Speed Is a Signal: When Faster Replies Increase Hiring Likelihood

References

• Agnew JR, Bateman H, Eckert C, Iskhakov F, Louviere J, Thorp S (2018) First impressions matter: An experimental investigation of online financial advice. Management Sci. 64(1):288–307.Link, Google Scholar
• Ahler DJ, Roush CE, Sood G (2025) The micro-task market for lemons: Data quality on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Political Sci. Res. Methods 13(1):1–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Algoe SB (2012) Find, remind, and bind: The functions of gratitude in everyday relationships. Soc. Personality Psych. Compass 6(6):455–469.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Algoe SB, Haidt J, Gable SL (2008) Beyond reciprocity: Gratitude and relationships in everyday life. Emotion 8(3):425–429.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barley SR, Meyerson DE, Grodal S (2011) E-mail as a source and symbol of stress. Organ. Sci. 22(4):887–906.Link, Google Scholar
• Becker WJ, Connolly T, Slaughter J (2010) The effect of job offer timing on offer acceptance, performance, and turnover. Personnel Psych. 63(1):223–241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bergsieker HB, Leslie LM, Constantine VS, Fiske ST (2012) Stereotyping by omission: Eliminate the negative, accentuate the positive. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 102(6):1214–1238.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berman JZ, Silver I (2022) Prosocial behavior and reputation: When does doing good lead to looking good? Current Opinion Psych. 43:102–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berman JZ, Levine EE, Barasch A, Small DA (2015) The braggart’s dilemma: On the social rewards and penalties of advertising prosocial behavior. J. Marketing Res. 52(1):90–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Black DE, Vance MD (2021) Do first impressions last? The impact of initial assessments and subsequent performance on promotion decisions. Management Sci. 67(7):4556–4576.Link, Google Scholar
• Blau PM (1964) Justice in social exchange. Sociol. Inquiry 34(2):193–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bodie GD, Vickery AJ, Gearhart CC (2013) The nature of supportive listening, I: Exploring the relation between supportive listeners and supportive people. Internat. J. Listening 27(1):39–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bolino MC, Long D, Turnley W (2016) Impression management in organizations: Critical questions, answers, and areas for future research. Annual Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 3(1):377–406.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown R, Duck J, Jimmieson N (2014) E-mail in the workplace: The role of stress appraisals and normative response pressure in the relationship between e-mail stressors and employee strain. Internat. J. Stress Management 21(4):325–347.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buechel EC, Solinas E (2025) The detachment paradox: Employers recognize the benefits of detachment for employee well-being and performance, yet penalize it in employee evaluations. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 188:104403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buell RW, Norton MI (2011) The labor illusion: How operational transparency increases perceived value. Management Sci. 57(9):1564–1579.Link, Google Scholar
• Carr CT, Hall RD, Mason AJ, Varney EJ (2017) Cueing employability in the gig economy: Effects of task-relevant and task-irrelevant information on Fiverr. Management Comm. Quart. 31(3):409–428.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cascio Rizzo GL, Ziano I (2025) Response speed influences consumer evaluations. Preprint, submitted June 9, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5286938.Google Scholar
• Chaudhry SJ, Loewenstein G (2019) Thanking, apologizing, bragging, and blaming: Responsibility exchange theory and the currency of communication. Psych. Rev. 126(3):313–344.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheng BH, Zhou Y, Chen F (2023) You’ve got mail! How work e-mail activity helps anxious workers enhance performance outcomes. J. Vocational Behav. 144:103881.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Connelly CE, Gallagher DG (2004) Emerging trends in contingent work research. J. Management 30(6):959–983.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crasta D, Rogge RD, Maniaci MR, Reis HT (2021) Toward an optimized measure of perceived partner responsiveness: Development and validation of the perceived responsiveness and insensitivity scale. Psych. Assessment 33(4):338–355.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Critcher CR, Inbar Y, Pizarro DA (2013) How quick decisions illuminate moral character. Soc. Psych. Personality Sci. 4(3):308–315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cuofano G (2019) Fiverr—FourWeekMBA.com. Medium (May 19), https://medium.com/@gennarocuofano/fiverr-fourweekmba-com-8fdc66638aff.Google Scholar
