-adherence. Management Sci. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Batt RJ, Gallino S (2019) Finding a needle in a haystack: The effects of searching and learning on pick-worker performance. Management Sci. 65(6):2624–2645.Link, Google Scholar
• Baucells M, Grushka-Cockayne Y, Hwang W (2024) Managerial mental accounting and downstream project decisions. Management Sci. 70(12):8612–8630.Link, Google Scholar
• Bearden JN, Murphy RO, Rapoport A (2008) Decision biases in revenue management: Some behavioral evidence. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 10(4):625–636.Link, Google Scholar
• Beer R, Qi A (2024) To communicate or not? Interfirm communication in collaborative projects. Management Sci. 70(5):3225–3244.Link, Google Scholar
• Beer R, Ahn HS, Leider S (2018) Can trustworthiness in a supply chain be signaled? Management Sci. 64(9):3974–3994.Link, Google Scholar
• Beer R, Qi A, Rios I (2024) Team building and incentive schemes in collaborative projects. Preprint, submitted June 27, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4872792.Google Scholar
• Beer R, Rios I, Saban D (2021) Increased transparency in procurement: The role of peer effects. Management Sci. 67(12):7511–7534.Link, Google Scholar
• Berg J, Dickhaut J, McCabe K (1995) Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games Econom. Behav. 10(1):122–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhaskaran SR, Krishnan V (2009) Effort, revenue, and cost sharing mechanisms for collaborative new product development. Management Sci. 55(7):1152–1169.Link, Google Scholar
• Bloomberg (2024) Three ways knowledge work automation and ai will change the way we work in 2024. Accessed March 6, 2024, https://sponsored.bloomberg.com/article/business-reporter/three-ways-knowledge-work-automation-and-ai-will-change-the-way-we-work-in-2024.Google Scholar
• Bolton GE, Ockenfels A (2000) ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(1):166–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cabello Ruiz R, Jiménez Ramírez A, Escalona Cuaresma MJ, González Enríquez J (2022) Hybridizing humans and robots: An RPA horizon envisaged from the trenches. Comput. Indust. 138:103615.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caminiti S (2022) Worker productivity is falling at the fastest rate in four decades. Accessed March 6, 2024, https://www.cnbc.com/2022/12/18/worker-productivity-is-falling-at-the-fastest-rate-in-four-decades.html.Google Scholar
• Cao X, Hu C, Sun J, Zhang D (2024) How forced intervention facilitates long-term algorithm adoption. Preprint, submitted September 16, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3640862.Google Scholar
• Caro F, Saez de Tejada Cuenca A (2023) Believing in analytics: Managers’ adherence to price recommendations from a DSS. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 25(2):524–542.Link, Google Scholar
• Caro F, Colliard JE, Katok E, Ockenfels A, Stier-Moses N, Tucker C, Wu D (2022) Call for papers—Management Science Special Issue on the Human-Algorithm Connection. Management Sci. 68(1):7–8.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen B, Hall NG (2021) Incentive schemes for resolving Parkinson’s law in project management. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 288(2):666–681.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen S, Klastorin T, Wagner MR (2021) Designing practical coordinating contracts in decentralized projects. Naval Res. Logist. 68(2):183–198.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christin A (2017) Algorithms in practice: Comparing web journalism and criminal justice. Big Data Soc. 4(2):2053951717718855.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crama P, Sting FJ, Wu Y (2019) Encouraging help across projects. Management Sci. 65(3):1408–1429.Link, Google Scholar
• Cui T, Raju JS, Zhang ZJ (2007) Fairness and channel coordination. Management Sci. 53(8):1303–1314.Link, Google Scholar
• Davenport TH, Ronanki R (2018) Artificial intelligence for the real world. Harvard Bus. Rev. 96(1):108–116.Google Scholar
• Davis AM, Huang R, Thomas DJ (2022) Retailer inventory sharing in two-tier supply chains: An experimental investigation. Management Sci. 68(12):8773–8790.Link, Google Scholar
• Dawande M, Janakiraman G, Qi A, Wu Q (2019) Optimal incentive contracts in project management. Production Oper. Management 28(6):1431–1445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DHL (2022) Bring on the bots! How automation can break through bottlenecks. Accessed November 22, 2022, https://www.dhl.com/global-en/delivered/digitalization/logistics-automation.html.Google Scholar
