The Hidden Costs of Fairness in Platform Markets: The Dynamics of Lowering Developer Royalty Rates

References

• Aguiar L, Waldfogel J (2018) Quality predictability and the welfare benefits from new products: Evidence from the digitization of recorded music. J. Political Econom. 126(2):492–524.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alderman BL, Blair RD (2023) Epic battles in two-sided markets. Antitrust Bull. 68(3):519–532.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amore MD, Conti A, Pelucco V (2023) Micro venture capital. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 17(4):886–924.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong M (2006) Competition in two-sided markets. RAND J. Econom. 37(3):668–691.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bai J, Chen MX, Liu J, Mu X, Xu DY (2023) Stand out from the millions: Market congestion and information friction on global e-commerce platforms. NBER Working Paper No. 28100, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Bhargava HK, Wang K, Zhang XL (2022) Fending off critics of platform power with differential revenue sharing: Doing well by doing good? Management Sci. 68(11):8249–8260.Link, Google Scholar
• Boudreau KJ (2012) Let a thousand flowers bloom? An early look at large numbers of software app developers and patterns of innovation. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1409–1427.Link, Google Scholar
• Boudreau KJ, Hagiu A (2009) Platform rules: Multi-sided platforms as regulators. Gawer A, ed. Platforms, Markets and Innovation (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK), 163–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Branstetter L, Lima F, Taylor LJ, Venâncio A (2014) Do entry regulations deter entrepreneurship and job creation? Evidence from recent reforms in Portugal. Econom. J. 124(577):805–832.Google Scholar
• Callaway B, Sant’Anna PH (2021) Difference-in-differences with multiple time periods. J. Econom. 225(2):200–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cao R (2018) Information frictions in new venture finance: Evidence from product hunt rankings. Unpublished working paper, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Cennamo C (2021) Competing in digital markets: A platform-based perspective. Acad. Management Perspect. 35(2):265–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cennamo C, Santalo J (2013) Platform competition: Strategic trade-offs in platform markets. Strategic Management J. 34(11):1331–1350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheng HK, Daniel Sokol D, Zang X (2024) The rise of empirical online platform research in the new millennium. J. Econom. Management Strategy 33(2):416–451.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conti A, Roche MP (2021) Lowering the bar? External conditions, opportunity costs, and high-tech start-up outcomes. Organ. Sci. 32(4):965–986.Link, Google Scholar
• Conti A, Ortega L, Sung E (2024) Sharpen your sword for litigation: Incumbent strategic reaction to the threat of entry. Management Sci. 71(1):803–824.Google Scholar
• Conti A, Thursby M, Rothaermel FT (2013b) Show me the right stuff: Signals for high-tech startups. J. Econom. Management Strategy 22(2):341–364.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conti A, Thursby J, Thursby M (2013a) Patents as signals for startup financing. J. Indust. Econom. 61(3):592–622.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Chaisemartin C, d’Haultfoeuille X (2020) Two-way fixed effects estimators with heterogeneous treatment effects. Amer. Econom. Rev. 110(9):2964–2996.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenmann T, Parker G, Van Alstyne M (2011) Platform envelopment. Strategic Management J. 32(12):1270–1285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ershov D (2024) Variety-based congestion in online markets: Evidence from mobile apps. Amer. Econom. J.: Microeconomics 16(2):180–203.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farronato C, Fong J, Fradkin A (2023) Dog eat dog: Balancing network effects and differentiation in a digital platform merger. Management Sci. 70(1):464–483.Link, Google Scholar
• Foerderer J, Lueker N, Heinzl A (2021) And the winner is…? The desirable and undesirable effects of platform awards. Inform. Systems Res. 32(4):1155–1172.Link, Google Scholar
• Goodman-Bacon A (2021) Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing. J. Econom. 225(2):254–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guzman J, Li A (2023) Measuring founding strategy. Management Sci. 69(1):101–118.Link, Google Scholar
