Information Design of a Delegated Search

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2024.05925

References

  • Alizamir S, de Véricourt F, Sun P (2022) Search under accumulated pressure. Oper. Res. 70(3):1393–1409.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Alizamir S, de Véricourt F, Wang S (2020) Warning against recurring risks: An information design approach. Management Sci. 66(10):4612–4629.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baca MR, Suzuki GJ, Zuro AM (2020) Insight: How biotech, pharma team up to promote their products. Accessed September 19, 2022, https://shorturl.at/mvqxu.Google Scholar
  • Ball I (2023) Dynamic information provision: Rewarding the past and guiding the future. Econometrica 91(4):1363–1391.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Behl MS (2015) Choosing an external recruiter for your business. Accessed September 26, 2022, https://shorturl.at/an6n0.Google Scholar
  • Bergemann D, Morris S (2019) Information design: A unified perspective. J. Econom. Literature 57(1):44–95.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bimpikis K, Ehsani S, Mostagir M (2019) Designing dynamic contests. Oper. Res. 67(2):339–356.AbstractGoogle Scholar
  • Boyaci T, Chakraborty S, Gurkan H (2024) Persuading skeptics and fans in the presence of additional information. Production Oper. Management 33(5):1142–1154.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brooks K (2020) R&D outsourcing trends. Accessed September 26, 2022, https://shorturl.at/eqmuI.Google Scholar
  • Buvailo A (2020) Pharma R&D outsourcing is on the rise. Accessed September 26, 2022, https://shorturl.at/GQg1f.Google Scholar
  • Candogan O (2020) Information design in operations. INFORMS TutORials Oper. Res. null(null):176–201.Google Scholar
  • Candogan O, Strack P (2023) Optimal disclosure of information to privately informed agents. Theoretical Econom. 18(3):1225–1269.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen B, Chen B, Knyazev D (2022) Information disclosure in dynamic research contests. RAND J. Econom. 53(1):113–137.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coffin N (2025) Types of feedback in recruitment management: Are you using them all? Accessed August 27, 2025, https://shorturl.at/EzHXP.Google Scholar
  • Dixit A (1989) Entry and exit decisions under uncertainty. J. Political Econom. 97(3):620–638.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ely JC, Szydlowski M (2020) Moving the goalposts. J. Political Econom. 128(2):468–506.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ely JC, Georgiadis G, Khorasani S, Rayo L (2023) Optimal feedback in contests. Rev. Econom. Stud. 90(5):2370–2394. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Farahani MH, Dawande M, Janakiraman G, Wang S (2025) Avoiding fields on fire: Information dissemination policies for environmentally safe crop-residue management. Management Sci. 71(8):6683–6706.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • FasterCapital (2025) Communication protocols: Establishing communication protocols for joint venture contracts. Accessed August 27, 2025, https://shorturl.at/ee9VT.Google Scholar
  • Hahn N, Hoefer M, Smorodinsky R (2022) The secretary recommendation problem. Games Econom. Behav. 134:199–228.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hu Z, Tang W (2021) Size matters, so does duration: The interplay between offer size and offer deadline. Management Sci. 67(8):4935–4960.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hu Z, Xiao Y (2025) Optimal dynamic mechanism under customer search. Oper. Res. 73(4):2045–2060.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hu M, Wang Z, Feng Y (2020) Information disclosure and pricing policies for sales of network goods. Oper. Res. 68(4):1162–1177.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jensen M (2025) Mastering feedback: How recruiters and hiring managers can work better together. Accessed August 27, 2025, https://shorturl.at/0Vfby.Google Scholar
  • Kamenica E (2019) Bayesian persuasion and information design. Ann. Rev. Econom. 11:249–272.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kamenica E, Gentzkow M (2011) Bayesian persuasion. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(6):2590–2615.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kelsky K (2015) The Professor Is In: The Essential Guide to Turning Your Ph.D. Into a Job (Three Rivers Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Khorasani S, Körpeoğlu E, Krishnan V (2024) Dynamic development contests. Oper. Res. 72(1):43–59.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kolotilin A (2018) Optimal information disclosure: A linear programming approach. Theoretical Econom. 13(2):607–635.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kornish LJ, Lippman SA, Mamer JW (2011) Search and the introduction of improved technologies. Naval Res. Logist. 58(6):578–594.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kremer I, Mansour Y, Perry M (2014) Implementing the “wisdom of the crowd”. J. Political Econom. 122(5):988–1012.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Küçükgül C, Özer Ö, Wang S (2022) Engineering social learning: Information design of time-locked sales campaigns for online platforms. Management Sci. 68(7):4899–4918.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Küçükgül C, Özer Ö, Wang S (2026) Recommender systems under privacy protection. Preprint, submitted January 30, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn. 4138757.Google Scholar
