Owner Support for Green Shareholder Voting and Divestment
References
- (2009) The “Wall Street Walk” and shareholder activism: Exit as a form of voice. Rev. Financial Stud. 22(7):2645–2685.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Environmental externalities of activism. Working paper, University of Toronto - Rotman School of Management, Toronto; European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI), Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
- (2015) Gender, stock market participation and financial literacy. Econom. Lett. 137:140–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) Can Pigou at the polls stop us melting the poles? J. Assoc. Environ. Resource Econom. 10(4):903–945.Google Scholar
- Australasian Centre for Corporate Responsibility (2024) Equinor AGM voting: Non-state shareholders revolt as 32 percent support climate proposal. Accessed December 17, 2024.Google Scholar
- (2022) How do investors value ESG? NBER Working Paper No. 30708, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- (2021) Impact investing. J. Financial Econom. 139(1):162–185.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Get real! Individuals prefer more sustainable investments. Rev. Financial Stud. 34(8):3976–4043.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) Voice through divestment. Working paper, European Corporate Governance Institute–Finance, Brussels.Google Scholar
- (2017) Returns to hedge fund activism: An international study. Rev. Financial Stud. 30(9):2933–2971.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Returns to shareholder activism: Evidence from a clinical study of the Hermes UK Focus Fund. Rev. Financial Stud. 22(8):3093–3129.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2025) The impact of impact investing. J. Financial Econom. 164:103972.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2025) The stock market and corporate consequences of ethical exclusions by the world’s largest fund. J. Internat. Financial Markets Institutions Money 102:102174.Google Scholar
- (2023) The portfolio of economic policies needed to fight climate change. Annual Rev. Econom. 15(1):689–722.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Do investors care about carbon risk? J. Financial Econom. 142(2):517–549.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Investor ideology. J. Financial Econom. 137(2):320–352.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) The moral preferences of investors: Experimental evidence. NBER Working Paper No. 29647, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- (2024) Group of 27 Shell investors co-file new climate resolution. Accessed May 30, 2024, https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/group-27-shell-investors-co-file-new-climate-resolution-2024-01-15/.Google Scholar
- (2024) Shell faces tense shareholder meeting as profits and climate collide. Accessed May 30, 2024, https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/shell-faces-tense-shareholder-meeting-profits-climate-collide-2023-05-18/.Google Scholar
- (2022) Retail shareholder participation in the proxy process: Monitoring, engagement, and voting. J. Financial Econom. 144(2):492–522.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Exit versus voice. J. Political Econom. 130(12):3101–3145.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) The party structure of mutual funds. Rev. Financial Stud. 35(6):2839–2878.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Fearless woman: Financial literacy and stock market participation. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- (2023) Facing change: Gender and climate change attitudes worldwide. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 117(2):591–608.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Incentive and informational properties of preference questions. Environ. Resource Econom. 37:181–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Environmental externalities and cost of capital. Management Sci. 60(9):2223–2247.Link, Google Scholar
- (2020) Institutional shareholders and corporate social responsibility. J. Financial Econom. 135(2):483–504.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) A review of Norges Bank’s active management of the Government Pension Fund Global. Swedish House of Finance Research Paper 18–7, Stockholm.Google Scholar
- (2016) Voting to tell others. Rev. Econom. Stud. 84(1):143–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Thirty years of shareholder activism: A survey of empirical research. J. Corporate Finance 44:405–424.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Active ownership. Rev. Financial Stud. 28(12):3225–3268.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Coordinated engagements. European Corporate Governance Institute–Finance Working Paper 721, Brussels.Google Scholar
- (2022) Yellow vests, pessimistic beliefs, and carbon tax aversion. Amer. Econom. J. Econom. Policy 14(1):81–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1957) An economic theory of political action in a democracy. J. Political Econom. 65(2):135–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Blockholder trading, market efficiency, and managerial myopia. J. Finance 64(6):2481–2513.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) The end of ESG. Financial Management 52(1):3–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Socially responsible divestment. European Corporate Governance Institute–Finance Working Paper 823, Brussels.Google Scholar
- (2022) Gender and climate action. Population Environ. 43(4):470–499.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Would constraining US fossil fuel production affect global CO2 emissions? A case study of US leasing policy. Climatic Change 150:29–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Understanding the resistance to carbon taxes: Drivers and barriers among the general public and fuel-tax protesters. Resource Energy Econom. 70:101331.Crossref, Google Scholar