• Donnelly GE, Wilson AV, Whillans AV, Norton MI (2021) Communicating resource scarcity and interpersonal connection. J. Consumer Psych. 31(4):726–745.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edelman B, Luca M, Svirsky D (2017) Racial discrimination in the sharing economy: Evidence from a field experiment. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 9(2):1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fang D, Maglio SJ (2024) On time or on thin ice: How deadline violations negatively affect perceived work quality and worker evaluations. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 185:104365.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman E, Reid EM, Mazmanian M (2020) Signs of our time: Time-use as dedication, performance, identity, and power in contemporary workplaces. Acad. Management Ann. 14(2):598–626.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flynn FJ, Collins H, Zlatev J (2023) Are you listening to me? The negative link between extraversion and perceived listening. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 49(6):837–851.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Giurge LM, Bohns VK (2021) You don’t need to answer right away! Receivers overestimate how quickly senders expect responses to non-urgent work emails. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 167:114–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Giurge LM, Whillans AV, West C (2020) Why time poverty matters for individuals, organisations and nations. Nature Human Behav. 4(10):993–1003.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grice HP (1975) Logic and conversation. Cole P, Moran JL, eds. Syntax and Semantics III: Speech Acts (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 41–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hannák A, Wagner C, Garcia D, Mislove A, Strohmaier M, Wilson C (2017) Bias in online freelance marketplaces: Evidence from TaskRabbit and Fiverr. Proc. 2017 ACM Conf. Comput. Supported Cooperative Work Soc. Comput. (ACM, New York), 1914–1933.Google Scholar
• Hazel L, Barker E, Pronin E (2023) Playing hard-to-get: A new look at an old strategy. J. Sex Res. 60(3):368–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holoien DS, Fiske ST (2013) Downplaying positive impressions: Compensation between warmth and competence in impression management. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 49(1):33–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang K, Yeomans M, Brooks AW, Minson JA, Gino F (2017) It doesn’t hurt to ask: Question-asking increases liking. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 113(3):430–452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Inzlicht M, Shenhav A, Olivola CY (2018) The effort paradox: Effort is both costly and valued. Trends Cognitive Sci. 22(4):337–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Itzchakov G, Reis HT (2023) Listening and perceived responsiveness: Unveiling the significance and exploring crucial research endeavors. Current Opin. Psych. 53:101662.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Itzchakov G, Weinstein N, Leary M, Saluk D, Amar M (2024) Listening to understand: The role of high-quality listening on speakers’ attitude depolarization during disagreements. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 126(2):213–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jeong M, Minson JA, Yeomans M, Gino F (2019) Communicating with warmth in distributive negotiations is surprisingly counterproductive. Management Sci. 65(12):5813–5837.Link, Google Scholar
• Jerejian ACM, Reid C, Rees CS (2013) The contribution of email volume, email management strategies and propensity to worry in predicting email stress among academics. Comput. Human Behav. 29(3):991–996.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jordan JJ, Hoffman M, Nowak MA, Rand DG (2016) Uncalculating cooperation is used to signal trustworthiness. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113(31):8658–8663.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Judd CM, James-Hawkins L, Yzerbyt V, Kashima Y (2005) Fundamental dimensions of social judgment: Understanding the relations between judgments of competence and warmth. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 89(6):899–913.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keinan A, Bellezza S, Paharia N (2019) The symbolic value of time. Current Opinion Psych. 26:58–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keith MG, McKay AS (2024) Too anecdotal to be true? Mechanical Turk is not all bots and bad data: Response to Webb and Tangney (2022). Perspect. Psych. Sci. 19(6):900–907.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kervyn N, Yzerbyt V, Judd CM (2010) Compensation between warmth and competence: Antecedents and consequences of a negative relation between the two fundamental dimensions of social perception. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psych. 21(1):155–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ludwig S, Herhausen D, Grewal D, Bove L, Benoit S, de Ruyter K, Urwin P (2022) Communication in the gig economy: Buying and selling in online freelance marketplaces. J. Marketing 86(4):141–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lund S, Madgavkar A, Manyika J, Smit S, Ellingrud K, Meaney M, Robinson O (2021) The future of work after COVID-19. McKinsey Global Institute (February 18), https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/future-of-work/the-future-of-work-after-covid-19.Google Scholar
• Mazmanian M, Orlikowski WJ, Yates J (2013) The autonomy paradox: The implications of mobile email devices for knowledge professionals. Organ. Sci. 24(5):1337–1357.Link, Google Scholar
