Roles of Artificial Intelligence in Collaboration with Humans: Automation, Augmentation, and the Future of Work

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2024.05684

References

  • Acemoglu D, Restrepo P (2018) The race between man and machine: Implications of technology for growth, factor shares, and employment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 108(6):1488–1542.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Agrawal A, Gans J, Goldfarb A (2018) Prediction Machines: The Simple Economics of Artificial Intelligence (Harvard Business Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Agrawal A, Gans J, Goldfarb A (2024) AI adoption and system-wide change. J. Econom. Management Strategy 33(2):327–337.Google Scholar
  • Amaya J, Holweg M (2024) Using algorithms to improve knowledge work. J. Oper. Management 70(3):482–513.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Asch SE (1955) Opinions and social pressure. Sci. Amer. 193(5):31–35.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Autor DH (2014) Polanyi’s Paradox and the Shape of Employment Growth (National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Autor DH (2015) Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation. J. Econom. Perspect. 29(3):3–30.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Autor DH, Levy F, Murnane RJ (2003) The skill content of recent technological change: An empirical exploration. Quart. J. Econom. 118(4):1279–1333.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baird A, Maruping LM (2021) The next generation of research on IS use: A theoretical framework of delegation to and from agentic IS artifacts. MIS Quart. 45(1):315–341.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Balasubramanian N, Ye Y, Xu M (2022) Substituting human decision-making with machine learning: Implications for organizational learning. Acad. Management Rev. 47(3):448–465.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bansal G, Nushi B, Kamar E, Lasecki WS, Weld DS, Horvitz E (2019) Beyond accuracy: The role of mental models in human-AI team performance. Proc. AAAI Conf. Human Comput. Crowdsourcing 7(1):2–11.Google Scholar
  • Beam AL, Kohane IS (2016) Translating artificial intelligence into clinical care. JAMA 316(22):2368–2369.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beer R, Qi A, Ríos I (2025) Behavioral externalities of process automation. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print July 2, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2024.05408.Google Scholar
  • Blattberg RC, Hoch SJ (1990) Database models and managerial intuition: 50% model + 50% manager. Management Sci. 36(8):887–899.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Boland PJ, Proschan F, Tong YL (1989) Modelling dependence in simple and indirect majority systems. J. Appl. Probab. 26(1):81–88.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bommasani R, Creel KA, Kumar A, Jurafsky D, Liang PS (2022) Picking on the same person: Does algorithmic monoculture lead to outcome homogenization? Adv. Neural Inform. Processing Systems 35:3663–3678.Google Scholar
  • Bonaccio S, Dalal RS (2006) Advice taking and decision-making: An integrative literature review, and implications for the organizational sciences. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 101(2):127–151.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bresnahan TF (2021) Artificial intelligence technologies and aggregate growth prospects. Diamond JW, Zodrow GR, eds. Prospects for Economic Growth in the United States (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 132–172.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Broussard M (2018) Artificial Unintelligence: How Computers Misunderstand the World (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brynjolfsson E, Mitchell T (2017) What can machine learning do? Workforce implications. Science 358(6370):1530–1534.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brynjolfsson E, Mitchell T, Rock D (2018) What can machines learn and what does it mean for occupations and the economy? AEA Papers Proc. 108:43–47.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chekroud AM, Hawrilenko M, Loho H, Bondar J, Gueorguieva R, Hasan A, Kambeitz J, et al. (2024) Illusory generalizability of clinical prediction models. Science 383(6679):164–167.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen C, Jain N, Karamshetty V (2023) Algorithm-human-algorithm: A new classification approach to integrating judgemental adjustments. Proc. 44th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (Hyderabad, India).Google Scholar
  • Condorcet M D (1785) Essay on the Application of Analysis to the Probability of Majority Decisions (Imprimerie Royale, Paris).Google Scholar