- ExxonMobil (2024) Shareholder proposal: ExxonMobil’s statement on proxy proposal exclusion. Accessed December 17, 2024, https://corporate.exxonmobil.com/news/corporate-news/shareholder-proposal.Google Scholar
- (2013) Morals and markets. Science 340(6133):707–711.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Diffusion of being pivotal and immoral outcomes. Rev. Econom. Stud. 87(5):2205–2229.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Moral bias in large elections: Theory and experimental evidence. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 103(2):175–192.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Federal Reserve Board (2024) Distribution of financial accounts—Corporate equities and mutual fund shares. Accessed December 18, 2024, https://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/z1/dataviz/dfa/distribute/chart/#quarter:139;series:Corporate%20equities%20and%20mutual%20fund%20shares;demographic:networth;population:1,3,5,7,9;units:levels.Google Scholar
- (2021) Shareholder activism and firms’ voluntary disclosure of climate change risks. Strategic Management J. 42(10):1850–1879.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2024) Norway’s wealth fund falls short on climate ambitions, NGO says. Reuters Online (October 28), https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/sustainable-finance-reporting/norways-wealth-fund-falls-short-climate-ambitions-ngo-says-2024-10-28/.Google Scholar
- (2022) Trade, voting, and ESG policies: Theory and evidence. Preprint, submitted December 28, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4306156.Google Scholar
- (2022) Do responsible investors invest responsibly? Rev. Finance 26(6):1389–1432.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) Four facts about ESG beliefs and investor portfolios. NBER Working Paper No. 31114, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- (2000) Corporate governance proposals and shareholder activism: The role of institutional investors. J. Financial Econom. 57(2):275–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) Climate capitalists. Preprint, submitted March 4, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4366445.Google Scholar
- (2019) How big a problem is it that a few shareholders own stock in so many competing companies? Harvard Bus. Rev. (February 19), https://hbr.org/2019/02/how-big-a-problem-is-it-that-a-few-shareholders-own-stock-in-so-many-competing-companies.Google Scholar
- (2022) The valuation of corporate social responsibility: A willingness to pay experiment. Preprint, submitted October 28, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4260824.Google Scholar
- (2023) Designing information provision experiments. J. Econom. Literature 61(1):3–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Companies should maximize shareholder welfare not market value. European Corporate Governance Institute–Finance Working Paper 521, Brussels.Google Scholar
- (2022) Private sanctions. NBER Working Paper No. 30728, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- (2022) Counterproductive sustainable investing: The impact elasticity of brown and green firms. Preprint, submitted February 17, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4359282.Google Scholar
- (2019) Do investors value sustainability? A natural experiment examining ranking and fund flows. J. Finance 74(6):2789–2837.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) ES risks and shareholder voice. European Corporate Governance Institute–Finance Working Paper 786, Brussels.Google Scholar
- (2023) Does socially responsible investing change firm behavior? Rev. Finance 27(6):2057–2083.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023a) Do investors care about impact? Rev. Financial Stud. 36(5):1737–1787.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023b) Is sustainable finance a dangerous placebo? Swedish House of Finance Research Paper 23–46, Stockholm.Google Scholar
- (2001) The effect of green investment on corporate behavior. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 36(4):431–449.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) How much do investors care about social responsibility? Preprint, submitted June 2, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4115854.Google Scholar
- (2024) ESG shareholder engagement and downside risk. Rev. Finance 28(2):483–510.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) The price of sin: The effects of social norms on markets. J. Financial Econom. 93(1):15–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) Corporate social responsibility. Annual Rev. Financial Econom. 15:327–350.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Geographic variation in opinions on climate change at state and local scales in the USA. Nature Climate Change 5(6):596–603.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) The asymmetry in responsible investing preferences. NBER Working Paper No. 29288, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- (2023) Climate risk disclosure and institutional investors. Rev. Financial Stud. 36(7):2617–2650.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Investors’ attention to corporate governance. Rev. Financial Stud. 34(12):5581–5628.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Voters, dictators, and peons: Expressive voting and pivotality. Public Choice 159:159–176.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2024) Political polarization and finance. NBER Working Paper No. 32792, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- (2024) The effects of mandatory ESG disclosure around the world. J. Accounting Res. 62(5):1795–1847.