Attention in Motion: Using Scroll Tracking to Measure the Dynamics of Preferential Choice

References

• Aouad A, Segev D (2021) Display optimization for vertically differentiated locations under multinomial logit preferences. Management Sci. 67(6):3519–3550.Link, Google Scholar
• Aouad A, Feldman J, Segev D, Zhang DJ (2025) The click-based MNL model: A framework for modeling click data in assortment optimization. Management Sci. 71(8):6319–7222.Google Scholar
• Arieli A, Ben-Ami Y, Rubinstein A (2011) Tracking decision makers under uncertainty. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconomics 3(4):68–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armel KC, Beaumel A, Rangel A (2008) Biasing simple choices by manipulating relative visual attention. Judgment Decision Making 3(5):396–403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Busemeyer JR, Johnson JG (2004) Computational models of decision making. Koehler DJ, Harvey N, eds. Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making (Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK), 133–154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Calalo JA, Ngo TT, Sullivan SR, Strand K, Buggeln JH, Lokesh R, Roth AM, Carter MJ, Kurtzer IL, Cashaback JG (2025) Online movements reflect ongoing deliberation. J. Neuroscience 45(31):e1913242025.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Callaway F, Rangel A, Griffiths TL (2021) Fixation patterns in simple choice reflect optimal information sampling. PLoS Comput. Biol. 17(3):e1008863.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cavanagh JF, Wiecki TV, Kochar A, Frank MJ (2014) Eye tracking and pupillometry are indicators of dissociable latent decision processes. J. Experiment. Psych. General 143(4):1476–1488.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chapman CS, Gallivan JP, Wood DK, Milne JL, Culham JC, Goodale MA (2010) Reaching for the unknown: Multiple target encoding and real-time decision-making in a rapid reach task. Cognition 116(2):168–176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen MK, Risen JL (2010) How choice affects and reflects preferences: Revisiting the free-choice paradigm. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 99(4):573–594.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Yao S (2017) Sequential search with refinement: Model and application with click-stream data. Management Sci. 63(12):4345–4365.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen DL, Schonger M, Wickens C (2016) oTree—An open-source platform for laboratory, online, and field experiments. J. Behav. Experiment. Finance 9:88–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cisek P (2007) Cortical mechanisms of action selection: The affordance competition hypothesis. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 362(1485):1585–1599.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cisek P, Kalaska JF (2005) Neural correlates of reaching decisions in dorsal premotor cortex: Specification of multiple direction choices and final selection of action. Neuron 45(5):801–814.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cisek P, Kalaska JF (2010) Neural mechanisms for interacting with a world full of action choices. Annual Rev. Neuroscience 33(1):269–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clithero JA (2018) Response times in economics: Looking through the lens of sequential sampling models. J. Econom. Psych. 69:61–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dale R, Roche J, Snyder K, McCall R (2008) Exploring action dynamics as an index of paired-associate learning. PLoS One 3(3):e1728.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Desimone R, Duncan J (1995) Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Rev. Neuroscience 18(1):193–222.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dohmen T, Falk A, Huffman D, Sunde U, Schupp J, Wagner GG (2011) Individual risk attitudes: Measurement, determinants, and behavioral consequences. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 9(3):522–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dotan D, Meyniel F, Dehaene S (2018) On-line confidence monitoring during decision making. Cognition 171:112–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dotan D, Pinheiro-Chagas P, Al Roumi F, Dehaene S (2019) Track it to crack it: Dissecting processing stages with finger tracking. Trends Cognitive Sci. 23(12):1058–1070.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Drugowitsch J, Moreno-Bote R, Churchland AK, Shadlen MN, Pouget A (2012) The cost of accumulating evidence in perceptual decision making. J. Neuroscience 32(11):3612–3628.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Enax L, Krajbich I, Weber B (2016) Salient nutrition labels increase the integration of health attributes in food decision-making. Judgment Decision Making 11(5):460–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• EverySteveJobsVideo (2007) Steve Jobs introduces iPhone in 2007 [Video]. YouTube (January 9), https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MnrJzXM7a6o.Google Scholar
• Fengler A, Bera K, Omar A, Frank M (in preparation) HSSM: A generalized toolbox for hierarchical Bayesian estimation of computational models in cognitive neuroscience. Google Scholar