  • Dell’Acqua F, McFowland E, Mollick ER, Lifshitz-Assaf H, Kellogg K, Rajendran S, Krayer L, Candelon F, Lakhani KR (2023) Navigating the jagged technological frontier: Field experimental evidence of the effects of AI on knowledge worker productivity and quality. Working paper, Harvard Business School Technology & Operations Management Unit, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Dellermann D, Ebel P, Söllner M, Leimeister JM (2019) Hybrid intelligence. Bus. Inform. Systems Engrg. 61(5):637–643.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Donahue K, Chouldechova A, Kenthapadi K (2022) Human-algorithm collaboration: Achieving complementarity and avoiding unfairness. Proc. 2022 ACM Conf. Fairness Accountability Transparency (Seoul, South Korea), 1639–1656.Google Scholar
  • Esteva A, Kuprel B, Novoa RA, Ko J, Swetter SM, Blau HM, Thrun S (2017) Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks. Nature 542(7639):115–118.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Frank MR, Autor D, Bessen JE, Brynjolfsson E, Cebrian M, Deming DJ, Feldman M, Groh M, Lobo J, Moro E (2019) Toward understanding the impact of artificial intelligence on labor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116(14):6531–6539.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fügener A, Grahl J, Gupta A, Ketter W (2021) Will humans-in-the-loop become borgs? Merits and pitfalls of working with AI. MIS Quart. 45(3):1527–1556.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fügener A, Grahl J, Gupta A, Ketter W (2022) Cognitive challenges in human–artificial intelligence collaboration: Investigating the path toward productive delegation. Inform. Systems Res. 33(2):678–696.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Geirhos R, Meding K, Wichmann FA (2020) Beyond accuracy: Quantifying trial-by-trial behaviour of CNNs and humans by measuring error consistency. Adv. Neural Inform. Processing Systems 33:13890–13902.Google Scholar
  • Geirhos R, Narayanappa K, Mitzkus B, Thieringer T, Bethge M, Wichmann FA, Brendel W (2021) Partial success in closing the gap between human and machine vision. Adv. Neural Inform. Processing Systems 34:23885–23899.Google Scholar
  • Graesser AC, Fiore SM, Greiff S, Andrews-Todd J, Foltz PW, Hesse FW (2018) Advancing the science of collaborative problem solving. Psych. Sci. Public Interest 19(2):59–92.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hekler A, Utikal JS, Enk AH, Hauschild A, Weichenthal M, Maron RC, Berking C, et al. (2019) Superior skin cancer classification by the combination of human and artificial intelligence. Eur. J. Cancer 120:114–121.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jain H, Padmanabhan B, Pavlou PA, Raghu TS (2021) Editorial for the special section on humans, algorithms, and augmented intelligence: The future of work, organizations, and society. Inform. Systems Res. 32(3):675–687.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jussupow E, Spohrer K, Heinzl A, Gawlitza J (2021) Augmenting medical diagnosis decisions? An investigation into physicians’ decision-making process with artificial intelligence. Inform. Systems Res. 32(3):713–735.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Karush W (1962) A generalalgorithm for the optimal distribution of effort. Management Sci. 9(1):50–72.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kesavan S, Kushwaha T (2020) Field experiment on the profit implications of merchants’ discretionary power to override data-driven decision-making tools. Management Sci. 66(11):5182–5190.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kleinberg J, Raghavan M (2021) Algorithmic monoculture and social welfare. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118(22):e2018340118.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lake BM, Salakhutdinov R, Tenenbaum JB (2015) Human-level concept learning through probabilistic program induction. Science 350(6266):1332–1338.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lake BM, Ullman TD, Tenenbaum JB, Gershman SJ (2017) Building machines that learn and think like people. Behav. Brain Sci. 40:e253.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lebovitz S, Levina N, Lifshitz-Assaf H (2021) Is AI ground truth really true? The dangers of training and evaluating AI tools based on experts’ know-what. MIS Quart. 45(3):1501–1525.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lebovitz S, Lifshitz-Assaf H, Levina N (2022) To engage or not to engage with AI for critical judgments: How professionals deal with opacity when using AI for medical diagnosis. Organ. Sci. 33(1):126–148.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G (2015) Deep learning. Nature 521(7553):436–444.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lindebaum D, Vesa M, Den Hond F (2020) Insights from “the machine stops” to better understand rational assumptions in algorithmic decision making and its implications for organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 45(1):247–263.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • List C, Goodin RE (2001) Epistemic democracy: Generalizing the Condorcet jury theorem. J. Political Philos. 9(3):277–306.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Madras D, Pitassi T, Zemel R (2018) Predict responsibly: Improving fairness and accuracy by learning to defer. Adv. Neural Inform. Processing Systems 31:6150–6160.Google Scholar