• Diakopoulos N (2020) Transparency. Dubber MD, Pasquale F, Das S, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Ethics of AI (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 197–213.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dietvorst BJ, Simmons JP, Massey C (2015) Algorithm aversion: People erroneously avoid algorithms after seeing them err. J. Experiment. Psych. Gen. 144(1):114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dietvorst BJ, Simmons JP, Massey C (2018) Overcoming algorithm aversion: People will use imperfect algorithms if they can (even slightly) modify them. Management Sci. 64(3):1155–1170.Link, Google Scholar
• Dohmen T, Falk A (2011) Performance pay and multidimensional sorting: Productivity, preferences, and gender. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(2):556–590.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duch ML, Grossmann MR, Lauer T (2020) z-tree unleashed: A novel client-integrating architecture for conducting z-tree experiments over the internet. J. Behav. Experiment. Finance 28:100400.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duffy J, Li Y (2019) Lifecycle consumption under different income profiles: Evidence and theory. J. Econom. Dynam. Control 104:74–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dufwenberg M, Kirchsteiger G (2004) A theory of sequential reciprocity. Games Econom. Behav. 47(2):268–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Schmidt KM (1999) A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quart. J. Econom. 114(3):817–868.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frederick S (2005) Cognitive reflection and decision making. J. Econom. Perspect. 19(4):25–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ge R, Zheng Z, Tian X, Liao L (2021) Human–robot interaction: When investors adjust the usage of robo-advisors in peer-to-peer lending. Inform. Systems Res. 32(3):774–785.Link, Google Scholar
• Grushka-Cockayne Y, Erat S, Wooten J, Donohue K, Katok E, Leider S (2018) New product development and project management decisions. Donohue K, Katok E, Leider S, eds. The Handbook of Behavioral Operations (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ), 367–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guerci J (2020) Attended vs unattended RPAs: The role of humans in document-driven RPA applications. Accessed March 6, 2024, https://www.ocrolus.com/blog/the-role-of-humans-in-rpa-applications/.Google Scholar
• Ho TH, Su X, Wu Y (2014) Distributional and peer-induced fairness in supply chain contract design. Production Oper. Management 23(2):161–175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holt CA, Laury SK (2002) Risk aversion and incentive effects. Amer. Econom. Rev. 92(5):1644–1655.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hou C, Lu M, Deng T, Shen ZJM (2021) Coordinating project outsourcing through bilateral contract negotiations. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 23(6):1543–1561.Link, Google Scholar
• Ibrahim R, Kim SH, Tong J (2021) Eliciting human judgment for prediction algorithms. Management Sci. 67(4):2314–2325.Link, Google Scholar
• Kagan E, Leider S, Sahin O (2021) Dynamic decision-making in operations management. Johns Hopkins Carey Business School Research Paper 21-13, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore.Google Scholar
• Käki A, Kemppainen K, Liesiö J (2019) What to do when decision-makers deviate from model recommendations? Empirical evidence from hydropower industry. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 278(3):869–882.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kalkancı B, Chen KY, Erhun F (2014) Complexity as a contract design factor: A human-to-human experimental study. Production Oper. Management 23(2):269–284.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katok E, Pavlov V (2013) Fairness in supply chain contracts: A laboratory study. J. Oper. Management 31(3):129–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kawaguchi K (2021) When will workers follow an algorithm? A field experiment with a retail business. Management Sci. 67(3):1670–1695.Link, Google Scholar
• Kesavan S, Kushwaha T (2020) Field experiment on the profit implications of merchants’ discretionary power to override data-driven decision-making tools. Management Sci. 66(11):5182–5190.Link, Google Scholar
• Kim SH, Tong J, Peden C (2020) Admission control biases in hospital unit capacity management: How occupancy information hurdles and decision noise impact utilization. Management Sci. 66(11):5151–5170.Link, Google Scholar
• Kirchmer M, Franz P, Bathmaker D (2019) Value-driven robotic process automation—Enabling effective digital transformation. Accessed March 6, 2024, https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.29609.75369.Google Scholar
• Kremer M, Debo L (2016) Inferring quality from wait time. Management Sci. 62(10):3023–3038.Link, Google Scholar
• Kwon HD, Lippman SA, McCardle KF, Tang CS (2010) Project management contracts with delayed payments. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 12(4):692–707.Link, Google Scholar
