Invisible Primes: Fintech Lending with Alternative Data
References
- (2019) Financial inclusion and alternate credit scoring: Role of big data and machine learning in fintech. Working paper, Indian School of Business, Hyderabad, India.Google Scholar
- (2023) Fintech lending and bank credit access for consumers. Management Sci. 69(1):555–575.Link, Google Scholar
- (2022) Consumer-lending discrimination in the fintech era. J. Financial Econom. 143(1):30–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Fintech lending. Annual Rev. Financial Econom. 14:187–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) On the rise of fintechs: Credit scoring using digital footprints. Rev. Financial Stud. 33(7):2845–2897.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2025) How much does racial bias affect mortgage lending? Evidence from human and algorithmic credit decisions. J. Finance 80(3):1463–1496.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) The supply and demand for data privacy: Evidence from mobile apps. Preprint, submitted December 1, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3987541.Google Scholar
- (2021) How costly is noise? Data and disparities in consumer credit. Preprint, submitted May 17, https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.07554.Google Scholar
- (2016) Credit invisibles and the unscored. Cityscape 18(2):9–34.Google Scholar
- (2018) Fintech, regulatory arbitrage, and the rise of shadow banks. J. Financial Econom. 130(3):453–483.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) The fintech gender gap. J. Financial Intermediation 54:101026.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2024) Fintech lending to borrowers with no credit history. NBER Working Paper 33208, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- (2025) Fannie and Freddie may foment another crisis. Wall Street J. (April 30), https://www.wsj.com/opinion/fannie-and-freddie-may-foment-another-crisis-mortgage-interest-rate-housing-loan-1e383ea2.Google Scholar
- (2023) The real effects of financial technology: Marketplace lending and personal bankruptcy. J. Banking Finance 155:106986.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2024) Buy now pay (pain?) later. Management Sci. 70(8):5586–5598.Link, Google Scholar
- (1988) Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: A nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44(3):837–845.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Fintech borrowers: Lax screening or cream-skimming? Rev. Financial Stud. 34(10):4565–4618.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Buy now, pay later credit: User characteristics and effects on spending patterns. NBER Working Paper 30508, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- (2021) Measuring bias in consumer lending. Rev. Econom. Stud. 88(6):2799–2832.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Can fintech reduce disparities in access to finance? Evidence from the Paycheck Protection Program. J. Financial Econom. 146(1):90–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Federal Reserve Board (2011) SR 11-7: Guidance on model risk management. Federal Reserve Supervisory Letter SR 11-7. Accessed April 4, 2026, https://web.archive.org/web/20260414141848/ https://www.federalreserve.gov/supervisionreg/srletters/sr1107.htm.Google Scholar
- (2019) An update on credit access and the Bureau’s first No-Action Letter. Accessed July 19, 2020, https://www.consumerfinance.gov/about-us/blog/update-credit-access-and-no-action-letter/.Google Scholar
- (2022) Predictably unequal? The effects of machine learning on credit markets. J. Finance 77(1):5–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) The role of technology in mortgage lending. Rev. Financial Stud. 32(5):1854–1899.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) How do payday loans affect borrowers? Evidence from the U.K. market. Rev. Financial Stud. 32(2):496–523.Google Scholar
- (2025) Fintech lending and cashless payments. J. Finance 81(2):1053–1101.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) How FinTech enters China’s credit market. AEA Papers Proc. 109:60–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Screening on loan terms: Evidence from maturity choice in consumer credit. Rev. Financial Stud. 31(9):3532–3567.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Screening peers softly: Inferring the quality of small borrowers. Management Sci. 62(6):1554–1577.Link, Google Scholar
- Johnson MJ, Ben-David I, Lee J, Yao V (2023) Fintech lending with lowtech pricing. NBER Working Paper No. 31154, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- (2010) Expanding credit access: Using randomized supply decisions to estimate the impacts. Rev. Financial Stud. 23(1):433–464.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Regression discontinuity designs in economics. J. Econom. Literature 48(2):281–355.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2025) Using grocery data for credit decisions. Management Sci. 71(4):2753–2777.Link, Google Scholar
- (2011) The real costs of credit access: Evidence from the payday lending market. Quart. J. Econom. 126(1):517–555.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Spillovers from costly credit. Rev. Financial Stud. 31(9):3568–3594.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Payday lenders: Heroes or villains? J. Financial Econom. 102(1):28–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) The FinTech opportunity. NBER Working Paper 22476, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- (2025) Effects of shadow bank competition on bank strategies and risk. University of Houston, TX.Google Scholar
- (2013) Endogeneity in empirical corporate finance. Constantinides GM, Harris M, Stulz RM, eds. Handbook of the Economics of Finance, vol. 2, part A (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 493–572.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019a) Peer-to-peer lenders versus banks: Substitutes or complements? Rev. Financial Stud. 32(5):1900–1938.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019b) The value of privacy: Evidence from online borrowers. Preprint, submitted September 1, https://ssrn.com/abstract=3880119.Google Scholar
- (2019) Marketplace lending: A new banking paradigm? Rev. Financial Stud. 32(5):1939–1982.Crossref, Google Scholar

