Personalized Pricing in the Presence of Privacy Concerns

References

• Acemoglu D, Makhdoumi A, Malekian A, Ozdaglar A (2022) Too much data: Prices and inefficiencies in data markets. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 14(4):218–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Acquisti A, Taylor C, Wagman L (2016) The economics of privacy. J. Econom. Literature 54(2):442–492.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ali SN, Lewis G, Vasserman S (2023) Voluntary disclosure and personalized pricing. Rev. Econom. Stud. 90(2):538–571.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson SP, Renault R (2006) Advertising content. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96:93–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson SP, Baik A, Larson N (2023) Price discrimination in the information age: Prices, poaching, and privacy with personalized targeted discounts. Rev. Econom. Stud. 90(5):2085–2115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong M (2006) Recent developments in the economics of price discrimination. Blundell R, Newey WK, Persson T, eds. Advances in Economics and Econometrics: Theory and Applications, Ninth World Congress, vol. II (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 97–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong M (2008) Interactions between competition and consumer policy. Competition Policy Internat. 4(1):97–147.Google Scholar
• Bellamy FD (2023) U.S. data privacy laws to enter new era in 2023. Reuters. Accessed January 12, 2023, https://www.reuters.com/legal/legalindustry/us-data-privacy-laws-enter-new-era-2023-2023-01-12/#:∼:text=Consent.Google Scholar
• Belleflamme P, Vergote W (2016) Monopoly price discrimination and privacy: The hidden cost of hiding. Econom. Lett. 149:141–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell J, Goldfarb A, Tucker C (2015) Privacy regulation and market structure. J. Econom. Management Strategy 24(1):47–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carrascal JP, Riederer C, Erramilli V, Cherubini M, de Oliveira R (2013) Your browsing behavior for a Big Mac: Economics of personal information online. WWW 2013 Proc. 22nd Internat. Conf. World Wide Web (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 189–200.Google Scholar
• Casadesus-Masanell R, Hervas-Drane A (2015) Competing with privacy. Management Sci. 61(1):229–246.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen Z (2022) Privacy costs and consumer data acquisition: An economic analysis of data privacy regulation. Preprint, submitted June 11, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4085923.Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Choe C, Matsushima N (2020) Competitive personalized pricing. Management Sci. 66(9):4003–4023.Link, Google Scholar
• Choe C, Cong J, Wang C (2024) Softening competition through unilateral sharing of customer data. Management Sci. 70(1):526–543.Link, Google Scholar
• Choe C, King S, Matsushima N (2018) Pricing with cookies: Behavior-based price discrimination and spatial competition. Management Sci. 64(12):5669–5687.Link, Google Scholar
• Choe C, Matsushima N, Shekhar S (2025) The bright side of the GDPR: Welfare-improving privacy management. Management Sci. 71(8):6836–6858.Link, Google Scholar
• Choi JP, Jeon DS, Kim B-C (2019) Privacy and personal data collection with information externalities. J. Public Econom. 173:113–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Das Chaudhury R, Choe C (2023) Digital privacy: GDPR and its lessons for Australia. Australian Econom. Rev. 56(2):204–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Cornière A, Montes R (2017) Consumer privacy and the incentives to price-discriminate in online markets. Rev. Network Econom. 16(3):291–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Esteves R-B (2022) Can personalized pricing be a winning strategy in oligopolistic markets with heterogeneous demand customers? Yes, it can. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 85:102874.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Federal Trade Commission (2025) FTC Surveillance Pricing 6(b) Study: Research summaries: A staff perspective. Accessed October 24, 2025, www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/p246202_surveillancepricing6bstudy_researchsummaries_redacted.pdf.Google Scholar
• Foros Ø, Kind HJ, Nguyen-Ones M (2024) The choice of pricing format: Firms may choose uniform pricing over personalized pricing to induce rivals to soften competition. Inform. Econom. Policy 66:101079.Crossref, Google Scholar
• GDMA, Acxiom (2022) Global data privacy: What the consumer really thinks. Global Data & Marketing Alliance (GDMA) & Acxiom Research Report. Accessed April 17, 2024, globaldma.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/GDMA-Global-Data-Privacy-2022.pdf.Google Scholar
• Ghose A, Huang K-W (2009) Personalized pricing and quality customization. J. Econom. Management Strategy 18(4):1095–1135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hannak A, Soeller G, Lazer D, Mislove A, Wilson C (2014) Measuring price discrimination and steering on e-commerce web sites. Proc. 2014 Conf. Internet Measurement Conf. (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 305–318.Google Scholar
• Houba H, Motchenkova E, Wang H (2023) Endogenous personalized pricing in the Hotelling model. Econom. Lett. 225:111037.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ichihashi S (2020) Online privacy and information disclosure by consumers. Amer. Econom. Rev. 110(2):569–595.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin T (2022) Valuing intrinsic and instrumental preferences for privacy. Marketing Sci. 41(4):663–681.Link, Google Scholar
• Loertscher S, Marx LM (2020) Digital monopolies: Privacy protection or price regulation? Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 71:102623.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lu Q, Matsushima N (2024) Personalized pricing when consumers can purchase multiple items. J. Indust. Econom. 72:1507–1524.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Matsumura T, Matsushima N (2015) Should firms employ personalized pricing? J. Econom. Management Strategy 24(4):887–903.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miklós-Thal J, Goldfarb A, Haviv A, Tucker C (2024) Frontiers: Digital hermits. Marketing Sci. 43(4):697–708.Link, Google Scholar
• McClain C, Faverio M, Anderson M, Park E (2023) How Americans view data privacy. Pew Research Center Report, Pew Research Center, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Montes R, Sand-Zantman W, Valletti T (2019) The value of personal information in online markets with endogenous privacy. Management Sci. 65(3):1342–1362.Link, Google Scholar
• OECD (2018) Personalised pricing in the digital era. Report, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) DAF/COMP(2018)13, OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
• Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (2021) Guidelines for obtaining meaningful consent, Revised August 13, 2021. Accessed November 10, 2025, https://www.priv.gc.ca/en/privacy-topics/collecting-personal-information/consent/gl_omc_201805/.Google Scholar
• Rhodes A, Zhou J (2024) Personalized pricing and competition. Amer. Econom. Rev. 114(7):2141–2170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rhodes A, Zhou J (2025) Personalization and privacy choice. Toulouse School of Economics Working Paper 1525, Toulouse School of Economics, Toulouse, France.Google Scholar
• Romanosky S, Acquisti A (2009) Privacy costs and personal data protection: Economic and legal perspectives. Berkeley Tech. Law J. 24(3):1061–1101.Google Scholar
• Shaffer G, Zhang ZJ (2002) Competitive one-to-one promotions. Management Sci. 48(9):1143–1160.Link, Google Scholar
• Sokol D, Comerford R (2016) Antitrust and regulating big data. George Mason Law Rev. 23(5):1129–1161.Google Scholar
• Taylor C, Wagman L (2014) Consumer privacy in oligopolistic markets: Winners, losers, and welfare. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 34:80–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thisse J-F, Vives X (1988) On the strategic choice of spatial price policy. Amer. Econom. Rev. 78(1):122–137.Google Scholar