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2024) Trading and shareholder democracy. J. Finance 79(1):257–304.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Financial literacy around the world: An overview. J. Pension Econom. Finance 10(4):497–508.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Proxy advisory firms: The economics of selling information to voters. J. Finance 74(5):2441–2490.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) Voting choice. NBER Working Paper No. 31636, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- (2016) Behind the scenes: The corporate governance preferences of institutional investors. J. Finance 71(6):2905–2932.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Mutual funds’ strategic voting on environmental and social issues. European Corporate Governance Institute–Finance Working Paper 774, Brussels.Google Scholar
- Ministry of Finance, Norway (2022) Annual report 2022. Accessed December 22, 2024, https://www.regjeringen.no/en/dokumenter/annual-report-2022/id2965731/.Google Scholar
- (2021) The real effects of environmental activist investing. European Corporate Governance Institute–Finance Working Paper 743, Brussels.Google Scholar
- Norges Bank Investment Management (2024a) About the fund. https://www.nbim.no/en/about-us/about-the-fund/.Google Scholar
- Norges Bank Investment Management (2024b) Divesting from companies. https://www.nbim.no/en/responsible-investment/divesting-from-companies/.Google Scholar
- Norges Bank Investment Management (2024c) NBIM voting records for shell. https://www.nbim.no/en/responsible-investment/voting/our-voting-records/?st=Ticker&votingquery=shel.Google Scholar
- Norges Bank Investment Management (2024d) Our voting records. https://www.nbim.no/en/responsible-investment/voting/our-voting-records/.Google Scholar
- (2022) Dissecting green returns. J. Financial Econom. 146(2):403–424.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) A new take on voice: The influence of BlackRock’s “Dear CEO” letters. Rev. Accounting Stud. 26(3):1088–1136.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Data quality of platforms and panels for online behavioral research. Behav. Res. Methods 54(4):1643–1662.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Exploring citizen support for different types of climate policy. Ecological Econom. 137:56–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Why do investors hold socially responsible mutual funds? J. Finance 72(6):2505–2550.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1968) A theory of the calculus of voting. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 62(1):25–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) Willingness to pay for carbon mitigation: Field evidence from the market for carbon offsets. Preprint, submitted December 31, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4315854.Google Scholar
- (2021) Ønsker Grønnere Oljefond. Klassekampen, https://klassekampen.no/utgave/2021-04-10/onsker-gronnere-olje fond.Google Scholar
- Shell (2019) Net carbon footprint: Sustainable energy future—2019 sustainability report. Accessed December 19, 2024, https://www.shell.com/sustainability/reporting-centre/reporting-centre-archive.html.Google Scholar
- (2023) Why do retail investors pick green investments? A lab-in-the-field experiment with crowdfunders. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 209:74–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Fossil-fuel investments in the Norwegian Government Pension Fund Global: Addressing climate issues through exclusion and active ownership. Report, expert group appointed by the Norwegian Ministry of Finance, Oslo.Google Scholar
- (2021) Who owns stocks in America? Mostly it’s the wealthy and white. U.S. New & World Report Online (March 15), https://www.usnews.com/news/national-news/articles/2021-03-15/who-owns-stocks-in-america-mostly-its-the-wealthy-and-white.Google Scholar
- Sovereign Wealth Fund Institute (2024) Sovereign Wealth Fund rankings. https://www.swfinstitute.org/fund-rankings/sovereign-wealth-fund.Google Scholar
- SP Global (2021) Investment firm nominates 4 members to Exxon board. Accessed December 17, 2024, https://www.spglobal.com/market-intelligence/en/news-insights/articles/2021/1/investment-firm-nominates-4-members-to-exxon-board-62316475.Google Scholar
- (2023) Presidential address: Sustainable finance and ESG issues—Value versus values. J. Finance 78(4):1837–1872.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Statistics Norway (2013) Climate policies in a fossil fuel-producing country. Accessed December 19, 2024.Google Scholar
- Statistics Norway (2024) Hva er vanlig formue? Accessed May 31, 2024, https://www.ssb.no/inntekt-og-forbruk/inntekt-og-formue/artikler/hva-er-vanlig-formue.Google Scholar
- (2009) The wages of social responsibility. Financial Analysts J. 65(4):33–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) Voting when money and morals conflict: An experimental test of expressive voting. J. Public Econom. 88(7–8):1645–1664.Crossref, Google Scholar
- United Nations (2024) Net Zero Coalition. Accessed August 7, 2024, https://www.un.org/en/climatechange/net-zero-coalition.Google Scholar
- (2012) Truth in consequentiality: Theory and field evidence on discrete choice experiments. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconomics 4(4):145–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Free-riders and underdogs: Participation in corporate voting. European Corporate Governance Institute–Finance Working Paper 649, Brussels.Google Scholar
- (2024) Morals in multi-unit markets. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 22(5):2225–2260.Crossref, Google Scholar