  • Maedche A, Legner C, Benlian A, Berger B, Gimpel H, Hess T, Hinz O, Morana S, Söllner M (2019) AI-based digital assistants. Bus. Inform. Systems Engrg. 61(4):535–544.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McGrath JE (1984) Groups: Interaction and Performance (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Michelucci P, Dickinson JL (2016) The power of crowds. Science 351(6268):32–33.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Minsky M, Papert S (1969) Perceptrons (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Mozannar H, Sontag D (2020) Consistent estimators for learning to defer to an expert. Proc. 37th Internat. Conf. Machine Learn. (JMLR.org), 7076–7087.Google Scholar
  • Orlikowski WJ (2002) Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organ. Sci. 13(3):249–273.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Palley AB, Soll JB (2019) Extracting the wisdom of crowds when information is shared. Management Sci. 65(5):2291–2309.AbstractGoogle Scholar
  • Polanyi M (1966) The logic of tacit inference. Philosophy 41(155):1–18.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Puranam P (2021) Human–AI collaborative decision-making as an organization design problem. J. Organ. Design 10(2):75–80.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Raghu M, Blumer K, Corrado G, Kleinberg J, Obermeyer Z, Mullainathan S (2019) The algorithmic automation problem: Prediction, triage, and human effort. Preprint, submitted March 28, https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.12220.Google Scholar
  • Rai A, Constantinides P, Sarker S (2019) Editor’s comments: Next generation digital platforms: Toward human-AI hybrids. MIS Quart. 43(1):iii–ix.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Raisch S, Krakowski S (2021) Artificial intelligence and management: The automation–augmentation paradox. Acad. Management Rev. 46(1):192–210.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenfeld A, Solbach MD, Tsotsos JK (2018) Totally looks like-how humans compare, compared to machines. Proc. IEEE Conf. Comput. Vision Pattern Recognition Workshop (IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC), 1961–1964.Google Scholar
  • Russakovsky O, Deng J, Su H, Krause J, Satheesh S, Ma S, Huang Z, Karpathy A, Khosla A, Bernstein M (2015) ImageNet large scale visual recognition challenge. Internat. J. Comput. Vis. 115(3):211–252.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ryle G (1945) Knowing how and knowing that: The presidential address. Proc. Aristotelian Soc. 46(1):1–16.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Samuel J, Zheng Z (E), Mookerjee V (2024) Task characteristics and incentives in collaborative problem solving: Evidence from three field experiments. Inform. Systems Res. 35(1):414–433.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Schuetz S, Venkatesh V (2020) The rise of human machines: How cognitive computing systems challenge assumptions of user-system interaction. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 21(2):460–482.Google Scholar
  • Simon HA (1957) Models of Man; Social and Rational (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
  • Smith BC (2019) The Promise of Artificial Intelligence: Reckoning and Judgment (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Steyvers M, Tejeda H, Kerrigan G, Smyth P (2022) Bayesian modeling of human–AI complementarity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119(11):e2111547119.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sutton RS, Barto AG (2018) Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Szegedy C, Vanhoucke V, Ioffe S, Shlens J, Wojna Z (2016) Rethinking the inception architecture for computer vision. Proc. IEEE Conf. Comput. Vision Pattern Recognition (Las Vegas, NV), 2818–2826.Google Scholar
  • Tschandl P, Rosendahl C, Akay BN, Argenziano G, Blum A, Braun RP, Cabo H, et al. (2019) Expert-level diagnosis of nonpigmented skin cancer by combined convolutional neural networks. JAMA Dermatology 155(1):58–65.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185(4157):1124–1131.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Walzner DD, Poreschack LM, Fuegener A, Schiffels S, Denz C (2023) Division of labor between humans and algorithms in healthcare: The case of surgery duration predictions. Proc. 44th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (Hyderabad, India).Google Scholar
  • Yaniv I, Kleinberger E (2000) Advice taking in decision making: Egocentric discounting and reputation formation. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 83(2):260–281.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.