Does Personalized Pricing Increase Competition? Evidence from NIL in College Football

References

• Ali SN, Lewis G, Vasserman S (2023) Voluntary disclosure and personalized pricing. Rev. Econom. Stud. 90(2):538–571.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Angrist J, Autor D, Pallais A (2022) Marginal effects of merit aid for low-income students. Quart. J. Econom. 137(2):1039–1090.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong M (2006) Recent Developments in the Economics of Price Discrimination. Blundell R, Newey W, Persson T, eds. Advances in Economics and Econometrics: Theory and Applications, Ninth World Congress, Econometric Society Monographs, vol. 2 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 97–141.Google Scholar
• Athey S, Wager S (2021) Policy learning with observational data. Econometrica 89(1):133–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Athey S, Tibshirani J, Wager S (2019) Generalized random forests. Annals Statist. 47(2):1148–1178.Google Scholar
• Baik S, Anderson A, Larson N (2023) Price discrimination in the information age: Prices, poaching, and privacy with personalized targeted discounts. Rev. Econom. Stud. 90(5):2085–2115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belloni A, Lovett MJ, Boulding W, Staelin R (2012) Optimal admission and scholarship decisions: Choosing customized marketing offers to attract a desirable mix of customers. Marketing Sci. 31(4):621–636.Link, Google Scholar
• Blair RD, Wang W (2018) The NCAA cartel and antitrust policy. Rev. Ind. Organ. 52(2):351–368. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Card D (1999) The causal effect of education on earnings. Handbook Labor Econom. 3A:1801–1863. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cattaneo MD, Crump RK, Farrell MH, Feng Y (2024) On binscatter. Amer. Econom. Rev. 114(5):1488–1514.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Choe C, Matsushima N (2020) Competitive personalized pricing. Management Sci. 66(9):4003–4023.Link, Google Scholar
• Chung DJ (2013) The dynamic advertising effect of collegiate athletics. Marketing Sci. 32(5):679–698.Link, Google Scholar
• Chung KY, Derdenger TP, Srinivasan K (2013) Economic value of celebrity endorsements: Tiger woods’ impact on sales of nike golf balls. Marketing Sci. 32(2):271–293.Link, Google Scholar
• Cohodes SR, Goodman JS (2014) Merit aid, college quality, and college completion: Massachusetts’ adams scholarship as an in-kind subsidy. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 6(4):251–285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Derdenger TP, Li H, Srinivasan K (2018) Firms’ strategic leverage of unplanned exposure and planned advertising: An analysis in the context of celebrity endorsements. J. Marketing Res. 55(1):14–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dubé J-P, Misra S (2023) Personalized pricing and consumer welfare. J. Political Econom. 131(1):131–189.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dynarski S (2000) Hope for whom? Financial aid for the middle class and its impact on college attendance. National Tax J. 53(3):629–661.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dynarski S, Page L, Scott-Clayton J (2023) College costs, financial aid, and student decisions. Hanushek EA, Machin SJ, Woessmann L, eds. Handbook of the Economics of Education, vol. 7 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 227–285. Google Scholar
• Eckard EW (1998) The NCAA cartel and competitive balance in college football. Rev. Indust. Organ. 13(3):347–369. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Epple D, Romano R, Sieg H (2002) On the demographic composition of colleges and universities in market equilibrium. Amer. Econom. Rev. 92(2):310–314. Google Scholar
• Epple D, Romano R, Sieg H (2003) Peer effects, financial aid, and selection of students into colleges. J. Appl. Econometrics 18(5):501–525.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Epple D, Romano R, Sieg H (2006) Admission, tuition, and financial aid policies in the market for higher education. Econometrica 74(4):885–928. Google Scholar
• Epple D, Romano R, Sarpça S, Sieg H, Zaber M (2019) Market power and price discrimination in the US market for higher education. RAND J. Econom. 50(1):201–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fillmore I (2023) Price discrimination and public policy in the US college market. Rev. Econom. Stud. 90(3):1228–1264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick MD, Jones D (2016) Post-baccalaureate migration and merit-based scholarships. Econom. Ed. Rev. 54:155–172. C28220052Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fort R, Lee YH (2007) Structural change, competitive balance, and the rest of the major leagues. Econom. Inquiry 45(3):519–532.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fort R, Quirk J (1995) Cross-subsidization, incentives, and outcomes in professional team sports leagues. J. Econom. Lit. 33(3):1265–1299.Google Scholar
• Garthwaite C, Keener J, Notowidigdo MJ, Ozminkowski NF (2020) Who profits from amateurism? Rent-sharing in modern college sports. NBER Working Paper No. 27734, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Imbens G, Angrist J (1994) Identification and estimation of local average treatment effects. Econometrica 62(2):467–475. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li F, Morgan KL, Zaslavsky AM (2018) Balancing covariates via propensity score weighting. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 113(521):390–400.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li X, Wang XS, Nault BR (2024) Is personalized pricing profitable when firms can differentiate? Management Sci. 70(7):4184–4199.Link, Google Scholar
• PBS (2023) Analysis: Who is winning in the high-revenue world of college sports? Accessed October 27, 2024, https://www.pbs.org/newshour/economy/analysis-who-is-winning-in-the-high-revenue-world-of-college-sports.Google Scholar
• Pigou AC (1920) The Economics of Welfare, 1st ed. (Macmillan, London).Google Scholar
• Rhodes A, Zhou J (2024) Personalized pricing and competition. Amer. Econom. Rev. 114(7):2141–2170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robins JM, Rotnitzky A, Zhao LP (1994) Estimation of regression coefficients when some regressors are not always observed. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 89(427):846–866.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Romer D (2006) Do firms maximize? Evidence from professional football. J. Political Econom. 114(2):340–365.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB (1983) The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70(1):41–55. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth J, Sant’Anna PH, Bilinski A, Poe J (2023) What’s trending in difference-in-differences? A synthesis of the recent econometrics literature. J. Econom. 235(2):2218–2244.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rubin D (1974) Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and non-randomized studies. J. Ed. Psych. 66(5):688–701.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scott-Clayton J, Zafar B (2019) Financial aid, debt management, and socioeconomic outcomes: Post-college effects of merit-based aid. J. Public Econom. 170:68–82. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shiller BR (2020) Approximating purchase propensitites and reservation prices from broad consumer tracking. Internat. Econom. Rev. 61(2):847–870.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thisse J-F, Vives X (1988) On the strategic choice of spatial price policy. Amer. Econom. Rev. 78(1):122–137.Google Scholar
• Wager S (2022) Stats 361: Causal inference. Lecture notes, Stanford University, Stanford.Google Scholar
• Waldfogel J (2015) First degree price discrimination goes to school. J. Indust. Econom. 63(4):569–597.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winston G (1999) Subsidies, hierarchies, and peers: The awkward economics of higher education. J. Econom. Perspect. 13(1):13–36.Crossref, Google Scholar