• Morewedge CK, Preston J, Wegner DM (2007) Timescale bias in the attribution of mind. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 93(1):1–11.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nam J, Balakrishnan M, De Freitas J, Brooks AW (2023) Speedy activists: How firm response time to sociopolitical events influences consumer behavior. J. Consumer Psych. 33(4):632–644.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pai J, Chou EY, Halevy N (2025) The humor advantage: Humorous bragging benefits job candidates and entrepreneurs. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 51(8):1330–1344.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Preacher KJ, Hayes AF (2008) Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav. Res. Methods 40(3):879–891.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reis HT, Gable SL (2015) Responsiveness. Current Opinion Psych. 1:67–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reis HT, Clark MS, Holmes JG (2004) Perceived partner responsiveness as an organizing construct in the study of intimacy and closeness. Mashek DJ, Aron A, eds. Handbook of Closeness and Intimacy (Psychology Press, New York), 211–236.Google Scholar
• Roberts F, Francis AL (2013) Identifying a temporal threshold of tolerance for silent gaps after requests. J. Acoustical Soc. America 133(6):EL471–EL477.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roberts AR, Levine EE, Sezer O (2021) Hiding success. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 120(5):1261–1286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roberts F, Margutti P, Takano S (2011) Judgments concerning the valence of inter-turn silence across speakers of American English, Italian, and Japanese. Discourse Processes 48(5):331–354.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosen CC, Simon LS, Gajendran RS, Johnson RE, Lee HW, Lin S-HJ (2019) Boxed in by your inbox: Implications of daily e-mail demands for managers’ leadership behaviors. J. Appl. Psych. 104(1):19–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenblat A, Levy KEC, Barocas S, Hwang T (2017) Discriminating tastes: Uber’s customer ratings as vehicles for workplace discrimination. Policy Internet 9(3):256–279.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schoenmueller V, Netzer O, Stahl F (2020) The polarity of online reviews: Prevalence, drivers and implications. J. Marketing Res. 57(5):853–877.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scopelliti I, Loewenstein G, Vosgerau J (2015) You call it “self-exuberance”; I call it “bragging.” Psych. Sci. 26(6):903–914.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sezer O, Gino F, Norton MI (2018) Humblebragging: A distinct and ineffective self-presentation strategy. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 114(1):52–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Silver I, Newman G, Small DA (2021) Inauthenticity aversion: Moral reactance toward tainted actors, actions, and objects. Consumer Psych. Rev. 4(1):70–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Similarweb (2022) Fiverr.com traffic analytics & market share. Accessed December 22, 2025, https://www.similarweb.com/website/fiverr.com/.Google Scholar
• Storozuk A, Ashley M, Delage V, Maloney EA (2020) Got bots? Practical recommendations to protect online survey data from bot attacks. Quant. Method. Psych. 16(5):472–481.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swider BW, Harris TB, Gong Q (2022) First impression effects in organizational psychology. J. Appl. Psych. 107(3):346–369.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Templeton EM, Wheatley T (2023) Listening fast and slow. Current Opinion Psych. 53:101658.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Templeton EM, Chang LJ, Reynolds EA, LeBeaumont MDC, Wheatley T (2022) Fast response times signal social connection in conversation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119(4):e2116915119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thaler RH (2018) From cashews to nudges: The evolution of behavioral economics. Amer. Econom. Rev. 108(6):1265–1287.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van de Calseyde PPFM, Evans AM, Demerouti E (2021) Leader decision speed as a signal of honesty. Leadership Quart. 32(2):101442.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van de Calseyde PPFM, Keren G, Zeelenberg M (2014) Decision time as information in judgment and choice. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 125(2):113–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• VanEpps EM, Hart E, Schweitzer ME (2024) Dual-promotion: Bragging better by promoting peers. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 126(4):603–623.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walster E, Walster GW, Piliavin J, Schmidt L (1973) “Playing hard to get”: Understanding an elusive phenomenon. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 26(1):113–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang D, Ziano I (2022) Faster responders are perceived as more extraverted. J. Experiment. Psych. General 151(12):3177–3197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Whillans AV, Yoon J, Donnelly G (2022) People overestimate the self-presentation costs of deadline extension requests. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 98:104253.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Whillans AV, Yoon J, Turek A, Donnelly GE (2021) Extension request avoidance predicts greater time stress among women. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118(45):e2105622118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Campbell E, Amir O (2026) An unexpected bias: High levels of achievement change the biases women face at work. Working paper, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
• Zhao X, Epley N (2021) Insufficiently complimentary?: Underestimating the positive impact of compliments creates a barrier to expressing them. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 121(2):239–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ziano I, Wang D (2021) Slow lies: Response delays promote perceptions of insincerity. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 120(6):1457–1479.Crossref, Google Scholar