Partial Law Invariance and Risk Measures

References

• Anscombe FJ, Aumann RJ (1963) A definition of subjective probability. Ann. Math. Statist. 34(1):199–205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Artzner P, Delbaen F, Eber J-M, Heath D (1999) Coherent measures of risk. Math. Finance 9(3):203–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baillon A, Bleichrodt H, Li C, Wakker PP (2025) Source theory: A tractable and positive ambiguity theory. Management Sci. 71(10):8767–8782.Link, Google Scholar
• Baillon A, Huang Z, Selim A, Wakker PP (2018) Measuring ambiguity attitudes for all (natural) events. Econometrica 86(5):1839–1858.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bäuerle N, Müller A (2006) Stochastic orders and risk measures: Consistency and bounds. Insurance: Math. Econom. 38(1):132–148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• BCBS (2019) Minimum capital requirements for market risk (February 2019). Accessed October 29, 2025, https://www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/d457.htm.Google Scholar
• Bernard C, Jiang X, Wang R (2014) Risk aggregation with dependence uncertainty. Insurance: Math. Econom. 54:93–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Castagnoli E, Cattelan G, Maccheroni F, Tebaldi C, Wang R (2022) Star-shaped risk measures. Oper. Res. 70(5):2637–2654.Link, Google Scholar
• Delage E, Li Y (2018) Minimizing risk exposure when the choice of a risk measure is ambiguous. Management Sci. 64(1):327–344.Link, Google Scholar
• Delage E, Kuhn D, Wiesemann W (2019) “Dice”-sion-making under uncertainty: When can a random decision reduce risk? Management Sci. 65(7):3282–3301.Link, Google Scholar
• Detlefsen K, Scandolo G (2005) Conditional and dynamic convex risk measures. Finance Stochastics 9(4):539–561.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dhaene J, Stassen B, Barigou K, Linders D, Chen Z (2017) Fair valuation of insurance liabilities: Merging actuarial judgement and market-consistency. Insurance: Math. Econom. 76:14–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dimmock S, Kouwenberg R, Wakker P (2016) Ambiguity attitudes in a large representative sample. Management Sci. 62(5):1363–1380.Link, Google Scholar
• Drapeau S, Kupper M (2013) Risk preferences and their robust representation. Math. Oper. Res. 38(1):28–62.Link, Google Scholar
• El Ghaoui LM, Oks M, Oustry F (2003) Worst-case value-at-risk and robust portfolio optimization. Oper. Res. 51:543–556.Link, Google Scholar
• Embrechts P, Puccetti G, Rüschendorf L (2013) Model uncertainty and VaR aggregation. J. Banking Finance 37(8):2750–2764.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Embrechts P, Wang B, Wang R (2015) Aggregation-robustness and model uncertainty of regulatory risk measures. Finance Stoch. 19(4):763–790.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Embrechts P, Mao T, Wang Q, Wang R (2021) Bayes risk, elicitability, and the expected shortfall. Math. Finance 31:1190–1217.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Epstein LG, Schneider M (2003) Recursive multiple-priors. J. Econom. Theory 113(1):1–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Filipović D, Kupper M, Vogelpoth N (2012) Approaches to conditional risk. SIAM J. Finance Math. 3(1):402–432.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Föllmer H, Schied A (2002) Convex measures of risk and trading constraints. Finance Stochastics 6(4):429–447.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Föllmer H, Schied A (2016) Stochastic Finance. An Introduction in Discrete Time, 4th ed. (Walter de Gruyter, Berlin).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frittelli M, Rosazza Gianin E (2002) Putting order in risk measures. J. Banking Finance 26(7):1473–1486.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frittelli M, Rosazza Gianin E (2005) Law invariant convex risk measures. Adv. Math. Econom. 7:33–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilboa I, Schmeidler D (1989) Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior. J. Math. Econom. 18(2):141–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gul F, Pesendorfer W (2014) Expected uncertain utility theory. Econometrica 82(1):1–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Han X, Wang Q, Wang R, Xia J (2025) Cash-subadditive risk measures without quasi-convexity. Mathematics Oper. Res., ePub ahead of print May 15, https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.2022.0312.Google Scholar
• Hansen LP, Sargent TJ (2001) Robust control and model uncertainty. Amer. Econom. Rev. 91(2):60–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen LP, Sargent TJ (2022) Structured ambiguity and model misspecification. J. Econom. Theory 199:105–165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klibanoff P, Marinacci M, Mukerji S (2005) A smooth model of decision making under uncertainty. Econometrica 73(6):1849–1892.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kupper M, Schachermayer W (2009) Representation results for law invariant time consistent functions. Math. Finance Econom. 2(3):189–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kusuoka S (2001) On law invariant coherent risk measures. Adv. Math. Econom. 3:83–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laeven RJ, Rosazza Gianin E, Zullino M (2024) Law-invariant return and star-shaped risk measures. Insurance: Math. Econom. 117:140–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu F, Wang R (2021) A theory for measures of tail risk. Math. Oper. Res. 46(3):1109–1128.Link, Google Scholar
• Maccheroni F, Marinacci M, Rustichini A (2006) Ambiguity aversion, robustness, and the variational representation of preferences. Econometrica 74(6):1447–1498.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Machina MJ, Schmeidler D (1992) A more robust definition of subjective probability. Econometrica 60(4):745–780.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McNeil AJ, Frey R, Embrechts P (2015) Quantitative Risk Management: Concepts, Techniques and Tools, revised edition (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Mu X, Pomatto L, Strack P, Tamuz O (2024) Monotone additive statistics. Econometrica 92(4):995–1031. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Natarajan K, Pachamanova D, Sim M (2008) Incorporating asymmetric distributional information in robust value-at-risk optimization. Management Sci. 54(3):573–585.Link, Google Scholar
• Nendel M, Riedel F, Schmeck MD (2021) A decomposition of general premium principles into risk and deviation. Insurance: Math. Econom. 100:193–209.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pelsser A, Stadje M (2014) Time-consistent and market-consistent evaluations. Math. Finance 24(1):25–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Riedel F (2004) Dynamic coherent risk measures. Stochastic Processing Their Appl. 112(2):185–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rockafellar RT, Uryasev S (2002) Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions. J. Banking Finance 26(7):1443–1471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rockafellar RT, Uryasev S, Zabarankin M (2006) Generalized deviation in risk analysis. Finance Stochastics 10(1):51–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sarin R, Wakker P (1992) A simple axiomatization of nonadditive expected utility. Econometrica 60:1255–1272.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sarin R, Wakker P (1997) A single-stage approach to Anscombe and Aumann’s expected utility. Rev. Econom. Stud. 64(3):399–409.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmeidler D (1989) Subjective probability and expected utility without additivity. Econometrica 57(3):571–587.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shapiro A, Dentcheva D, Ruszczynski A (2021) Lectures on Stochastic Programming: Modeling and Theory (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strzalecki T (2011) Axiomatic foundations of multiplier preferences. Econometrica 79(1):47–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wald A (1945) Statistical decision functions which minimize the maximum risk. Ann. Math. 46(2):265–280.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wald A (1949) Statistical decision functions. Ann. Math. Statist. 20(2):165–205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang R, Ziegel JF (2021) Scenario-based risk evaluation. Finance Stochastics 25(4):725–756.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang R, Zitikis R (2021) An axiomatic foundation for the expected shortfall. Management Sci. 67(3):1413–1429.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhu S, Fukushima M (2009) Worst-case conditional value-at-risk with application to robust portfolio management. Oper. Res. 57(5):1155–1168.Link, Google Scholar