• Lacity M, Willcocks L (2021) Becoming strategic with intelligent automation. MIS Quart. Executive 20(2):1–14.Google Scholar
• Lebovitz S, Lifshitz-Assaf H, Levina N (2022) To engage or not to engage with ai for critical judgments: How professionals deal with opacity when using AI for medical diagnosis. Organ. Sci. 33(1):126–148.Link, Google Scholar
• Leider S, Lovejoy WS (2015) Bargaining in supply chains (long version). Working paper, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
• Leider S, Şahin Ö (2014) Contracts, biases, and consumption of access services. Management Sci. 60(9):2198–2222.Link, Google Scholar
• Li J, Leider S, Beil D, Duenyas I (2021) Running online experiments using web-conferencing software. J. Econom. Sci. Assoc. 7(2):167–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin W, Kim S-H, Tong J (2021) Revisiting the cause of algorithm aversion: Algorithm feedback asymmetry in the field and lab. Preprint, submitted August 25, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3891832.Google Scholar
• Long X, Nasiry J, Wu Y (2020) A behavioral study on abandonment decisions in multistage projects. Management Sci. 66(5):1999–2016.Link, Google Scholar
• Moffitt KC, Rozario AM, Vasarhelyi MA (2018) Robotic process automation for auditing. J. Emerging Tech. Accounting 15(1):1–10.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Olsen TL, Tomlin B (2020) Industry 4.0: Opportunities and challenges for operations management. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 22(1):113–122.Link, Google Scholar
• Palley AB, Kremer M (2014) Sequential search and learning from rank feedback: Theory and experimental evidence. Management Sci. 60(10):2525–2542.Link, Google Scholar
• Parkinson CN (1955) Parkinson’s law. The Economist (London) 177(5856):635–637.Google Scholar
• Rabin M (1993) Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics. Amer. Econom. Rev. 83(5):1281–1302.Google Scholar
• Rahmani M, Roels G, Karmarkar US (2017) Collaborative work dynamics in projects with co-production. Production Oper. Management 26(4):686–703.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rios I, Ghosh P (2024) Competition in optimal stopping: Behavioral insights. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 26(6):2256–2273.Link, Google Scholar
• Schatsky D, Mahidhar V (2013) The future of knowledge work. Accessed March 6, 2024, https://www2.deloitte.com/uk/en/insights/focus/signals-for-strategists/the-future-of-knowledge-work.html.Google Scholar
• Schultz KL, Juran DC, Boudreau JW, McClain JO, Thomas LJ (1998) Modeling and worker motivation in JIT production systems. Management Sci. 44(12-part-1):1595–1607.Link, Google Scholar
• Siemsen E, Aloysius J (2020) Supply chain analytics and the evolving work of supply chain managers. Association for Supply Chain Management White Paper, Association for Supply Chain Management, Chicago.Google Scholar
• Snyder C, Keppler S, Leider S (2025) Algorithm reliance, fast and slow. Management Sci. Forthcoming.Link, Google Scholar
• Song JM, Zhao Y, Xu X (2021) Incentives and gaming in collaborative projects under risk-sharing partnerships. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 23(2):453–470.Link, Google Scholar
• Sun J, Zhang DJ, Hu H, Van Mieghem JA (2022) Predicting human discretion to adjust algorithmic prescription: A large-scale field experiment in warehouse operations. Management Sci. 68(2):846–865.Link, Google Scholar
• Van Donselaar KH, Gaur V, Van Woensel T, Broekmeulen RA, Fransoo JC (2010) Ordering behavior in retail stores and implications for automated replenishment. Management Sci. 56(5):766–784.Link, Google Scholar
• Walden M (2023) You decide: What’s wrong with worker productivity? Accessed March 6, 2024, https://cals.ncsu.edu/news/you-decide-whats-wrong-with-worker-productivity/.Google Scholar
• Wu Y, Ramachandran K, Krishnan V (2014) Managing cost salience and procrastination in projects: Compensation and team composition. Production Oper. Management 23(8):1299–1311.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wuttke DA, Donohue K, Siemsen E (2018) Initiating supplier new product development projects: A behavioral investigation. Production Oper. Management 27(1):80–99.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang J (2016) Deadlines in product development. Management Sci. 62(11):3310–3326.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhang W, Shokoohyar S, Qi A, Katok E (2023) Coordination for assembly. Preprint, submitted July 3, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2889868.Google Scholar
• Zhao S, López Vargas K, Friedman D, Gutierrez M (2020) UCSC LEEPS lab protocol for online economics experiments. Preprint, submitted June 3, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3594027.Google Scholar