• Fisher G (2017) An attentional drift diffusion model over binary-attribute choice. Cognition 168:34–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fisher G (2021) A multiattribute attentional drift diffusion model. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 165:167–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fisher G (2023) Measuring the factors influencing purchasing decisions: Evidence from cursor tracking and cognitive modeling. Management Sci. 69(8):4558–4578.Link, Google Scholar
• Fisher G (2025) Triangulating decision-making via choices, eye fixations, and reaching trajectories. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 189:104421.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freeman JB (2018) Doing psychological science by hand. Current Directions Psych. Sci. 27(5):315–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freeman JB, Ambady N (2010) Mousetracker: Software for studying real-time mental processing using a computer mouse-tracking method. Behav. Res. Methods 42(1):226–241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freeman JB, Dale R, Farmer TA (2011) Hand in motion reveals mind in motion. Frontiers Psych. 2:59.Google Scholar
• Freeman JB, Ambady N, Rule NO, Johnson KL (2008) Will a category cue attract you? Motor output reveals dynamic competition across person construal. J. Experiment. Psych. General 137(4):673–690.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frydman C, Nave G (2017) Extrapolative beliefs in perceptual and economic decisions: Evidence of a common mechanism. Management Sci. 63(7):2340–2352.Link, Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D, Strack P, Strzalecki T (2018) Speed, accuracy, and the optimal timing of choices. Amer. Econom. Rev. 108(12):3651–3684.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gallivan JP, Chapman CS, Wolpert DM, Flanagan JR (2018) Decision-making in sensorimotor control. Nature Rev. Neuroscience 19(9):519–534.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gallivan JP, Stewart BM, Baugh LA, Wolpert DM, Flanagan JR (2017) Rapid automatic motor encoding of competing reach options. Cell Rep. 18(7):1619–1626.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gelman A, Rubin DB (1992) Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Statist. Sci. 7(4):457–472.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibson JJ (1986) The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ).Google Scholar
• Glaholt MG, Wu MC, Reingold EM (2009) Predicting preference from fixations. PsychNology J. 7(2):141–158.Google Scholar
• Glenberg AM, Kaschak MP (2002) Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bull. Rev. 9(3):558–565.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gold JI, Shadlen MN (2007) The neural basis of decision making. Annual Rev. Neuroscience 30(1):535–574.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gomez P, Ratcliff R, Childers R (2015) Pointing, looking at, and pressing keys: A diffusion model account of response modality. J. Experiment. Psych. Human Perception Performance 41(6):1515–1523.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gordon J, Maselli A, Lancia GL, Thiery T, Cisek P, Pezzulo G (2021) The road towards understanding embodied decisions. Neuroscience Biobehavioral Rev. 131:722–736.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gossner O, Steiner J, Stewart C (2021) Attention please! Econometrica 89(4):1717–1751.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta S, Maple C, Crispo B, Raja K, Yautsiukhin A, Martinelli F (2023) A survey of human-computer interaction (HCI) & natural habits-based behavioural biometric modalities for user recognition schemes. Pattern Recognition 139:109453.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haggard P (2008) Human volition: Towards a neuroscience of will. Nature Rev. Neuroscience 9(12):934–946.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haith AM, Huberdeau DM, Krakauer JW (2015) Hedging your bets: Intermediate movements as optimal behavior in the context of an incomplete decision. PLoS Comput. Biol. 11(3):e1004171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hauser JR, Wernerfelt B (1990) An evaluation cost model of consideration sets. J. Consumer Res. 16(4):393–408.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmqvist K, Nyström M, Andersson R, Dewhurst R, Jarodzka H, Van de Weijer J (2011) Eye Tracking: A Comprehensive Guide to Methods and Measures (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Hommel B, Müsseler J, Aschersleben G, Prinz W (2001) The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behav. Brain Sci. 24(5):849–878.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khaw MW, Li Z, Woodford M (2018) Temporal discounting and search habits: Evidence for a task-dependent relationship. Frontiers Psych. 9:2102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim HE, Avraham G, Ivry RB (2021) The psychology of reaching: Action selection, movement implementation, and sensorimotor learning. Annual Rev. Psych. 72(1):61–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Konovalov A, Krajbich I (2016) Gaze data reveal distinct choice processes underlying model-based and model-free reinforcement learning. Nature Comm. 7(1):12438.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koop GJ, Johnson JG (2011) Response dynamics: A new window on the decision process. Judgment Decision Making 6(8):750–758.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krajbich I (2019) Accounting for attention in sequential sampling models of decision making. Current Opinion Psych. 29:6–11.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krajbich I, Rangel A (2011) Multialternative drift-diffusion model predicts the relationship between visual fixations and choice in value-based decisions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108(33):13852–13857.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krajbich I, Armel C, Rangel A (2010) Visual fixations and the computation and comparison of value in simple choice. Nature Neuroscience 13(10):1292–1298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krajbich I, Lu D, Camerer C, Rangel A (2012) The attentional drift-diffusion model extends to simple purchasing decisions. Frontiers Psych. 3:193.Google Scholar