• Hagiu A (2006a) Microsoft Xbox: Changing the game? Harvard Business School Case 707-501, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Hagiu A (2006b) Pricing and commitment by two-sided platforms. RAND J. Econom. 37(3):720–737.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hagiu A (2009) Two-sided platforms: Product variety and pricing structures. J. Econom. Management Strategy 18(4):1011–1043.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hagiu A (2014) Strategic decisions for multisided platforms. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 55(2):4–13.Google Scholar
• Hagiu A, Jullien B (2011) Why do intermediaries divert search? RAND J. Econom. 42(2):337–362.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hagiu A, Wright J (2019) The optimality of ad valorem contracts. Management Sci. 65(11):5219–5233.Link, Google Scholar
• Halaburda H, Jan Piskorski M, Yıldırım P (2018) Competing by restricting choice: The case of matching platforms. Management Sci. 64(8):3574–3594.Link, Google Scholar
• Heath A (2016) AngelList buys product hunt for around $20 million. Bus. Insider (December 1), https://www.businessinsider.com/angellist-buys-product-hunt-for-around-20-million-2016-12.Google Scholar
• Jensen R, Thursby M (2001) Proofs and prototypes for sale: The licensing of university inventions. Amer. Econom. Rev. 91(1):240–259.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kretschmer T, Leiponen A, Schilling M, Vasudeva G (2022) Platform ecosystems as meta-organizations: Implications for platform strategies. Strategic Management J. 43(3):405–424.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li H, Zhu F (2021) Information transparency, multihoming, and platform competition: A natural experiment in the daily deals market. Management Sci. 67(7):4384–4407.Link, Google Scholar
• McIntyre DP, Srinivasan A (2017) Networks, platforms, and strategy: Emerging views and next steps. Strategic Management J. 38(1):141–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Padilla J, Perkins J, Piccolo S (2022) Self-preferencing in markets with vertically integrated gatekeeper platforms. J. Indust. Econom. 70(2):371–395.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parker GG, Van Alstyne MW (2005) Two-sided network effects: A theory of information product design. Management Sci. 51(10):1494–1504.Link, Google Scholar
• Png IPL, Wang H (2010) Buyer uncertainty and two-part pricing: Theory and applications. Management Sci. 56(2):334–342.Link, Google Scholar
• Rietveld J, Schilling MA (2021) Platform competition: A systematic and interdisciplinary review of the literature. J. Management 47(6):1528–1563.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rochet J-C, Tirole J (2003) Platform competition in two-sided markets. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 1(4):990–1029.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rong K, Sokol DD, Zhou D, Zhu F (2024) Antitrust platform regulation and entrepreneurship: Evidence from China. Harvard Business School Working Paper No. 24-039, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Seamans R, Zhu F (2014) Responses to entry in multi-sided markets: The impact of Craigslist on local newspapers. Management Sci. 60(2):476–493.Link, Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1955) A behavioral model of rational choice. Quart. J. Econom. 69(1):99–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sokol DD, Zhu F (2021) Harming competition and consumers under the guise of protecting privacy: An analysis of apple’s iOS 14 policy updates. Cornell Law Rev. Online 107:94.Google Scholar
• Spulber D (2006) Firms and networks in two-sided markets. Hendershott T, ed. Economics and Information Systems, Handbooks in Information Systems, vol. 1 (Elsevier Science, New York), 137–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taeuscher K, Rothe H (2021) Optimal distinctiveness in platform markets: Leveraging complementors as legitimacy buffers. Strategic Management J. 42(2):435–461.Crossref, Google Scholar
• U.S. House of Representatives (2020) Investigation of Competition in Digital Markets (U.S. Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Wooldridge JM (2023) Simple approaches to nonlinear difference-in-differences with panel data. Econom. J. 26(3):C31–C66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wooldridge JM (2025) Two-way fixed effects, the two-way Mundlak regression, and difference-in-differences estimators. Empirical Econom. 69(5):2545–2587.Google Scholar
• Zheng Y, Kaiser H (2013) Optimal quality threshold of admission in a two-sided farmers’ market. Appl. Econom. 45(23):3360–3369.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhu F, Li X, Valavi E, Iansiti M (2021) Network interconnectivity and entry into platform markets. Inform. Systems Res. 32(3):1009–1024.Link, Google Scholar