  • Kwon HD (2010) Invest or exit? Optimal decisions in the face of a declining profit stream. Oper. Res. 58(3):638–649.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lewis TR (2012) A theory of delegated search for the best alternative. RAND J. Econom. 43(3):391–416.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li H, Shi X (2017) Discriminatory information disclosure. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(11):3363–3385.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lippman SA, Mamer JW (2012) Exploding offers. Decision Anal. 9(1):6–21.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lippman SA, McCall JJ (1976) The economics of job search: A survey. Econom. Inquiry 14(2):155–189.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lippman SA, McCardle KF (1991) Uncertain search: A model of search among technologies of uncertain values. Management Sci. 37(11):1474–1490.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Liu Y, Cooper WL, Wang Z (2019) Information provision and pricing in the presence of consumer search costs. Production Oper. Management 28(7):1603–1620.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Malamud S, Schrimpf A (2022) Persuasion by dimension reduction. Preprint, submitted October 4, https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.08884.Google Scholar
  • McCardle KF (1985) Information acquisition and the adoption of new technology. Management Sci. 31(11):1372–1389.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McCardle KF, Tsetlin I, Winkler RL (2018) When to abandon a research project and search for a new one. Oper. Res. 66(3):799–813.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mehrotra S, Gobburu J (2016) Communicating to influence drug development and regulatory decisions: A tutorial. CPT Pharmacometrics Systems Pharmacology 5(4):163–172.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mihm J, Schlapp J (2019) Sourcing innovation: On feedback in contests. Management Sci. 65(2):559–576.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Orlov D, Skrzypacz A, Zryumov P (2020) Persuading the principal to wait. J. Political Econom. 128(7):2542–2578.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Palley AB, Kremer M (2014) Sequential search and learning from rank feedback: Theory and experimental evidence. Management Sci. 60(10):2525–2542.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Papanastasiou Y, Bimpikis K, Savva N (2018) Crowdsourcing exploration. Management Sci. 64(4):1477–1973.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rahmani M, Ramachandran K (2021) Delegating innovation projects with deadline: Committed vs. flexible stopping. Management Sci. 67(10):6317–6332.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rayo L, Segal I (2010) Optimal information disclosure. J. Political Econom. 118(5):949–987.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rogerson R, Shimer R, Wright R (2005) Search-theoretic models of the labor market: A survey. J. Econom. Literature 43(4):959–988.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rothschild M (1974) Searching for the lowest price when the distribution of prices is unknown. J. Political Econom. 425–454.Google Scholar
  • Shives K (2016) When it comes to dissertations, done is best. Accessed April 14, 2026, https://shorturl.at/Lwn0K.Google Scholar
  • Smolin A (2021) Dynamic evaluation design. AEJ Microeconom. 13(4):300–331.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • TalentLyft (2022) Contingency recruiting. Accessed May 1, 2026, https://www.talentlyft.com/hr-glossary/contingency-recruiting.Google Scholar
  • Tang W, Bearden JN, Tsetlin I (2009) Ultimatum deadlines. Management Sci. 55(8):1423–1437.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Targum SD, Milbauer AJ (2008) The process of getting new drugs to market. Accessed September 26, 2022, https://shorturl.at/MKaPv.Google Scholar
  • Ulbricht R (2016) Optimal delegated search with adverse selection and moral hazard. Theoretical Econom. 11(1):253–278.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ulu C, Smith JE (2009) Uncertainty, information acquisition, and technology adoption. Oper. Res. 57(3):740–752.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wong R (2022) Finding the right CEO. Accessed May 1 2026, https://hbr.org/2022/01/finding-the-right-ceo.Google Scholar
  • Zorc S, Tsetlin I (2020) Deadlines, offer timing, and the search for alternatives. Oper. Res. 68(3):927–948.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zorc S, Tsetlin I, Hasija S, Chick SE (2023) The when and how of delegated search. Oper. Res. 73(1):461–482.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.