• Lakoff G, Johnson M (1980) Metaphors We Live By (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Lepora NF, Pezzulo G (2015) Embodied choice: How action influences perceptual decision making. PLoS Comput. Biol. 11(4):e1004110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lohse GL, Johnson EJ (1996) A comparison of two process tracing methods for choice tasks. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 68(1):28–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lu J, Hutchinson JW (2025) Information search within a web page: Modeling the full sequence of eye movement decisions, subjective value updating, and first clicks. Management Sci. 71(3):2332–2359.Link, Google Scholar
• McKinstry C, Dale R, Spivey MJ (2008) Action dynamics reveal parallel competition in decision making. Psych. Sci. 19(1):22–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milosavljevic M, Malmaud J, Huth A, Koch C, Rangel A (2010) The drift diffusion model can account for the accuracy and reaction time of value-based choices under high and low time pressure. Judgment Decision Making 5(6):437–449.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Molano-Mazón M, Garcia-Duran A, Pastor-Ciurana J, Hernández-Navarro L, Bektic L, Lombardo D, de la Rocha J, Hyafil A (2024) Rapid, systematic updating of movement by accumulated decision evidence. Nature Comm. 15(1):10583.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Myers CE, Interian A, Moustafa AA (2022) A practical introduction to using the drift diffusion model of decision-making in cognitive psychology, neuroscience, and health sciences. Frontiers Psych. 13:1039172.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orquin JL, Loose SM (2013) Attention and choice: A review on eye movements in decision making. Acta Psych. 144(1):190–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pärnamets P, Johansson P, Hall L, Balkenius C, Spivey MJ, Richardson DC (2015) Biasing moral decisions by exploiting the dynamics of eye gaze. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112(13):4170–4175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pezzulo G, Cisek P (2016) Navigating the affordance landscape: Feedback control as a process model of behavior and cognition. Trends Cognitive Sci. 20(6):414–424.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Philiastides MG, Ratcliff R (2013) Influence of branding on preference-based decision making. Psych. Sci. 24(7):1208–1215.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prelec D (1998) The probability weighting function. Econometrica 66(3):497–527.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Priorelli M, Stoianov IP, Pezzulo G (2025) Embodied decisions as active inference. PLoS Comput. Biol. 21(6):e1013180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ratcliff R (1978) A theory of memory retrieval. Psych. Rev. 85(2):59–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ratcliff R, McKoon G (2008) The diffusion decision model: Theory and data for two-choice decision tasks. Neural Comput. 20(4):873–922.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ratcliff R, Van Zandt T, McKoon G (1999) Connectionist and diffusion models of reaction time. Psych. Rev. 106(2):261–300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Resulaj A, Kiani R, Wolpert DM, Shadlen MN (2009) Changes of mind in decision-making. Nature 461(7261):263–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schoemann M, O’Hora D, Dale R, Scherbaum S (2021) Using mouse cursor tracking to investigate online cognition: Preserving methodological ingenuity while moving toward reproducible science. Psychonomic Bull. Rev. 28(3):766–787.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schotter ER, Gerety C, Rayner K (2012) Heuristics and criterion setting during selective encoding in visual decision making: Evidence from eye movements. Visual Cognition 20(9):1110–1129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Selen LP, Shadlen MN, Wolpert DM (2012) Deliberation in the motor system: Reflex gains track evolving evidence leading to a decision. J. Neuroscience 32(7):2276–2286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shadlen MN, Kiani R (2013) Decision making as a window on cognition. Neuron 80(3):791–806.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shimojo S, Simion C, Shimojo E, Scheier C (2003) Gaze bias both reflects and influences preference. Nature Neuroscience 6(12):1317–1322.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith SM, Krajbich I (2018) Attention and choice across domains. J. Experiment. Psych. General 147(12):1810–1826.