Choosing Scenarios to Estimate Resilience and Stress Test Financial Institutions

References

• Berset L, Wicht T (2019) Master’s project in architecture. École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland, https://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/272311.Google Scholar
• Blanchet J, Kang Y (2021) Sample out-of-sample inference based on Wasserstein distance. Oper. Res. 69(3):985–1013.Link, Google Scholar
• Breuer T, Csiszar I (2013) Systematic stress tests with entropic plausibility constraints. J. Banking Finance 37(5):1552–1559.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Britten-Jones M, Schaefer SM (1999) Non-linear value-at-risk. Rev. Finance 2(2):161–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Broadie M, Du Y, Moallemi CC (2000) Risk estimation via regression. Oper. Res. 63(5):1077–1097.Link, Google Scholar
• Chamon L, Ribeiro A (2017) Approximate supermodularity bounds for experimental design. von Luxburg U, Guyon I, Bengio S, Wallach H, Fergus R, eds. NIPS’17: Proc. 31st Internat. Conf. Neural Inform. Processing Systems (Curran Associates Inc., Red Hook, NY), 5409–5418.Google Scholar
• Commodity Futures Trading Commission (2019) Supervisory stress testing of clearinghouses. Report, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Esfahani PM, Kuhn D (2018) Data-driven distributionally robust optimization using the Wasserstein metric: Performance guarantees and tractable reformulations. Math. Programming 171(1–2):115–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flood MD, Korenko GG (2015) Systematic scenario selection: Stress testing and the nature of uncertainty. Quant. Finance 15(1):43–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glasserman P, Heidelberger P, Shahabuddin P (2000) Variance reduction techniques for estimating value-at-risk. Management Sci. 46(10):1349–1364.Link, Google Scholar
• Glasserman P, Kang C, Kang W (2015) Stress scenario selection by empirical likelihood. Quant. Finance 15(1):25–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Golub B, Greenberg D, Ratcliffe R (2018) Market-driven scenarios: An approach for plausible scenario construction. J. Portfolio Management 44(5):6–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hong LJ, Liu G (2011) Monte Carlo estimation of value-at-risk, conditional value-at-risk and their sensitivities. Jain S, Creasey R, Himmelspach J, White KP, Fu MC, eds. WSC’11: Proc. Winter Simulation Conf. (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 95–107.Google Scholar
• Kapinos P, Mitnik OA (2016) A top-down approach to stress-testing banks. J. Financial Services Res. 49(2–3):229–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kopeliovich Y, Novosyolov A, Satchkov D, Schachter B (2015) Robust risk estimation and hedging: A reverse stress testing approach. J. Derivatives 22(4):10–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Montgomery DC (2019) Design and Analysis of Experiments, 10th ed. (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Nikolov A, Singh M, Tantipongpipat UT (2019) Proportional volume sampling and approximation algorithms for A-optimal design. SODA’19: Proc. 30th Annual ACM-SIAM Sympos. Discrete Algorithms (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia), 1369–1386.Google Scholar
• Parlatore C, Philippon T (2025) Designing stress scenarios. J. Finance 80(2):833–873.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pflug GC, Pichler A, Wozabal D (2012) The 1/n investment strategy is optimal under high model ambiguity. J. Banking Finance 36(2):410–417.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pritsker M (2012) Enhanced stress testing and financial stability. Preprint, submitted June 12, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2082994.Google Scholar
• Pritsker M (2017) Choosing stress scenarios for systemic risk through dimension reduction. FRB Boston Risk and Policy Analysis Unit Paper No. RPA 17-04, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, Boston, https://www.bostonfed.org/publications/risk-and-policy-analysis/2017/choosing-stress-scenarios-for-systemic-risk-through-dimension-reduction.aspx.Google Scholar
• Pukelsheim F (2006) Optimal Design of Experiments, Classics in Applied Mathematics, vol. 50 (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia).Crossref, Google Scholar
• RiskMetrics Group (1996) Riskmetrics—Technical document. Technical report, J.P. Morgan/Reuters, New York.Google Scholar
• Rouvinez C (1997) Going Greek with VaR. Risk 10:57–65.Google Scholar
• Stoyanov SV, Samorodnitsky G, Rachev S, Ortobelli Lozza S (2006) Computing the portfolio conditional value-at-risk in the alpha-stable case. Probab. Math. Statist. 26(1):1–22.Google Scholar
• Wilson T (1999) Value at risk. Alexander C, ed. Risk Management and Analysis, vol. 1 (Wiley, Chichester, UK), 61–124.Google Scholar