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith SM, Krajbich I (2019) Gaze amplifies value in decision making. Psych. Sci. 30(1):116–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith SM, Krajbich I, Webb R (2019) Estimating the dynamic role of attention via random utility. J. Econom. Sci. Assoc. 5(1):97–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spivey MJ, Dale R (2006) Continuous dynamics in real-time cognition. Current Directions Psych. Sci. 15(5):207–211.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spivey MJ, Grosjean M, Knoblich G (2005) Continuous attraction toward phonological competitors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102(29):10393–10398.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Statista (2024) Share of mobile internet traffic in global regions 2024. Accessed December 30, 2024, https://www.statista.com/statistics/306528/share-of-mobile-internet-traffic-in-global-regions/.Google Scholar
• Stewart BM, Baugh LA, Gallivan JP, Flanagan JR (2013) Simultaneous encoding of the direction and orientation of potential targets during reach planning: Evidence of multiple competing reach plans. J. Neurophysiology 110(4):807–816.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stillman PE, Krajbich I, Ferguson MJ (2020) Using dynamic monitoring of choices to predict and understand risk preferences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117(50):31738–31747.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stillman PE, Shen X, Ferguson MJ (2018) How mouse-tracking can advance social cognitive theory. Trends Cognitive Sci. 22(6):531–543.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stillman PE, Wilson JD, Kalkstein DA, Ferguson MJ (2025) The temporal dynamics of self-control. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 122(45):e2501425122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sugrue LP, Corrado GS, Newsome WT (2005) Choosing the greater of two goods: Neural currencies for valuation and decision making. Nature Rev. Neuroscience 6(5):363–375.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sullivan N, Hutcherson C, Harris A, Rangel A (2015) Dietary self-control is related to the speed with which attributes of healthfulness and tastiness are processed. Psych. Sci. 26(2):122–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Symes E, Ellis R, Tucker M (2007) Visual object affordances: Object orientation. Acta Psych. 124(2):238–255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tavares G, Perona P, Rangel A (2017) The attentional drift diffusion model of simple perceptual decision-making. Frontiers Neuroscience 11:468.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomas AW, Molter F, Krajbich I, Heekeren HR, Mohr PN (2019) Gaze bias differences capture individual choice behaviour. Nature Human Behav. 3(6):625–635.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Todorov E, Jordan MI (2002) Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination. Nature Neuroscience 5(11):1226–1235.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trella AL, Zhang KW, Nahum-Shani I, Shetty V, Doshi-Velez F, Murphy SA (2022) Designing reinforcement learning algorithms for digital interventions: Pre-implementation guidelines. Algorithms 15(8):255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tucker M, Ellis R (1998) On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. J. Experiment. Psych. Human Perception Performance 24(3):830–846.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Den Berg R, Anandalingam K, Zylberberg A, Kiani R, Shadlen MN, Wolpert DM (2016) A common mechanism underlies changes of mind about decisions and confidence. eLife 5:e12192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• W3 Consortium (2015) Mobile accessibility: How WCAG 2.0 and other W3C/WAI guidelines apply to mobile. Accessed October 15, 2025, http://www.w3.org/TR/mobile-accessibility-mapping/.Google Scholar
• Wang S, Cheah JH, Lim XJ (2023) Online shopping cart abandonment: A review and research agenda. Internat. J. Consumer Stud. 47(2):453–473.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Webb R (2019) The (neural) dynamics of stochastic choice. Management Sci. 65(1):230–255.Link, Google Scholar
• Wispinski NJ, Gallivan JP, Chapman CS (2020) Models, movements, and minds: Bridging the gap between decision making and action. Ann. New York Acad. Sci. 1464(1):30–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Woodford M (2014) Stochastic choice: An optimizing neuroeconomic model. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(5):495–500.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xiang Chiong K, Shum M, Webb R, Chen R (2024) Combining choice and response time data: A drift-diffusion model of mobile advertisements. Management Sci. 70(2):1238–1257.Link, Google Scholar
• Yang X, Krajbich I (2023) A dynamic computational model of gaze and choice in multi-attribute decisions. Psych. Rev. 130(1):52–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zilker V (2022) Stronger attentional biases can be linked to higher reward rate in preferential choice. Cognition 225:105095.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuk AAO, Bertrand JK, Chapman CS (2025) Continuous measures of decision-difficulty captured remotely: Mouse-tracking sensitivity extends to tablets and smartphones. Comput. Human Behav. 162:108450.Crossref, Google Scholar